In early childhood, using play as a pedagogical tool can be a way to ensure children have access to an education that involves worthwhile opportunities to learn that are ripe with joy and aim toward fostering depth of knowledges. There are numerous possibilities for the types of play a classroom can offer children, so when a school or district decides to commit to play, there are many decisions to make that ultimately shape how play is both understood and experienced by teachers, children, and their families.
Research Question:
This study examines a district that was undergoing a complete overhaul of its prekindergarten (PreK) programming policies, with a goal of becoming an innovative, play-based program. It aims to understand how a new vision for play would be taken up in the district by exploring the question: How do stakeholders understand and respond to a new play-based PreK program?
Research Design:
This is a qualitative, purposive case study that involved an examination of semistructured interviews, ethnographic classroom observations, and classroom artifacts. The semistructured interviews were conducted with teachers, paraprofessionals, parents, and administrators.
Conclusions/Recommendations:
This study shows how common early childhood ideals, historical practices, and current reform efforts all contribute to the possibilities for the roles play can serve within a school setting. As play practices are designed and enacted, it is essential to have clear ideas about how play is defined, the goals for play, teachers’ roles within play, and the ways in which already present policies as well as early childhood tenets connect with a district’s vision for play.
AntinT. M.ConstantineN. A.HuntG. (2015). Conflicting discourses in qualitative research: The search for divergent data within cases. Field Methods, 27(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X14549926
BrownC. P.BarryD. P.KuD. H.EnglehardtJ. (2021). How education stakeholders made sense of the types of learning experiences children are and should be having in kindergarten and why. Early Education and Development, 32(2), 291–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2020.1750292
4.
CoburnC. E. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904805276143
5.
CoburnC. E. (2006). Framing the problem of reading instruction: Using frame analysis to uncover the microprocesses of policy implementation. American Educational Research Journal, 43(3), 343–349. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312043003343
6.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
7.
EarlyD. M.IrukaI. U.RitchieS.BarbarinO. A.WinnD. M. C.CrawfordG. M.FrameP. M.CliffordR. M.BurchinalM.HowesC.BryantD. M.PiantaR. C. (2010). How do pre-kindergarteners spend their time? Gender, ethnicity, and income as predictors of experiences in pre-kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 25(2), 177–193https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2009.10.003
8.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I.ShawL. L. (2011). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.
9.
FessehaE.PyleA. (2016). Conceptualising play-based learning from kindergarten teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Early Years Education, 24(3), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2016.1174105
10.
FisherK. R.Hirsh-PasekK.GolinkoffR. M.GryfeS. G. (2008). Conceptual split? Parents’ and experts’ perceptions of play in the 21st century. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 305–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2008.04.006
11.
GordonC. (2019). Race in the heartland. Economic Policy Institute.
12.
GraueM. B.WhyteK.DelaneyK. (2014) Fostering culturally and developmentally responsive teaching through improvisational practice. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 35(4), 297–317.
13.
GraueM. B.WhyteK.KarabonA. (2015). The power of improvisational teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48(1), 13–21.
Hassinger-DasB.ToubT. S.ZoshJ. M.MichnickJ.GolinkoffR.Hirsh-PasekK. (2017). More than just fun: A place for games in playful learning/Más que diversión: El lugar de los juegos reglados en el aprendizaje lúdico. Journal for the Study of Education and Development, 40(2), 191–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/02103702.2017.129268
16.
HatchJ. A. (2005). Teaching in the new kindergarten. United Nations.
17.
Hirsh-PasekK.GolinkoffR. M.BerkL. E.SingerD. (2009). A mandate for playful learning in preschool: Applying the scientific evidence. Oxford University Press.
18.
Hirsh-PasekK.ZoshJ. M.GolinkoffR. M.GrayJ. H.RobbM. B.KaufmanJ. (2015). Putting education in “educational” apps: Lessons from the science of learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/152910061556972
19.
IrukaI. U.Gardner-NeblettN.TelferN. A.Ibekwe-OkaforN.CurentonS. M.SimsJ.NeblettE. W. (2022). Effects of racism on child development: Advancing antiracist developmental science. Annual Review of Developmental Psychology, 4(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-devpsych-121020-031339
20.
IsenbergJ. P.QuisenberryN. (2002). A position paper of the Association for Childhood Education International PLAY: Essential for all children. Childhood Education, 79(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2002.10522763
21.
JonesE.ReynoldsG. (2015). The play’s the thing: Teachers’ roles in children's play. Teachers College Press.
KuhL. P. (Ed.). (2014). Thinking critically about environments for young children: Bridging theory and practice. Teachers College Press.
