AnastasiA.Differential Psychology: Individual and Group Differences in Behavior. (MacmillanNew York, 1937) 615 pp.
2.
ArlittA. H. “On the need for caution in establishing race norms.” Jour. Applied Psychol., 5: 1921, 179–183.
3.
ArsenianS.Bilingualism and Mental Development. (Teachers College, Columbia University, Contributions to Education, No. 712, New York, 1937) 164 pp.
4.
BaldwinB. T., FillmoreE. A., and HadleyL.Farm Children: An Investigation of Rural Child Life in Selected Areas of Iowa. (D. Appleton-Century: New York, 1930) 337 pp.
5.
BallR. S. “The predictability of occupational level from intelligence.” Jour. Consult. Psychol., 2: 1938, 184–186.
6.
BayleyN., and JonesH. E. “Environmental correlates of mental and motor development: a cumulative study from infancy to six years.” Child Develop., 8: 1937, 329–341.
7.
BookW. F.The Intelligence of High-School Seniors: As Revealed by a Statewide Mental Survey of Indiana High Schools. (Macmillan: New York, 1922) 371 pp.
8.
BradwayK. P. “Paternal occupational intelligence and mental deficiency.” Jour. Applied Psychol., 19: 1935, 527–542.
9.
BrillM. “Studies of Jewish and non-Jewish intelligence.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 27: 1936, 331–352.
10.
BurdickE. M. “A group test of home environment.” Arch. Psychol., 16: 1928, 115 pp.
11.
BurksB. S. “Nature and Nurture: Their Influence upon Achievement.” The Twenty-Seventh Yearbook, Part II, of this Society, 1928. (pp. 248–353)
12.
BurksB. S. “Nature and Nurture: Their Influence upon Intelligence.” The Twenty-Seventh Yearbook, Part I, of this Society, 1928. (pp. 219–316)
13.
BurksB. S. “On the relative contributions of nature and nurture to average group differences in intelligence.” Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 24: 1938, 276–282.
14.
BurksB. S., and JonesH. E. “A study of differential fertility in two California cities.” Human Biol, 7: 1935, 539–554.
15.
BurksB. S., and KelleyT. L. “Nature and Nurture: Their Influence upon Intelligence.” The Twenty-Seventh Yearbook, Part I, of this Society, 1928. (pp. 9–38)
16.
ByrnsR., and HenmonV. A. C. “Parental occupation and mental ability.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 27: 1936, 284–291.
17.
CanadyH. G. “The intelligence of Negro college students and parental occupation.” Amer. Jour. Sociol., 42: 1936, 388–389.
18.
CattellR. B. “Occupational norms of intelligence, and the standardization of an adult intelligence test.” Brit. Jour. Psychol., 25: 1934–1935, 1–28.
19.
CattellR. B.The Fight for Our National Intelligence. (P. S. King: London, 1937) 164 pp.
20.
CattellR. B. “Some further relations between intelligence, fertility, and socio-economic factors.” Eugenics Rev., 29: 1937, 171–179.
21.
ChapinF. S. “A quantitative scale for rating the home and social environment of middle-class families in an urban community: a first approximation to the measurement of socio-economic status.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 19: 1928, 99–111.
22.
ChapinF. S.The Measurement of Social Status by the Use of the Social Status Scale. (University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, 1933) 16 pp.
23.
ChapmanJ. C., and SimsV. M. “The quantitative measurement of certain aspects of socio-economic status,” Jour. Educ. Psychol, 16: 1925, 380–390.
24.
ChapmanJ. C., and WigginsD. M. “Relation of family size to intelligence of offspring and socio-economic status of family.” Ped. Sem., 32: 1925, 414–421.
25.
ChaunceyM. R. “The relation of the home factor to achievement and intelligence-test scores.” Jour. Educ. Res., 20: 1929, 88–90.
26.
ClarkC. D., and GistN. P. “Intelligence as a factor in occupational choice.” Amer. Sociol. Rev., 3: 1938, 683–694.
27.
