Educational Policies Commission. The Unique Function of Education in American Democracy. (National Education Association and the Department of Superintendence: Washington, 1937)
2.
EeatherstoneW. B. “New Schools for a New Day.” Pp. 48–74, in EverettSamuel (editor), A Challenge to Secondary Education. (D. Appleton-Century Company: New York, 1935)
3.
HandH. C. “The reciprocal relationship of curriculum and guidance.” California Journal of Secondary Education, 12: March, 1937, 148–151.
4.
HandH.C., and CarleyV. A. “When shall we have a sound guidance program in the secondary school?” California Journal of Secondary Education, 6: May, 1935, 359–365.
5.
HarapH. H. “Curriculum and Guidance.” (In Purdue University, Proceedings of the Second Annual Guidance Conference.1936, 29–37)
6.
HarapHenry (Chairman). The Changing Curriculum. (D. Appleton-Century Company: New York, 1937. Joint yearbook of the Department of Supervisors and Directors of Instruction, N. E. A., and the Society for Curriculum Study)
7.
McConnCharles Maxwell. “Working Philosophy of Guidance.” (In Purdue University, Proceedings of the Second Annual Guidance Conference.1936, 7–22)
8.
National Resources Committee.Technological Trends and National Policy. (United States Government Printing Office: Washington, 1937)
9.
ProctorWilliam Martin. “The task of guidance in a modern school.” California Journal of Secondary Education, 12: March, 1937, 142–147.
10.
NortonJohn K., and NortonMargaret A.Foundations of Curriculum
