BallardP. B. “The teaching of mathematics in London public elementary schools. the teaching of mathematics in the United Kingdom,” Part I, pp. 3–20. Board of Education Report on Educational Subjects. Vol. XXVI. (London: His Majesty's Stationery Office, 1912)
2.
BarnesE., and YoungB.Children and Architecture. (New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1932)
3.
BenezetL. P. “The story of an experiment.” Jour. of the Nat. Education Assoc, 24: 241–244, 301–303; 25: 7–8.
4.
BrownellW. A. “Readiness and the arithmetic curriculum.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 38: 34–355.
5.
BrownellW. A.The Development of Children's Number Ideas in the Primary Grades. Supplementary Educational Monograph, No. 35. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1928)
6.
BrownellW. A., and ChazalCharlotte. “The effect of premature drill on third-grade arithmetic.” Jour. of Educ. Research, 29: 17–29.
7.
BruecknerL. J. “Intercorrelations of arithmetical abilities.” Jour. of Experimental Educ., 3: 42–44.
8.
BruecknerL. J.Diagnostic and Remedial Teaching in Arithmetic (Philadelphia: Winston Company, 1930)
9.
BruecknerL. J. “Social problems as a basis for a vitalized arithmetic curriculum.” Jour. of Experimental Educ, 1: 320–323.
10.
BuckinghamB. R., and MacLatchyJ. “The Number Abilities of Children When They Enter the First Grade.” Twenty-Ninth Yearbookofthis Society, 1930, 473–524.
11.
BuckinghamG. E. and Others. Diagnostic and Remedial Teaching in First-Year Algebra. (Evanston, Illinois: Northwestern University, 1933)
12.
BuswellG. T.The Vocabulary of Arithmetic Supplementary Educational Monograph, No. 28. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1931)
13.
BuswellG. T., and JohnL.Diagnostic Studies in Arithmetic. Supple mentary Educational Monograph, No. 30. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1926)
14.
CadwellA. G.Arithmetic Activities. (Cleveland: Board of Education, 1931)
15.
ClappF.The Number Combinations, Their Relative Difficulty, and the Frequency of Their Appearance in Textbooks. (Madison, Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin, 1924)
16.
“Educational Diagnosis.”Thirty-Fourth Yearbook of this Society, 1935, 270–271.
17.
GrossnickleF. “Concepts in social arithmetic for the eighth-grade level.” Jour. of Educ. Research, 30: 475–488.
18.
GrossnickleF. “An experiment with two methods of estimation of the quotient.” Elem. Sch. Jour.37: 668–677.
19.
GundersonA. “The nature and content of arithmetic in readers in Grades and 2.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 36: 527–540.
20.
GundlachW. B. “Ability of high-school students in common fractions.” Jour. of Educ. Research, 29: 347–554.
21.
HannaP. “Opportunities for the Use of Arithmetic in an Activity Program.” Chapter 5 in “The Teaching of Arithmetic,” Tenth Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (New York: Bureau of Publications, Teachers College, Columbia University, 1935)
22.
HarapH. L., and MapesE. “The learning of decimals in an arithmetic activity program.” Jour. of Educ. Research, 29: 686–693.
23.
HarapH. L., and MapesE. “Learning the fundamentals in an activity curriculum.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 34: 515–526.
24.
HildrethG. “Number readiness and progress in arithmetic.” Jour. of Experimental Educ., 4: 1–6.
25.
HughesA.A Unit of Work: Carrying the Mail. (New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1933)
26.
JohnL. “The effect of using the long division form in teaching division by one-digit numbers.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 30: 675–692.
27.
JuddC. H.Psychological Analysis of the Fundamentals of Arithmetic. (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1927)
28.
KnightF. B., and BehrensM.Learning the 100 Addition Combinations and the 100 Subtraction Combinations. (New York: Longmans, Green and Company, 1928)
29.
MacGregorG.Achievement Tests in the Primary School. (Publication of the Scottish Council for Research in Education, VI. London: University of London Press, Ltd., 1934)
30.
MatthewsC. O.The Grade Placement of Materials in the Social Studies. Contributions to Education, No. 241. (New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1926)
NoremG. M., and KnightF. B. “The Learning of the 100 Multiplication Combinations.” In Twenty-Ninth Yearbook of this Society, 1930.
33.
PolkinghorneA. “Young children and fractions.” Childhood Education, 11: 354–358.
34.
PresseyL. C., and MooreW. S. “Growth of mathematical vocabulary from the third grade through high school.” School Review, 40: 449–454.
35.
ReidFlorence. “Incidental number situations in the first grade.” Jour. of Educ. Research, 30: 36–43.
36.
RuchG. M. “The relative difficulty of the 100 multiplication combinations with special reference to textbook construction.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 32: 369–377.
37.
SchaeferG. “An informational unit on time.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 38: 114–117.
38.
SmithNila B. “An investigation of the uses of number in the out-of-school life of first-grade children.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 24: 621–626.
39.
SteelH. J. “Time activity analysis technique applied to the supervision of arithmetic.” “Scientific Method in Supervision.” Second Yearbook of the National Conference on Educational Method, 1929, 33–145.
40.
TaylorJ. S. “Omitting arithmetic in the first year.” Educ. Admin. and Superv., 2: 87–93.
41.
TermanL. M., and MerrillMaud. Measuring Intelligence. (Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company, 1937)
42.
WahlstromEbba. “The computational arithmetic of social experiences of third-grade children.” Jour. of Educ. Research, 30: 124–129.
43.
WarrenDorothy E., and BurtonW. H. “Knowledge of simple business practices possessed by intermediate-grade pupils.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 35: 511–516.
44.
WashburneC. W. “The values, limitations, and applications of the findings of the Committee of Seven.” Jour. of Educ. Research, 29: 694–707.
45.
WashburneC. W. “When should we teach arithmetic? A Committee of Seven investigation.” Elem. Sch. Jour., 28: 659–665.
46.
WashburneC. W. “Mental age and the arithmetic curriculum: A summary of the Committee of Seven grade-placement investigations to date.” Jour. of Educ. Research, 23: 210–231.
47.
WashburneC. W., and VogelMabel. “Are any number combinations inherently difficult?” Jour. of Educ. Research, April, 1928.
48.
WilsonG. M. “New standards in arithmetic.” Jour. of Educ. Research, 22: 351–360.
49.
WilsonG. M., and DalyrympleC. O. “Useful fractions.” Jour. of Educ. Research, 30: 341–347.
50.
WoodyC. “The nature and amount of arithmetic in types of reading material for the elementary school.” Educational Outlook, 6: 199–217.
51.
WoodyC. “The arithmetical backgrounds of young children.” Jour. of Educ. Research, 30: 188–201.