The Work of the Committee of Seven on Grade–Placement in Arithmetic

Beall Ross H. An Individual Instruction Unit in Long Division. (Unpublished doctor's dissertation. Iowa City: The University of Iowa, 1932. 221 pp. and appendices)

Brownell William A. “A critique of the Committee of Seven's investigations on the grade placement of arithmetic topics.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 38: March, 1938, 495–508.

Brownell William A. “Readiness and the arithmetic curriculum.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 38: January, 1938, 344–354.

Chandler Turner C. “Investigations in the placement of arithmetic topics.” Illinois Teacher, 25: April, 1937, 240–241.

Committee of Seven. Classified Problems in Arithmetic. (Mimeographed book of problems. Winnetka Educational Press Winnetka, Illinois, 1934)

Committee of Seven. Meaning of Fractions Textbook. (Published as Book VIII of the Washburne Individual Arithmetics. World Book Company, 1930. Also sold by Winnetka Educational Press, Winnetka, Illinois)

Committee of Seven. “Preliminary report of the Sub-Committee on problemsolving.” (Research Department, Winnetka Public Schools, Winnetka, Illinois, 1936)

Committee of Seven. Teaching of Linear Measure, Square Measure, and Time: Results of Experiments and Recommendations for Curricular Placement. (Winnetka Educational Press Winnetka, Illinois, 1938)

Committee of Seven. Tests in the Foundations Necessary for the Various Arithmetic Processes. (Mimeographed book of tests. Winnetka Educational Press Winnetka, Illinois, 1933)

Gillet Harry O. “Placement of arithmetic topics.” Journal of the National Educational Association, 20: June, 1931, 199–200.

Grossnickle Foster E. “An experiment with two methods of estimation of the quotient.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 37: May, 1937, 668–677.

Harap Henry L. , and Mapes Charlotte E. “Learning the fundamentals in an activity curriculum.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 34: March, 1934, 515–525.

Harap Henry L. , and Mapes Charlotte E. “The learning of decimals in an arithmetic activity program.” Jour. of Educ. Research, 29: May, 1936, 686–693.

Mapes Charlotte E. , and Harap Henry L. Six Activity Units in Fractions. (Mimeographed Curriculum Laboratory Bulletin 33. Cleveland: Western Reserve University, 1933. 19 pp.)

Osborne Raymond W. , and Gillet Harry O. “Mental age is important factor in teaching arithmetic.” The Nation's Schools, 12: July, 1933, 19–24.

Osborne Raymond W. “Report of the Committee of Seven: results of further investigations of the placement of arithmetic topics.” (Research Dept., Winnetka Public Schools: mimeographed report for meeting of the Northern Illinois Conference on Supervision, at DeKalb, on May 8, 1931)

Raths Louis E. “Grade-placement of addition and subtraction of fractions.” Educ. Research Bulletin, 11: January 20, 1932, 29–38. (Ohio State University)

Raths Louis E. “The last word: A reply to Mr. Washburne's rebuttal.” Educ. Research Bulletin, 11: November 23, 1932, 409–410. (Ohio State University)

Raths Louis E. “Once again: A reply to Mr. Washburne's criticism.” Educ. Research Bulletin, 11: November 23, 1932, 401–405. (Ohio State University)

Storm Howard . “How the Committee of Seven can help the teacher.” Illinois Teacher, 23: April, 1935, 253–254.

Washburne Carleton . Adjusting the School to the Child. (Yonkers, N. Y.: World Book Company, 1932) 32 –48.

Washburne Carleton . “Arithmetic grade-placement investigations of the Committee of Seven: A reply to Louis E. Raths.” Educ. Research Bulletin, 11: November 23, 1932, 396–410. (Ohio State University)

Washburne Carleton . “Comparison of two methods of teaching pupils to apply the mechanics of arithmetic to the solution of problems.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 27: June, 1927, 758–767.

Washburne Carleton . “Grade-placement of arithmetic topics.” TwentyNinth Yearbook ofthis Society, 1930, 641–670.

Washburne Carleton . “Mental age and the arithmetic curriculum — A summary of the Committee of Seven grade-placement investigations to date.” Jour. of Educ. Research, 23: March, 1931, 210–231.

Washburne Carleton . “One reason children fail in arithmetic — A Committee of Seven investigation.” Progressive Education, 9: March, 1932, 215–223.

Washburne Carleton , and Voas William H. “Rebuttal.” Educational Research Bulletin, 11: November 23, 1932, 405–409. (Ohio State University)

Washburne Carleton . “Reply to Brownell's critique of the Committee of Seven's investigations.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 39: February, 1939.

Washburne Carleton . “Ripeness.” Progressive Education, 13: February, 1936, 125–130.

Washburne Carleton . “Social practices in arithmetic fundamentals.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 27: September, 1926, 60–66.

Washburne Carleton , and Osborne Raymond . “Solving arithmetic problems.” Part I. Elem. Sch. Jour., 27: November, 1926, 219–226; Part II, ibid., 27 December, 1926, 296-304.

Washburne Carleton . “Teaching of linear measure, square measure, and time.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 39: March, 1939.

Washburne Carleton , and Morphett Mabel Vogel . “Unfamiliar situations as a difficulty in solving arithmetic problems.” (To supplement study reported in Elem. Sch. Jour. for November, 1926.) Jour. of Educ. Research, 18 October, 1928, 220–224.

Washburne Carleton . “The values, limitations, and applications of the findings of the Committee of Seven.” Jour. of Educ. Research, 29: May, 1936, 694–707.

Washburne Carleton . “When should we teach arithmetic? —A Committee of Seven investigation.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 28: May, 1928, 659–665.

Washburne Carleton . “Why is arithmetic a bugbear?” New Era, 15: January, 1934, 17–23; also Illinois Teacher, 23: November, 1934, 69-71.