AnastasiA., and FoleyJ. P.Jr. “An analysis of spontaneous drawings by children in different cultures.” Jour. Appl. Psychol., 20: 1936, 689–726.
2.
AnastasiA., and FoleyJ. P.Jr. “A study of animal drawings by Indian children of the north Pacific coast.” Jour. Soc. Psychol., 9: 1938, 363–374.
3.
AtwellS. “Color vision in relation to artistic ability.” Psychol. Bull., 36: 1939, 647.
4.
BarnhartE. N. “The criteria used in preferential judgments of geometrical forms.” Amer. Jour. Psychol., 53: 1940, 354–370.
5.
BarwellJ. S. “The nature of ugliness.” Brit. Jour. Med. Psychol., 17: 1937, 119–127.
6.
Birgemann-KönitzerM. “Entwicklungsaufbau plastischer Gestaltung,” (The structural development of plastic form). Z. Jugendk., 51935, 42–50.
7.
Beebe-CenterJ. G., and PrattC. C. “A test of Birkhoff's esthetic measure.” Jour. Gen. Psychol., 17: 1937, 339–353.
8.
BirkhoffG. D. “The present status of esthetic measure.” Sci. Mo., 46: 1938, 351–357.
9.
BoseR. C. “On the construction of balanced incomplete block designs.” Ann. Eugen.9: 1939, 353–599.
10.
BowiesD. F. “The rôle of subject matter in art.” Jour. Phil., 36: 1939, 617–430.
11.
BrighouseG. “The effects of protracted observation of a painting.” Psychol. Bull, 36: 1939, 552.
12.
BrighouseG. “A Study of Aesthetic Apperception.” Psychol. Monogr., 51: 1939, 1–22.
13.
BrighouseG. “Variability in Preferences for Simple Forms.” Psychol Monogr., 51: 1939, 68–74.
14.
BurkhardtH. “Ueber Verlagerung raümlicher Gestalten.” (On the alteration of spatial forms.)Neue psychol. Stud., 71933, 158.
15.
BuswellG. T.How People Look at Pictures: A Study of the Psychology and Perception of Art. (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, 1935)
16.
CahalanE. J. “The Consistency of Aesthetic Judgment.” Psychol. Monogr., 51: 1939, 75–87.
17.
CameronN. “Functional immaturity in the symbolization of scientifically trained adults.” Jour. Psychol., 6: 1938, 161–175.
18.
CaneF. “The gifted child in art.” Jour. Educ. Soctol., 10: 1936, 67–73.
19.
CarrollH. A. “A preliminary report on a study of the relationship between ability in art and certain personality traits.” School and Soc, 36: 1932, 285–288.
20.
CarrollH. A. “A preliminary report on a study of the interrelationships of certain appreciations.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 23: 1932, 505–510.
21.
CarrollH. A., and EurichA. C. “Abstract intelligence and art appreciation.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 23: 1932, 214–220.
22.
ClairM. B. “Variation in the Perception of Aesthetic Qualities in Paintings.” Psychol. Manogr., 51: 1939, 52–67.
23.
CzurlesS. A. “The Emergence of Art Abilities in the First Three Years of Life.” (Master's Thesis, Syracuse University Library: Syracuse, 1938)
24.
DavisF. C. “Aesthetic proportion.” Amer. Jour. Psychol., 45: 1933, 298–302.
25.
DavisR. C. “An evaluation and test of Birkhoff's aesthetic measurement formula.” Jour. Gen. Psychol., 15: 1936, 231–240.
DrepsH. F. “The Psychophysical Capacities and Abilities of College Art Students of High and Low Standing.” Psychol. Monogr., 45: 1933, 134–146.
28.
DwelshauvebsG. “Reeherehes expérimentales sur l'imagination créatrice.” (Experimental research on ereative imagination.)Jour. Psychol. norm. path., 321935, 435–442.
29.
EiglerP. “The Kohs block-design test.” Chad Development, 1: 1930, 341–342.
30.
EurichA.C., and CarrollH. A. “Group differences in art judgment.” School and Soc, 34: 1931, 204–206.
31.
FlemmingE. G. “Personality and artistic talent.” Jour. Educ. Sociol., 8: 1934, 27–33.
32.
FomenkoK. E. (The perception of pictures of spatial and perspective relations in the preschool age.) [In] Psikhologitchni doslidzernnia, Naoo-kovi zapkki. (Derj. Ped. Institut: Kharkov, 1939) 101–199.
33.
GarrisonK. C. “Psychology of special abilities.” Peabody Reflector, 12: 1939, 11–13.
34.
