CohenD., McLaughlinM., & TalbertJ. (Eds.). (1993). Teaching for understanding: Challenges for policy and practice.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2.
GamoranA., PorterA., SmithsonJ., & WhiteP. (1997). Upgrading high school mathematics instruction: Improving learning opportunities for low-achieving, low-income youth, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 9 (4), 325–338.
3.
LeeV., CroningerR., & SmithJ. (1997). Course-taking, equity, and mathematics learning: Testing the constrained curriculum hypothesis in U.S. secondary schools, Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 99–121.
4.
RidgwayJ. (1998). From barrier to lever: Revising roles for assessment in mathematics education (Brief, vol. 2, no. 1). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education.
5.
ShieldsP. (1997, March 13). Author's notes of oral presentation at a conference on evaluation of systemic reform in Madison, Wisconsin.
6.
TreismanU. (1997). What have we learned? What do we need to know? In CluneW. H. (Eds.), Research on systemic reform: What have we learned? What do we need to know? (pp. 16–21) (Workshop Report No. 4, vol. 2). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Madison, National Institute for Science Education.