A program for improving Bill of Rights teaching in high schools: The report of the Williamstown Workshop.New York: Civil Liberties Educational Foundation, 1962.
AndersonR. C.Learning in discussions: A resume of the authoritarian-democratic studies. Harvard educ. Rev., 1959, 29, 201–215.
4.
AndrewsK. R.Case method of teaching human relations and administration. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univer. Press, 1953.
5.
BerendaRuthThe influence of the group on the judgments of children. New York: King's Crown Press, 1950.
6.
BishopR. W.How did they happen? Actual case histories make powerful teaching tools. Safety Educ., 1963, 42, 6–8.
7.
BlackledgeW. L., & E.H. Use case studies in consumer economics class. Bus. educ. World, 1963, 43, 21–25ff.
8.
BrennanW. J.Jr., Teaching the Bill of Rights. Soc. Educ., 1963, 27, 238–243ff.
9.
Civil Liberties Educational Foundation, Inc.A report on the current status of Bill of Rights-civil liberties teaching in secondary schools.New York: Civil Liber. Educ. Fndtn, 1962 (mimeo).
10.
DruckerA. J., & RemmersH. H.Citizenship attitudes of graduated seniors at Purdue University, United States college graduates and high school pupils. J. educ. Psychol., 1951, 42, 231–235.
MagounF. A.Teaching human relations by the case demonstration method. Boston, Mass.: Beacon Press, 1959.
18.
MaierN. R. F., & HoffmanL. R.Using trained ‘developmental’ discussion leaders to improve further the quality of group decisions. J. appl. Psychol., 1960, 44, 247–251.
19.
MenackerJ.Jury training in the social studies curriculum. Soc. Stud., 1961, 52, 134–135.
20.
MillerL. N.The case method in ethical education. Okla. Tchr., 1956, 38, 15ff.
21.
NashP.Should we abandon the Bill of Rights?Soc. Educ., 1959, 23, 371–372ff.
22.
National Assembly on Teaching the Principles of the Bill of Rights.Statement.New York: The Assembly, 1962 (mimeo).
23.
OliverD. W., & ShaverJ. P.The analysis of public controversy: A study in citizenship education. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Univer. Grad. Sch. Educ., 1962 (2 vols., mimeo).
24.
OliverD. W., & SusanBaker,. The case method. Soc. Educ., 1959, 23, 25–28.
25.
OstlundL. A.An experimental study of case-discussion learning. J. exper. Educ., 1956, 25, 81–89.
26.
OstlundL. A.Group integration in a case discussion course. J. educ. Psychol.1953, 44, 463–474.
27.
ParkerD., & EconopoulyN.Teaching civil liberties by the case method. Soc. Educ., 1961, 25, 283–285.
28.
RaderM.Issues in teaching about communism. Teach. Coll. Rec., 1963, 64, 577–583.
29.
RemmersH. H., & FranklinR. D.Sweet land of Liberty. Phi Delta Kappan, 1962, 44, 22–27.
30.
RogersH. B.The role of the case method in engineering and business education. J. engn. Educ., 1955, 45, 627–633.
31.
StarrI.Teaching the Bill of Rights. Soc. Educ., 1959, 23, 373–378.
32.
WiebeG. D.The Army-McCarthy hearings and the public conscience. Publ. Opin. Quart., 1958-59, 22, 490–502.
33.
Youth looks at civil liberties and the 1960 election.Report of Poll No. 61 of the Purdue Opinion Panel.Lafayette, Ind.: Purdue Univer. Div. Educ. Ref., 1960 (mimeo).