The purpose of this article is to present one mathematician's view of the NCTM standards documents. There is a brief discussion of the history of the standards and a brief presentation of philosophical and personal context. The bulk of the article discusses specific notions, examples, concepts, phrases, and uses/misuses of the standards. An attempt is made throughout to differentiate among what the standards say, what people think they say, and what teachers do in the classroom under the influence of what they think the standards say.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BoswellJ. (1836). Life of Samuel Jackson.London: J. Murray.
2.
DubinskyE., and LeronU. (1994). Learning abstract algebra with ISETL.New York: Springer-Verlag.
3.
Educational Development Corporation. (1996). Connected geometry.Dedham, MA: Janson Publications.
4.
FeyJ. T., HeidM. K., GoodR. A., SheetsC., BlumeG. W., & ZbiekR. M. (1995). Concepts in Algebra: A technological approach.Chicago: Everyday Learning.
5.
FreudenthalH. (1973). Mathematics as an educational task.Dordrecht, Netherlands: D. Reidel.
6.
HunsakerD. (1997, November 3). Ditch the calculators: Letting children punch numbers into a machine does not add up to learning math, Newsweek, n. p.
7.
KanskyR. J. (1994). Facilitator's guide to “Creating a climate for change in math.” Washington, DC: Annenberg/CPB Math and Science Project.
8.
Mathematical Sciences Education Board. (1990). Reshaping school mathematics: A philosophy and framework for curriculum.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
9.
Mathematical Sciences Education Board. (1993). Measuring up: Prototypes for mathematics assessment.Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10.
National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform.Washington, DG: Government Printing Office.
11.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: Author.
12.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1991). Professional standards for teaching mathematics.Reston, VA: Author.
13.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1995). Assessment standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: Author –
14.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1996). A perspective on reform in mathematics and science education.Reston, VA: Eisenhower National Clearinghouse for Mathematics and Science Education.
15.
National Science Board Commission on Precollege Education in Mathematics, Science, and Technology. (1983). Educating Americans for the twenty-first century: A plan of action for improving the mathematics, science and technology education for all American elementary and secondary students so that their achievement is the best in the world by 1995.Washington, DC: Author.
16.
OrtonR. E. (1995). Ockham's Razor and Plato's Beard. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26 (3), 204–229.
17.
ReysR. E., ReysB. J., HohdaN., & EmoriH. (1995). “Mental computation performance and strategy use of Japanese students in grades 2, 4, 6 and 8,” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26 (4), 304–326
18.
WittgensteinL. (1967). Remarks on the foundations of mathematics. In RheesR., von WrightG. H., and AnscombeG. E. M. (Eds.). London: Blackwell.