Nepantlera Pedagogy in an Immigrant Youth Theater Project: The Role of a Hmong Educator in Facilitating the Exploration of Culture and Identity

Abstract

Background/Context:

Community-based youth theater programs afford youth opportunities to explore and “author” new identities by “performing writing.” Yet, we know much less about the ways in which immigrant youth are exploring struggles and changes within their families and ethnic community. We particularly lack research about the roles of immigrant adult educators in youth programs, and the significance to the pedagogical process of their experiences, being, and modes of interacting with young people who share with them a common ethnicity.

Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study:

The purpose of the study is to explore the role of a community-based Hmong immigrant educator as a “nepantlera,” or boundary-crossing “guide” in Hmong youth’s negotiation of culture and identity. It is guided by three questions: (1) How does nepantlera pedagogy move beyond self–other dichotomies? (2) How does nepantlera pedagogy facilitate rewriting the self to construct new visions of ethnic identity? and (3) How does nepantlera pedagogy entail risking the personal?

Setting:

The research setting was a Hmong community-based arts organization in an urban center in the Midwestern United States.

Population/Participants/Subjects:

Three 1.5-generation Hmong American adult staff of a community-based organization, one Korean American teaching artist from a local theater company, and 11 second-generation Hmong American adolescents participated in the study.

Research Design:

The study draws from a critical ethnographic investigation of the culturally relevant practices of a youth theater project within a Hmong coethnic organization.

Data Collection and Analysis:

Ethnographic data collection occurred over the 4-month program cycle of the theater project. Data sources include field notes from participant observations, semi-structured interviews, audio and video recordings of the activities, work products, and documents about the program and organization. The data were analyzed with thematic analysis techniques.

Findings/Results:

The findings suggest that the nepantlera pedagogy of the Hmong immigrant educator fostered opportunities for Hmong youth to (1) disrupt binaries between first-generation and second-generation immigrants by exploring not only differences but also commonalities; (2) imagine new ethnic selves by exploring and rewriting a Hmong edict against same-last-name relationships; and (3) experience the vulnerability of their Hmong educator through disclosure about his personal life.

Conclusions/Recommendations:

The nepantlera pedagogy of an immigrant educator within a coethnic community-based organization brings a perspective from the nepantla, or “in-between,” of culture and identity that provides immigrant youth with a deeper level of cultural knowledge and connectedness to navigate their multiple worlds.

Keywords

nepantlera pedagogy youth arts program coethnic organizations out-of-school time Hmong immigrant Asian American

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achinstein

Ogawa

R. T.

(2011). Change(d) agents: New teachers of color in urban schools. Teachers College Press.

Aguilar-Valdez

J. R.

LópezLeiva

C. A.

Roberts-Harris

Torres-Velásquez

Lobo

Westby

(2013). Ciencia en Nepantla: The journey of Nepantler@s in science learning and teaching. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 8, 821–858. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-013-9512-9

Anzaldúa

G. E.

(2002a). Now let us shift: . . . The path of conocimiento . . . inner work, public acts. In Anzaldúa

G. E.

Keating

(Eds.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation (pp. 540–578). Routledge.

Anzaldúa

G. E.

(2002b). (Un)natural bridges, (un)safe spaces. In Anzaldúa

G. E.

Keating

(Eds.), This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation (pp. 1–5). Routledge.

Anzaldúa

G. E.

(2009). Borderlands la frontera: The new mestiza (4th ed.). Aunt Lute Books.

Anzaldúa

G. E.

Keating

(Eds.). (2002). This bridge we call home: Radical visions for transformation. Routledge.

Anzaldúa

G. E.

Keating

A. L.

(2009). The Gloria Anzaldúa reader. Duke University Press.

Anzaldúa

G. E.

Keating

A. L.

(2015). Light in the dark/luz en lo oscuro: Rewriting identity, spirituality, reality. Duke University Press.

Baldridge

B. J.

(2018). On educational advocacy and cultural work: Situating community-based youth work[ers] in broader educational discourse. Teachers College Record, 120(2), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0091732X16688622

10.

Boyatzis

R. E.

(1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. SAGE.

11.

Braun

Clarke

(2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

12.

Burr

(1995). An introduction to social constructionism. Routledge.

13.

Carlson

(1996). Performance: A critical introduction. Routledge.

14.

Clarke

Braun

(2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

15.

