ArsenianS. “The Spearman Visual Perception Test (Part I) with pantomime directions.” Brit. Jour. Educ. Psychol., 7: 1937, 287–301.
2.
BradfordE. J. G. “Can present scholastic standards be maintained?” Forum Educ., 3: 1925, 186–198.
3.
BradfordE. J. G. “The relation of intelligence to varying birth rate in different social grades.” Brit. Jour. Educ. Psychol., 7: 1937, 229–246.
4.
BurksB. S. “Nature and Nurture: Their Influence upon Intelligence.” Twenty-Seventh Yearbook, Part I, of this Society, 1928, pp. 219–316.
5.
CattellJ. McK. “Families of American men of science.” Scientific Monthly, 4: 1917, 248–262; 5: 368–377.
6.
CattellR. B. “Occupational norms of intelligence and the standardization of an adult intelligence test.” Brit. Jour. Psychol., 25: 1934–1935, 1–28.
7.
CattellR. B.The Fight for Our National Intelligence. (P. S. King: London, 1937) 164 pp.
8.
CattellR. B. “Measurement versus intuition in applied psychology.” Character and Personality, 6: 1937, 114–131.
9.
CattellR. B. “Some further relations between intelligence, fertility, and socio-economic factors.” Eugen. Rev., 29: 1937, 171–179.
10.
CattellR. B. “Some changes in social life in a community with a falling intelligence quotient.” Brit. Jour. Psychol., 28: 1938, 430–450.
11.
CattellR. B. “A culture-free intelligence test.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 1939.
12.
CattellR. B., and WillsonJ. H. “Contributions concerning mental inheritance. I. Of Intelligence.” Brit. Jour. Educ. Psychol., 8: 1938, 129–149.
13.
ChapmanJ. C., and WigginsD. M. “Relation of size of family to intelligence of offspring and socio-economic status of family.” Ped. Sent., 32: 1925, 414–421.
14.
CharlesE.The Twilight of Parenthood. (Watts: London, 1934) 266 pp.
15.
CollinsJ. E. “The intelligence of school children and parental occupation.” Jour. Educ. Res., 17: 1928, 157–169.
16.
ConradH. S., and JonesH. E. “A field study of the differential birth rate.” Jour. Amer. Statis. Assoc., 27: 1932, 153–159.
17.
DawsonS. “Intelligence and fertility.” Brit. Jour. Psychol., 23: 1932–1933, 42–51.
18.
DexterE. S. “The relation between occupation of parent and intelligence of school children.” School and Soc., 17: 1923, 612–614.
19.
DuffJ. F., and ThomsonG. H. “Social and geographical distribution of intelligence in Northumberland.” Brit. Jour. Psychol., 14: 1923–1924, 192–198.
20.
EllisH. H.A Study of British Genius. (Hurst: London, 1904) 300 pp.
21.
FisherR. A.The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. (Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1930) Chaps. IX–XI.
22.
FryerD. “Occupational-intelligence standards.” School and Soc., 16: 1922, 273–277.
23.
GaltonF.English Men of Science; Their Nature and Nurture. (Macmillan: London, 1874) 270 pp.
24.
GanttW. H.A Medical Review of Soviet Russia. (Brit. Med. Assoc: London, 1928) 112 pp.
25.
Great Britain, Census Office.Census of England and Wales, 1911, “Fertility of marriage.” (H. M. Stationery Office: London, 1915) 424 pp.
26.
Great Britain, Mental Deficiency Committee.Report of the Mental Deficiency Committee. Part IV. “Investigation into the incidence of mental deficiency.” Report by Lewis, E. O. (H. M. Stationery Office: London, 1929) 239 pp.
27.
HaggertyM. E., and NashH. B. “Mental capacity of children and paternal occupation.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 15: 1924, 559–572.
28.
HeronE.On the Relation of Fertility in Man to Social Status, and on the Changes in this Relation that Have Taken Place during Fifty Years. (Dulau: London, 1906) 22 pp.
29.
JonesD. C. “Eugenic aspects of the Merseyside survey.” Eugen. Rev., 28: 1936, 103–113.
30.
JordanA. M. “Parental occupation and children's intelligence scores.” Jour. Applied Psychol., 17: 1933, 103–119.
31.
