As the debate on what content should be included in Ethnic Studies continues, there has also been an exploration of what effective pedagogy in Ethnic Studies looks like. Community responsive pedagogy advances the work of critical pedagogy and culturally responsive pedagogy by centralizing a community's context in the education of children and youth. We use community to refer to the cultural, political, social, and economic spaces and places that shape student and family realities.
Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study
This chapter begins by drawing from the scholarship written about Ethnic Studies and the development of a pedagogy that is both responsive to students and centers their wellness. Building off the research on Ethnic Studies pedagogies, we offer a conceptualization of community responsive pedagogy (CRP). Community responsive leaders and educators transform climates, cultures, and curriculum to prioritize youth wellness (innerself, interpersonal, interconnectedness) through a focus on three domains of pedagogical practice: relationships, relevance, and responsibility.
Research Design
We begin with historicizing the origins of CRP in Ethnic Studies and then provide examples of how CRP can be applied. The chapter explores the three domains of CRP and provides examples from our previous studies to show how educators practice those domains to reveal the potential benefits for all students.
Conclusions/Recommendations
Ethnic Studies as a movement is community responsive. CRP has the potential to go beyond the Ethnic Studies classroom and reshape the way we understand education and its purpose. Ethnic Studies, and the community responsive teaching that sits at its pedagogical core, centers youth wellness. In this chapter, we reveal that (1) the protective nature of caring adult relationships acts as armor against future threats to a child's wellness, which is particularly important for youth living in the chronically stressful environments created by structural inequalities; (2) centering students, their families, their communities, and their ancestors, a relevant pedagogy acknowledges their stories as assets that provide cultural wisdom and medicine, along with pathways to freedom and justice—advancing Maslow's individualistic frame toward one that allows children to use their learning to develop a sense of concentric circles of interconnectedness (peers, school community, local community, larger society, and the world); and (3) schools and educators also have the responsibility to acknowledge and leverage student strengths to develop and maintain their well-being and overall achievement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AkomA., ShahA., NakaiA., & CruzT. (2016). Youth Participatory Action Research (YPAR) 2.0: How technological innovation and digital organizing sparked a food revolution in East Oakland. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(10), 1287–1307.
2.
BeckhamK., & ConcordiaA. (2019). We don't want to just study the world, we want to change it. In CuauhtinR.T., ZavalaM., SleeterC., & AuW (Eds.), Rethinking ethnic studies (pp. 319–327). Milwaukee, WI: Rethinking Schools.
BuenavistaT. L., StovallD. O., & ValdezC. (2019). Ethnic studies educators as enemies of the state and the fugitive space of classrooms. In Rethinking Ethnic Studies (pp. 220–225). Rethinking Schools.
6.
Burke-HarrisN. (2019). The deepest well. Mariner Books.
7.
CamangianP. (2010). Starting with self: Teaching autoethnography to foster critically caring literacies. Research in the Teaching of English, 45(2), 179–204.
8.
CammarotaJ., & FineM. (Ed.). (2008). Revolutionizing education: Youth participatory action research in motion. Routledge.
9.
CammarotaJ., & RomeroA. (Ed.). (2014). Raza studies: The public option for educational revolution. University of Arizona Press.
10.
CNR (California Newsreel). (2008). Unnatural causes: Is inequality making us sick? [Video]. https://unnaturalcauses.org/
11.
CollierM., & GonzalesD. (2009). Creation and survival: Courses and academic program, 1969–1986. In ChanJ.P. et al. (Eds.), At 40: Asian American Studies at San Francisco State (pp. 63–74). AAS Department, San Francisco State University.
12.
CuauhtinR. T. (2019a). The studies framework: A holistic overview. In CuauhtinR.T., ZavalaM., SleeterC., & AuW. (Eds.), Rethinking ethnic studies (pp. 65–75). Rethinking Schools.
13.
CuauhtinR. T. (2019b). Teaching John Bell's four I's of oppression. In CuauhtinR.T., ZavalaM., SleeterC., & AuW. (Eds.), Rethinking ethnic studies (pp. 216–219). Rethinking Schools.
14.
CurammengE. R. (2020). Advancing teacher preparation through ethnic studies: Portraits of Filipino American self-identified male teachers. Race Ethnicity and Education, 23(3), 454–472.
15.
