After decades of restrictive U.S. language policies geared toward English-only education, recent years have seen a proliferation of dual-language programs, Seal of Biliteracy awards, and bilingual education programming more broadly. The demand for such programming ostensibly suggests growing consensus around the benefits of linguistic diversity—dubbed “The New Bilingualism” by The Atlantic in 2016. However, recent research suggests that the pivot to this New Bilingualism is largely taking place in contexts of privilege, disproportionately benefiting English-dominant, middle- and upper-class communities as compared with multilingual communities where demand for bilingual programming is not “new” at all.
Focus of Study
This piece explores how recent, well-intentioned expansions in bilingual education programming may actually reinforce historical inequities. Putting forth a framework of idealized language ideologies, the article documents how bilingualism has historically been encouraged for some and denied to others in U.S. education and policy contexts.
Research Design
Through historical analysis, this article documents how language ideologies overlap with racism and nationalism in educational and policy contexts across key periods of U.S. history and into the present day.
Conclusions/Recommendations
A framework of idealized language ideologies foregrounds (1) idealized language practices, (2) idealized speakers, and (3) institutional interests, highlighting how these dynamics function to maintain educational and broader social inequities. Applying such a lens makes it possible to simultaneously acknowledge positive expansions of bilingual programming, while also questioning the framing of such programming as “new” or as a panacea for educational inequality. In a time of rapid expansion for bilingual educational programming, this piece demonstrates that even bilingualism can be normatively framed as an idealized language ideology to reinforce problematic language hierarchies. Thus, it is imperative that teachers, teacher educators, and policy makers reckon with these historical dynamics to ensure that educational models designed to ameliorate linguistic inequities do not end up reproducing them instead.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlimH. S., & SmithermanG. (2012). Articulate while Black: Barack Obama, language, and race in the U.S. Oxford University Press.
2.
AllardE. C. (2015). Undocumented status and schooling for newcomer teens. Harvard Educational Review, 853, 478—501.
3.
American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages. (2011). Foreign language enrollments in K–12 public schools: Are students prepared for a global society?
4.
AriasM. B., & FaltisC. (Eds.). (2012). Implementing educational language policy in Arizona: Legal, historical and current practices in SEI (Vol. 86). Multilingual Matters.
5.
AringtonM. (1991). English-only laws and direct legislation: The battle in the states over language minority rights. Journal of Law & Politics, 7, 325—352.
6.
BaconC. K. (2017). Dichotomies, dialects, and deficits: Confronting the “Standard English” myth in literacy and teacher education. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 661, 341—357. https://doi.org/10.1177/2381336917719255
7.
Baker-BellA. (2020). Linguistic justice: Black language, literacy, identity, and pedagogy. Routledge.
8.
BarrosS. R. (2017). Rejecting Babel: Examining multilingualism without citizenship in the U.S. postnational scenario. Current Issues in Language Planning, 182, 117—135.
9.
BartoloméL. I. (2010). Preparing to teach newcomer students: The significance of critical pedagogy and the study of ideology in teacher education. Teachers College Record, 11214, 505—526.
10.
BatteyD.Llamas-FloresS.BurkeM.GuerraP.KangH. J., & KimS. H. (2013). ELL policy and mathematics professional development colliding: Placing teacher experimentation within a sociopolitical context. Teachers College Record, 1156, 1—44.
11.
BialystokE. (2011). Reshaping the mind: The benefits of bilingualism. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 654, 229—235.
12.
BonfiglioT. P. (2010). Race and the rise of standard American (Vol. 7). Walter de Gruyter.
13.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2018). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in America. Rowman & Littlefield. (Original work published 2003)
14.
BoyleA.AugustD.TabakuL.ColeS., & Simpson-BairdA. (2015). Dual language education programs: Current state policies and practices. Office of English Language Acquisition, U.S. Department of Education.
15.
BriskM. E. (2006). Bilingual education: From compensatory to quality education (2nd ed.). Erlbaum.
16.
CallahanR. M., & GándaraP. C. (Eds.). (2014). The bilingual advantage: Language, literacy and the U.S. labor market (Vol. 99). Multilingual Matters.
17.
Carter AndrewsD. J.BrownT.CastilloB. M.JacksonD., & VellankiV. (2019). Beyond damage-centered teacher education: Humanizing pedagogy for teacher educators and preservice teachers. Teachers College Record, 1216, 1—28.
18.
Cervantes-SoonC. G. (2014). A critical look at dual language immersion in the New Latin@diaspora. Bilingual Research Journal, 371, 64—82.