GinsbubgA. M.(“Proportions and equilibrium of mass in architecture.”)Psikhotekn. i prikhofiziol truda, 1931, 46–55.
35.
GoodenotghF. L. “Children's Drawings.” [In] A Handbook of Child Psychology. (Clark University Press: Worcester, 1931) 480–514.
36.
GraeweH.Untersuchung der Entwicklung des Zeichnens. (A study of the development of drawing.) (Schroedel: Halle, 1932)
37.
GraeweH. “Das Tierzeichnen der Kinder.” (Children's drawings of animals.)Z. pädag. Psychol., 361935, 251–256, 291–300.
38.
GridleyP. F. “Graphic Representation of a Man by Four-year-old Children in Nine Prescribed Drawing Situations.” Genet. Psychol Monogr., 20: 1938, 183–350.
39.
GrimesJ. W. “Values in a work of art.” Educ. Res. Bull, Ohio State University, 19: 1940, 283–292.
40.
GuanellaF. M. “Block-building activities of young children.” Arch. Psychol (New York), 1934, 92.
41.
GuilfordJ. P., and GuilfordR. B. “A prognostic test for students in design.” Jour. Appl. Psychol., 15: 1931, 335–345.
42.
HarshC. M., Beebe-CenterJ. G., and Beebe-CenterR. “Further evidence regarding preferential judgment of polygonal forms,” Jour. Psychol., 7: 1939, 343–380.
43.
HeatonM. L. “The inheritance of artistic traits.” Eug. News, 16: 1932, 211–213.
44.
HetzerH. “Kind und Schaffen, Experimente über konstruktive Betätigungen im Kleinkindalter.” (Creative ability in children; experiments on constructive occupations of preschool children.) Quellen u. Stud. z. Jugendk., 71931, 108.
45.
HevnerK. “Experimental studies of the affective value of colors and lines.” Jour. Appl. Psychol., 19: 1935, 385–398.
46.
HevnerK., and MuellerJ. H. “The effectiveness of various types of art appreciation aids.” Jour. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 34: 1939, 63–72.
47.
HollingworthL. S. “Special Gifts and Special Deficiencies.” [In] A Handbook of Child Psychology. (Clark University Press: Worcester, 1931) 627–642.
48.
HommaT.(The law of Prägnanz in the process of drawing figures.)Jap. Jour. Psychol., 12: 1937, 112–153.
49.
HuangI. “The Psychology of Children's Drawings.” (Commercial Press: Shanghai, 1938)
50.
HurlockE. B., and ThomsonJ. L. “Children's drawings: an experimental study of perception.” Child Development, 5: 1934, 127–138.
51.
HothA. “Neigung und Eignung.” (Inclination and talent.)Z. Jugendk., 41934, 198–206.
52.
IinumaR., and WatanabeK.(Observations on moving objects drawn by children. Orientation and motion of railway trains.)Jap. Jour. Psychol., 12: 1937, 393–408.
KahnR. “Inheritance of ability in drawing.” Eug. News, 16: 1931, 42.
55.
KatoM. “Kantanna zukei ni okeru biteki wariai no jikken-bigaku-teki kenkyü.” (An experimental study on esthetic proportion in simple forms.)Jap. Jour. Exp. Psychol., 51938, 57–61.
56.
KellettK. R. “A Gestalt Study of the Function of Unity in Aesthetic Perception.” Psychol. Monogr., 51: 1939, 23–51.
KienzleR.Das bildhafte Gestalten ah Amdruck der Persönlichkeit. (Pictorial forms as expressions of the personality.) (Esslingen: Burgbücherei, 1932)
59.
KinterM.The Measurement of Artistic Abilities: A Survey of Scientific Studies in the Field of Graphic Arts. (Psychological Corporation: New York, 1933)
60.
KlineL. W., and CaretG. L. “A Measuring Scale for Free-Hand Drawing. Part II. Design and Composition.” Hopkins Univ. Stud. Educ., 1933, No. 5.
61.
KnatoerA.J.The Knauber Art Vocabulary Test. (Published by the author: Cincinnati, 1935)
62.
KobayashiS.(A study on a variation of facsimiles drawn by children.)Jap. Jour. Psychol., 12: 1937, 375–392.
63.
KoesterH. L. “Ueber das Verhaltnis der intellectuellen Begabung zur musikalischen, zeichnerischen, und technischen Begabung.” (On the relations between intellectual aptitudes and talents for music, drawing, and technical skills.)Zsch, f. pad. Psychol., 311930, 399–403.
64.
Körperth-TippelA. (Child and picture.) (Deutscher Verlag für Jugend und Volk; Vienna; n.d.)
65.
