In ultrasound-based elastography methods, the estimation of shear wave velocity typically involves the tracking of speckle motion due to an applied force. The errors in the estimates of tissue displacement, and thus shear wave velocity, are generally attributed to electronic noise and decorrelation due to physical processes. We present our preliminary findings on another source of error, namely, speckle-induced bias in phase estimation. We find that methods that involve tracking in a single location, as opposed to multiple locations, are less sensitive to this source of error since the measurement is differential in nature and cancels out speckle-induced phase errors.
LernerRMHuangSRParkerKJ. “Sonoelasticity” images derived from ultrasound signals in mechanically vibrated tissues. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16:231-9.
2.
ParkerKJHuangSRMusulinRALernerRM. Tissue response to mechanical vibrations for “sonoelasticity imaging.”Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990;16:241-6.
3.
CathelineSWuFFinkM. A solution to diffraction biases in sonoelasticity: the acoustic impulse technique. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999;105:2941-50.
4.
ManducaAOliphantTEDresnerMAMahowaldJLKruseSAAmrominE. Magnetic resonance elastography: non-invasive mapping of tissue elasticity. Med Image Anal. 2001;5:237-54.
5.
NightingaleKRPalmeriMLNightingaleRWTraheyGE. On the feasibility of remote palpation using acoustic radiation force. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110:625-34.
6.
ChenSFatemiMGreenleafJF. Remote measurement of material properties from radiation force induced vibration of an embedded sphere. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002;112:884-9.
7.
SandrinLTanterMCathelineSFinkM. Shear modulus imaging with 2-D transient elastography. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2002;49:426-35.
8.
NightingaleKMcAleaveySTraheyG. Shear-wave generation using acoustic radiation force: in vivo and ex vivo results. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2003;29:1715-23.
9.
WuZTaylorLSRubensDJParkerKJ. Sonoelastographic imaging of interference patterns for estimation of the shear velocity of homogeneous biomaterials. Physics Med Biol. 2004;49:911-22.
WalkerWFTraheyGE. A fundamental limit on delay estimation using partially correlated speckle signals. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 1995;42:301-8.
12.
McAleaveySAMenonMOrszulakJ. Shear-modulus estimation by application of spatially-modulated impulsive acoustic radiation force. Ultrason Imaging. 2007;29:87-104.
13.
McAleaveySCollinsEKellyJElegbeEMenonM. Validation of SMURF estimation of shear modulus in hydrogels. Ultrason Imaging. 2009;31:131-50.
14.
McAleaveySANightingaleKRTraheyGE. Estimates of echo correlation and measurement bias in acoustic radiation force impulse imaging. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2003;50:631-41.
15.
JensenJA. Field: a program for simulating ultrasound systems. Med Biol Eng Comput. 1996;34: 351-3.
16.
PalmeriMLWangMHDahlJJFrinkleyKDNightingaleKR. Quantifying hepatic shear modulus in vivo using acoustic radiation force. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2008;34:546-58.
17.
ZhaoHSongPFUrbanMWYinMGreenleafJFChenS. Bias observed in time-of-flight shear wave speed measurements using radiation force of a focused ultrasound beam. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2011;37:1884-92.
