University-based teacher education programs are increasingly committed to teaching about race and racism, but programs continue to face challenges in preparing justice-oriented educators. Critical scholarship on teaching about race and racism has identified some core concepts that teachers should learn, including an understanding of systemic racism. A deeper understanding of the structure and function of White supremacy as a system, specifically as it operates within teacher education as a social institution, can provide insight about the challenges faced by teacher educators (TEs) who teach about race and racism. Drawing from articulations of the characteristics of White supremacy, the author identifies operant mechanisms of White supremacy in teacher education.
Purpose
This article offers a framework for the logic of White supremacy as consisting of three core concepts: (1) the logic of racialized distribution of power; (2) the logic of intentional White ignorance and historical erasure; and (3) the logic of dehumanization of people of color through violence and White cultural hegemony. The study examined the tensions that emerge for teacher educators who aim to teach teachers to disrupt White supremacy but are working from within White supremacist institutions.
Research Design
The theoretical framework was used to examine emerging tensions experienced by TEs in a cross-institutional qualitative study that used phenomenological methods. Data were collected from teacher educators across multiple institutions and included interviews, classroom artifacts, and focus groups.
Findings
Findings aligned to the White supremacy framework. Tensions related to the racial distribution of power focused on differentiated support for teacher candidates (TCs) of color and navigating moments of racial tension. Tensions related to White ignorance and erasure centered on responding to White students’ resistance decentering Whiteness. Finally, tensions related to dehumanization of people of color focused on challenging deficit ideologies.
Recommendations
The findings suggest that being open to and conscious of these tensions through critical reflection can be productive for teacher educators. More research is needed that considers the distinct needs of TCs of color and White TCs when learning about race and racism. In addition, further research can apply the logic of White supremacy in cross-institutional studies and continue to engage TEs as participants to explore linkages between interpersonal and institutional effects of White supremacy in other contexts.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AccapadiM. M. (2007). When White women cry: How White women's tears oppress women of color. The College Student Affairs Journal, 26, 208—216.
2.
AchinsteinB., & OgawaR. T. (2012). New teachers of color and culturally responsive teaching in an era of educational accountability: Caught in a double bind. Journal of Educational Change, 131, 1—39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-011-9165-y
3.
AlexanderM. (2010). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. The New Press.
BanksJ. A. (2013). The construction and historical development of multicultural education, 1962–2012. Theory Into Practice, 52, 73—82.
6.
BellD. (1992). Racial realism. Connecticut Law Review, 242, 363—379.
7.
BellD. (1993). The racism is permanent thesis: Courageous revelation or unconscious denial of racial genocide. Capital University Law Review, 22, 571—587.
8.
BerreyE. (2015). The enigma of diversity: The language of race and the limits of social justice. University of Chicago Press.
9.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (1997). Rethinking racism: Toward a structural interpretation. American Sociological Review, 623, 465—480.
10.
BrownA. L., & AuW. (2014). Race, memory, and master narratives: A critical essay on U.S. curriculum history. Curriculum Inquiry, 443, 358—389. http://doi.org/10.1111/curi.12049
11.
ChandlerP. T. (2015). Doing race in social studies: Critical perspectives. Information Age Publishing.
12.
CharmazK. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. SAGE.
13.
ClarkC., & PetersonP. (1986). Teachers’ thought processes. In Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed., pp. 255—296). Macmillan.
Cochran-SmithM. (1995). Uncertain allies: Understanding the boundaries of race and teaching. Harvard Educational Review, 654, 541—570.
16.
CollinsP. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed.). Routledge.
17.
ConklinH. G., & HughesH. E. (2016). Practices of compassionate, critical, justice-oriented teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 671, 47—60.
18.
CrenshawK. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 436, 1241—1299.
19.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. SAGE.
20.
CrossB. E. (2005). New racism, reformed teacher education, and the same ole’ oppression. Educational Studies, 383, 263—274. http://doi.org/10.1207/s15326993es3803_6
21.
DuBoisW. E. B. (1935). Black reconstruction in America: An essay toward a history of the part which Black folk played in the attempt to reconstruct democracy in America, 1860–1880. Oxford University Press.
22.
DumasM. (2018). Beginning and ending with Black suffering: A meditation on and against racial justice in education. In TuckE., & YangW. (Eds.), Toward what justice? Describing diverse dreams of justice in education (pp. 29—43). Routledge.
