In this article I first examine the nature of the case for regarding inclusion as a conversational and theoretical ideal. I argue that inclusion is best understood as a moral rather than an epistemological virtue. I then try to show that embracing inclusion as a conversational and theoretical ideal does not require either the rejection of the universal, or the rejection of scholarly standards.
AntonyL. M. (1993). Quine as feminist: The radical import of naturalized epistemology. In AntonyL. M., & WittC. (Eds.), A mind of one's own: Feminist essays on reason and objectivity (pp. 185–225). Boulder: Westview Press.
3.
AntonyL. M., & WittE. (Eds.). (1993). A mind of one's own: Feminist essays on reason and objectivity.Boulder: Westview Press.
4.
ApelKarl-Otto. (1977). The problem of philosophical foundations in light of a transcendental pragmatics of language. In BaynesK. (Eds.), After Philosophy (pp. 250–290). Cambridge: MIT Press.
5.
Bar OnBat-Ami. (1993). Marginality and epistemic privilege. In AlcoffL., and PotterE. (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 83–100). New York: Routledge.
6.
BaynesK., BohmanJ., & McCarthyT. (Eds.). (1987). After philosophy: End or transformation?Cambridge: MIT Press.
7.
BurbulesN. C. (1991a). The virtue of reasonableness. In BuchmannM., & FlodenR. E. (Eds.), Philosophy of education1991 (pp. 215–224). Champaign, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
8.
BurbulesN. C. (1991b). Rationality and reasonableness: A discussion of Harvey Siegel's Relativism Refuted and Educating Reason. Educational Theory41 (2), 235–252.
9.
BurbulesN. C. (1993). Dialogue in teaching: Theory and practice.New York: Teachers College Press.
10.
CodeL. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
11.
CodeL. (1993). Taking subjectivity into account. In AlcoffL., & PotterE. (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 15–48). New York: Routledge.
12.
CohenA., & DascalM. (Eds.). (1989). The institution of philosophy: A discipline in crisis?La Salle, IL: Open Court.
13.
DalmiyaV., & AlcoffL. (1993). Are “old wives’ tales” justified? In AlcoffL., & PotterE. (Eds.), Feminist epistemologies (pp. 217–244). New York: Routledge.
14.
FeuerL. S. (Ed.). (1959). Marx and Engels: Basic writings on politics and philosophy.New York: Anchor Books.
15.
FraserN., & NicholsonL. (1989). Social criticism without philosophy: An encounter between feminism and postmodernism. In CohenA., & DascalM. (Eds.), The institution of philosophy (pp. 283–302). La Salle, IL: Open Court.
16.
GirouxH. (1988). Postmodernism and the discourse of educational criticism. Journal of Education170 (3), 5–30.
17.
HaackS. (1993). Evidence and inquiry: Towards reconstruction in epistemology.Oxford: Black-well Publishers.
18.
HabermasJürgen (1987). Philosophy as stand-in and interpreter. In BaynesK. (Eds.), After philosophy (pp. 296–315). Cambridge: MIT Press.
19.
HardingS. (1989). Feminist justificatory strategies. In GarryA., & PearsallM. (Eds.), Women, knowledge, and reality: Explorations in feminist philosophy (pp. 189–201). Boston: Unwin Hyman.
20.
HardingS. (1991). Whose science? Whose knowledge?: Thinking from women's lives.Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
21.
HardingS., & HintikkaM. B. (Eds.). (1983). Discovering reality: Feminist perspectives on epistemology, metaphysics, methodology, and philosophy of science.Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
22.
HaslangerS. (1993). On being objective and being objectified. In AntonyL. M., & WittC. (Eds.), A mind of one's own (pp. 85–125). Boulder: Westview Press.
23.
KoertgeN. (1981). Methodology, ideology and feminist critiques of science. In AsquithP. D., & GiereR. N. (Eds.), PSA 1980: Proceedings of the 1980 biennial meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, volume two (pp. 346–359). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
24.
