Given our current anti-immigrant context, it is pertinent that we understand how (un)documented parents who are members of a parent-organized and parent-initiated group come to develop a collectivist Latinx identity within oppressive and marginalizing structures and policies.
Purpose/Objectives
This study analyzes the processes and actions of a Latinx parent group that led to the establishment of a collectivist identity and the activation of a collective conscientizacao/critical consciousness amid an anti-immigrant climate.
Research Design
Based on a 2.5-year critical ethnography, we analyzed data that included in-depth interviews, participant observations, photographs, and documents. In doing so, we were able to center the experiences of a parent organizing group in an elementary school in the Midwest during a period of heightened immigrant surveillance and anti-immigrant legislation.
Findings/Results
Our research suggests that critical consciousness was activated among this group in three stages: (1) Stage 1 describes the actions/strategies FUV took to develop a collective critical consciousness; (2) Stage 2 details the ways in which FUV members activated (i.e., enacted) their collective critical consciousness; and (3) Stage 3 discusses FUV's ongoing efforts to nurture a collective critical consciousness.
Conclusions/Recommendations
This study combats oppressive, marginalizing, and prevailing academic and public parental involvement discourse, thus having direct implications for how school officials center and support (un)documented Latinx parents and families in schools.
AnzaldúaG. (Ed.). (1990). Making face, making soul: Creative and critical perspectives by Women of Color. Aunt Lute Books.
3.
Baquedano-LópezP.AlexanderR. A., & HernandezS. J. (2013). Equity issues in parental and community involvement in schools: What teacher educators need to know. Review of Research in Education, 37, 149—182.
4.
BertrandM., & RodelaK. (2018). A framework for rethinking educational leadership in the margins: Implications for social justice leadership preparation. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 131, 10—37.
5.
CarreonG. P.DrakeC., & BartonA. C. (2005). The importance of presence: Immigrant parents’ school engagement experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 423, 465—498.
6.
CarspeckenP. F. (1996). Critical ethnography in educational research: A theoretical and practical guide. Routledge.
CreswellJ. W. (2008). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.
9.
DarderA. (2006). Foreword. In E. M. Olivos, The power of parents: A critical perspective of bicultural parent involvement in public schools. Peter Lang.
10.
De CarvalhoM. E. (2001). Rethinking family-school relations: A critique of parental involvement in schooling. Erlbaum.
11.
De GaetanoY. (2007). The role of culture in engaging Latino parents’ involvement in school. Urban Education, 422, 145—162.
12.
Delgado BernalB. (2002). Critical race theory, Latino critical theory, and critical-raced gendered epistemologies: Recognizing students of color as holders and creators of knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 81, 105—126.
13.
FernándezE. (2016). Illuminating agency: A Latin@immigrant parent's testimonio on the intersection of immigration reform and schools. Equity and Excellence in Education, 49, 350—362.
14.
FernándezE., & LópezG. (2016). When parents behave badly: A critical policy analysis of parent involvement in schools. In YoungM., & DiemS. (Eds.), Critical policy analysis (pp. 111—129). Springer.
15.
FernándezE., & ScribnerS. M. P. (2018). “Venimos … para que se oiga la voz…”: Activating community cultural wealth as parental educational leadership. Journal of Research on Leadership Education, 131, 59—78.
16.
FreireP. (2010). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum International. (Original work published 1970)
17.
GuajardoM., & GuajardoF. (2002). Critical ethnography and community change. In ZouY., & TruebaE. (Eds.), Ethnography and schools: qualitative approaches to the study of education (pp. 281—305). Rowman & Littlefield.
18.
HillC. E.KnoxS.ThompsonB. J.WilliamsE. N.HessS. A., & LadanyN. (2005). Consensual qualitative research: An update. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 52, 196—205.
19.
HongS. (2011). A cord of three strands: A new approach to parent engagement in schools. Harvard Education Press.
20.
LópezG. R. (2001). The value of hard work: Lessons on parent involvement from an (im) migrant household. Harvard Educational Review, 713, 416—437.
21.
