Young children's engagement with mathematics is occurring in a context in which school transition and readiness concerns that invoke increased institutional rules and disciplinary practices involving power dynamics are coming into play. These trends made us curious to undertake an in-depth investigation of the different ways children and their teachers engage in mathematics in preschool classrooms today.
Purpose/Focus of Study
In our video-ethnography study we explored the ways mathematics manifested itself in a Pre-K setting and how mathematics functioned in different ways throughout the school day. The question guiding our research was: Recognizing the context of current transition and readiness concerns in early childhood education, in what ways is mathematics manifested in the interactions of teachers and children in a Pre-K classroom?
Setting
The study took place in a childcare center, accredited by the National Association for the Education of Young Children, in the United States.
Participants
Participants in this study were four 4- to 5-year-old children and their teachers in an ethnically diverse classroom.
Research Design
The study drew on a video-ethnographic method through semester-long observations and video-recordings in a Pre-K classroom. The analysis began with (a) labeling manifestations of mathematics in the video data through open coding, proceeded to (b) the examination and the categorization of the various manifestations of mathematics, was followed by (c) the identification of the key scenes which best represented each category, and ended with (d) the multimodal analysis of the key scenes.
Findings
This research illustrated that formal mathematics teaching and learning contexts included the kinds of disciplinary and bodily control practices that have been evident in studies of children at the preschool level transitioning into school. The study demonstrated the ways that mathematics, with its authoritative and classificatory nature, became a disciplinary tool itself during the course of the day. Also evident were the ways in which all actors in the classroom drew on mathematics for problem-solving in real-life situations within a power/resistance dynamic.
Conclusions/Recommendations
This research raises questions of how disciplinary practices might limit children's mathematics learning. The finding that mathematics was implicated in the practices of power dynamics among teachers and children and among children opens up possibilities for teachers to recognize how mathematics is being used informally and creatively by children. Teachers can then use this knowledge to build on young children's identities as powerful and competent mathematicians, using mathematics in problem solving during day-to-day interactions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlibaliM. W., & NathanM. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’ and teachers’ gestures. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 212, 247—286.
2.
AschT.ConnorL., & AschP. (1983). Jero on Jero: A Balinese trance séance observed [Motion Picture]. Documentary Educational Resources.
3.
AubreyC. (1993). An investigation of the mathematical knowledge and competencies which young children bring to school. British Educational Research Journal, 19, 27—41.
4.
BartholdssonÅ.Gustafsson LundbergJ., & HultinE. (2014). Cultivating the socially competent body: Bodies and risk in Swedish programmes for social and emotional learning in preschools and schools. Critical Studies in Education, 552, 201—212.
5.
BroströmS. (2002). Communication and continuity in the transition from kindergarten to school. In FabianH., & DunlopA. (Eds.), Transitions in the early years: Debating continuity and progression for children in early education (pp. 76—87). Routledge.
6.
ClementsD. H. (2004a). Geometric and spatial thinking in early childhood education. In ClementsD. H.SaramaJ., & DiBiaseA. M. (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 267—298). Lawrence Erlbaum.
7.
ClementsD. H. (2004b). Part 1: Major themes and recommendations. In ClementsD. H.SaramaJ., & DiBiaseA.-M. (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 7—76). Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
ClementsD. H.FusonK. C., & SaramaJ. (2017). The research-based balance in early childhood mathematics: A response to Common Core criticisms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 40, 150—162.
9.
ClementsD., & SaramaJ. (2007). Effects of a preschool mathematics curriculum: Summative research on the building blocks project. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 382, 136—163.
10.
ClementsD. H.SaramaJ., & GermerothC. (2016). Learning executive function and early mathematics: Directions of causal relations. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 79—90.
11.
CoppleC., & BredekampS. (Eds.). (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving young children from birth through age 8 (3rd ed.). National Association of Education for Young Children (NAEYC).
12.
CorsaroW. A., & MolinariL. (2000). Priming events and Italian children's transition from preschool to elementary school: Representation and action. Social Psychology Quarterly, 631, 16—33.
13.
Dávila-CoatesG., & FrancoJ. (1999). Movement, mathematics and learning: Experiences using a family learning model. In CopleyJ. V. (Ed.), Mathematics in the early years (pp.169—174). Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics/National Association of Educating Young Children.
14.
DixonK. (2011). Literacy, power and the schooled body. Routledge.
15.
DockettS., & EinarsdóttirJ. (2017). Continuity and change as children start school. In BallamN.PerryB., & GarpelinA. (Eds.), Pedagogies of educational transitions: European and antipodean research (pp. 133—150). (International Perspectives on Early Childhood Education and Development; Vol. 16). Springer-Verlag London, Limited.
16.
DockettS., & PerryB. (1999). Starting school: What do the children say?Early Child Development and Care, 159, 107—119.
17.
DockettS., & PerryB. (2004). Starting school: Perspectives of Australian children, parents and educators. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 22, 171—89.
18.
DockettS., & PerryB. (2005). Children's drawings: Experiences and expectations of school. International Journal of Equity and Innovation in Early Childhood3, (2), 77—89.
