Various means of characterizing ultrasonic attenuation in tissue are reviewed. A simple method for estimating frequency-dependent attenuation via measurement of the zero crossing density of the signal is presented and validated. Both the effects of the frequency dependence of scatter and stochastic variability of the measurement are considered and discussed. Results of measurements made in phantoms, animals and humans are presented and compared to the theoretical model. The technique is shown to be technically feasible.
ChiversR.C.ParryR.J.Ultrasonic velocity and attenuation in mammalian tissue, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.63, 940–953 (1978).
2.
GloverG.H.Computerized time-of-flight ultrasonic tomography for breast examination, Ultrasound Med. Biol.3, 117–127 (1977).
3.
GloverG.H.SharpJ.C.Reconstruction of ultrasound propagation speed distributions in soft tissue: time-of-flight tomography, IEEE Trans. Sonics UltrasonicsSU-24, 229–234 (1977).
4.
GreenleafJ.F.JohnsonS.A.SamayoaW.F.DuckF.A.Algebraic Reconstruction of Spatial Distributions of Acoustic Velocities in Tissue from Their Time-of-Flight Profiles, in Acoustical Holography, Vol. 6, BoothNewell, ed., pp. 71–89 (Plenum Press, New York1975).
5.
KossoffG.FryE.K.JellinsJ.Average velocity of ultrasound in the human female breast, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.53, 1730–1736 (1973).
6.
WellsP.N.T.Absorption and dispersion of ultrasound in biological tissue, Ultrasound Med. Biol.1, 369–376 (1975).
7.
DinesK.A.KakA.C.Ultrasonic attenuation tomography of soft tissues, Ultrasonic Imaging1, 16–33 (1979).
8.
KucR.SchwartzM.Von MicskyL.Parametic Estimation of the Acoustic Attenuation Coefficient Slope for Soft Tissue, in 1976 IEEE Ultrasonic Symposium Proceeding, pp. 44–47 (IEEE Cat. No. 76CH 1120–5SU).
9.
KucR.SchwartzM.Estimating the acoustic attenuation coefficient slop for liver from reflected ultrasound signals, IEEE Trans. Sonics UltrasonicsSU-26, 353–362 (1979).
10.
KucR.Clinical application of an ultrasound attenuation coefficient estimation technique for liver pathology characterization, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.BME-27, 312–319 (1980).
11.
KucR.TaylorK.W. Variations of acoustic attenuation coefficient slope estimates for in vivo liver, Ultrasound Med. Biol. (In press).
12.
OphirJ.MakladN.F.BigelowR.H.Ultrasonic attenuation measurements of in vivo human muscle, Ultrasonic Imaging4, 290–295 (1982).
13.
MountfordR.A.WellsP.N.T.Ultrasonic liver scanning: the quantitative analysis of the normal A-scan, Phys. Med. Biol.17, 14–25 (1972).
14.
MountfordR.A.WellsP.N.T.Ultrasonic liver scanning: the A-scan in the normal and cirrhosis, Phys. Med. Biol.17, 261–269 (1972).
15.
ChiversR.C.The scattering of ultrasound by human tissues - some theoretical models, Ultrasound Med. & Biol.3, 1–13 (1977).
16.
GoreJ.C.LeemanS.Ultrasonic backscattering from human tissue: a realistic model, Phys. Med. Biol.22, 317–326 (1977).
17.
NicholasD.An Introduction to the Theory of Acoustic Scattering by Biological Tissues, in Recent Advances in Ultrasound in Biomedicine, Vol. 1, WhiteD. N., ed., pp. 1–28 (Research Studies Press, Forest Grove, OR, 1977).
18.
NicholasD.HillC.R.NassiriD.K.Evaluation of backscattering coefficients for excised human tissues: principles and techniques, Ultrasound Med. Biol.7, 7–16 (1982).
19.
NicholasD.Evaluation of backscattering coefficients for excised human tissues: results, interpretation and associated measurements, Ultrasound Med. Biol.7, 17–28 (1982).
20.
O'DonnelM.MillerJ.G.Quantitative broadband ultrasonic backscatter: an approach to nondestructive evaluation in acoustically inhomogeneous materials, J. Appl. Phys.52, 1056–1065 (1981).
21.
WaagR.C.LeeP.P.K.LernerR.M.HunterL.P.GramiakR.SchenkE.A.Angle Scan and Frequency-swept Ultrasonic Scattering Characterization of Tissues, in Ultrasonic Tissue Characterization II, LinzerM., ed., Nat. Bur. Stand. Spec. Publ. 525, pp. 143–152 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1979).
22.
JoyntL.MacovskiA.BoyleD. Techniques for In Vivo Tissue Characterization, in Abstracts, Third International Sympposium on Ultrasonic Imaging & Tissue Characterization, pp. 59–61 (National Bureau of Standards, Gaithersburg, MD, 1978).
23.
LerskiR.A.MorleyP.BarnettE.MillsP.R.WatkinsonG.MacSweenR.N.M.Ultrasonic characterization of diffuse liver disease - the relative importance of frequency content in the A-scan signal, Ultrasound Med. Biol.8, 155–160 (1982).
24.
LizziF.L.ElbaumM.E.Clinical Spectrum Analysis Techniques for Tissue Characterization, in Ultrasonic Tissue Characterization II, LinzerM., ed., Nat. Bur. Stand. Spec. Publ. 525, pp. 111–119 (U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 1979).
25.
SommerF.G.JoyntL.F.CarrollB.A.MacovskiA.Ultrasonic characterization of abdominal tissues via digital analysis of backscattered waveforms, Radiology141, 811–817 (1981).
26.
SerabianS.Influence of attenuation upon the frequency content of a stress wave packet in graphite, J. Acoust. Soc. Am.42, 1052–1059 (1967).
27.
MerkulovaV.M.Accuracy of the pulse method for measuring the attenuation and velocity of ultrasound, Sov. Physics - Acoustics12, 411–414 (1967).
28.
FlaxS.W.WebsterJ.G.UpdikeS.J.Statistical evaluation of the Doppler ultrasonic blood flowmeter, ISA Transactions10, 1–20 (1971).
RiceS.O.Mathematical analysis of random noise, Bell Syst. Tech. J.23, 282–332 (1944); 24, 46–108 (1945).
31.
FerrariL.JonesJ.GonzalezV.BehrensM.In vivo measurement of attenuation based on the theory of Gaussian pulse propagation, Ultrasonic Imaging4, 178 (1982) (Abstract only).
32.
FinkM.HottingerF.CardosoJ.F.Ultrasonic signal processing for in vivo attenuation measurement: short time Fourier analysis, Ultrasonic Imaging5, 117–135 (1983).
33.
PaupoulisA.Probability, Random Variables, and Stochastic Processes, pp. 485–487 (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1965).
34.
MullerJ.W.Some formulae for a dead-time-distorted Poisson process, Nuclear Inst. and Methods117, 401–404 (1974).