CoffeyH. S., and WellmanB. L. “The role of cultural status in intelligence changes of preschool children.” Jour. Exper. Educ., 5: 1936–1937, 191–202.
28.
CollinsJ. E. “The intelligence of school children and paternal occupation.” Jour. Educ. Res., 17: 1928, 157–169.
29.
ConradH. S., and JonesH. E. “A field study of the differential birth rate.” Jour. Amer. Statistical Assoc., 27: 1932, 153–159.
30.
CuffN. B. “Relationship of socio-economic status to intelligence and achievement.” Peabody Jour. Educ., 11: 1933, 106–110.
31.
DavidsonP. E., and AndersonH. D. “Are Edwards’ socio-economic levels economic? “School and Soc., 48: 1938, 153–156.
32.
DubnoffB. “A comparative study of mental development in infancy.” Ped. Sem., and Jour. Genet. Psychol., 53: 1938, 67–73.
33.
DuffJ. F. “Children of high intelligence: a follow-up inquiry.” Brit. Jour. Psychol., 19: 1929, 413–439.
34.
DuffJ. F., and ThomsonG. H. “The social and geographical distribution of intelligence in Northumberland.” Brit. Jour. Psychol., 14: 1923, 192–198.
35.
FreemanF. N., HolzingerK. J., and MitchellB. C. “Nature and Nurture: Their Influence upon Intelligence.” The Twenty-Seventh Yearbook, Part I, of this Society, 1928. (pp. 103–218)
36.
FurfeyP. H. “The relation between socio-economic status and intelligence of young infants as measured by the Linfert-Hierholzer scale.” Ped. Sem. and Jour. Genet. Psychol., 35: 1928, 478–480.
37.
FurfeyP. H., and MuehlenbeinJ. “The validity of infant intelligence tests.” Ped. Sem. and Jour. Genet. Psychol., 40: 1932, 219–233.
38.
GesellA., and LordE. E. “A psychological comparison of nursery-school children from homes of low and high economic status.” Ped. Sem. and Jour. Genet. Psychol., 34: 1927, 339–356.
39.
GlassL. C. “The relation of the ‘intelligence’ of college students to the occupation of their parents.” Eugen. News, 21: 1936, 1–2.
40.
GoodenoughF. L. “The relation of the intelligence of preschool children to the education of their parents.” School and Soc., 26: 1927, 54–56.
41.
GoodenoughF. L. “The relation of the intelligence of preschool children to the occupation of their fathers.” Amer. Jour. Psychol., 40: 1928, 284–294.
42.
GoodenoughF. L. “A comment on Robert L. Thorndike's ‘Note on IQ changes in foster home children, by Emmett L. Schott.” Jour. Applied Psychol., 23: 1939, 308–309.
43.
GoodenoughF. L., and AndersonJ. E.Experimental Child Study. (D. Appleton-Century: New York, 1931) 546 pp.
44.
HaughtB. F. “The relation of intelligence of college Freshmen to parental occupation.” Psychol. Monog., 50: 1938, No. 5, 203–210.
45.
HertzmanM. “The effects of the relative difficulty of mental tests on patterns of mental organization.” Arch. Psychol., 28: 1935–1936, 69 pp.
46.
HildrethG. “Occupational status and intelligence.” Personnel Jour., 13 : 1934, 153–157.
47.
HillH. S. “Correlation between IQ's of bilinguals at different ages on different intelligence tests.” School and Soc., 44: 1936, 89–90.
48.
HillH. S. “The effect of bilingualism on the measured intelligence of elementary-school children of Italian parentage.” Jour. Exper. Educ., 5: 1936–1937, 75–78.
49.
HolzingerK. J. “The statistical evaluation of nature and nurture.” Jour. Amer. Statistical Assoc., 30: 1935, 274–280.
50.
JamiesonE., and SandifordP. “The mental capacity of the southern Ontario Indians.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 19: 1928, 536–551.
51.
