Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background/Context:

Special educators must be prepared to provide expert instruction and collaborate with a range of professionals to provide students with disabilities with equitable and inclusive educational opportunities. Teacher preparation is an important part of providing special education teacher candidates (SETCs) with robust opportunities to learn (OTL) both the instructional and collaborate aspects of their role.

Purpose/Research Questions:

In this paper, we describe SETCs’ OTL about their instructional and collaborative roles, addressing the following research questions: (1) To what extent do SETCs report OTL instructional and collaborative practices? (2) Are there significant differences in their experiences of OTL instructional and collaborative practices? (3) In what ways are SETCs’ reported OTL instructional practice distinct from their OTL collaborative practice?

Research Design:

We used a sequential mixed explanatory design to fulfill our research aim. In Phase 1, we drew on survey data from 154 SETCs across six traditional teacher preparation programs about their OTL instructional and collaborative practice. To explore differences identified in Phase 1 and to better understand SETCs’ OTL in teacher preparation, in Phase 2 we analyzed interview data from 20 SETCs from the survey sample. Coding was informed by Grossman and colleagues’ (2009) pedagogies of practice framework.

Conclusions/Recommendations:

Quantitative analyses revealed SETCs experienced more extensive OTL about instructional practice than collaborative practice. Qualitative analyses underscored that, whereas OTL instructional practice reflected the three elements of pedagogies of practice (i.e., representations, decompositions, and approximations of practice), OTL collaborative practice lacked structure and specificity. Especially given the struggles novice special educators report regarding collaboration in their first years in the field, findings offer valuable insight into the preparation of special educators for the complex, coordinated, and collaborative work necessary to support inclusive education and improved outcomes for students with disabilities.

Keywords

teacher preparation special education pedagogy instruction collaboration

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aceves

T. C.

Kennedy

M. J.

(2024, Feb.). High-leverage practices for students with disabilities (2nd ed.). Council for Exceptional Children and CEEDAR Center.

Alborno

(2022). Child case studies: Leading the way to inclusion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 111. Article 103618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103618

American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. (2020, Sept.). Strategies that promote diversity, equity, and inclusion in educator preparation. Author. https://www.aacteconnect360.org/communities/communityhome/librarydocuments/viewdocument?DocumentKey=a786dd86-da75-4849-aba0-df472b0065c5

Annamma

Morrison

(2018). DisCrit classroom ecology: Using praxis to dismantle dysfunctional education ecologies. Teaching and Teacher Education, 73, 70–80.

Archer

A. L.

Hughes

C. A.

(2011). Explicit instruction: Effective & efficient teaching. Guilford Press.

Benedict

Holdheide

Brownell

M. T.

Foley

A. M.

(2016). Learning to teach: Practice-based preparation in teacher education. Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability and Reform (CEEDAR). https://ceedar.education.ufl.edu/document/learning-to-teach-practice-based-preparation-in-teacher-education/

Berlin

Youngs

Cohen

(2021). How elementary teaching candidates’ learning opportunities are associated with their knowledge, self-efficacy, and beliefs. Teachers College Record, 123. Article 070302. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812112300702

Billingsley

B. S.

Bettini

E. A.

Williams

T. O.

(2017). Teacher racial/ethnic diversity: Distribution of special and general educators of color across schools. Remedial and Special Education, 40(4), 199–212. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517733047

Boveda

Annamma

S. A.

(2023). Beyond making a statement: An intersectional framing of the power and possibilities of positioning. Educational Researcher, 52(5), 306–314. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X231167149

10.

Boyd

Lankford

Loeb

Rockoff

Wyckoff

(2008). The narrowing gap in New York City teacher qualifications and its implications for student achievement in high poverty schools. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 27, 793–818. https://doi.org/10.3386/w14021

11.

Brownell

M. T.

Benedict

A. E.

Leko

M. M.

Peyton

Pua

Richards-Tutor

(2019). A continuum of pedagogies for preparing teachers to use high-leverage practices. Remedial and Special Education, 40(6), 338v355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932518824990

12.

Brownell

M. T.

Sindelar

P. T.

Kiely

M. T.

Danielson

L. C.

(2010). Special education teacher quality and preparation: Exposing foundations, constructing a new model. Exceptional Children, 76, 357–377. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600307

13.

CAST. (2024). Universal design for learning guidelines, version 3.0. https://udlguidelines.cast.org

14.

Cohen

Berlin

(2020). What constitutes an “opportunity to learn” in teacher preparation? Journal of Teacher Education, 71(4), 434–448.

15.

Cohen

Wong

V. C.

Krishnamachari

Erickson

(2024). Experimental evidence on the robustness of coaching supports in teacher education. Educational Researcher, 53(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x231198827

16.

