AchesonKeith A. “The Effects of Feedback from Television Recordings and Three Types of Supervisory Treatments.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, 1964.
2.
AllenDwight W., and RyanKevin A.Microteaching.Reading, Mass.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1969.
3.
AmidonEdmund J., and FlandersNed A.The Role of the Teacher in the Classroom: A Manual for Understanding and Improving Teachers’ Classroom Behavior.Minneapolis, Minn.: Paul S. Amidon Associates, 1963.
4.
AmidonEdmund J., and SimonAnita. “Teacher-Pupil Interaction.” Review of Educational Research25 (1965): 130–40.
5.
AubertineHorace E. “The Set Induction Process and Its Application in Teaching.” Journal of Educational Research61 (1968): 363–67.
6.
BanduraAlbert. Social Learning Theory.New York: General Learning Press, 1971.
7.
BaronBennie G. “An Investigation of the Effect of Videotape and Microteaching Technique on Openness.” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Southern Mississippi, 1967.
8.
BerlinerDavid C.Microteaching and the Technical Skills of Teaching Approach to Teacher Training. Technical Report no. 8, Stanford Center for Research and Development in TeachingStanford, Calif., 1969.)
9.
BrooksAlbert D. “Effect of Alternate Techniques for Modifying Teacher Behavior.” Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, 1967.
10.
ClausKaren. Effects of Modeling and Feedback Treatments on the Development of Teachers’ Questioning Skills. Technical Report no. 7, Stanford Center for Research and Development in TeachingStanford, Calif., 1969 (ED 033 081).
11.
CooperJames M., and AllenDwight W.Microteaching: History and Present Status. Final Report, Research Project, no. OEC 0-8-080490-2706(010), U.S. Office of EducationWashington, 1970. (ED 036 471)
12.
CyphertFrederick R., and AndrewsL. L. “Using the Videotaper in Teacher Education.” Audiovisual Instruction12 (1967): 1067–69.
FlandersNed A.Teacher Influence, Pupil Attitudes, and Achievement.Cooperative Research Monograph, no. 12, OE-25040. Washington: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1965.
15.
FullerFrances F.Effects of Personalized Feedback during Teacher Preparation on Teacher Personality and Teacher Behavior. Report Series, no. 4. University of Texas Research and Development Center on Teacher Education.
16.
KallenbachW. W., and GallM. D. “Microteaching versus Conventional Methods in Training Elementary Intern Teachers.” Journal of Educational Research63 (1969): 136–41.
17.
KaufmanArnold, BaronAlan, and KoppRosemarie E. “Some Effects of Instructions on Human Operant Behavior.” Psychonomic Monograph Supplements1 (1966): 243–50.
18.
KoranJohn J.The Relative Effects of Imitation versus Problem Solving on the Acquisition of Inquiry Behavior by Intern Teachers. Technical Report, no. 11, Stanford Center for Research and Development in TeachingStanford, Calif., 1970.
19.
KoranMary L., SnowRichard E., and McDonaldFrederick J. “Teacher Aptitude and Observational Learning of a Teaching Skill.” Journal of Educational Psychology61 (1971): 219–28.
20.
LangeDonald N. “An application of Social Learning Theory in Effecting Change in a Group of Student Teachers Using Video Modeling Techniques.” Journal of Educational Research65 (1971): 151–54.
21.
McAleeseW. R., and UnivinDerick. “A Selective Survey of Microteaching.” Programmed Learning and Educational Technology8 (1971): 10–21.
22.
McDonaldFrederick J. “The Evaluation of Teaching Behavior.” In Competency-based Teacher Education: Progress, Problems, and Prospects, edited by HowsamR. B., and HoustonW. R.Chicago: Science Research Associates, forthcoming.
23.
McDonaldFrederick J. “The Influence of Learning Theories on Education (1900–1950).” In Theories of Learning and Instruction, Sixty-third yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I, edited by HilgardE. R., pp. 1–16. Chicago: Distributed by the University of Chicago Press, 1964.
24.
McDonaldFrederick J., and AllenDwight W.Training Effects of Feedback and Modeling Procedures on Teaching Performance.Final Report, Research Project, no. OE-6-10-078, U.S. Office of Education. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University, 1967.
25.
MedleyDonald M., SchluckCarolyn G., and AmesNancy P.Assessing the Learning Environment in the Classroom: A Manual for Users of OSCAR SV.Research Memorandum 68–9. Princeton, N.J.: Educational Testing Service, 1968.
26.
RampEugene, UlrichRoger, and DulaneySylvia. “Delayed Timeout As a Procedure for Reducing Disruptive Classroom Behavior: A Case Study.” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis4 (1971): 235–40.
27.
RosenshineBarak. “Evaluation of Classroom Instruction.” Review of Educational Research40 (1970): 279–300.
28.
RosenshineBarak. “The Stability of Teacher Effects upon Student Achievement.” Review of Educational Research40 (1970): 647–62.
29.
RoushRobert E.A Study of Change in Selected Teacher Education Interns’ Behavior Using Videotape Recordings. Final Report, Research Project, no. 8-G-944, U.S. Office of EducationWashington, n.d.
30.
SalzburgBernard H. “The Effect of Intermittent Contingent Access to Play on Printing of Kindergarten Children.” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis4 (1971): 163–72.
31.
SchuelerHerbert, and GoldMilton J. “Video Recordings of Student Teachers—A Report of the Hunter College Research Project Evaluating the Use of Kinescopes in Preparing Student Teachers.” Journal of Teacher Education15 (1964): 358–64.
32.
TagiuriR., and PetrulloL. eds. Person Perception and Interpersonal Behavior.Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1958.
33.
“Teacher Education Models.” Journal of Research and Development in Education2 (1969): 3–136.
34.
ThoresenC. E. Paper on file.
35.
ThoresenC. E., and KrumboltzJ. D. “Relationship of Counselor Reinforcement of Selected Responses to External Behavior.” Journal of Counseling Psychology14 (1967): 140–44.
36.
TuckmanBruce W., McCallKendrick M., and HymanRonald T. “The Modification of Teacher Behavior: Effects of Dissonance and Coded Feedback.” American Educational Research Journal6 (1969): 607–18.
37.
WaimonMorton D., BellDennis D., and RamseyerGary C. “The Effects of Microplanning on the Performance and Attitudes of Prospective Teachers.” Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, New York, February 1971.
38.
YoungD. “A Preliminary Report on the Effectiveness of Colleague Supervision on the Acquisition of Selected Teaching Behavior in a Microteaching Series.” Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, 1970.