American Educational Research Association. “Psychological tests and their uses.” Rev. Educ. Research, 8: 1938, 318–362.
2.
AnastasiA.Differential Psychology. (Macmillan: New York, 1937) 615 pp.
3.
AndersonJ. E. “The prediction of terminal intelligence from infant and preschool tests.” (Unpublished study.)
4.
AretzC. W., GutherieM. A., and WaldmanJ. L.The Northward Trend of Nativity of Notable Leaders of Civilization. (Temple University: Philadelphia, 1931) 46 pp.
5.
BallerW. R. “A study of the present social status of a group of adults who, when they were in elementary schools, were classified as mentally deficient.” Genet. Psychol. Monog., 18: 1936, 165–244.
6.
BennettA.A Comparative Study of Subnormal Children in Elementary Schools. (Teachers College, Columbia University, Contributions to Education, No. 510: New York, 1932) 81 pp.
7.
BereM.A Comparative Study of the Mental Capacity of Children of Foreign Parentage. (Teachers College, Columbia University, Contributions to Education, No. 154; New York, 1924) 105 pp.
8.
BlairG. M.Mentally Superior and Inferior Children in the Junior and Senior High School; A Comparative Study of their Backgrounds, Interests, and Ambitions. (Teachers College, Columbia University, Contributions to Education, No. 766: New York, 1938) 87 pp.
9.
BranderT. “Existerer det ett samband mellan födelsevikt och intelligenskvot hos för tidigt födda barn? “Finsha Läk-Sällsk. Handl., 77: 1935, 69–80.
10.
BurksB. S., JensenD. W., and TermanL. M.Genetic Studies of Genius. III. The Promise of Youth. (Stanford University Press: Stanford, California, 1930) 508 pp.
11.
CarrollH. A., and HollingworthLeta S. “The systematic error of Herring-Binet in rating gifted children.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 21; 1930, 1–11.
12.
CattellJ. McK. “The origin and distribution of scientific men.” Science, 66: 1927, 513–516.
13.
CattellP. “Constant changes in the Stanford-Binet IQ.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 22: 1931, 544–550.
14.
CattellR. B.Crooked Personalities in Childhood and After. (D. Appleton-Century: New York, 1938) 215 pp.
15.
ChipmanC. E. “The constancy of the intelligence quotient in mental defectives.” Psychological Clinic, 18: 1929–1930, 103–111.
16.
CollmanR. D.The Psychogalvanic Reactions of Normal and Exceptional Children. (Teachers College, Columbia University, Contributions to Education, No. 469; New York, 1931) 88 pp.
17.
ConklinA. M.Failures of Highly Intelligent Pupils, A Study of Behavior by Means of a Control Group. (Dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia University, New York, 1939.) To be published in Teachers College, Columbia University, Contributions to Education.
18.
CoxC. M.Genetic Studies of Genius. II. The Early Mental Traits of Three Hundred Geniuses. (Stanford University Press: Stanford, California, 1926) 842 pp.
19.
ChumpB. L.Educability of Indian Children in Reservation Schools. (Southeastern State Teachers College, Contributions to Education, No. 3: Durant, Okla., 1932) 58 pp.
20.
DavenportC. B., and MinogueB. M. “The intelligence quotient and the physical quotient: Their fluctuation and inter correlation.” Human Biology, 2: 1930, 473–507.
21.
DaytonN. A. “Correlation between intelligence and physical condition in 14, 176 retarded school children.” Med. Jour. and Rec., 132: 1930, 222–224.
22.
DaytonN. A. and Others. “Mortality and expectation of life in mental deficiency in Massachusetts: Analysis of 14-year period 917–1930.” New Eng. Jour. Med., 206: 1932, 555–570; 616–631.
23.
DearbornW. P., and CattellP. “The intelligence and achievement of private-school pupils.” Jour. Educ. Psychol, 21: 1930, 197–211.
24.
DollE. A. “Social adjustment of the mentally subnormal.” Jour. Educ. Res., 28: 1934, 36–43.
25.
DollE. A. “The Vineland Social Maturity Scale.” Revised Edition.Training School Bull, 321935, 1–7.
26.
