Spatial Angular Compounding for Elastography without the Incompressibility Assumption

Abstract

Spatial-angular compounding is a new technique that enables the reduction of noise artifacts in ultrasound elastography. Previous results using spatial angular compounding, however, were based on the use of the tissue incompressibility assumption. Compounded elastograms were obtained from a spatially-weighted average of local strain estimated from radiofrequency echo signals acquired at different insonification angles. In this paper, we present a new method for reducing the noise artifacts in the axial strain elastogram utilizing a least-squares approach on the angular displacement estimates that does not use the incompressibility assumption. This method produces axial strain elastograms with higher image quality, compared to noncompounded axial strain elastograms, and is referred to as the least-squares angular-compounding approach for elastography. To distinguish between these two angular compounding methods, the spatial-angular compounding with angular weighting based on the tissue incompressibility assumption is referred to as weighted compounding. In this paper, we compare the performance of the two angular-compounding techniques for elastography using beam steering on a linear-array transducer. Quantitative experimental results demonstrate that least-squares compounding provides comparable but smaller improvements in both the elastographic signal-to-noise ratio and the contrast-to-noise ratio, as compared to the weighted-compounding method. Ultrasound simulation results suggest that the least-squares compounding method performs better and provide accurate and robust results when compared to the weighted compounding method, in the case where the incompressibility assumption does not hold.

Keywords

Angled beams angular compounding compounding elasticity elastogram elastography imaging strain signal-to-noise ultrasound

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ophir

Cespedes

Ponnekanti

Yazdi

Elastography - a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues, Ultrasonic Imaging 13, 111–134 (1991).

Muthupillai

Lomas

Rossman

Magnetic-resonance elastography by direct visualization of propagating acoustic strain waves, Science 269, 1854–1857 (1995).

Ophir

Alam

Garra

Elastography: ultrasonic estimation and imaging of the elastic properties of tissues, Proc Inst Mech Eng Part H-J Eng Med 213, 203–233 (1999).

Varghese

Ophir

Konofagou

Kallel

Righetti

Tradeoffs in elastographic imaging, Ultrasonic Imaging 23, 216–248 (2001).

Pesavento

Lorenz

Siebers

Ermert

New real-time strain imaging concepts using diagnostic ultrasound, Phys Medi Biol 45, 1423–1435 (2000).

Cespedes

Ophir

Ponnekanti

Maklad

Elastography: elasticity imaging using ultrasound with application to muscle and breast in vivo, Ultrasonic Imaging 15, 73–88 (1993).

O'Donnell

Skovoroda

Shapo

Emelianov

. Internal displacement and strain imaging using ultrasonic speckle tracking, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Contr 41, 314–325 (1994).

Parker

Huang

Musulin

Lerner

. Tissue response to mechanical vibrations for ‘sonoelasticity imaging, Ultrasound Med Biol 16, 241–246 (1990).

Bertrand

Meunier

Doucet

Ferland

Ultrasonic biomechanical strain gauge based on speckle tracking, in Proc IEEE Ultrason Symp pp. 859–864 (1989).

10.

Krouskop

Dougherty

Vinson

. A pulsed Doppler ultrasonic system for making noninvasive measurements of the mechanical properties of soft tissue, J Rehab Res Dev 24, 1–8 (1987).

11.

Insana

Cook

Bilgen

Chaturvedi

Zhu

Maximum-likelihood approach to strain imaging using ultrasound, J Acoust Soc Amer 107, 1421–1434 (2000).

12.

Nightingale

Scott-Soo

Nightingale

Trahey

Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: in vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility, Ultrasound Med Biol 28, 227–235 (2002).

13.

Pesavento

Lorenz

Siebers

Ermert

New real-time strain imaging concepts using diagnostic ultrasound, Phys Med Biol 45, 1423–1435 (2000).

14.

Plewes

Betty

Urchuk

Soutar

Visualizing tissue compliance with MR imaging, J Mag Res Imag 5, 733–738 (1995).

15.

Alam

Ophir

Konofagou

. An adaptive strain estimator for elastography, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Contr 45, 461–472 (1998).

