ArnezN. (1981). The besieged school superintendent; A case study of school superintendent school-board selections in Washington, D.C., 1973–1975.Washington, DC: University Press of America.
2.
BlumbergA. (1985). The school superintendent: Living with conflict.New York: Teachers College Press.
3.
BossertS. (1988). School Effects. In BoyanN. (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 341–354). New York: Macmillan.
4.
BoyanN. (1988). Describing and explaining administrative behavior. In BoyanN. (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 77–98). New York: Macmillan.
5.
BoydW. (1976). The public, the professionals, and educational policy making: Who governs?Teachers College Record, 77 (4), 539–577.
6.
BridgesE. (1982). Research on the school administrator: The state of the art, 1967–1980. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18 (3), 12–33.
7.
CrowsonR. (1987). The local district superintendency: A puzzling administrative role. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23 (3), 49–69.
8.
CubanL. (1988). The managerial imperative.Albany: State University of New York Press.
9.
DwyerD. (1985). Five principals in action.San Francisco: Far West Laboratory for Educational Research and Development.
10.
EricksonD. (1979). Research on educational administration: The state of the art. Educational Researcher, 8, 9–14.
HeckR., and HallingerP. (1995). Models for principal effectiveness. Unpublished paper.
13.
JacobsonS., HickcoxE., & StevensonR. (1996). School administration: Persistent dilemmas in preparation and practice.Westport, CT: Praeger.
14.
JohnsonS. (1996). Leading to change: The challenge of the new superintendency.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
KowalskiT. (1995). Keepers of the Flame: Contemporary urban superintendents.Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
16.
LeithwoodK. (1995). Effective school district leadership.Albany: State University of New York Press.
17.
McCartyD., & RamseyC. (1971). The school managers: Power and conflict in American public education.Westport, CT: Greenwood.
18.
MeyerJ., & RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83 (2), 340–363.
19.
PitnerN. (1988). The study of administrator effects and effectiveness. In BoyanN. (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 99–122). New York: Macmillan.
20.
SayreW. (1958). Additional observations on the study of administration. Teachers College Record, 60 (3), 73–76.
21.
SmithL., DwyerD., PruntyJ., & KleineP. (1988). Innovation and change in schooling: History, politics, and agency. Book 3.New York: Falmer.
22.
TyackD., & HansotE. (1982). Managers of virtue.New York: Basic Books.
23.
WimpelbergR. (1997). Superintending: The undeniable politics and indefinite effects of school district leadership. American Journal of Education, 105, 319–343.
24.
YeeG. (1996). Executive succession and organizational change in an urban school district Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Stanford UniversityStanford, CA.
25.
YeeG., & CubanL. (1996). When is tenure long enough? A historical analysis of superintendent turnover and tenure in urban school districts. Educational Administration Quarterly, 2, 615–641.
26.
ZeiglerH., KehoeE., & ReismanJ. (1985). City managers and school superintendents.New York: Praeger.