(This bibliography includes only those studies referred to in the article.)
2.
AbellAdelaide M. “Rapid reading: advantages and methods,” Educational Review, 8: October, 1894: 283–86.
3.
BowdenJosephine.Learning to Read. (Master's thesis, University of Chicago, 1911.)
4.
CourtisS. A. “Standards in rates of reading.” Fourteenth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I, 1915; pp. 41–59.
5.
DearbornW. F.The psychology of reading. (Columbia Contributions to Philosophy and Psychology, v. 14, no. 1.) New York: Columbia University. 1906.
6.
DodgeRaymond.Die. Motorischen Wortvorstellungen.Halle: N. Nicmeyer, 1896. 78 pp. (p. 65.)
7.
FordyceCharles. “Testing the efficiency in reading.” Addresses and Proceedings of the National Education Association, 55: 818–21, July 7–14, 1917. (p. 821)
8.
GrayClarence T.Types of Reading Ability as Exhibited through Tests and Laboratory Experiments. (Supplementary Educational monograph, v. 1, no. 5, August, 1917.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1917. 196 pp.
9.
GrayWilliam S.Reading, Survey of the St. Louis Public Schools, v. 2.St. Louis: Board of Education, 1917.
10.
HueyEdmund B.The Psychology and Pedagogy of Reading.New York: Macmillan, 1913. 469 pp.
11.
JuddCharlesII.Measuring the Work of the Public Schools.Cleveland, Ohio: 1916.
12.
OberholtzerE. E. “Testing the efficiency of reading in the grades,” Elementary School Journal, 15 : February, 1915; 313–22.
13.
PetersCharles C. “The influence of speed drills upon the rate and effectiveness of silent reading.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 8: June, 1917: 350–366.
14.
QuantzJ. O. “Problems in the psychology of reading,” Psychological Review, Monograph Supplement, v. 2, no. 1, December, 1897.
15.
RuedigerWilliam C. “Field of distinct vision,” Columbia Contributions to Philosophy and Psychology, v. 16, no. 1, 1907.
16.
WaldoKarl D. “Tests in reading in Sycamore schools,” Elementary School Journal, 15; January, 1915: 251–268.
17.
WhippleG. M., and CurtisJosephine N. “Preliminary investigation of skimming in reading.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 8; June, 1917: 333–349.