23.
DumasM. J., & NelsonJ. D. (2016). Toward a critical framework for educational research. Harvard Educational Review, 861, 27—48.
24.
Duncan-AndradeJ. (2009). Note to educators: Hope required when growing roses in concrete. Harvard Educational Review, 792, 181—194.
25.
EsquivelA.LewisK.RodriguezD.StovallD., & WilliamsT. (2002). We know what's best for you: Silencing of people of color. In SlaterJ.FainS., & RossattoC. (Eds.), The Freirean legacy: Educating for social justice (pp. 207—219). Peter Lang.
26.
GarrettH. J., & SegallA. (2013). (Re) considerations of ignorance and resistance in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 644, 294—304.
27.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, research, and practice. Teachers College Press.
28.
GibbonsA. (2018). The five refusals of White supremacy. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 773–4, 729—755.
GillbornD. (2016). The policy of inequity: Using CRT to unmask White supremacy in education policy. In LynnM., & DixsonA. D. (Eds.), Handbook of critical race theory in education (pp. 129—139). Routledge.
31.
GistC. D. (2017). Voices of aspiring teachers of color: Unraveling the double bind in teacher education. Urban Education, 528, 927—956. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085915623339
32.
GorskiP. C. (2009). What we're teaching teachers: An analysis of multicultural teacher education coursework syllabi. Teaching and Teacher Education, 252, 309—318. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.07.008
33.
GotandaN. (1991). A critique of “Our constitution is color-blind.”Stanford Law Review, 44, 1—68.
34.
GrossmanP.ComptonC.IgraD., & WilliamsonP. W. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 1119, 2055—2100.
35.
GubaE. G., & LincolnY. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In DenzinN. K., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (p. 105—117). SAGE.
36.
HarrisC. I. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 1068, 1707—1791.
37.
HayesC., & JuárezB. (2012). There is no culturally responsive teaching spoken here: A critical race perspective. Democracy and Education, 201, 1.
38.
HaynesC. (2017). Dismantling the White supremacy embedded in our classrooms: White faculty in pursuit of more equitable educational outcomes for racially minoritized students. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 291, 87—107. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1135971
39.
HikidoA., & MurrayS. (2015). Whitened rainbows: How White college students protect Whiteness through diversity discourses. Race Ethnicity and Education, 33249, 1—23.
40.
HowardT. (2003). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Ingredients for critical teacher reflection. Theory Into Practice, 423, 195—202.
41.
HuertaT. M. (2011). Humanizing pedagogy: Beliefs and practices on the teaching of Latino children. Bilingual Research Journal, 341, 38—57. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2011.568826
42.
HugginsN. (1991). The deforming mirror of truth: Slavery and the master narrative of American history. Radical History Review, 49, 25—48.
43.
HughesR., & GilesM. (2010). CRiT walking in higher education: Activating critical race theory in the academy. Race Ethnicity and Education, 131, 41—57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613320903549685
44.
HyttenK., & WarrenJ. (2003). Engaging Whiteness: How racial power gets reified in education. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 161, 65—89.
45.
IversonS. V. (2007). Camouflaging power and privilege: A critical race analysis of university diversity policies. Educational Administration Quarterly, 435, 586—611. http://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X07307794
46.
IversonS. V. (2012). Constructing outsiders: The discursive framing of access in university diversity policies. The Review of Higher Education, 352, 149—177. http://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2012.0013
Ladson-BillingsG. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 323, 465—491.
49.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what's it doing in a nice field like education?Qualitative Studies in Education, 111, 7—24.
50.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1999). Preparing teachers for diverse student populations: A critical race theory perspective. Review of Research in Education, 24, 211—247.
51.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2011). Race … to the top, again: Comments on the genealogy of critical race theory. Connecticut Law Review, 435, 1439—1457.
52.
LampertM. (1985). How do teachers manage to teach? Perspectives on problems in practice. Harvard Educational Review, 552, 178—194.
53.
LazosS. R. (2012). Are student teaching evaluations holding back women and minorities? The perils of “doing” gender and race in the classroom. In Gutierrez y MuhsG.NiemannY. F.GonzalezC. G., & HarrisA. P. (Eds.), Presumed incompetent: The intersections of race and class for women in academia (pp. 164—185). University Press of Colorado.
54.