LópezM. P., & LópezG. R. (2009). Persistent inequality: Contemporary realities in the education of undocumented Latina/o students. Routledge.
22.
JasisP., & Ordóñez-JasisR. (2004). Convivencia to empowerment: Latino parent organizing at la familia. High School Journal, 882, 32—42.
23.
McClainM. (2010). Parental agency in educational decision making: A Mexican American experience. Teachers College Record, 11212, 3074—3101.
24.
NájeraJ. R. (2015). Unauthorized education: Challenging borders between good and bad immigrants. Association of Mexican-American Educators Journal, 93, 36—46.
25.
Negrón-GonzalesG. (2014). Undocumented, unafraid, and unapologetic: Re-articulatory practices and migrant youth “illegality.”Latino Studies, 12(2), 259—278.
26.
O'LearyA. O., & SanchezA. (2011). Anti-immigrant Arizona: Ripple effects and mixed immigration status households under “policies of attrition” considered. Journal of Borderlands Studies, 261, 115—133.
27.
OliverL. P. (1987). Study circles: Coming together for personal growth and social change. Seven Locks Press.
28.
OlivosE. M. (2004). Tensions, contradictions, and resistance: An activist's reflection of the struggles of Latino parents in the public school system. High School Journal, 874, 25—35.
29.
OlivosE. M. (2006). The power of parents: A critical perspective of bicultural parent involvement in public schools. Peter Lang.
30.
OlivosE. M. (2009). Collaboration with Latino families: A critical perspective of home school interactions. Intervention in School & Clinic, 452, 109—115.
31.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. SAGE.
32.
Pérez-CarreónG.DrakeC., & BartonA. C. (2005). The importance of presence: Immigrant parents’ school engagement experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 423, 465—498.
33.
RamirezF. (2003). Dismay and disappointment: Parental involvement of Latino immigrant parents. The Urban Review, 352, 93—110.
34.
RodelaK. C. (2013). Latino families and parent involvement in Oregon: Current issues and models (White paper). Center for Latin@ Studies and Engagement, Oregon State University.
35.
RodelaK. C. (2014). Ni el problema, ni el remedio (Neither the problem, nor the solution): Latina immigrant mothers negotiating deficit perspectives in U.S. early childhood education [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Stanford University.
36.
RodelaK. (2016). Undocumented educational leadership: The development of Latina mothers into emergent social justice leaders. National FORUM of Applied Educational Research Journal, 29, 21—33.
37.
RodelaK., & BertrandM. (2018). Rethinking educational leadership in the margins: Youth, parent, and community leadership for equity and social justice. Journal of Research in Leadership Education, 131, 3—9.
38.
RomeroM. (2008). The inclusion of citizenship status in intersectionality: What immigration raids tells us about mixed-status families, the state, and assimilation. International Journal of the Family, 342, 131—152.
39.
SchwandtT. A. (2007). The SAGE dictionary of qualitative inquiry (3rd ed.). SAGE.
40.
ScribnerS. M. P., & FernándezE. (2017). Organizational politics of parental engagement: The intersections of school reform, anti-immigration policies, and Latinx parent organizing. Policy, 31, 895—920.
41.
ShahP. (2009). Motivating participation: The symbolic effects of Latino representation on parent school involvement. Social Science Quarterly, 901, 212—230.
42.
ShortR., & MagañaL. (2002). Political rhetoric, immigration attitudes, and contemporary prejudice: A Mexican American dilemma. Journal of Social Psychology, 1426, 701—712.
43.
ValdésG. (2004). Between support and marginalisation: The development of academic language in linguistic minority children. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 72–3, 102—132.
44.
VélezV. N. (2016). Organizing for change: Latinx im/migrant parents, school decision-making, and the racial politics of parent leadership in school reform. Association of Mexican American Educators Journal, 103, 108—128.
45.
WilsonT. D. (2000). Anti-immigrant sentiment and the problem of reproduction/ maintenance in Mexican immigration to the United States. Critique of Anthropology, 202, 191—213.
46.
ZimmermanA. M. (2011). A dream detained: Undocumented Latino youth and the DREAM movement. NACLA Report on the Americas, 446, 14—17.