24.
LesperanceM. (2021). Timing is everything: Understanding the importance of timing, length, and sequence of activities. Teaching Young Children, 14(4), 16–18.
25.
LittleM. H.Cohen-VogelL. (2016). Too much too soon? An analysis of the discourses used by policy advocates in the debate over kindergarten. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(106), 1–38.
26.
LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.
27.
LobmanC. L. (2006). Improvisation: An analytic tool for examining teacher–child interactions in the early childhood classroom. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 21(4), 455–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2006.09.004
28.
LombardiM. M.OblingerD. G. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause Learning Initiative, 1(2007), 1–12.
29.
LynchM. (2015). More play, please: The perspective of kindergarten teachers on play in the classroom. American Journal of Play, 7(3), 347–370.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass.
32.
MillerE.AlmonJ. (2009). Crisis in the kindergarten: Why children need to play in school. Alliance for Childhood.
33.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2022). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (4th ed.). NAEYC.
34.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Sage.
PyleA.DannielsE. (2017). A continuum of play-based learning: The role of the teacher in play-based pedagogy and the fear of hijacking play. Early Education and Development, 28(3), 274–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2016.1220771
37.
PyleA.DeLucaC. (2017). Assessment in play-based kindergarten classrooms: An empirical study of teacher perspectives and practices. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(5), 457–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2015.1118005
38.
PyleA.DeLucaC.DannielsE. (2017). A scoping review of research on play-based pedagogies in kindergarten education. Review of Education, 5(3), 311–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/rev3.3097
39.
PyleA.PriolettaJ.PoliszczukD. (2018). The play-literacy interface in full-day kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46, 117–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0852-z
40.
PyleA.PyleM. A.PriolettaJ.AlacaB. (2020). Portrayals of play-based learning: Misalignments among public discourse, classroom realities, and research. American Journal of Play, 13(1), 53–86.
41.
RussellJ. L. (2011). From child’s garden to academic press: The role of shifting institutional logics in redefining kindergarten education. American Educational Research Journal, 48(2), 236–267. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831210372135
42.
SaldañaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Sage.
43.
SchwandtT. A.LincolnY. S.GubaE. G. (2007). Judging interpretations: But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 114, 11–25.
44.
ScottW. R. (2014). Institutions and organizations: Ideas, interests, and identities. Sage.
45.
Souto-ManningM. (2017). Is play a privilege or a right? And what’s our responsibility? On the role of play for equity in early childhood education. Early Child Development and Care, 187(5–6), 785–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2016.1266588
46.
SpillaneJ. P.ReiserB. J.ReimerT. (2002). Policy implementation and cognition: Reframing and refocusing implementation research. Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 387–431. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543072003387
47.
StahlN. A.KingJ. R. (2020). Expanding approaches for research: Understanding and using trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Developmental Education, 44(1), 26–28.
48.
SteinA.CoburnC. E. (2023). Instructional policy from pre-K to third grade: The challenges of fostering alignment and continuity in two school districts. Educational Policy, 37(3), 840–872. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904821105844
49.
TaylorM. E.BoyerW. (2020). Play-based learning: Evidence-based research to improve children’s learning experiences in the kindergarten classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(2), 127–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00989-7
50.
ValentinoR. (2018). Will public pre-K really close achievement gaps? Gaps in prekindergarten quality between students and across states. American Educational Research Journal, 55(1), 79–116. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831217732000
51.
VartuliS.RohsJ. (2006). Conceptual organizers of early childhood curriculum content. Early Childhood Education Journal, 33(4), 231–237.
52.
VERBI Software. (2021). MAXQDA 2022 [computer software]. VERBI Software. https://www.maxqda.com
53.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations (Vol. 3). Sage.
54.
WengerE. (1999). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge University Press.
55.
WhyteK. L.CoburnC. E. (2022). Understanding kindergarten readiness. The Elementary School Journal, 123(2), 344–361.
56.
YaremychH. E.PerskyS. (2023). Recruiting fathers for parenting research: An evaluation of eight recruitment methods and an exploration of fathers’ motivations for participation. Parenting, 23(1), 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2022.2036940
57.
ZhulamanovaI.RaisorJ. (2020). Early childhood preservice teachers’ perceptions on children’s play. International Online Journal of Primary Education, 9(2), 128–143.
58.
ZoshJ. M.Hirsh-PasekK.HopkinsE. J.JensenH.LiuC.NealeD.SolisS. L.WhitebreadD. (2018). Accessing the inaccessible: Redefining play as a spectrum. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1124. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01124