CurammengE. R., & Tintiangco-CubalesA. (2017). Growing our own hope: The development of a Pin@y teacher pipeline. In PicowerB., & KohliR. (Eds.), Confronting racism in teacher education: Counternarratives of critical practice (pp. 157–163). Routledge.
16.
DarderA. (1991). Cultural and power in the classroom: A critical foundation for bicultural education. Bergin & Garvey.
DavidE. J. R., SharmaD. K. B., & PetalioJ. (2017). Losing Kapwa: Colonial legacies and the Filipino American family. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 8(1), 43–55.
19.
DeeT., & PennerE. (2017). The causal effects of cultural relevance: Evidence from an ethnic studies curriculum. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 127–166.
20.
de los RíosC. V. (2018). Bilingual Vine making: Problematizing oppressive discourses in a secondary Chicanx/Latinx studies course. Learning, Media and Technology, 43(4), 359–373.
21.
de los RiosC. V., LópezJ., & MorrellE. (2016). Critical ethnic studies in high school classrooms: Academic achievement via social action. In NogueraP.A., PierceJ.C., & AhramR. (Eds.), Race, equity, and education (pp. 177–198). Springer.
22.
DelpitL. (1995). Other people's children. New Press.
23.
DesaiM. (2018). Reading, naming, and changing the world: Youth participatory action research in a Hawai'i school (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Hawaii, Manoa.
24.
Duncan-AndradeJ. (2007). Gangstas, wankstas, and ridas: Defining, developing, and supporting effective teachers in urban schools. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(6), 617–638.
25.
Duncan-AndradeJ. (2009). Note to educators: Hope required when growing roses in concrete. Harvard Education Review, 79(2), 1–13.
26.
Duncan-AndradeJ., & MorrellE. (2008). The art of critical pedagogy: Possibilities from theory to practice in urban schools. Peter Lang.
27.
Espinoza-HeroldM. (2003). Introducing Carla: “This is America and here you speak English!” In M. Espinoza-Herold, Issues in Latino education: Race, school culture, and the politics of academic success (pp. 67–93). A and B.
28.
FreireP. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Herder & Herder.
29.
GinwrightS. (2015). Hope and healing in urban education. Routledge Press.
30.
GonzalesD. P., Tintiangco-CubalesA., SalungaN., SchroederS., & Daus-MagbualR. (2009). Our history of ethnic studies: Stories from San Francisco State University. In Tintiangco-CubalesA. (Ed.), Pin@y educational partnerships: A Filipina/o American studies sourcebook, Volume 2: Filipina/o American identities, activism, and service (pp. 73–86). Phoenix Publishing House International.
31.
Hannegan-MartinezS. (2019). From punk love to compa love: A pedagogical paradigm to intervene on trauma. Urban Review, 51(4), 659–675.
32.
Hannegan-MartinezS. (2020). Literacies of love: Trauma, healing, and pedagogical shifts in an English classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles.
33.
Hu-DehartE. (1993). The history, development, and future of ethnic studies. Phi Delta Kappan, 75(1), 50–54.
34.
JohnsonT. M. (2020). Artelia Green's & Olivia Williams’ legacy: A study on the pedagogical practices that improve health for Black children (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of California, Berkeley.
35.
KohlH. (1995). I won't learn from you. New Press.
36.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2009). The dreamkeepers. Jossey-Bass. (Original work published 1994)
37.
Ladson-BillingsG., & TateW. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68.
38.
LoveB. (2019). We want to do more than survive. Beacon Press.
39.
MabalonD. (2016). Essential questions of ethnic studies. Campaign to Save Ethnic Studies at San Francisco State University [Unpublished post]. San Francisco, CA.
40.
MairaS., & ShihadeM. (2006). Meeting Asian/Arab American studies: Thinking race, empire, and Zionism in the U.S. Journal of Asian American Studies, 9(2), 117–140.
41.
Maslow, (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 430–437.
42.
MenakemR. (2017). My grandmother's hands: Racialized trauma and the pathway to mending our hearts and bodies. Recovery Press.
43.
MilneA. (2016). Coloring in the white spaces: Reclaiming cultural identity in whitestream schools. Peter Lang.
44.
MoralesS., AviñaS. M., & BernalD. D. (2016). Education in Nepantla: A Chicana feminist approach to engaging Latina/o elementary youth in ethnic studies. In SandovalD.M., RatcliffA.J., BuenavistaT.L., & MarinJ.R. (Eds.), “White” washing American education: The new culture wars in ethnic studies (pp. 67–93). Praeger.