16.

Alam

Ophir

Reduction of signal decorrelation from mechanical compression of tissues by temporal stretching: applications to elastography, Ultrasound Med Biol 23, 95–105 (1997).

17.

Cespedes

Ophir

Reduction of Image Noise in Elastography, Ultrasonic Imaging 15, 89–102 (1993).

18.

Varghese

Ophir

Cespedes

Noise reduction in elastograms using temporal stretching with multi-compression averaging, Ultrasound Med Biol 22, 1043–1052 (1996).

19.

Techavipoo

Varghese

Wavelet denoising of displacement estimates in elastography, Ultrasound Med Biol 30, 477–491 (2004).

20.

Chen

. Strain compounding: a new approach for speckle reduction, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Contr 49, 39–46 (2002).

21.

Chaturvedi

Insana

Hall

. 2-D companding for noise reduction in strain imaging, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Contr 45, 179–191 (1998).

22.

Techavipoo

Varghese

Improvements in elastographic contrast-to-noise ratio using spatial-angular compounding, Ultrasound Med Biol 31, 529–536 (2005).

23.

Techavipoo

Chen

Varghese

Zagzebski

Madsen

. Noise reduction using spatial-angular compounding for elastography, IIEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Contr 51, 510–520 (2004).

24.

Rao

Chen

Shi

Varghese

Spatial-angular compounding for elastography using beam steering on linear array transducers, Med Phys (2006, (in press)).

25.

Techavipoo

Chen

Varghese

Zagzebski

. Estimation of displacement vectors and strain tensors in elastography using angular insonifications, IEEE Trans Med Imag 3, 1479–1489 (2004).

26.

Burckhardt

. Speckle in ultrasound B-mode scans, IEEE Trans Sonics Ultrason 25, 1–6 (1978).

27.

Entrekin

Porter

Sillesen

Real-time spatial compound imaging: application to breast, vascular, and musculoskeletal ultrasound, Semin Ultrasound CT MR 22, 50–64. (2001).

28.

Jespersen

Wilhjelm

Sillesen

Ultrasound spatial compound scanner for improved visualization in vascular imaging, in Proc 1998 IEEE Ultrason Symp pp. 1623–1626 (1998).

29.

Ping

Spatial compounding in 3D imaging of limbs, Ultrasonic Imaging. 19, 251–265 (1997).

30.

Quazi

. An overview on the time-delay estimate in active and passive systems for target localization, IEEE Trans Acoust Speech Proc 29, 527–533 (1981).

31.

Kallel

Ophir

, A least-squares strain estimator for elastography, Ultrasonic Imaging 19, 195–208 (1997).

32.

Fung

. Biomechanics: Mechanical Properties of Living Tissues (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1981).

33.

Scharf

. In Statistical Signal Processing: Detection, Estimation, and Time Series Analysis (Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts, 1991), pp. 359–415.

34.

Varghese

Ophir

A theoretical framework for performance characterization of elastography: The strain filter, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Contr 44, 164–172 (1997).

35.

Varghese

Ophir

An analysis of elastographic contrast-to-noise ratio, Ultrasound Med Biol 24, 915–924 (1998).

36.

Fung

, Biomechanical Properties of Living Tissues (Springer Verlag, NY, 1981).

37.

Jurvelin

Buschmann

Hunziker

BEB

Mechanical anisotropy of the human knee articular cartilage in compression, Proc Inst Mech Eng [H] 217, 215–219 (2003).

38.

Zagzebski

. A frequency domain model for generating B-mode images with array transducers, IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelec Freq Contr 46, 690–699 (1999).

39.

Konofagou

Harrigan

Ophir

Krouskop

. Poroelastography: Imaging the poroelastic properties of tissues, Ultrasound Med Biol 27, 1387–1397 (2001).

40.

Righetti

Ophir

Srinivasan

Krouskop

. The feasibility of using elastography for imaging the Poisson's ratio in porous media, Ultrasound Med Biol 30, 215–228 (2004).

41.

Spatial compounding in 3D imaging of limbs, Ultrasonic Imaging 19, 251–265 (1997).