ElleyW. B. (1992). How in the world do students read?Netherlands: International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
2.
U.S. Department of Education. (1983). The imperative for education reform.Washington, DC: I Author.
3.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (1997). The condition of education 1997.Washington, DC: Author.
4.
MullisI. V. S., DosseyJ. A., FoertschM. A., JonesL. R., & GentileC. A. (1991). Trends in academic progress: Achievement of U.S. students in science, 1969–70 to 1990; mathematics, 1973 to 1990; reading, 1971 to 1990; writing, 1984 to 1990Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
5.
PongS. (1996). School participation of children from single-mother families in Malaysia.Comparative Education Review, (430), 231–249.
6.
PostD., & PongS. (1997). Intra-family educational inequality in Hong Kong: The waning effect of sibship composition.Philadelphia: Penn State University, Population Research Institute. Forthcoming in Comparative Education Review
7.
SchneiderB., & ColemanJ. S. (1993). Parents, their children, and schoolsSan Francisco: Westview Press.
8.
StedmanL. C. (1994). Incomplete explanations: The case of U.S. performance in the international assessments of education.Educational Researcher, (273), 24–32.
9.
TaylorA. R. (1996). Conditions for American children, youth, and families: Are we “world class”?Educational Researcher, (285), 10–12.
10.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (1992). Marital status and living arrangemesnt (CPR Population Characteristics, Series P-20, No. 468). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
11.
World Bank. (1996). Social indicators of development 1996Washington, DC: Author.
12.
ZillN. (1996). Family change and student achievement: What we have learned, what it means for schools. In BoothA., & DunnJ. F. (Eds.), Family-school links (pp. 139–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.