45.
MorrellE. (2008). Critical literacy and urban youth: Pedagogies of access, dissent, and liberation. Routledge.
46.
NoddingsN. (2013). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). University of California Press.
47.
PerryB., & SzalavitzM. (2017). The boy who was raised as a dog. Hachette Book Group.
48.
Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896).
49.
PoonO., & CohenJ. (2012). Youth participatory action research and the future of education reform. Journal of Critical Thought and Praxis, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.31274/jctp-180810-16
50.
Reyes-McGovernE., & BuenavistaT. L. (2016). Ethnic studies with K-12 students, families, and communities: The role of teacher education in preparing educators to serve the people. In HipolitoE., & ZavalaM. (Eds.), XChange: Publications and Resources for Public School Professionals: Ethnic Studies K-12. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Center X/UC Regents. https://ucla.app.box.com/v/Ethnic-Studies-Role-Teacher-Ed
51.
RosenthalR., & JacobsenL. (2003). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teacher expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. Irvington.
52.
SacramentoJ. (2019). Critical collective consciousness: Ethnic studies teachers and professional development. Equity & Excellence in Education, 52(2–3), 167–184.
53.
SleeterC., & ZavalaM. (2020). Transformative ethnic studies in schools: Curriculum, pedagogy, and research. Teachers College Press.
54.
SnyderC. R., RandK. L., & SigmonD. R. (2002). Hope theory: A member of the positive psychology family. In SnyderC.R., & LopezS.J. (Eds.), Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 257–276). Oxford University Press.
55.
SolorzanoD. G. (1989). Teaching and social change: Reflections on a Freirean approach in a college classroom. Teaching Sociology, 17(2), 218–225.
56.
SolorzanoD. G., & YossoT. J. (2000). Maintaining social justice hopes within academic realities: A Freirean approach to critical race/LatCrit pedagogy. Denver Law Review, 78, 595.
57.
SteeleC. (2011). Foreword: Pursuing effective integrated education. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3) 431–434.
58.
SymeS. L. (2004). Social determinants of health: The community as empowered partner. Preventing Chronic Disease: Public Health Research, Practice, and Policy, 1(1), 1–4.
59.
TatumB. (1997). Why are all the Black kids sitting together in the cafeteria?Basic Books.
60.
TelloJ. (2019). Recovering your sacredness. Suenos.
61.
Tintiangco-CubalesA. (2007). Pin@y educational partnerships: A Filipina/o American studies sourcebook. Volume I: Philippine and Filipina/o American history. Phoenix Publishing House International.
62.
Tintiangco-CubalesA. (2010). What is ethnic studies? Presentation at San Francisco State University 2010. In Tintiangco-CubalesA., KiangP., & MuseusS.D. (Eds.), AAPI Nexus Asian Americans & Pacific Islanders policy, practice and community (pp. 76–100). University of California, Los Angeles.
63.
Tintiangco-CubalesA., & CurammengE. (2018). Pedagogies of resistance: Filipina/o “gestures of rebellion” against the inheritance of American schooling. In BuenavistaT., & AliA. (Eds.), At war: Challenging racism, materialism, and militarism in education (pp. 228–251). Fordham University Press.
64.
Tintiangco-CubalesA., Daus-MagbualA., DesaiM., SabacA., & TorresM. V. (2016). Into our hoods: Where critical performance pedagogy births resistance. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29(10), 1308–1325.
65.
Tintiangco-CubalesA., KohliR., SacramentoJ., HenningN., Agarwal-RangnathR., & SleeterC. (2014). Toward an Ethnic Studies pedagogy: Implications for K-12 schools from the research. Urban Review. 10.1007/s11256-014-0280-y
66.
TuckE., & YangK. W. (2016). What justice wants. Critical Ethnic Studies, 2(2), 1–15.
67.
ValdesG. (1996). Con respeto. Teachers College Press.
68.
ValdezC. (2020). Flippin’ the scripted curriculum: Ethnic studies inquiry in elementary education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 23(4), 581–597.
69.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and the politics of caring. State University of New York Press.
70.
Van der KolkB. (2015). The body keeps the score. Penguin.
YossoT. J. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.