LonginoH. (1990). Science as social knowledge: Values and objectivity in scientific inquiry.Princeton: Princeton University Press.
25.
LyotardJ.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. (G. Bennington & B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
26.
MacIntyreA. (1987). The relationship of philosophy to history: Postscript to the second edition of After Virtue. In BaynesK. (Eds.), After philosophy (pp. 412–422). Cambridge: MIT Press.
27.
MacKinnonC. (1987). Feminism unmodified: Discourses on life and law.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
28.
McCarthyT. (1988). Scientific rationality and the ‘strong program’ in the sociology of knowledge. In McMullinE. (Ed.), Construction and constraint: The shaping of scientific rationality (pp. 75–95). Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
29.
McLarenP. L. (1994). Foreword: Critical thinking as a political project. In WaltersK. S. (Ed.), Re-thinking reason: New perspectives in critical thinking (pp. ix–xv). Albany: State University of New York Press.
30.
MoultonJ. (1983). A paradigm of philosophy: The adversary method. In HardingS., & HintikkaM. B. (Eds.), Discovering reality (pp. 149–164). Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
31.
NagelT. (1986). The view from nowhere.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
32.
NeimanA., & SiegelH. (1993). Objectivity and rationality in epistemology and education: Scheffler's middle road. Synthese94 (1), 55–83.
33.
NussbaumM. (1994, October). Feminists and philosophy. The New York Review of Books41 (17), 59–63.
34.
PutnamH. (1981). Reason, truth, and history.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35.
PutnamH. (1982). Why reason can't be naturalized. Synthese52 (1), 3–23.
36.
RapaportE. (1993). Generalizing gender: Reason and essence in the legal thought of Catharine MacKinnon. In AntonyL. M., & WittC. (Eds.), A mind of one's own (pp. 127–143). Boulder: Westview Press.
37.
RortyR. (1989a). Solidarity or objectivity? In KrauszM. (Ed.), Relativism: Interpretation and confrontation (pp. 35–50). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
38.
RortyR. (1989b). Contingency, irony, and solidarity.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
RosenbergJ. F. (1993). Raiders of the lost distinction: Richard Rorty and the search for the last dichotomy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research53 (1), 195–214.
40.
SchefflerI. (1973). Reason and teaching.London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
41.
SchefflerI. (1995). Teachers of my youth: An American Jewish experience.Dordrecht: Kluwer.
42.
SearleJ. R. (1993). Is there a crisis in American higher education?Bulletin of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences46 (4), 24–47.
43.
SiegelH. (1987). Relativism refuted: A critique of contemporary epistemological relativism.Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
SiegelH. (1991). The rationality of reasonableness. In BuchmannM., & FlodenR. E. (Eds.)., Philosophy of education1991 (pp. 225–233). Champaign, IL: Philosophy of Education Society.
46.
SiegelH. (1993). Gimme that old-time enlightenment meta-narrative: Radical pedagogies (and politics) require old-fashioned epistemology (and moral theory). Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines11 (4), 1, 17–22.
47.
SiegelH. (1995a). Knowledge and certainty: Feminism, postmodernism, and multi-culturalism. In KohliW. (Ed.), Critical conversations in philosophy of education. (pp. 190–200). New York: Routledge.
48.
SiegelH. (1995b). 'Radical’ pedagogy requires ‘conservative’ epistemology. Journal of Philosophy of Education29 (1), 33–46.
49.
SiegelH. (in press). Naturalism and the abandonment of normativity. In O'DonohueW., & KitchenerR. (Eds.), Psychology and philosophy: Interdisciplinary problems and responses.Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
50.
SosaE. (1987). Serious philosophy and freedom of spirit. The Journal of Philosophy84 (12), 707–726.
51.
WeinsteinM. (1993). Rationalist hopes and utopian visions. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines11 (3), 1, 16–22.
52.
WeinsteinM. (1994). How to get from ought to is: Postmodern epistemology and social justice. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines13 (3–4), 26–32.