19.
Cervantes-SoonC. G.DornerL.PalmerD.HeimanD.SchwerdtfegerR., & ChoiJ. (2017). Combating inequalities in two-way language immersion programs: Toward critical consciousness in bilingual education spaces. Review of Research in Education, 411, 403—427.
20.
Cervantes-SoonC. G.GambrellJ.KasunG. S.SunW.FreireJ. A., & DornerL. M. (2020). “Everybody wants a choice” in dual language education of El Nuevo Sur: Whiteness as the gloss for everybody in media discourses of multilingual education. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 1—17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348458.2020.1753201
21.
ColomerS. E., & Chang-BaconC. K. (2020). Seal of Biliteracy graduates get critical: Incorporating critical biliteracies in dual language programs and beyond. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 634, 379—389. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.1017
CrawfordJ. (2000). At war with diversity: U.S. language policy in an age of anxiety (Vol. 25). Multilingual Matters.
24.
DeBoseC. E. (2007). The Ebonics phenomenon, language planning, and the hegemony of standard English. In AlimH. S., & BaughJ. (Eds.), Talkin Black talk: Language, education and social change (pp. 30—43). Teachers College Press.
25.
de JongE. J. (2011). Foundations for multilingualism in education: From principles to practice. Caslon.
26.
DelpitL., & DowdyJ. K. (Eds.). (2008). The skin that we speak: Thoughts on language and culture in the classroom. The New Press.
27.
DornerL. (2016). The outstanding opportunities, but persistent challenges, of dual language education. University of Missouri, Columbia.
28.
Dunbar-OrtizR. (2014). An indigenous peoples’ history of the United States. Beacon Press.
29.
EllisE. (2006). Monolingualism: The unmarked case. Sociolinguistic Studies, 72, 173—196.
30.
FloresN., & GarcíaO. (2017). A critical review of bilingual education in the United States: From basements and pride to boutiques and profit. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 37, 14—29.
31.
FloresN., & RosaJ. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 852, 149—171.
32.
FloresN.TsengA., & SubtireluN. (Eds.). (2020). Bilingualism for all? Raciolinguistic perspectives on dual language education in the United States. Multilingual Matters.
33.
FoughtC. (2006). Language and ethnicity. Cambridge University Press.
34.
GalindoR. (2011). The nativistic legacy of the Americanization era in the education of Mexican immigrant students. Educational Studies, 474, 323—346.
35.
GalvinW. F. (2002). The Official Massachusetts Information for Voters: The 2002 Ballot Questions. Massachusetts Secretary of the Commonwealth. http://www.sec.state.ma.us/ele/elepdf/ifv02.pdf
36.
GarcíaO., & KleifgenJ. A. (2018). Educating emergent bilinguals: Policies, programs, and practices for English language learners. Teachers College Press.
37.
GodleyA. J.ReaserJ., & MooreK. G. (2015). Pre-service English language arts teachers’ development of critical language awareness for teaching. Linguistics and Education, 32, 41—54.
38.
GogolinI. (1997). The “monolingual habitus” as the common feature in teaching in the language of the majority in different countries. Per Linguam, 132, 38—49.
HammanL. (2018). Bilingualism for all? Interrogating language and equity in dual language immersion in Wisconsin. In CrandallJ., & BaileyK. M. (Eds.), Global perspectives on language education policies (pp. 141—152). Routledge.
44.
HeinekeA. J., & DavinK. J. (Eds.). (2020). The Seal of Biliteracy: Case studies and considerations for policy implementation. Information Age.
45.
HellerM. (2010). The commodification of language. Annual Review of Anthropology, 39, 101—114.
46.
HellerM., & McElhinnyB. (2017). Language, capitalism, colonialism: Toward a critical history. University of Toronto Press.
47.
HintonK. A. (2016). Call it what it is: Monolingual education in U.S. schools. Critical Inquiry in Language Studies, 131, 20—45.
48.
HornbergerN. H.HarschL., & EvansB. (1999). The Six Nation Education Research Project: The United States: A country report—Language education of language minority students in the United States. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 151. https://repository.upenn.edu/wpel/vol15/iss1/1
49.
HowardT. C., & Rodriguez-MinkoffA. (2017). Culturally relevant pedagogy 20 years later: Progress or pontificating? What have we learned, and where do we go?Teachers College Record, 1191, 1—32.
50.