KruseW. “Experimentelle Untersuchungen über die Vererbung der zeichnerisehen Begabung. I.” (Experimental investigations of the iaheritanee of drawing ability. I.)Zsch. f. Psychol., 1261932, 86–145.
66.
KröberW. “Über das Aufzeichnen von Formen aus dem Gedächtnis.” (Concerning the drawing of forms from memory.)Z. Angew. Psychol., 641938, 273–327.
67.
KrugerG. “Analyse der Denkvorgange beim Lesen von Werkzeich-nungen.” (Analysis of the thought processes involved in reading mechanical drawings.) Psychotechn. Zsch., 1938, 24–33.
68.
KotoY.(Children's appreciation of Japanese pieturee.)Trans. Inst. Child Blvd., 17: 1937, 1–38.
69.
KundeL. A. “Aesthetic judgment of seventh-grade students of line in dress costume design.” Pittsb. Schs., 12: 1938, 141–154.
70.
LangfordR. C. “Ocular behavior and the principle of pictorial balance.” Psychol. Bull, 30: 1933, 679.
71.
Lark-HorovitzB. “Interlinkage of sensory memories in relation to training in drawing.” Jour. Genet. Psychol., 49: 1936, 69–89.
72.
Lark-HorovitzB. “On art appreciation of children: I. Preference of picture subjects in general.” Jour. Educ. Res., 31: 1937, 118–137.
73.
Lark-HorovitzB. “On art appreciation of children: II. Portrait preference study.” Jour. Educ. Res., 31: 1938, 572–598.
74.
Lark-HorovitzB. “On art appreciation of children: III. Textile pattern preference study.” Jour. Educ. Res., 33: 1939, 7–35.
75.
Lark-HorovitzB. “On art appreciation of children: IV. Comparative study of white and Negro children, 13 to 15 years old.” Jour. Educ. Res., 30: 1939, 258–285.
76.
LembkeW. “Über Zeichnungen von ‘frechen’ und ‘schuchternen’ Schulkindern.” (The significance of drawings by “bold “and “shy “pupils.) Zsch. f. pad. Psychol., 1930, 459–463.
77.
LeveyH. B. “A theory concerning free creation in the inventive arts.” Psychiatry, 3: 1940, 229–293.
78.
LinkM. “Die Malerfamilie Tischbein.” (The Tischbein family of painters.)Arch. f. Rossen- u. Gesellschbiol., 271933, 185–186.
79.
LochM. “Über Eidetik und Kinderzeichnung.” (Concerning eidetic imagery and children's drawing.)Arb. a. d. Psychol. Instit. d. München, 21931.
80.
LöwenfeldV.The Nature of Creative Activity. Translated by O. A. Oeser. (Harcourt, Brace and Co.: New York, 1939)
81.
LucioW. H., and MeadC. D. “An investigation of children's preferences for modern pictures.” Elem. Sch. Jour.39: 1939, 678–689.
82.
MarkeyF. V. “Imaginative Behavior of Young Children.” Child Develpm. Monogr., 1935, No. 18.
83.
MartinH. “Stile und Stilwandlungsgesetze der Kinderzeichnung, nach-gewiesen an den Menschenzeichnungen der Volksschulkinder.” (Styles and laws of change in style in children's drawing as shown in drawings of a man by folkschool children.)Vjach. f. Jugendk., 21932, 211–226.
84.
MartinH. “Die Motivwahl und ihre Wandel in der freinen Zeichnung des Grundschulkindes.” (Choice of motif and its change in spontaneous drawings of elementary pupils.)Z. pädag. Psychol., 401939, 231–241.
85.
McCloyW. “Creative Imagination in Children and Adults.” Psychol. Monogr., 51: 1939, 88–102.
PerkinsF. T. “Symmetry in visual recall,” Amer. Jour. Psychol., 44: 1932, 473–190.
117.
PopenoeP. “The inheritance of artistic talents.” Jour. Hered., 20: 1929.
118.
RabelloS.Caractericas do desenho infantil. Gontribução para o estudo psychologico da manga brasileira.” (Characteristics of children's drawing. Contribution to the psychological study of the Brazilian child.)Bol. Direct. tech. Educ., Pernambuco, 2: 1932, 15–78.
119.
RatheK.Die Ausdrucksfunktion extrem verkurzter Figuren. (The expressive function of radically foreshortened figures.) (Warburg Institute: London, 1938)
120.
ReinhardtH. “Studien zur Eignung sum Konstrukteurberaf.” (Studies on aptitude for construction work.)Indus. Psychotechn., 81931, 263–266.
121.
RobbinsA. B. “The inheritance of designing capacity.” Eug. News, 16: 1931, 192–193.
