AbernethyE. M.Relationships between Mental and Physical Growth. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Vol. I, No. 7. Washington: National Research Council, 1936. Pp. vii + 80.
2.
AlexanderW. P. “Intelligence, Concrete and Abstract.” British Journal of Psychology Monograph Supplements, No.19: 1935. Pp. 177.
3.
BayleyN. “Factors Influencing the Growth of Intelligence in Young Children,” Intelligence: Its Nature and Nurture, pp. 49–79. Thirty-ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education (5835 Kimbark Avenue), 1940.
4.
BronnerA. F., HealyW., LoweG. M., and ShimbergM. E.A Manual of Individual Mental Tests and Testing.Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1927. Pp. x + 287.
5.
BurksB. S., JensenD. W., and TermanL. M.Genetic Studies of Genius, III. The Promise of Youth.Stanford, California: Stanford University Press, 1930. Pp. xiv + 508.
6.
CattellP. “Constant Changes in the Stanford-Binet IQ,” Journal of Educational Psychology, XXII (1931), 544–50.
7.
CattellP. “Do the Stanford-Binet IQ's of Superior Boys and Girls Tend to Decrease or Increase with Age?” Journal of Educational Research, XXVI (1933), 668–73.
8.
ConradH. S., JonesH. E., and HsiaoH. H. “Sex Differences in Mental Growth and Decline,” Journal of Educational Psychology, XXIV (1933), 161–69.
9.
CrawfordA. B. “Some Observations on the Primary Mental Abilities Battery in Action,” School and Society, LI (1940), 585–92.
10.
DearbornW. F., RothneyJ. W. M. and Others. Predicting the Child's Development.Cambridge, Massachusetts: Sci-Art Publishers, 1941. Pp. 360.
11.
FreemanF. N., and FloryC. D. “Growth in Intellectual Ability as Measured by Repeated Tests.” Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, Vol. II, No. 2. Washington: National Research Council, 1937. Pp. xi + 116.
12.
GarrettH. E., BryanA. I., and PerlR. E.The Age Factor in Mental Organization. Archives of Psychology, No. 176. New York: Columbia University, 1935. Pp. 29.
13.
GuilfordJ. P. “Human Abilities,” Psychological Review, XLVII (1940), 367–94.
14.
HarrisJ. A., JacksonC. M., PatersonD. G., and ScammonR. E.The Measurement of Man.Minneapolis, Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press, 1930. Pp. 215.
15.
HartsonL. “Does College Training Influence Test Intelligence?” Journal of Educational Psychology, XXVII (1936), 481–91.
16.
HertzmanM.The Effects of the Relative Difficulty of Mental Tests on Patterns of Mental Organization. Archives of Psychology, No. 197. New York: Columbia University, 1936. Pp. 69.
17.
HestonJ. C., and CannellC. F. “A Note on the Relation between Age and Performance of Adult Subjects on Four Familiar Psychometric Tests,” Journal of Applied Psychology, XXV (1941), 415–19.
18.
HonzikM. P., and JonesH. E. “Mental-Physical Relationships during the Preschool Period,” Journal of Experimental Education, IV (1937), 139–46.
19.
JonesH. E. “Relationships in Physical and Mental Development,” Mental and Physical Development, pp. 91–102. Review of Educational Research, IX, No. 1. Washington: American Educational Research Association, 1939.
20.
JonesH. E. Unpublished mss. Institute of Child Welfare, University of California, Berkeley.
21.
JonesH. E., and ConradH. S.The Growth and Decline of Intelligence: A Study of a Homogeneous Group between the Ages of Ten and Sixty, pp. 223–98. Genetic Psychology Monographs, Vol. XIII, No. 3. Worcester, Massachusetts: Clark University, 1933.
22.
JonesH. E., ConradH. S., and HornA. “Psychological Studies of Motion Pictures. II. Observation and Recall as a Function of Age,” pp. 225–43. University of California Publications in Psychology, Vol. III. Berkeley California: University of California Press, 1928.
23.
KeeneC. M., and StoneC. P. “Mental Status as Related to Puberty Praecox,” Psychological Bulletin, 34: 1937, 123–33.
24.
KuznetsG. M., and McNemarO. “Sex Differences in Intelligence-Test Scores,” Intelligence: Its Nature and Nurture, pp. 211–20. Thirty-ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education (5835 Kimbark Avenue), 1940.
25.
LincolnE. A. “The Stanford-Binet IQ changes of Superior Children,” School and Society, XLI (1935), 519–20.
26.
McManamaSister Maurice. AGenetic Study of the Cognitive General Factor in Human Intelligence. Studies of Psychology and Psychiatry, Catholic University of America, Vol. IV, No. 2. Washington: Catholic University of America, 1936. Pp. 35.