DollE. A., and McKayB. E. “The social competence of special-class children.” Jour. Educ. Res., 31: 1937, 90–106.
27.
DuffJ. F. “Children of high intelligence. a follow-up inquiry.” Brit. Jour. Psychol, 29: 1939, 413–439.
28.
DuffJ. F., and ThomsonG. “The social and geographical distribution of intelligence in Northumberland.” Brit. Jour, Psychol, 14: 1923, 192–198.
29.
DunlopF. S.Subsequent Careers of Non-Academic Boys. (Privately printed: Ottawa, Canada, 1935) 93 pp.
30.
DurostW. N.Children's Collecting Activity Related to Social Factors. (Teachers College, Columbia University, Contributions to Education, No. 535: New York, 1932) 115 pp.
31.
ElwoodM. “A descriptive study of a gifted child.” Pittsburgh Schools, 12: 1938, 169–173.
32.
FrazerJ. A. (See Reference 81a.)
33.
GaltonF.Hereditary Genius. (Macmillan: London, 1869 and 1914) 379 pp.
34.
GarthT. H.Race Psychology. (Whittlesey House, McGraw-Hill: New York, 1931) 260 pp.
35.
GoldbergS. “A clinical study of K., IQ 196.” Jour. Applied Psychol, 18: 1934, 550–560.
36.
GoodenoughF. L. “Racial differences in the intelligence of school children.” Jour. Exper. Psychol., 9: 1926, 388–397.
37.
GoodenoughF. L. “The relation of the intelligence of preschool children to the occupation of their fathers.” Amer. Jour. Psychol, 40: 1928, 284–302.
38.
GordonH.Mental and Scholastic Tests among Retarded Children. (Board of Education, Education Pamphlet No. 44: London, 1923) 92 pp.
39.
HaggertyM. E. “The incidence of undesirable behavior in public-school children.” Jour. Educ. Res., 12: 1925, 102–122.
40.
HaggertyM. E., and NashH. B. “Mental capacity of children and paternal occupation.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 15: 1924, 559–572.
41.
HartshorneH., and MayM.Studies in Deceit. (Macmillan: New York, 1928. 2 vols.) 414, 306 pp.
42.
Harvard College. “The development of the Harvard national scholarship plan.” (Report of the Dean of Harvard College to the President of the University for the Academic Year, 1936–1937)
43.
HealyW., and BronnerA. F.New Light on Delinquency and its Treatment. (Yale University Press: New Haven, Conn., 1936) 226 pp.
44.
HeinisH. “A personal constant.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 17: 1926, 163–186.
45.
HildenA. H. “A comparative study of the intelligence quotient and Heinis’ personal constant.” Jour. Applied Psychol., 17: 1933, 355–375.
46.
HollingworthH. L.Mental Growth and Decline. (D. Appleton-Century: New York, 1927) 396 pp.
47.
HollingworthL. S. “Differential action upon the sexes of forces that tend to segregate the feebleminded.” Jour. Abnorm. and Soc. Psychol., 17: 1922–1923, 35–57.
48.
HollingworthL. S. “Musical sensitivity of children who test above 135 IQ. (Stanford-Binet).” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 17: 1926, 95–109.
49.
HollingworthL. S. “Do intellectually gifted children grow toward mediocrity in stature? “Ped. Sem., and Jour. Genet. Psychol., 37: 1930, 345–360.
50.
HollingworthL. S. “The child of very superior intelligence as a special problem in social adjustment.” Mental Hygiene, 15: 1931, 3–16.
51.
HollingworthL. S. “The comparative beauty of the faces of highly intelligent adolescents.” Ped. Sem., and Jour. Genet. Psychol., 47: 1935, 268–281.
52.
HollingworthL. S. “Development of personality in highly intelligent children.” Yearbook Nat. Element. School Prin., 15: 1936, 272–281.
53.
HollingworthL. S. “Some suggestions on scholarships.” Ind. Jour. Columbia Univ., 4: 1936, 4.
54.
HollingworthL. S., and CobbM. V. “Children clustering at 165 IQ and children clustering at 146 IQ compared for three years in achievement.” Twenty-Seventh Yearbook, Part II, of this Society, 1928, 3–33.
55.