Cohodes

E. M.

McCauley

Preece

D. A.

Gross

J. J.

Gee

D. G.

(2022). Parental assistance with emotion regulation moderates link between COVID-19 stress and child mental health. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 54(2), 202–219. https://doi.org/10.1080/15374416.2022.2140431

17.

Council for Exceptional Children. (2020). Initial practice-based professional preparation standards for special educators. https://exceptionalchildren.org/standards/initial-practice-based-professional-preparation-standards-special-educators

18.

Council for Exceptional Children. (2021, Nov.). Position statement: Strengthening the workforce to support all children and youth with exceptionalities. Author. https://exceptionalchildren.org/sites/default/files/2021-11/strengthening_the_teacher_workforce__112021.pdf

19.

Council of Chief State School Officers. (2013). InTASC: Model core teaching standards and learning progressions for teachers 1.0. Author. https://ccsso.org/sites/default/files/2017-12/2013_INTASC_Learning_Progressions_for_Teachers.pdf

20.

Dooley

D. G.

Rhodes

Bandealy

(2022). Pandemic recovery for children—Beyond reopening schools. JAMA Pediatrics, 176(4), 347–348.

21.

Driver

Zimmer

Murphy

(2018). Using mixed reality simulations to prepare preservice special educators for collaboration in inclusive settings. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 26(1), 57–77.

22.

Endrew F. v. Douglas County School District, 137 S.Ct. 988 (2017).

23.

Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub. L. No. 114-95 § 114 Stat. 1177 (2015–2016).

24.

Friend

(2020). Interactions: Collaboration skills for school professionals (9th ed.). Pearson.

25.

Greene

J. C.

Caracelli

V. J.

Graham

W. F.

(1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255–274. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163620

26.

Grossman

Compton

Igra

Ronfeldt

Shahan

Williamson

(2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111, 2055–2100.

27.

Haines

S. J.

Strolin-Goltzman

Ura

S. K.

Conforti

Manga

(2022). It flows both ways: Relationships between families and educators during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 12(11), 745.

28.

Hirsch

S. E.

Griffith

C. A.

Kelley

M. H.

Carlson

McKown

(2023). Increasing preservice teachers’ knowledge and skills using a mixed-reality simulator: The tale of two studies. Teacher Education and Special Education, 46(3), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064231154028

29.

L. T.

Bentler

P. M.

(1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

30.

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).

31.

Interprofessional Education Collaborative. (2023). IPEC core competencies for interprofessional collaborative practice: Version 3. Author.

32.

Jackson

D. L.

Gillaspy Jr

J. A.

Purc-Stephenson

(2009). Reporting practices in confirmatory factor analysis: An overview and some recommendations. Psychological Methods, 14, 6–23. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014694

33.

Johnson

S. M.

Kraft

M. A.

Papay

J. P.

(2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers’ working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students’ achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1–39.

34.

Kazemi

Ghousseini

Cunard

Turrou

A. C.

(2016). Getting inside rehearsals: Insights from teacher educators to support work on complex practice. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(1), 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487115615191

35.

Leech

N. L.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

Combs

J. P.

(2011). Writing publishable mixed research articles: Guidelines for emerging scholars in the health sciences and beyond. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 5(1), 7–24.

36.

Leko

M. M.

Brownell

M. T.

(2011). Special education preservice teachers’ appropriation of pedagogical tools for teaching reading. Exceptional Children, 77(2), 229–251. https://10.1177/001440281107700205

37.

Leko

M. M.

Brownell

M. T.

O’Brien

Nagro

S. A.

(2024). Capitalizing on the potential of practice based preparation in special education teacher preparation. In McCray

E. D.

Bettini

Brownell

M. T.

McLeskey

Sindelar

P. T.

(Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (2nd ed., pp. 106–125). Routledge.

38.

Leko

M. M.

Brownell

M. T.

Sindelar

P. T.

Kiely

M. T.

(2015). Envisioning the future of special education personnel preparation in a standards-based era. Exceptional Children, 82, 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402915598782

39.

Leko

M. M.

Cook

B. G.

Cook

(2021). Qualitative methods in special education research. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 36(4), 2782–2786.

40.

Leko

M. M.

Hitchcock

J. H.

Love

H. R.

Houchins

D. E.

Conroy

M. A.

(2023). Quality indicators for mixed-methods research in special education. Exceptional Children, 89(4), 432–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/00144029221141031

41.

Mathews

H. M.

(2018). Examining opportunities to learn in special education teacher preparation [doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia].

42.

Mathews

H. M.

(2021). Developing a theory of program vision as professional socialization in special education teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 46(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/08884064211058901

43.

Mathews

H. M.

Myers

A. M.

Youngs

P. A.

(2023). The role of teacher self-efficacy in special education teacher candidates’ sensemaking: A mixed-methods investigation. Remedial and Special Education, 44(3), 209–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325221101812

44.

