Abstract
The perception that girls historically have had a difficult time in science and math is commonly accepted by educators and laypeople alike. Yet the historical nature of these difficulties is questionable. Current debates on sex-segregated science and math classes, receiving considerable attention in the popular press and academic-education circles in recent months, seem to be founded on a misunderstanding of what girls’ “historical difficulties” actually were. The historical, social, and political con -text of women's experience in science serves to challenge the stereotype that girls “historically” have had a difficult time in math and science. Further alluding to the nature of women's difficulties as historical and personal, without a critical analysis of the sociopolitical parameters of women's experience, serves to perpetuate stereo -types about women rather than militate against obstacles created by them.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