HollingworthL. S., and KaunitzR. M. “The centile status of gifted children at maturity.” Ped. Sem., and Jour. Genet. Psychol., 45: 1934, 106–120.
56.
HollingworthL. S., and RustM. M. “Application of the Bernreuter inventory of personality to highly intelligent adolescents.” Jour. Psychol., 4: 1937, 287–293.
57.
HonzikM. P. “The constancy of mental test performance during the preschool period.” Ped. Sem., and Jour. Genet. Psychol., 52: 1938, 285–302.
58.
HonzikM. P., and JonesH. E. “Mental-physical relationships during the preschool period.” Jour. Exper. Educ., 6: 1937–1938, 139–146.
59.
KeysN., and NathanJ. M. “Occupations for the mentally handicapped.” Jour. Applied Psychol., 16: 1932, 497–511.
60.
KlinebergO.Negro Intelligence and Selective Migration. (Columbia University Press: New York, 1935) 66 pp.
61.
KuhlmannF. “Results of repeated mental reexaminations of 639 feebleminded over a period of ten years.” Jour. Applied Psychol., 5: 1921, 195–224.
62.
LamsonE. E.A Study of Young Gifted Children in Senior High School (Teachers College, Columbia University, Contributions to Education, No. 424: New York, 1930) 117 pp.
63.
LamsonE. E. “To what extent are intelligence quotients increased by children who participate in a rich vital school curriculum? “Jour. Educ. Psychol., 29: 1938, 67–70.
64.
LaycockS. R. “Adjustments of superior and inferior school children.” Jour. Soc. Psychol., 4: 1933, 353–366.
65.
LincolnE. A. “The Stanford-Binet IQ changes of superior children.” School and Soc., 41: 1935, 519–520.
66.
LincolnE. A. “A study of changes in the intelligence quotients of superior children.” Jour. Educ. Research, 29: 1935, 272–275.
67.
LorgeI., and HollingworthL. S. “Adult status of highly intelligent children.” Ped. Sem., and Jour. Genet. Psychol., 49: 1936, 215–226.
68.
MacMurrayD. “A comparison of the intelligence of gifted children and of dull-normal children measured by the Pintner-Paterson Scale, as against the Stanford-Binet Scale.” Jour. Psychol., 4: 1937, 273–280.
69.
McElweeE. W. “Seymour, a boy with 192 IQ.” Jour. Juv. Research, 18: 1934, 28–35.
70.
McNemarQ., and TermanL. M. “Sex differences in variational tendency.” Genet. Psychol. Monog., 18: 1936, 1–66.
71.
MonahanJ. E., and HollingworthL. S. “The neuro-muscular capacity of children who test above 135 IQ.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 18: 1927, 88–96.
72.
MorrisonB. M.A Study of the Major Emotions in Persons of Defective Intelligence. (University of California Press: Berkeley, 1924. University of California publications in psychology, Vol. 3, No. 3) 145 pp.
73.
National Committee on Coordination in Secondary Education. “Education of Gifted Children in Secondary Schools. Report adopted at Cleveland, Feb. 27, 1939.” (Accepted for publication in the Jour. of Educ. Sociology, Vol. 12.) (74 National Education Association of the U. S. A., Committee on Social-Economic Goals of America. Implications of Social-Economic Goals for Education. (Washington, D. C, 1937) 126 pp.
74.
NeffW. S. “Socioeconomic status and intelligence: a critical survey.” Psycho. Bull, 35: 1938, 727–757.
75.
NevillE. M. “Brilliant children: with special reference to their particular difficulties.” Brit. Jour. Educ. Psychol., 7: 1937, 247–258.
76.
PatersonD. G.Physique and Intellect. (D. Appleton-Century: New York, 1930) 304 pp.
77.
PritchardM. C. and Others. “A comparison of the two Stanford Revisions of the Binet-Simon Scale as respects validity for high deviates.” (Unpublished study.)
78.
RappaportM. E. “The selection of the intelligence quotient divisor for clinical cases between fourteen and nineteen years of age.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 25: 1934, 101–114.
79.
RegensburgJ. “Studies of educational success and failure in supernormal children.” Arch. Psychol., 20: 1931, 1–150.
80.
