BinneyJ.Criticism, research, and tag lines. Clearing House, 1959, 33, 534–536.
2.
BrownellW.A.Session I, Symposium and round table: The preparation of research workers in education. AERA Newsletter, 1957, 8, 7–8.
3.
DurnallE.J.Jr., Predicting scholastic success for graduate students in education. Sch. & Soc., 1954, 80, 107.
4.
Educational Policies Commission.Manpower and education.Washington, D.C.: Natl. Educ. Assn., 1956.
5.
FeldmanM.J.A comparison of Miller Analogy Test Scores. J. couns. Psychol., 1958, 5, 149–50.
6.
HarmonL.R.High school backgrounds of science doctorates. Sci, 1961, 133, 679–688.
7.
KellyE.L., & GoldbergL.R.Correlates of later performance and specialization in psychology: A follow-up study of the trainees assessed in the V.A. selection research project. Psychol. Monogr., 1959, 75, No. 12 (Whole No. 482).
8.
NelsonG.E.Educational periodicals: Which are most useful for research?Clearing House, 1957, 31, 547–548.
9.
Office of Scientific Personnel, National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council.Production of U.S. Scientists. Science, 1958, 127, 682–686.
SymondsP.M.The organization of educational research in the United States. Harvard educ. Rev., 1957, 27, 159–167.
14.
US National Science Foundation.Graduate student enrollment and support in American universities and colleges. Washington, D.C.: Govt. Print. Off., 1954.
15.
WaltersG.V., & PatersonD.G.Miller Analogy Test scores and ratings of PhDs in psychology. Amer. Psychol., 1953, 8, 89–90.