Delpit

(2006). Other people’s children: Cultural conflict in the classroom. The New Press.

16.

Denzin

Lincoln

(Eds.). (2000). The handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). SAGE.

17.

DePouw

(2012). When culture implies deficit: Placing race at the center of Hmong American education. Race Ethnicity and Education, 15(2), 223–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2011.624505

18.

Edell

(2013). “Say it how it is”: Urban teenage girls challenge and perpetuate stereotypes through writing and performing theatre. Youth Theatre Journal, 27, 51–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/08929092.2012.722903

19.

Emerson

R. M.

Fretz

R. I.

Shaw

L. L.

(1995). Writing ethnographic fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press.

20.

Fine

(1994). Dis-stance and other stances: Negotiations of power inside feminist research. In Gitlin

(Ed.), Power and method: Political activism and educational research (pp. 13–35). Routledge.

21.

Fránquiz

Avila

Lewis

(2013). Engaging bilingual students in sustained literature study in central Texas. Journal of Latin American Studies, 5(3), 142–155. https://doi.org/10.18085/llas.5.3.e13g5462g7341x05

22.

Gaztambide-Fernández

R. A.

(2008). The artist in society: Understandings, expectations, and curriculum implications. Curriculum Inquiry, 38(3), 233–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873x.2008.00408.x

23.

Ginwright

S. A.

(2005). On urban ground: Understanding African-American intergenerational partnerships in urban communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 33(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.20045

24.

Gutiérrez

(2012). Embracing nepantla: Rethinking “knowledge” and its use in mathematics teaching. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 1(1), 29–56. https://doi.org/10.4471/redimat.2012.02

25.

Hall

(1995). New cultures for old. In Massey

Jess

(Eds.), A place in the world? (pp. 175–213). Oxford University Press.

26.

Halverson

E. R.

(2005). InsideOut: Facilitating gay youth identity development through a performance-based youth organization. Identity, 5(1), 67–90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532706xid0501_5

27.

Halverson

E. R.

(2010). The dramaturgical process as a mechanism for identity development of LGBTQ youth and its relationship to detypification. Journal of Adolescent Research, 25(5), 635–668.

28.

Hammock

A. C.

(2011). Identity construction through theatrical community practice. Qualitative Social Work, 10, 364–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325011408481

29.

Keating

(2000). Gloria E. Anzaldúa: Interviews/entrevistas. Routledge.

30.

Keating

(2006). From borderlands and new mestizas to nepantlas and nepantleras: Anzaldúan theories for social change. Human Architecture: Journal of the Sociology of Self-Knowledge, 4(3), 5–16.

31.

Kiryio

J. D.

Thirumurthy

McNulty

C. P.

Brown

M. S.

(2009). Issues in education: Help wanted: Seeking the critical confluence of minorities in teaching. Childhood Education, 85(3), 179–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/00094056.2009.10521387

32.

Koltyk

J. A.

(1997). New pioneers in the heartland: Hmong life in Wisconsin. Allyn & Bacon.

33.

Ladson-Billings

(1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. Jossey-Bass.

34.

Lamborn

S. D.

Moua

(2008). Normative family interactions: Hmong American adolescents’ perceptions of their parents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23(4), 411–437.

35.

Lee

S. C.

Xiong

Z. B.

Yuen

F. K.

(2006). Explaining early marriage in the Hmong American community. In Holgate

Evans

Yuen

F. K. O.

(Eds.), Teen pregnancy and parenthood: Global perspectives, issues, and interventions (pp. 25–37). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203597040

36.

Lee

S. J.

(2005). Up against whiteness: Race, school, and immigrant youth. Teachers College Press.

37.

Lee

S. J.

Hawkins

M. R.

(2008). “Family is here”: Learning in community-based after-school programs. Theory Into Practice, 47(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840701764763

38.

Lee

S. J.

Vaught

(2003). “You can never be too rich or too thin”: Popular and consumer culture and the Americanization of Asian American girls and young women. The Journal of Negro Education, 72(4), 457–466.

39.

Lincoln

Guba

(1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE.

40.

Madison

D. S.

(2011). Critical ethnography: Method, ethics, and performance. SAGE.

41.

McCallister

(2004). Schooling the possible self. Curriculum Inquiry, 34(4), 425–461. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-873x.2004.00305.x

42.