ReynoldsM. M.Negativism of Preschool Children. (Teachers College, Columbia University, Contributions to Education, No. 288, New York, 1928) 126 pp.
81.
RussellB.Icarus: Or The Future of Science. (Dutton: New York, 1926) 64 pp.
82.
RustM. M.The Effect of Resistance on the Intelligence Scores of Young Children. (Teachers College, Columbia University, Child Development Monographs, No. 6, New York, 1931) 80 pp.
83.
RustM. M. “Factors influencing the validity of mental tests at the nursery-school age.” Proceedingsofthe National Association for Nursery Education, Toronto, Ontario, 1933, 77–81.
84.
Scottish Council for Research in Education.The Intelligence of Scottish Children. (University of London Press: London, 1933) 155 pp.
85.
SimmonsR. McK.A Study of a Group of Children of Exceptionally High Intelligence Quotient in Situations Partaking of the Nature of Suggestion. (Dissertation, Teachers College, Columbia UniversityNew York, 1938. To be published in Teachers College, Columbia University, Contributions to Education) 148 pp.
86.
StoddardG. D. “Child development: a new approach to education.” School and Soc.49: 1939, 33–38.
87.
StokeS. M., and LehmanH. C. [The details of this reference unfortunately could not be supplied for inclusion here. — Ed.]
88.
StrongE. K.Jr.Vocational Aptitudes of Second-Generation Japanese in the United States. (Stanford University Press: Stanford, Calif., 1933) 183 pp.
89.
TeagardenF. L. “Change of environment and the IQ.” Jour. Applied Psychol., 1927, 11, 289–296.
90.
TermanL. M.The Measurement of Intelligence: An Explanation of and a Complete Guide for the Use of the Stanford Revision and Extension of the Binet-Simon Intelligence Scale. (Houghton Mifflin Co.: Boston, 1916) 362 pp.
91.
TermanL. M.Genetic Studies of Genius. Vol I. Mental and Physical Traits of a Thousand Gifted Children. (Stanford University Press: Stanford, Calif., 1925) 648 pp.
92.
ThorndikeE. L. “How may we improve the selection, training, and life-work of leaders?” Teachers College Record, 40: 1939, 593–605.
93.
ThorndikeE. L. and Others. The Measurement of Intelligence. (Teachers College, Columbia University: New York, 1930) 616 pp.
94.
University of the State of New York.Organizations of Special Classes for Subnormal Children. (University of the State of New York Press: Albany, 1930) 9 pp.
95.
Vineland Laboratory. “Bibliographic notes: Publications on the Vine-land Social Maturity Scale.” Training School Bull., 35: 1938, 57–59.
96.
VisherS. S. “The comparative rank of the American states.” Amer. Jour. Soc., 36: 1931, 735–757.
97.
VisherS. S. “Where our notables came from.” Scientific Mouthly, 45: 1937, 172–177.
98.
WarrenH. C. (ed.). Dictionary of Psychology. (Houghton Mifflin: Boston, 1934) 371 pp.
99.
WellmanB. L., and StoddardG. D. “The IQ: a problem in social construction.” Social Frontier5: 1939, 151–152.
100.
WellmanB. L. “Our changing concept of intelligence.” Jour. Consult. Psychol., 2: 1938, 97–107.
101.
WheelerL. R. “A comparative study of the physical growth of dull children.” Jour. Educ. Research, 20: 1929, 273–282.
102.
WittyP. A.A Study of One Hundred Gifted Children. (State Teachers College Studies in Education, Vol. 1, No. 13: Emporia, Kansas, 1930) 44 pp.
103.
WittyP. A. “The relative frequency of gifted boys and girls in the secondary school.” Educ. Admin. and Superv., 20: 1934, 606–612.
104.
WittyP. A., and JenkinsM. D. “The case of ‘B’ — a gifted Negro girl.” Jour. Soc. Psychol., 6: 1935, 117–124.
105.
WittyP. A., and JenkinsM. D. “Intra-race testing and Negro intelligence.” Jour. Psychol., 1: 1936, 179–192.
106.
WittyP. A., and LehmanH. C. “The play behavior of fifty gifted children.” Jour. Educ. Psychol., 18: 1927, 259–265.