JonesD. C., and Carr-SaundersA. M. “The relation between intelligence and social status among orphan children.” Brit. Jour. Psychol. (Gen. Sect.), 17: 1926–1927, 343–364.
52.
JonesH. E. “Homogamy in intellectual abilities.” Amer. Jour. Social., 35: 1929, 369–382.
53.
JonesH. E., ConradH. S., and BlanchardM. B. “Environmental handicap in mental-test performance.” Univ. Calif. Publ. Psychol., 5, No. 3: 1932, 63–99.
54.
JordanA. M. “Paternal occupations and children's intelligence scores.” Jour. Applied Psychol., 17: 1933, 103–119.
55.
KlinebergO. “A study of psychological differences between ‘racial’ and national groups in Europe.” Arch. Psychol., 20: 1931, 58 pp.
56.
KlinebergO.Negro Intelligence and Selective Migration. (Columbia University Press: New York, 1935) 66 pp.
57.
LawrenceE. M. “An investigation into the relationship between intelligence and environment.” Brit. Jour. Psychol., Monog. Suppl., 16: 1931, 80 pp.
58.
LeahyA. M. “Nature-nurture and intelligence.” Genet. Psychol. Monog., 17: 1935, 235–308.
59.
LeahyA. M. “A study of adopted children as a method of investigating nature-nurture.” Jour. Amer. Statistical Assoc., 30: 1935, 281–287.
60.
LeahyA. M.Measurement of Urban Home Environment. (University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, 1936) 70 pp.
61.
LithauerD. B., and KlinebergO. “A study of the variation in IQ of a group of dependent children in institutions and foster homes.” Ped. Sem. and Jour. Genet. Psychol., 42: 1933, 236–242.
62.
LongH. H. “Test results of third-grade Negro children selected on the basis of socio-economic status, I.” Jour. Negro Educ., 4: 1935, 192–212.
63.
LorimerF., and OsbornF.Dynamics of Population; Social and Biological Significance of Changing Birth Rates in the United States. (Macmillan: New York, 1934) 461 pp.
64.
MacMurrayD. “A comparison of the intelligence of gifted children and of dull-normal children measured by the Pintner-Paterson scale, as against the Stanford-Binet scale.” Jour. Psychol., 4: 1937, 273–280.
65.
MallerJ. B. “Vital indices and their relation to psychological and social factors: a study of 310 health areas in New York City with reference to birth rate, death rate, juvenile delinquency, school progress, and intelligence.” Human Biol, 5: 1933, 94–121.
66.
MurphyG., MurphyL. B., and NewcombT. M.Experimental Social Psychology; An Interpretation of Research upon the Socialization of the Individual, (Harper and Brothers: New York and London, 1037) 1121 pp.
67.
NeffW. S. “Socio-economic status and intelligence: a critical survey.” Psychol. Bull, 35: 1938, 727–757.
68.
NewmanH. H., FreemanP. N., and HolzingerK. J.Twins: A Study of Heredity and Environment. (University of Chicago Press: Chicago, Ill., 1937) 369 pp.
69.
PatersonD. G.Minnesota Mechanical Ability Tests; the Report of a Research Investigation Subsidized by the Committee on Human Migrations of the National Research Council and Conducted in the Department of Psychology of the University of Minnesota. (The University of Minnesota Press: Minneapolis, Minn., 1930) 586 pp.
70.
PatersonD. G., and RundquistE. A. “The occupational background of feeblemindedness.” Amer. Jour. Psychol., 45: 1933, 118–124.
71.
PintnerR., and ArsenianS. “The relation of bilingualism to verbal intelligence and school adjustment.” Jour. Educ. Res., 31: 1937–1938, 255–263.
ProctorW. M. “Intelligence and length of schooling in relation to occupational levels.” School and Soc., 42: 1935, 783–786.
74.
ReymertM. L., and FringsJ. “Children's intelligence in relation to occupation of father.” Amer. Jour. Social, 41: 1935, 351–354.
75.
SangrenP. V. “Comparative validity of primary intelligence tests.” Jour. Applied Psychol., 13: 1929, 394–412.