IrvineJ. T.GalS., & KroskrityP. V. (2009). Language ideology and linguistic differentiation. In DurantiA. (Ed.), Linguistic anthropology: A reader (2nd ed., pp. 402—434). Wiley-Blackwell.
51.
KatznelsonN., & BernsteinK. A. (2017). Rebranding bilingualism: The shifting discourses of language education policy in California's 2016 election. Linguistics and Education, 40, 11—26.
52.
KendiI. X. (2016). Stamped from the beginning: The definitive history of racist ideas in America. Nation Books.
53.
KliebardH. M. (2018). Forging the American curriculum: Essays in curriculum history and theory. Routledge.
54.
KnobelD. (1996). America for Americans: The nativist movement in the United States. Twayne.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1998). Just what is critical race theory and what's it doing in a nice field like education?International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 111, 7—24.
LeeE. (2003). At America's gates: Chinese immigration during the exclusion era, 1882–1943. University of North Carolina Press.
60.
Lindholm-LearyK. (2012). Success and challenges in dual language education. Theory Into Practice, 514, 256—262.
61.
Lippi-GreenR. (2012). English with an accent: Language, ideology, and discrimination in the United States. Routledge.
62.
LópezI. H. (2015). Dog whistle politics: How coded racial appeals have reinvented racism and wrecked the middle class. Oxford University Press.
63.
MacedoD. (2000). The colonialism of the English only movement. Educational Researcher, 293, 15—24.
64.
MacSwanJ., & RolstadK. (2006). How language proficiency tests mislead us about ability: Implications for English language learner placement in special education. Teachers College Record, 10811, 2304—2328.
65.
MatsudaA., & DuranC. S. (2013). Problematizing the construction of U.S. Americans as monolingual English speakers. In RamanathanV. (Ed.), Language policies and (dis) citizenship: Rights, access, pedagogies (pp. 35—51). Multilingual Matters.
66.
McCartyT. L. (2004). Dangerous difference: A critical-historical analysis of language education policies in the United States. In TollefsonJ. W., & TsuiA. B. M. (Eds.), Medium of instruction policies: Which agenda? Whose agenda (pp. 71—96). Erlbaum.
67.
McFieldG. P. (Ed.). (2014). The miseducation of English learners: A tale of three states and lessons to be learned. Information Age.
68.
MeadowsW. C. (2016). An honor long overdue: The 2013 Congressional Gold and Silver Medal ceremonies in honor of Native American code talkers. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 402, 91—121.
MetzM. (2018). Challenges of confronting dominant language ideologies in the high school English classroom. Research in the Teaching of English, 524, 455—477.
71.
MirelJ. (2010). Patriotic pluralism: Americanization education and European immigrants. Harvard University Press.
MoralesP. Z., & RaoA. B. (2015). How ideology and cultural capital shape the distribution of Illinois’ bilingual education programs. Teachers College Record. https://www.tcrecord.org/content.asp?contentid=18139
75.
MoralesP. Z., & RazfarA. (2016). Advancing integration through bilingualism for all. In FrankenbergE.GarcesL. M., & HopkinsM. (Eds.), School integration matters: Research-based strategies to advance equity (pp. 135—144). Teachers College Press.
76.
MothaS. (2014). Race, empire, and English language teaching: Creating responsible and ethical anti-racist practice. Teachers College Press.
77.
NgJ. C.LeeS. S., & PakY. K. (2007). Contesting the model minority and perpetual foreigner stereotypes: A critical review of literature on Asian Americans in education. Review of Research in Education, 311, 95—130.
78.
OlsenL. (2009). The role of advocacy in shaping immigrant education: A California case study. Teachers College Record, 1113, 817—850.
79.
OmiM., & WinantH. (2014). Racial formation in the United States. Routledge.
80.
OrtizP. (2018). An African American and Latinx history of the United States. Beacon Press.
81.
PavlenkoA. (2003). “Language of the enemy”: Foreign language education and national identity. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 65, 313—331.
82.
PérezA. H., & EncisoP. (2017). Decentering whiteness and monolingualism in the reception of Latinx YA literature. Bilingual Review/Revista Bilingüe, 335.
83.
PhillipsonR. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford University Press.
84.
ReaserJ.AdgerC. T.WolframW., & ChristianD. (2017). Dialects at school: Educating linguistically diverse students. Taylor & Francis.
85.
ReyesL. (2006). The Aspira consent decree: A thirtieth-anniversary retrospective of bilingual education in New York City. Harvard Educational Review, 763, 369—400.
