Among the most unrelenting contemporary critics of public schools are members of the Christian Right, some of whom seek the destruction of public education. The theories of child rearing espoused by the Christian Right are analyzed in this article. They emphasize physical punishment, the breaking of children's will, and obedience to authority. Such theories cannot be supported by modern psychology. Furthermore, these child-rearing practices are totally incompatible with the constructivist models of learning that form the basis for the educational reforms undertaken by science, mathematics, and social studies educators. The school curriculum used in many fundamentalist Christian schools was also analyzed and found to be limited, biased, and sometimes untrue. The arguments made against outcomes based education and whole language programs were found to be confused and chaotic. The antagonism of the Christian Right to these programs is based on a fear of losing control over their children's thinking, rather than any compelling empirical data. It is concluded that many among the Christian Right are unable to engage in politics that make a common school possible. They may be unable to compromise and live with educational decisions reflecting a pluralistic democracy keeping separate church and state.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Accelerated Christian Education. (1986). Science PACES.Lewisville, TX: Author.
2.
American Psychological Association. (1975). Proceedings for the year 1974: Minutes of the annual meeting of the Council of Representatives. American Psychologist, 30, 620–651.
3.
Arizona Eagle Forum. (1996). Arizona eagle action alert: The hijacking of Arizona's schools.Snowflake, AZ: Author.
4.
BanduraA. (1977). Social learning theory.Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
5.
BerlinerD. C. (1990). What's all the fuss about instructional time? In Ben-PeretzM., & BrommeR. (Eds.), The nature of time in schools (pp. 3–35). New York: Teachers College Press.
6.
BerlinerD. C., & BiddleB. J. (1995). The manufactured crisis.Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
7.
BloomB. S. (1968). Learning for mastery. Evaluation Comment, 1 (20), whole issue.
8.
BlumenfeldS. L. (1994a). The whole-word hoax. The New American, 10 (16), 23–24.
9.
BlumenfeldS. L. (1994b). Down the slippery slope. The New American, 10 (16), 25–26.
10.
BostonR. (1996a). The most dangerous man in America? Pat Robertson and the rise of the Christian Coalition.Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.
11.
BostonR. (1996b, June). The parent trap. Church and State, pp. 8–13.
12.
BrownA. (1994). The advancement of learning. Educational Researcher, 23 (8), 4–12.
13.
BruerJ. T. (1993). Schools for thought.Cambridge: MIT Press.
14.
BurronA. (1994). Traditionalist Christians and OBE: What's the problem?Educational Leadership, 51 (6), 73–75.
15.
California Senate Rules Committee, Legislative Councils’ Digest, AB 7, Juveniles: Paddling.Sacramento: Author. (Senate home page Webmaster@Sen.Ca.90V).
16.
CalfeeR. C., & PatrickC. L. (1996). Teach our children well.Stanford: Stanford University Alumni Association.
17.
CampbellJ. R. (1996). NAEP 1994 reading report card for the nation and the states.Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service/Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Department of Education.
18.
CarrollJ. B. (1963). A model of school learning. Teachers College Record, 64 (8), 723–733.
19.
ChristensonL. (1970). The Christian family.Minneapolis: Bethany Publishing.
20.
ClevengerT. (1994, November 13). First couples of conservatism. Longview News-Journal, pp. 1A, 10A.
21.
CovingtonM. V. (1992). Making the grade: A self-worth perspective on motivation and school reform.Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
22.
DeCorteE., GreerB., & VerschaffelL. (1996). Mathematics teaching and learning. In BerlinerD. C., and CalfeeR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 451–549). New York: Macmillan.
23.
DiamondS. (1989). Spiritual warfare: The politics of the Christian right.Boston: South End Press.
24.
DobsonJ. (1970). Dare to discipline.Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers.
25.
DobsonJ. (1985). The strong-willed child.Wheaton, IL: Tyndale House Publishers.
26.
DobsonJ., & BauerG. L. (1990). Children at risk.Dallas, TX: Word Publishing.
27.
Education Reporter (1986, March). Reading experts blast state's endorsement of whole language. (Newspaper published by the Eagle Forum Education & Legal Defense Fund, No. 122).
28.
EriksonE. (1968). Identity, youth and crisis.New York: Norton.
29.
FisherC. W., & BerlinerD. C. (Eds). (1985). Perspective on instructional time.New York: Longman.
30.
GaddyB. B., HallT. W., & MarzanoR. J. (1996). School wars.San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31.
GardnerH. (1983). Frames of mind.New York: Basic Books.
32.
GehrmanM. B. (1987). Reading, writing and religion. Free Inquiry, 7, 12–18.
33.