McLaughlin

M. W.

(2001). Community counts: How youth organizations matter for youth development. Public Education Network.

43.

Milner

(2015). Black teachers as curriculum texts in urban schools. In He

M. F.

Schultz

B. D.

(Eds.), The Sage guide to curriculum in education (pp. 215–222). SAGE.

44.

Ngo

(2010). Unresolved identities: Discourse, ambivalence, and urban immigrant students. SUNY Press.

45.

Ngo

(2012). The importance of family for a gay Hmong American man: Complicating discourses of “coming out.” Hmong Studies Journal, 13(1), 1–27.

46.

Ngo

(2013). Culture consciousness among Hmong immigrant leaders: Beyond the dichotomy of cultural essentialism and cultural hybridity. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 958–990.

47.

Ngo

(2015). Hmong culture club as a place of belonging: The cultivation of Hmong students’ cultural and political identities. Journal of Southeast Asian American Education and Advancement, 10(2), 2. https://doi.org/10.7771/2153-8999.1130

48.

Ngo

(2017). The costs of “living the dream” for Hmong immigrants: The impact of subtractive schooling on family and community. Educational Studies, 53(5), 450–467.

49.

Ngo

Lor

(2013). Great expectations: The struggles of Hmong American high school boys. In Pfeiffer

Yang

(Eds.), Diversity within diaspora: The status of Hmong America 30 years after initial resettlement in the United States (pp. 151–164). University of Hawaii Press.

50.

Ortega

(2016). In-between: Latina feminist phenomenology, multiplicity, and the self. SUNY Press.

51.

Patton

M. Q.

(2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). SAGE.

52.

Reza-López

Huerta Charles

Reyes

L. V.

(2014). Nepantlera pedagogy: An axiological posture for preparing critically conscious teachers in the borderlands. Journal of Latinos and Education, 13(2), 107–119. https://doi.org/10.1080/15348431.2013.821062

53.

Rumbaut

R. G.

(2012). Generation 1.5, educational experiences of. In Banks

J. A.

(Ed.), Encyclopedia of diversity in education (Vol. 1, pp. 983–983). SAGE.

54.

Scott

J. W.

(1992). Experience. In Butler

Scott

(Eds.), Feminists theorize the political (pp. 22–39). Routledge.

55.

Suárez-Orozco

M. C.

(2002). Children of immigration. Harvard University Press.

56.

Valenzuela

(1999). Subtractive schooling: Issues of caring in education of U.S.-Mexican youth. State University of New York Press.

57.

Vang

(2012). The good Hmong girl eats laab. In Her

V. K.

Buley-Meissner

M. L.

(Eds.), Choosing to be Hmong and American: Re-envisioning identity, community and culture in modern society (pp. 101–112). Minnesota Historical Society.

58.

Vang

T. J.

(2013). The role of psycho-sociocultural factors in suicide risk among Mong/Hmong youth [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Portland State University.

59.

Winn

M. T.

(2012). The politics of desire and possibility in urban playwriting: (Re)reading and (re)writing the script. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7(4), 317–332. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480x.2012.715737

60.

Winn

M. T.

Jackson

C. A.

(2011). Toward a performance of possibilities: Resisting gendered (in)justice. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24(5), 615–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/09518398.2011.600261

61.

Wong

N. W. A.

(2010). “Cuz they care about the people who goes there”: The multiple roles of a community-based youth center in providing “youth (comm)unity” for low-income Chinese American youth. Urban Education, 45(5), 708–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085909355766

62.

Xiong

Z. B.

Deenanath

Mao

(2013). Parent-child relationships in Hmong immigrant families in the United States. In Karraker

(Ed.), The other people: Interdisciplinary perspectives on migration (pp. 91–106). Palgrave.

63.

Xiong

Z. B.

Tuicomepee

LaBlanc

Rainey

(2006). Hmong immigrants’ perceptions of family secrets and recipients of disclosure. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 87(2), 231–239.

64.

Yang

(2013). The American experience of the Hmong. In Pfeifer

M. E.

Chiu

Yang

(Eds.), Diversity in diaspora: Hmong Americans in the twenty-first century (pp. 3–53). University of Hawaii Press.

65.

Zhou

Kim

(2006). Community forces, social capital, and educational achievement: The case of supple mentary education in the Chinese and Korean immigrant communities. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 1–29.