LeonardoZ. (2004). The color of supremacy: Beyond the discourse of “White privilege.”Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(2), 137—152.
55.
LeonardoZ. (2008). Reading Whiteness: Antiracist pedagogy against White racial knowledge. In AyersW.QuinnT., & StovallD. (Eds.), Handbook of social justice in education (pp. 231—248). Routledge.
56.
LeonardoZ., & HarrisA. P. (2013). Living with racism in education and society: Derrick Bell's ethical idealism and political pragmatism. Race Ethnicity and Education, 164, 470—488.
57.
LindquistJ. (2004). Class affects, classroom affectations: Working through the paradoxes of strategic empathy. College English, 672, 187—209.
58.
MarxS. (2004). Exploring and challenging Whiteness and White racism with White preservice teachers. Counterpoints, 273, 132—152.
59.
MatiasC. E., & AllenR. L. (2016). Do you feel me? Amplifying messages of love in critical race theory. Journal of Educational Foundations, 291–4, 5—28.
60.
MatiasC. E.HenryA., & DarlandC. (2017). The twin tales of Whiteness: Exploring the emotional roller coaster of teaching and learning about Whiteness. Taboo, 161, 7—29.
61.
McGeeE. O., & StovallD. (2015). Reimagining critical race theory in education: Mental health, healing, and the pathway to liberatory praxis. Educational Theory, 655, 491—511.
62.
MillsC. (1994). Revisionist ontologies: Theorizing White supremacy. Social and Economic Studies, 433, 105—134.
63.
MillsC. W. (1997). The Racial Contract. Cornell University Press.
64.
MilnerH. R. (2008). Disrupting deficit notions of difference: Counter-narratives of teachers and community in urban education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 246, 1573—1598. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.02.011
65.
MilnerH. R., & HowardT. C. (2013). Counter-narrative as method: Race, policy and research for teacher education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 164, 536—561.
66.
MilnerH. R.PearmanA., & McGeeE. O. (2013). Critical race theory, interest convergence, and teacher education. In LynnM., & DixsonA. (Eds.), Handbook of Critical Race Theory in Education (pp. 339—354). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203155721.ch25
67.
MolinaB. (2018, December 20). Cashing checks, napping, more activities leading to police calls on Black people in 2018. USA Today.
68.
MollL.AmantiC.NeffD., & GonzalezN. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 312, 132—141.
69.
MorganD. L., & HoffmanK. (2018). Focus groups. In The SAGE handbook of qualitative data collection (pp. 250—263). SAGE.
PagerT. (2018, December 24). A Black man was in his building's lobby. A White neighbor accused him of not living there. The New York Times.
74.
ParisD. (2019). Naming beyond the White settler colonial gaze in educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 323, 217—224. http://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2019.1576943
75.
PatelL. (2015). Desiring diversity and backlash: White property rights in higher education. The Urban Review, 474, 657—675.
76.
PhilipT. M.RochaJ., & Olivares-PasillasM. C. (2017). Supporting teachers of color as they negotiate classroom pedagogies of race: A study of a teacher's struggle with “friendlyfire” racism. Teacher Education Quarterly, 441, 59—79.
77.
PicowerB. (2009). The unexamined Whiteness of teaching: How White teachers maintain and enact dominant racial ideologies. Race Ethnicity and Education, 122, 197—215.
78.
RavitchS. M., & CarlN. M. (2016). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological. SAGE.
79.
SaidE. W. (1978). Orientalism. Pantheon Books.
80.
SaldañaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE.
81.
SmithA. (2012). Indigeneity, settler colonialism, White supremacy. In Martinez HoSangD.LaBennettO., & PulidoL. (Eds.), Racial formation in the twenty-first century (pp. 66—89). University of California Press.
82.
SmithJ., & OsbornM. (2003). Interpretive phenomenological analysis. In SmithJ. A. (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods (pp. 51—80). SAGE.
83.
SolórzanoD. G., & YossoT. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 81, 23—44.
84.
StarksH., & TrinidadS. B. (2007). Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research, 1710, 1372—1380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307307031
85.
StevensonH. (2014). Promoting racial literacy in schools: Differences that make a difference. Teachers College Press.
86.
StovallD. (2005). A challenge to traditional theory: Critical race theory, African-American community organizers, and education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 261, 95—108.
87.
TuckE., & YangK. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 11.