Mathews

H. M.

Rodgers

W. J.

Youngs

(2017). Sense-making for beginning special educators: A systematic mixed studies review. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.007

45.

Mathews

H. M.

Weiss.

McKenney

Silva

(2024). Coherence in special education teacher preparation: Developing sustainable professional identities. In: McCray

E. D.

Bettini

E. A.

Brownell

M. T.

McLeskey

Sindelar

P. T.

(Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (2nd ed., pp. 392–411). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003297093-24

46.

McEwan

Ruissen

G. R.

Eys

M. A.

Zumbo

B. D

Beauchamp

M. R.

(2017). The effectiveness of teamwork training on teamwork behaviors and team performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled interventions. PLoS ONE, 12(1). Article e0169604. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169604

47.

McKenzie

R. G.

(2009). A national survey of pre-service preparation for collaboration. Teacher Education and Special Education, 32(4), 379–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406409346241

48.

McLaughlin

M. J.

(2010). Evolving interpretations of educational equity and students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 265–278.

49.

McLeskey

Billingsley

Brownell

M. T.

Maheady

Lewis

T. J.

(2019). What are high-leverage practices for special education teachers and why are they important? Remedial and Special Education, 40(6), 331–337.

50.

Miles

M. B.

Huberman

A. M.

Saldana

(2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage.

51.

Nagro

S. A.

deBettencourt

L. U.

Rosenberg

M. S.

Carran

D. T.

Weiss

M. P

. (2017). The effects of guided video analysis on teacher candidates’ reflective ability and instructional skills. Teacher Education and Special Education, 40(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416680469

52.

Onwuegbuzie

A. J.

Collins

K. M. T.

(2007). A typology of mixed methods sampling designs in social science research. The Qualitative Report, 12, 281–316. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2007.1638

53.

Pellegrino

Weiss

Regan

(2015). Learning to collaborate: General and special educators in teacher education. The Teacher Educator, 50, 187–202. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2015.1038494

54.

Rosenberg

M. S.

Nagro

Day

Mason-Williams

Sindelar

P. T.

(2023). Alternative routes to special education teacher preparation: A policy in need of a new playbook. In: McCray

D. E.

Betini

E. A.

Brownell

M. T.

McLeskey

Sindelar

P. T.

(Eds.), Handbook of research on special education teacher preparation (pp. 213–230). Routledge.

55.

Sayeski

K. L.

Bateman

D. F.

Yell

M. L.

(2019). Re-envisioning teacher preparation in an era of Endrew F.: Instruction over access. Intervention in School and Clinic, 54(5), 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1053451218819157

56.

Schmidt

W. H.

Maier

(2009). Opportunity to learn. In: Sykes

Schneider

B. L.

Plank

D. N.

(Eds.), Handbook on education policy research (pp. 541–549). Routledge.

57.

Shepherd

K. G.

Fowler

McCormick

Wilson

C. L.

Morgan

(2016). The search for role clarity: Challenges and implications for special education teacher preparation. Teacher Education and Special Education, 39(2), 83–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416637904

58.

Sims

Walsh

(2009). Lesson study with preservice teachers: Lessons from lessons. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(5), 724–733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.10.005

59.

Sindelar

P. T.

Daunic

Rennells

M. S.

(2004). Comparisons of traditionally and alternatively trained teachers. Exceptionality, 12(4), 209–223. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex1204_3

60.

Sykes

Bird

Kennedy

(2010). Teacher education: Its problems and some prospects. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(5), 464–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110375804

61.

Trainor

A. A.

Graue

(2014). Evaluating rigor in qualitative methodology and research dissemination. Remedial and Special Education, 35(5), 267–274.

62.

Vannest

K. J.

Hagan-Burke

Parker

R. I.

Soares

D. A.

(2011). Special education teacher time use in four types of programs. The Journal of Educational Research, 104(4), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671003709898

63.

Williamson

Hoppey

McLeskey

Bergmann

Moore

(2020). Trends in LRE placement rates over the past 25 years. The Journal of Special Education, 53(4), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466919855052

64.

Yell

M. L.

Katsiyannis

Bradley

M. R.

(2017). The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act: The evolution of special education law. In: Kauffman

J. M.

Hallahan

D. P.

Pullen

P. C.

(Eds.), Handbook of special education (2nd ed., pp. 55–70). Routledge.

65.

Youngs

Elreda

L. M.

Anagnostopoulos

Cohen

Drake

Konstantopoulos

(2022). The development of ambitious instruction: How beginning elementary teachers’ preparation experiences are associated with their mathematics and English language arts instructional practices. Teaching and Teacher Education, 110, 103576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103576

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.22 MB

Contrasting Opportunities to Learn Across Domains in Special Education Teacher Preparation: A Mixed Methods Study

Abstract

Background/Context:

Purpose/Research Questions:

Research Design:

Conclusions/Recommendations:

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material