86.
RickfordJ. R. (1999). African American vernacular English: Features, evolution, educational implications. Wiley-Blackwell.
87.
RickfordJ. R., & RickfordR. J. (2000). Spoken soul: The story of black English. Wiley.
88.
RobertsG.LeiteJ., & WadeO. (2018). Monolingualism is the illiteracy of the twenty-first century. Hispania, 1005, 116—118.
89.
RoedigerD. R. (2006). Working toward Whiteness: How America's immigrants became White: The strange journey from Ellis Island to the suburbs. Basic Books.
90.
RosaJ., & BurdickC. (2017). Language ideologies. In GarcíaO.FloresN., & SpottiM. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of language and society (pp. 103—124). Oxford University Press.
91.
RosaJ., & FloresN. (2017). Unsettling race and language: Toward a raciolinguistic perspective. Language in Society, 465, 621—647.
92.
RubinD. L. (1992). Nonlanguage factors affecting undergraduates’ judgments of nonnative English-speaking teaching assistants. Research in Higher Education, 334, 511—531.
93.
SchiroM. (2012). Curriculum theory: Conflicting visions and enduring concerns. SAGE.
94.
SchwartzA., & BoovyB. (2017). Mapping monolingualism within a language/race cartography: Reflections and lessons learned from “World Languages and Cultures Day.”L2 Journal, 9(1), 1—20.
95.
ShanksT. R. W. (2005). The Homestead Act: A major asset-building policy in American history. In SherradenM. (Ed.), Inclusion in the American Dream: Assets, poverty, and public policy (pp. 20—41). Oxford University Press.
96.
ShinS. J. (2017). Bilingualism in schools and society: Language, identity, and policy. Routledge.
97.
SilversteinM. (1996). Monoglot “standard” in America: Standardization and metaphors of linguistic hegemony. In BrenneisD., & MacaulayR. S. (Eds.), The matrix of language: Contemporary linguistic anthropology (pp. 284—306). Westview Press.
98.
SmithP. (2019). (Re) positioning in the Englishes and (English) literacies of a Black immigrant youth: Towards a transraciolinguistic approach. Theory Into Practice, 583, 292—303.
99.
Souto-ManningM. (2019). Transforming university-based teacher education: Preparing asset-, equity-, and justice-oriented teachers within the contemporary political context. Teachers College Record, 1216.
100.
SpillaneJ. P. (2009). Standards deviation: How schools misunderstand education policy. Harvard University Press.
101.
SpringJ. (2016). Deculturalization and the struggle for equality: A brief history of the education of dominated cultures in the United States. Routledge.
Suárez-OrozcoC., & Suárez-OrozcoM. M. (2009). Children of immigration. Harvard University Press.
104.
SubtireluN. C.BorowczykM.Thorson HernándezR., & VeneziaF. (2019). Recognizing whose bilingualism? A critical policy analysis of the Seal of Biliteracy. The Modern Language Journal, 1032, 371—390.
105.
TollefsonJ. W. (2015). Historical-structural analysis. In HultF. M., & JohnsonD. C. (Eds.), Research methods in language policy and planning: A practical guide (pp. 140—151). Wiley-Blackwell.
106.
TsudaT. (2014). “I'm American, not Japanese!”: The struggle for racial citizenship among later-generation Japanese Americans. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 373, 405—424.
107.
ValdésG. (2018). Analyzing the curricularization of language in two-way immersion education: Restating two cautionary notes. Bilingual Research Journal, 414, 388—412.
108.
ValdezV. E.FreireJ. A., & DelavanM. G. (2016). The gentrification of dual language education. The Urban Review, 484, 601—627.
WileyT. G. (2000). Continuity and change in the function of language ideologies in the United States. In RicentoT. (Ed.), Ideology, politics and language policies: Focus on English (pp. 67—85). John Benjamins.
111.
WileyT. G. (2014). Diversity, super-diversity, and monolingual language ideology in the United States: Tolerance or intolerance?Review of Research in Education, 381, 1—32.
112.
WolfeP. (2006). Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native. Journal of Genocide Research, 84, 387—409.
113.
WoolfordA. (2015). This benevolent experiment: Indigenous boarding schools, genocide, and redress in Canada and the United States. University of Nebraska Press.
114.
WrightW. E. (2019). Foundations for teaching English language learners: Research, theory, policy, and practice. Caslon.
115.
YildizY. (2012). Beyond the mother tongue: The postmonolingual condition. Fordham University Press.