19.
DockettS., & PerryB. (2007). Transitions to school: Perceptions, expectations, experiences. University of New South Wales Press.
20.
EinarsdóttirJ. (2002). Children's accounts of the transition from preschool to elementary school. Tidsskriftet Barn, 4, 49—72.
21.
EinarsdóttirJ. (2003). When the bell rings we have to go inside: Preschool children's views on the primary school. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 11(Suppl.), 35—49.
22.
EinarsdóttirJ. (2007). Children's voices on the transition from preschool to primary school. In DunlopA., & FabianH. (Eds.), Informing transitions in the early years (pp. 74—91). Open University Press.
23.
EinarsdóttirJ. (2010). Children's experiences of the first year of primary school. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 182, 163—180.
24.
EinarsdóttirJ. (2013). Transition from preschool to primary school in Iceland from the perspectives of children. In MargettsK., & KienigA. (Eds.), International perspectives on transition to school: Reconceptualising beliefs, policy and practice (pp. 67—78). Routledge.
25.
EinarsdóttirJ.DockettS., & PerryB. (2009). Making meaning: Children's perspectives expressed through drawings. Early Child Development and Care, 1792, 217—232.
26.
EmersonR. M.FretzR. I., & ShawL. L. (2001). Participant observation and fieldnotes. In AtkinsonP.CoffeyA.DelamontS.LoflandJ., & LoflandL. (Eds.), Handbook of ethnography (pp. 352—368). SAGE.
27.
EricksonF. (1984). What makes school ethnography ethnographic?Anthropology and Education Quarterly15, 51—66.
28.
EricksonF. (1992). Ethnographic microanalysis of interaction. In LeCompteM.MillroyW., & PreissleJ. (Eds.), The handbook of qualitative research in education (pp. 201—225). Academic.
29.
FabianH. (2002). Children starting school: A guide to successful transitions and transfers for teachers and assistants. David Fulton.
30.
FessehaE., & PyleA. (2016). Conceptualising play-based learning from kindergarten teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Early Years Education, 243, 361—377.
31.
FlewittR. (2003). Is every child's voice heard? Longitudinal case studies of 3-year-old children's communicative strategies at home and in a preschool playgroup. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southampton.
32.
FlewittR. (2005). Using multimodal analysis to unravel a silent child's learning. Early Childhood Practice: The Journal for Multi-Professional Partnerships, 72, 5—16.
33.
FlyvbjergB. (2011). Case study. In DenzinN., & LincolnY. S. (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 301—316). SAGE.
34.
FoucaultM. (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972-1977. Pantheon Books.
35.
FoucaultM. (1990). The history of sexuality. Volume 1: An introduction. (R. Hurley, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1976)
36.
FoucaultM. (1995). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). Vintage Books. (Original work published 1977)
37.
FreudenthalH. (1968). Why to teach mathematics so as to be useful?Educational Studies in Mathematics, 1(1/2), 3—8.
GinsburgH. P.InoueN., & SeoK. (1999). Young children doing mathematics: Observations of everyday mathematics. CopleyJ. (Ed.), Mathematics in the early years (pp. 88—100). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
40.
GinsburgH. P.LeeJ. S., & BoydJ. S. (2008). Mathematics education for young children: What it is and how to promote it. Social Policy Report of the Society for Research in Child Development, 22, 3—22.
41.
GoodwayJ. D.RudisillM. E.HamiltonM. L., & HartM. A. (1999). Math in motion. In CopleyJ. V. (Ed.), Mathematics in the early years (pp.175—181). Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics/National Association of Educating Young Children.
42.
GriebelW., & NieselR. (2002). Co-constructing transition into kindergarten and school by children, parents and teachers. In DunlopA. W., & FabianH. (Eds.), Transitions in the early years: Debating continuity and progression for young children in early education (pp. 64—75). Routledge.
43.
HacheyA. C. (2013). The early childhood mathematics education revolution. Early Education and Development, 244, 419—430.
44.
Hirsh-PasekK.GolinkoffR. M.BerkL. E., & SingerD. G. (2009). A mandate for playful learning in preschool: Presenting the evidence. Oxford University Press.
45.
JewittC. (2009). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis. Routledge.
46.
KamlerB.MacLeanR.ReidJ., & SimpsonA. (2001). Put your hands in your own laps: Disciplining the student body. In JohnstonJ. R. (Ed.), The body in the American context: An anthology (pp. 221—239). Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
47.
KarsliE. (2014). Young children's embodied mathematical practices in and out of school context: A video-ethnography inquiry. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Georgia, Athens.
48.
KieranC.FormanE., & SfardA. (Eds.) (2001). Learning discourse: Discursive approaches to research in mathematics education. Kluwer Academic.
49.
KimM.RothW. M., & ThomJ. (2009). Children's gestures and the embodied knowledge of geometry. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 91, 207—238.
50.
KressG. (2009). What's mode? In. JewittC. (Ed.). The Routledge handbook of multimodal analysis (pp. 54—67). Routledge.
51.
LakoffG., & NúnezR.E. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. Basics Books.