27.
MacMeekenA. M.The Intelligence of a Representative Group of Scottish Children.London: University of London Press, 1939. Pp. xv + 143.
28.
McNemarQ.The Revision of the Stanford-Binet Scale.Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1942. Pp. 189.
29.
McNemarQ., and TermanL. M.Sex Differences in Variational Tendency. Genetic Psychology Monographs, Vol. XVIII No. 1. Worcester Massachusetts: Clark University, 1936. Pp. 66.
30.
OdomC. L. “A Study of the Mental-Growth Curve with Special Reference to the Results of Group Intelligence Tests,” Journal of Educational Psychology, XX (1929), 401–16.
31.
PintnerR., and PatersonD. G.A Scale of Performance Tests.New York: D. Appleton Co., 1917. Pp. ix + 217.
32.
RavenJ. C. “Standardization of Progressive Matrices,” British Journal of Medical Psychology, XIX (1941), 137–50.
33.
RichardsonC. A., and StokesC. W.The Growth and Variability of Intelligence. British Journal of Psychology Monograph Supplements, Vol. XVIII. London: British Journal of Psychology, 1933. Pp. 83.
34.
RobertsJ. A. P., and GriffithsR. “Studies on a Child Population. II. Retests on the Advanced Otis and Stanford-Binet Scales, with Notes on the Use of a Shortened Binet Scale,” Annals of Eugenics, VIII (1937), 15–45.
35.
RoffM. E. “A Statistical Study of the Development of Intelligence-Test Performance,” Journal of Psychology, XI (1941), 371–86.
36.
RogersA. L. “The Growth of Intelligence at the College Level,” School. and Society, XXXI (1930), 693–99.
37.
ShockN. W., and JonesH. E. “Mental Development and Performance as Related to Physical and Physiological Factors,” Growth and Development, pp. 531–52. Review of Educational Research, Vol. XI, No. 5. Washington: American Educational Research Association, 1941.
38.
StephensonW. “Tetrad Differences for Nonverbal Subtests,” Journal of Educational Psychology, XXII (1931), 167–85.
39.
StoddardG. D.The Meaning of Intelligence.New York: Macmillan Co., 1943. Pp. ix + 504.
40.
StoneC. P., and BarkerR. G. “Aspects of Personality and Intelligence in Postmenarcheal and Premenarcheal Girls of the Same Chronological Age,” Journal of Comparative Psychology, XXIII (1937), 439–45.
41.
StoneC. P., and Doe-KuhlmannL. “Notes on the Mental Development of Children Exhibiting the Somatic Signs of Puberty Praecox,” Guidance in Educational Institutions, pp. 388–97. Twenty-seventh Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education (5835 Kimbark Avenue), 1928.
42.
ThomsonG. H. “A Formula to Correct for the Effect of Errors of Measurement on the Correlation of Initial Values with Gains,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, VII (1924), 321–24.
43.
ThomsonG. H. “An Alternative Formula for the True Correlation of Initial Values with Gains,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, VIII (1925), 323–24.
44.
ThomsonG. H.The Factorial Analysis of Human Ability.Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co., 1939. Pp. xv + 326.
45.
ThorndikeE. L. “The Influence of Chance Imperfection of Measures upon the Relation of Initial Score to Gain or Loss,” Journal of Experimental Psychology, VII (1924), 225–32.
46.
ThorndikeE. L. and Others. The Measurement of Intelligence.New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University: 1926. Pp. xxvi + 616.
47.
ThorndikeE. L., BregmanE. O., TiltonJ. W., and WoodyardE.Adult Learning.New York: Macmillan Co., 1928. Pp. x + 335.
48.
ThurstoneL. L. “A Method of Scaling Psychological and Educational Tests,” Journal of Educational Psychology, XVI (1925), 433–51.
49.
ThurstoneL. L., and AckersonL. “The Mental-Growth Curve for the Binet Tests,” Journal of Educational Psychology, XX (1929), 569–83.
50.
ThurstoneL. L., and ThurstoneT. G.Factorial Studies of Intelligence. Psychometric Monographs, No. 2. Chicago: Published for Psychometric Society by University of Chicago Press, 1941. Pp. v + 94.
51.
WechslerD.The Measurement of Intelligence.Baltimore, Maryland: Williams & Wilkins, 1939. Pp. ix + 229.
52.
WoodL., and KuminE. “A New Standardization of the Ferguson Form Boards,” Journal of Genetic Psychology, LIV (1939), 265–84.
53.
WeightM. B. “The Development of Mental Ability at the College-Adult Level,” Journal of Educational Psychology, XXII (1931), 610–28.
54.
ZieveL. “Note on the Correlation of Initial Scores with Gains,” Journal of Educational Psychology, XXXI (1940), 391–94.