KornhauserA. W. “Economic standing of parents and the intelligence of their children.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 9: 1918, 159–164.
32.
LawrenceE. M. “An investigation into the relation between intelligence and inheritance.” Brit. Jour. Psychol., Monog. Suppl., No, 16, 5:. 1931. 80 pp.
33.
LintzT. F.Jr. “Relation of I.Q. to size of family.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 18: 1927, 486–496.
34.
LorimerF., and OsbornF.Dynamics of Population: Social and Biological Significance of Changing Birth Rates in the United States. (Macmillan: New York, 1934) 461 pp.
35.
MacdonaldH. “Social distribution of intelligence in the Isle of Wight.” Brit. Jour, Psychol., 16: 1926–1926, 123–129.
36.
MacdougallW.National Welfare and National Decay. (Methuen & Co.: London, 1921) 213 pp.
37.
MallerJ. B. “Mental ability and its relation to physical health and socioeconomic status.” Psychol. Clin., 22: 1933, 101–107.
38.
MallerJ. B. “Vital indices and their relation to psychological and social factors.” Human Biol, 5: 1933, 94–121.
39.
MooreE. “Report of the Work of Commission II: (Differential fertility).” [In] Problems of Population. Report of the Proceedings of the Second General Assembly of the International Union for the Scientific Investigation of Population Problems. (George Allen and Unwin, Ltd.: London, 1932) pp. 355–357.
40.
National Society for the Study of Education.The Twenty-Seventh Yearbook. Part II. “Nature and Nurture: Their Influence upon Intelligence.” (Public School Publishing Co.: Bloomington, Ill., 1928) 397 pp.
41.
NeffW. S. “Socio-economic status and intelligence: A critical surrey.” Psychol Bull, 35: 1938, 727–757.
42.
PearlR.The Biology of Population Growth. (Knopf: New York, 1925) 260 pp.
43.
PresseyS. L., and RalstonR. “Minor studies from the psychological laboratory of Indiana University: The relation of general intelligence of school children to the occupation of their fathers.” Jour. Applied Psychol., 3: 1919, 366–373.
44.
PriceB. “Reference data in Moscow families of 1935.” (Abstract) Psychol. Bull, 351938, 696–697.
45.
RobertsJ. A. F. “Intelligence and family size.” Eugen. Rev., 30: 1939, 237–247.
46.
RobertsJ. A. P., NormanR. M., and GriffithsR. “Studies on a child population. I. Definition of sample.” Annals of Eugen., 6: 1935, 319–388.
47.
RobertsJ. A. F., NormanR. M., and GriffithsR. “Studies on a child population. III. Intelligence and family size.” Annals of Eugen., 8: 1938, 178–215.
48.
SandifordS. “Parental occupation and the intelligence of offspring.” School and Soc., 23: 1926, 117–119.
49.
SchwesingerG. C.Heredity and Environment. Studies in the Genesis of Psychological Characteristics. (Macmillan: New York, 1933) 484 pp.
50.
StroudJ. B. “A study of the relation of intelligence-test scores of public-school children to the economic status of their parents.” Ped. Sem. and Jour. Genet. Psychol., 35: 1928, 105–111.
51.
SutherlandH. E. G. “The relationship between I.Q. and size of family.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 20: 1929, 81–90.
52.
SutherlandH. E. G., and ThomsonG. H. “The correlation between intelligence and size of family.” Brit. Jour. Psychol. (Gen. Sect.), 17: 1926–1927, 81–92.
53.
SydenstrickerE., and NotesteinF. W. “Differential fertility according to social class.” Jour. Amer. Statis. Assoc., 25: 1930, 9–32.
54.
TermanL. M., BaldwinB. T., BronsonE. T. and Others. Genetic Studies of Genius. I. Mental and Physical Traits of a Thousand Gifted Children. (Stanford University Press: Stanford, 1925) 648 pp.
55.
Wagner-ManslauW.Ber. d. Internat. Kong. f. Bevolkerungswissen.1933.
56.
WilloughbyR. R. “Fertility and parental intelligence.” Amer. Jour. Psychol., 40: 1928, 671–672.
57.
WilloughbyR. R., and GoodrieM. “Neglected factors in the differential birth rate problem.” Ped. Sem. and Jour. Genet. Psychol., 34: 1927, 373–393.