Anderson & Merton. Remedial work in reading.El. Sch. Jour., May and June, 1920.
2.
BoggsLueinda.How children learn to read.Ped. Sem., 12: 1905.
3.
BrinkerhoffGeo. I. Aims in primary reading.Education, 38: Sept. 17th.
4.
CattellJ. M.Mind, 1886.
5.
CourtisS. A.The Measurement of Classroom Products.Gary Survey, 1919.
6.
Currier & Duguid. Phonics or no phonies.El. Sch. Jour.17: December, 1916.
7.
DicksonV. E.What first-grade children can do in school as related to what is shown by mental tests.Jour. of Educ. Research, 2 : June, 1920.
8.
GrayC. T.Types of Reading Ability as Exhibited Through, Tests and Laboratory Experiments.University of Chicago, Sup. Educ. Monograph, Vol. I, No. 5.
9.
GrayW. S. Reading, in the Survey of the St. Louis Schools, Vol. V.
10.
GrayW. S.Studies of Elementary School Reading Through Standardized Tests.University of Chicago, Sup. Educ. Monograph, Vol. I, No. 1.
11.
GrayW. S.Principles of method in teaching reading.Eighteenth Yearbook, Part II, 1919.
12.
HaggertyM. E.Discriminative Capacity of Reading Examination Sigma 1. (An unpublished study, Univ. of Minnesota.)
13.
HawleyW. E.The Effect of Clear Objectives on the Teaching of Reading. (An unpublished study at Rochester, N. Y.)
14.
HendricksE. L.A Study in Reading.Silver, Burdett & Co.1911.
15.
HueyE. B.The Psychology & Pedagogy of Reading.New York. 1908.
16.
JuddC. H.Measuring the Work of the Public Schools. Cleveland Survey Report, 1916.
17.
JuddC. H.Reading, Its Nature and Development.Chicago Univ. Educ. Monograph, Vol. II, No. 4.
18.
MeadC. D.Silent reading versus oral reading with one hundred sixth-grade pupils.Jour. Educ. Psych., 6: 1915.
19.
OberholtzerE. E.Testing the efficiency of reading in the grades.Elem. Sch. J., 15: Feb., 1915.
20.
O'HernJ. P.The reading problem in the public schools as affected by actual measurements.Jour. N. Y. State Teachers Ass'n., April, 1916.
21.
PackerP. C., & AndersonH. W.The loss in reading ability during the summer vacation.Midland Schools, 30: November, 1915.
22.
PintnerR., and Gilliland. Oral and silent reading.Jour. Educ. Psych., 7: April, 1916, 201–212.
23.
PintnerR.Inner speech during silent reading.Psych. Rev., 20: March, 1913.
24.
PintnerR.Oral reading of fourth-grade pupils.Jour. Educ. Psych., 4: 1913.
25.
QuantzJ. A.Problems in the psychology of reading.Psych. Rev. Mon. Supplement, Vol. II, No. 1, 1897.
26.
ReichertC.Lorena. Paper read before the Educational Measurements Section of the Wisconsin State Teachers Association, Milwaukee, Nov. 1919.
27.
SchmidtW. A.An Experimental Study in the Psychology of Reading, Univ. of Chicago, Sup. Educ. Monograph, Vol. 1, No. 2.
28.
TermanL. M.The use of intelligence tests in the grading of school children.Jour. Educ. Research, 1: January, 1920.
29.
TheisenW. W.Provisions for individual differences in teaching reading.Jour. Educ. Research, 2: September, 1920.
30.
TheisenW. W.Reading, Some Standard Test Results and Teaching Observations. Studies in Educational Measurement No. 2. Wis. State Dept. of Instruction (in press).
31.
TheisenW. W.Some Factors Affecting Results in Primary Reading as Measured by the Haggerty Achievement Reading Test (an unpublished study, State Dept. of Public Instr., Madison, Wis.)
32.
UhlW. L.The use of results of reading tests as bases for planning remedial work.Elem. Sch. Jour., Vol. 17.
ZirbesLaura.Diagnostic measurement as a basis for procedure.Elem. Sch. Jour., 18: March, 1918.
35.
ZornowT. A.The use of the Gray oral reading test in a Rochester school and some deductions from the results.Jour. N. Y. State Teachers Ass'n., April, 1919.