122.
RoumaG. “Dessins d'indiens quitchouas et aymaras. Le graphisme et l'expression graphique.” (Drawings of the Queehua and Aymara Indians. Writing and graphic expression.)Sem. univ. Pédag. Univ. libre Brum., 11935, 133–147.
123.
SaundersA. W. “The Stability of Artistic Aptitude at the Childhood Level.” Psychol. Monogr., 48: 1936, 126–153.
124.
SohiebeG. “Erlebnismotorik und sseichnerischer (physiognomischer) Ausdruck bei Kindern und Jugendlichen. Zur Psychogenese der Ausdrucks-gestaltung.” (Empirical motor expression and graphic physiognomic expression in children and youth. on the psychogenesis of expressional representations.)Z. Kinderforsch., 431934, 40–76.
125.
SchildreP. “The child and the symbol.” Scientia, Milano, 64: 1938, 21–26.
126.
SeemanE. “Development of the pictorial aptitude in children.” Character and Personality, 2: 1934, 209–221.
127.
ShabalinS. N.(The objective-gnostic moments in the perception of form in preschool children.)Sci. Mem. pedag. Inst. Herzen, 18: 1939, 59–106.
128.
ShafferL. F. “Children's Interpretations of Cartoons.” Teach. Coll. Contrib. Educ., 1930, No. 429.
129.
ShawR. F.Finger Painting. (Little, Brown and Co.: Boston, 1934)
130.
ShoemakerR. “Student pedigree-studies. 51. Artistic ability in the Shoemaker family,” Eugen. News, 22: 1937, 107–108.
131.
SissonE. D. “Suggestion in art judgment.” Jour. Gen. Psychol., 18: 1938, 433–435.
132.
SpearmanC. “Is ability random or organized?Jour. Educ. Psychol., 311940, 305–310.
133.
SpielreinS. “Kinderzeichnungen bei offenen und gesehlossenen Augen: Untersuchungen über die unterschwelligen kinästhetischen Vorstellungen.” (Children's drawings with the eyes open and shut: researches on kinesthetic images below the threshold of consciousness.)Imago, 171931, 359–391.
134.
SpoerlD. T. “Personality and drawing in retarded children.” Character and Pers., 8: 1940, 227–239.
135.
SterzingerO. “Zur Prufung und Untersuchung der kunstlerischen Veranlagung.” (On the testing and examining of artistic ability.)Psychotechn. Zsch., 61931, 1–10.
136.
StowA., and ManuelH. T. “The art ability of Mexican children.” School and Soc, 34: 1931, 379–380.
137.
TakedaT. “On the drawing of children.” Jap. Jour. Psychol., 9: 1934, 217–226.
138.
TieboutC. “The Measurement of Quality in Children's Paintings by the Scale Method.” Psychol Monogr., 1936, 85–94.
139.
TieboutC., and MeierN. C. “Artistic Ability and General Intelligence.” Psychol. Monogr., 48, 1936, 95–125.
140.
VarnumW. H.Selective Art Aptitude Test (International Textbook Co.: Scranton, 1939)
141.
VernonM.D. “The relation of cognition and phantasy in children.” Brit. Jour. Psychol., 30: 1940, 273–294.
142.
VernonP. E.The Measurement of Abilities. (University of London Press: London, 1940) (143) Vogt, W. “Zur Frage des Trainings.” (The problem of training.) Int. Zsch. f. Indiv.-psychol., 10: 1932, 146–151.
143.
VossM. D. “An experimental study of the developmental processes in art appreciation.” Proc. Ia. Acad. Sci., 42: 1935, 173.
144.
VossM. D. “A Study of Conditions Affecting the Functioning of the Art Appreciation Process at the Child Level.” Psychol. Monogr., 48: 1936, 1–39.
145.
VossM. D. “The Validity and Reliability of a Modified Form of. the McAdory Art Test for Use at Lower Grade Levels.” Psychol Monogr., 48: 1936, 68–84.
146.
VydraJ. “Stammesunterschiede in der Begabung des Kindes fur bildende Kunst.” (Racial differences in children's talent for pictorial art.) 4 Versamml. f. Kinderforsch. (Bratislava: 1932) 311–314.
147.
WaltonW. E. “Empathic Responses in Children.” Psychol. Monogr., 48: 1936, 40–67.
148.
WileyL. “The Validity of Certain Accepted Criteria of Design.” (Thesis abstract. University of IllinoisUrbana, 1940)
149.
WilsonD. J. “An experimental investigation of Birkhoff's aesthetic measure.” Jour. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 34: 1939, 390–394.