52.
LeCompteM. D. (1980). The civilizing of children: How young children learn to become students, Journal of Thought, 15(3) 105—127.
53.
LeeK. (2012). In a kindergarten class, you walk with [your hands on] hips and lips: Attention deficit/hyperactivity body in U.S. early schooling, presented at the 20th International Reconceptualizing Early Childhood Education Conference. Penn State University, State College, PA, USA.
54.
LermanS. (2001). Cultural, discursive psychology: A socio-cultural approach to studying the teaching and learning of mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46(1-3), 87—113.
55.
LevineS. C. (2014). Relation of parent number and spatial talk to preschool children's numerical and spatial thinking, presented at 18th International Roundtable on School, Family, and Community Relationships, Philadelphia, PA.
56.
Lim-KimS. (1999). Teaching mathematics through musical activities. In CopleyJ. V. (Eds.), Mathematics in the early years (pp.146—150). Washington, DC: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics/National Association of Educating Young Children.
57.
MaxwellJ. A., & MillerB. A. (2008). Categorizing and connecting strategies in qualitative data analysis. In Hesse-BiberS. N., & LeavyP. (Eds.), Handbook of emergent methods (pp. 461—477). Guilford Press.
58.
MillerE., & AlmonJ. (2009). Crisis in the kindergarten: Why children need to play in school. Alliance for Childhood Press.
59.
National Association for the Education of Young Children & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2010). Early childhood mathematics: Promoting good beginnings. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
60.
National Research Council. (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: Paths toward excellence and equity. National Academy Press.
61.
ParksA. N. (2015). Exploring mathematics through play in the early childhood classroom. Teachers College Press.
62.
ParksA. N., & ChangD. (2014). Play and mathematics: Helping young children see math in play. Teaching Children Mathematics, 205, 310—317.
63.
PerryB., & DockettS. (2005). What did you do in maths today?Australian Journal of Early Childhood, 30(3), 32—37.
64.
PiantaR. (2004). Going to kindergarten: Transition models and practices. In WhittonD.DockettS., & PerryB. (Eds.), Proceedings of the international conference, continuity and change: Transitions in education. Sydney, AU: University of Western Sydney.
65.
PiastaS. B.PelattiC. Y., & MillerH. L. (2014). Mathematics and science learning opportunities in preschool classrooms. Early Education and Development, 254, 445—468.
66.
PrudenS. M.LevineS. C., & HuttenlocherJ. (2011). Children's spatial thinking: Does talk about the spatial world matter?Developmental Science, 146, 1417—1430.
RossJ. (2004). The instructable body: Student bodies from classrooms to prisons. In BreslerL. (Ed.), Knowing bodies, feeling minds: Embodied knowledge in arts education and schooling (169—181). Kluwer Academic Press.
69.
SadlerP. M., & TaiR. H. (2007). The two high-school pillars supporting college science. Science, 317, 457—458.
70.
SeoK.-H., & GinsburgH. P. (2004). What is developmentally appropriate in early childhood mathematics education? Lessons from new research. In ClementsD. H.SaramaJ., & DiBiaseA.-M. (Eds.), Engaging young children in mathematics: Standards for early childhood mathematics education (pp. 91—104). Erlbaum.
71.
StipekD. (2013). Mathematics in early childhood education: Revolution or evolution?Early Education & Development, 244, 431—435.
72.
TobinJ. (1995). Post-structural research in early childhood education. In HatchA. (Ed.). Qualitative research in early childhood settings (pp. 223—243). Praeger.
73.
TobinJ. (2004). The body in preschool. In BreslerL. (Ed.). Knowing bodies, feeling minds: Embodied knowledge in arts education and schooling (pp. 111—125). Kluwer Academic Press.
74.
TobinJ.HsuehY., & KarasawaM. (2009). Preschool in three cultures, revisited: Japan, China, and the United States. University of Chicago Press.
75.
ValenzanoL.AlibaliM. W., & KlatzkyR. (2003). Teachers’ gestures facilitate students’ learning: A lesson in symmetry. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 187—204.
76.
Van OersB. (2002). Educational forms of initiation in mathematical culture. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 46, 59—85.
77.
VazouS., & SkradeM. A. (2017). Intervention integrating physical activity with math: Math performance, perceived competence, and need satisfaction. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 155, 508—522.
78.
WalkerdineV. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. Routledge.
79.
WalshD. J. (2004). Frog boy and the American monkey: The body in Japanese early schooling. In BreslerL. (Ed.). Knowing bodies, feeling minds: Embodied knowledge in arts education and schooling (pp. 97—109). Kluwer Academic Press.
80.
WeisbergD. S.Hirsh-PasekK., & GolinkoffR. M. (2013). Guided play: Where curricular goals meet a playful pedagogy. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7, 104—112.
81.
WoodE., & HedgesH. (2016). Curriculum in early childhood education: Critical questions about content, coherence and control. The Curriculum Journal, 273, 387—405.
82.
YackelE., & CobbP. (1996). Socio-mathematical norms, argumentation, and autonomy in mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 274, 458—477.