76.
SchottE. L. “IQ changes in foster-home children.” Jour. Applied Psychol., 21: 1937, 107–112.
77.
SchwesingerG. C.Heredity and Environment: Studies in the Genesis of Psychological Characteristics. (Macmillan: New York, 1933) 484 pp.
78.
ShimbergM. E. “An investigation into the validity of norms with special reference to urban and rural groups.” Arch. Psychol., 16: 1928–1929, 84 pp.
79.
ShuttleworthF. K. “The nature versus nurture problem. Part I. Definition of the problem.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 26: 1935, 561–578.
80.
ShuttleworthF. K. “The nature versus nurture problem. Part II. The contributions of nature and nurture to individual differences in intelligence.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 26: 1935, 655–681.
81.
SimsV. M.The Measurement of Socio-Economic Status: In Cooperation with the Character Education Inquiry, Teachers College, Columbia University. (Public School Publishing Company: Bloomington, Ill., 1928) 33 pp.
82.
SirkinM. “The relation between intelligence, age, and home environment of elementary-school pupils.” School and Soc., 30: 1929, 304–308.
83.
SkeelsH. M., and FillmoreE. A. “Mental development of children from underprivileged homes.” Ped. Sem. and Jour. Genet. Psychol., 50: 1937, 427–439.
84.
SpringesN. N. “The influence of general social status on school children's behavior.” Jour. Educ. Res., 32: 1938–1939, 583–591.
85.
StokeS. M.Occupational Groups and Child Development: A Study of the Mental and Physical Growth of Children in Relation to Occupational Grouping of Parents. (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass., 1927) 92 pp. (Harvard Monographs in Education, No. 8.)
86.
StokeS. M., and LehmanH. C. “Intelligence-test scores of social and occupational groups.” School and Soc., 31: 1930, 372–377.
87.
StroudJ. B. “A study of the relation of intelligence-test score of publicschool children to the economic status of their parents,” Ped. Sem. and Jour. Genet. Psychol., 35: 1928, 105–111.
88.
TaussigF. W.Principles of Economics. (Macmillan: New York, 2d ed.,1915) Vol. II, 576 pp.
89.
TesmanL. M., BaldwinB. T., BronsonE. and Others. Genetic Studies of Genius: Vol. I. Mental and Physical Traits of a Thousand Gifted Children. (Stanford University Press: Stanford, Calif., 1925) 648 pp.
90.
TermanL. M., FreemanF. N., GatesA. I. and Others. “Nature and nurture: Their influence upon intelligence and upon achievement.” (Selected papers read at the Boston meeting of this Society.)Jour. Educ. Psychol., 191928, 361–409.
91.
TermanL. M., and MerrillM. A.Measuring Intelligence: A Guide to the Administration of the New Revised Stanford-Binet Tests of Intelligence. (Houghton Mifflin: Boston, Mass., 1937) 461 pp.
92.
ThorndikeR. L. “Note on ‘IQ changes in foster-home children’ by Emmett L. Schott.” Jour. Applied Psychol., 22: 1938, 662.
93.
Van AlstyneD.The Environment of Three-Year-Old Children: Factors Related to Intelligence and Vocabulary Tests. (Teachers College, Columbia University, Contributions to Education, No. 366, New York, 1929) 108 pp.
94.
WallisW. D. “Observations on Leahy's ‘Nature-Nurture and Intelligence.”’Ped. Sem. and Jour. Genet. Psychol., 491936, 315–324.
95.
WilliamsJ. H. “The Whittier scale for grading home conditions.” Jour. Deling., 1: 1916, 273–286.
YerkesR. M. [editor]. “Psychological examining in the United States Army.” [In] Memoirs, National Academy of Sciences, XV, Part III, Chapter 15. (Government Printing Office: Washington, D. C., 1921) pp. 819–837. See also simpler presentation of this material in Yoakum, C. S., and Yerkes, R. M. [editors]. Army Mental Tests. (Holt: New York, 1920) 303 pp. — Editor.