GreenoJ., CollinsA., & ResnickL. (1996). Cognition and learning. In BerlinerD. C., & CalfeeR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 15–48). New York: Macmillan.
34.
GrevenP. (1992). Spare the child: The religious roots of punishment and the psychological impact of physical abuse.New York: Vintage.
35.
HöessR. (1963). Der Kommandant von Auschwitz. (Martin Brozat, ed.). Munich: DTV.
36.
HowardA. (1996, January 24). The devil came to Humble: How the radical religious right “saved” the school kids. Public news (Houston, TX), p. 14.
37.
HunterR. (1987). Accelerated Christian Education, Inc.: Marching to a different drummer.Brisbane, Queensland: Brisbane College of Advanced Education, Mt. Gravatt Campus.
38.
HylesJ. (1972). How to rear children.Hammond, IN: Hyles-Anderson Publishers.
39.
IserbytC. T. (1993). Back to basics reform or Skinnerian international curriculum.Bath, ME: Author. (Original work published 1985).
KnightJ. (1985). Creation-science, evolution-science, and education: Anything goes?Australian Journal of Education, 29, 115–132.
42.
KosminB. A., & LachmanS. P. (1993). One nation under God.New York: Crown Publishers.
43.
LessinR. (1979). Spanking: Why when how?Minneapolis: Bethany Publishing.
44.
LinnM. C., SongerN. B., & EylonB. S. (1996). Shifts and convergences in science learning and instruction. In BerlinerD. C., & CalfeeR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 438–490). New York: Macmillan.
45.
McCaslinM., & GoodT. (1992). Compliant cognition: The misalliance of management and instructional goals in current school reform. Educational Researcher, 21, 4–17.
46.
McQuillanJ. (1996, Summer). New questions amidst the aftershocks: What caused California's reading crisis?California English, p. 10.
47.
Michigan Alliance of Families (n.d.). The ABC's of OBE.Flushing, MI: Author.
48.
MillerA. (1990). For your own good: Hidden cruelty in child-rearing and the roots of family violence.New York: The Noonday Press.
49.
MillerA. (1993). Breaking down the wall of silence.New York: Meridian.
50.
MillerK. E. (1995). Cross-state data compendium for the NAEP 1994 reading assessment.Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service/Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Department of Education.
51.
National Council for the Social Studies. (1993). A vision of powerful teaching and learning in the social studies: Building und erstanding and civic efficacy. Social Education, 57 (5), 213–223.
52.
National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Curriculum standards for the social studies (excerpted draft). Washington, DC: Author.
53.
National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics.Reston, VA: Author.
54.
ParkerB. (1981). Target: Public schools. Graduate Woman, 75 (5), 10–13.
55.
PeshkinA. (1986). Gods choice: The total world of a Christian fundamentalist school.Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56.
PeshkinA. (1987, Fall). The truth and consequences of fundamentalist Christian schooling. Free Inquiry, pp. 5–10.
57.
PoeppelmeyerM. H. (1994). Can we achieve world class standard students through outcome-based education? A look at the real OBE.Hilliard, OH: Author.
58.
PressleyM. (1996, August). Getting beyond whole language: Elementary reading instruction that makes sense in light of recent psychological research. Paper given at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.
59.
Project 2061, American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans: A Project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology.Washington, DC: Author.
60.
Project 2061, American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy.New York: Oxford University Press.
61.
RobertsonP. (1990). The new millenium: 10 trends that will impact you and your family by the year 2000.Dallas: World Publishing.
62.
RobertsonP. (1993). The turning tide: The end of liberalism and the rise of common sense.Dallas: World Publishing.
63.
SimondsR. L. (1985). How to elect Christians to public office.Costa Mesa, CA: National Association of Christian Educators/Christians for Excellence in Education.
64.
SnowR. E., CornoL., & JacksonD. (1996). Individual differences in affective and conative functions. In BerlinerD. C., & CalfeeR. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 243–310). New York: Macmillan.
65.
SowersC. (1995, March 25). Headmaster faced other abuse charges. Arizona Republic, p. A1.
66.
SpeckC., & PrideauxD. (1993). Fundamentalist education and creation science. Australian Journal of Education, 37, 279–295.
67.
SweetR. W. (1995). Dr. Spock revisited. Right to Read Report, 2 (8), 7.
68.
Tennessee State Bill No. 2878 SN. (1995). Tennessee 99th General Assembly Second Regular Session (version of 1/26/1996).Nashville: Author.
69.
ThoburnR. L. (1986). The children trap.Fort Worth, TX: Dominion Press/Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, Inc.
70.
ZitterkopfR. (1994). A fundamentalist's defense of OBE. Educational Leadership, 51 (6), 76–78.
