Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background/Context

The Post-9/11 GI Bill has provided educational benefits to millions of military service members and veterans since its adoption in August 2009. Recent studies indicate that the bill has significantly improved college enrollment and educational attainment among post-9/11 veterans. A significant proportion of veterans suffer from service-connected disabilities. While provisions of the Post-9/11 GI Bill may render education benefits that are appealing to veterans with service-connected disabilities, little is known with regard to how the bill has affected college participation among this venerable subpopulation of veterans.

Purpose/Objective

This study examines the effect of the Post-9/11 GI Bill on college enrollment rates among veterans with service-connected disabilities and unpacks potentially heterogeneous impacts across groups with different demographic characteristics (i.e., sex, age, race/ ethnicity, educational attainment, and disability ratings).

Population

Post-9/11 veterans.

Research Design

Triple differences.

Data Collection and Analysis

Secondary data analysis based on American Community Survey 2005–2016.

Findings/Results

While the Post-9/11 GI Bill has increased college enrollment for veterans without service-connected disabilities by less than 1 percentage point, the increase is much larger—about 5 percentage points—for veterans with service-connected disabilities. Enrollment effects for veterans with service-connected disabilities are consistent and positive across sex, age, race/ethnicity, educational attainment, and disability ratings.

Conclusions/Recommendations

The results of this study provide strong evidence for the significant enrollment growth among veterans with service-connected disabilities after the adoption of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. While this result is reassuring, it is not clear whether this large effect for veterans with service-connected disabilities is due to favorable provisions in the Post-9/11 GI Bill or due to lower opportunity costs. In the future, researchers may want to identify appropriate sources for data on detailed educational benefits to examine the mechanisms behind the effect.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

K. S.

, & Proctor

B. E.

(2010). Adaptation to college for students with and without disabilities: Group differences and predictors. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 22 3, 166—184.

Angrist

J. D.

(1993). The effect of veterans benefits on education and earnings. ILR Review, 46 4, 637—652.

Angrist

Autor

Hudson

, & Pallais

(2016). Updated results from a randomized evaluation of post-secondary aid. Available at https://www8.gsb.columbia.edu/faculty-research

Barnard-Brak

Davis

Tate

, & Sulak

(2009). Attitudes as a predictor of college students requesting accommodations. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 31 3, 189—198.

Barr

(2015). From the battlefield to the schoolyard: The short-term impact of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. Journal of Human Resources, 50 3, 580—613.

Barr

(2019). Fighting for education: Veterans and Financial Aid. Journal of Labor Economics, 37 2, 509—544.

Bertrand

Duflo

, & Mullainathan

(2004). How much should we trust differences-indifferences estimates? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119 1, 249—275.

Bound

, & Turner

(2002). Going to war and going to college: Did World War II and the GI Bill increase educational attainment for returning veterans? Journal of Labor Economics, 20 4, 784—815.

Bureau of Labor Statistics (2017). Employment Situation of Veterans. Available at https://www.bls.gov/news.release/vet.nr0.htm

10.

Castleman

B. L.

, & Long

B. T.

(2016). Looking beyond enrollment: The causal effect of need-based grants on college access, persistence, and graduation. Journal of Labor Economics, 34 4, 1023—1073.

11.

Clelan

, & Kofoed

M. S.

(2017). The effect of the business cycle on freshman financial aid. Contemporary Economic Policy, 35 2, 253—268.

12.

Correia

(2016). REGHDFE: Stata module to perform linear or instrumental-variable regression absorbing any number of high-dimensional fixed effects. Statistical Software Components, August 6.

13.

Deming

, & Dynarski

(2010). College aid. In Levine

, & Zimmerman

(Eds.), Targeting investments in children: Fighting poverty when resources are limited (pp. 283—302). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

14.

Dynarski

(2000). Hope for whom? Financial aid for the middle class and its impact on college attendance. National Tax Journal, 53 3, 629—661.

15.

Elnitsky

C. A.

Blevins

Findlow

J. W.

Alverio

, & Wiese

(2018). Student veterans reintegrating from the military to the university with traumatic injuries: how does service use relate to health status? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 99(2), S58—S64.

16.

Ford

, & Vignare

(2014). The evolving military learner population: A review of the literature. Online Learning, 19 1, 7—30.

17.

Goldrick-Rab

Kelchen

Harris

D. N.

, & Benson

(2016). Reducing income inequality in educational attainment: Experimental evidence on the impact of financial aid on college completion. American Journal of Sociology, 121 6, 1762—1817.

18.

Hossler

Braxton

, & Coopersmith

(1989). Understanding student college choice. In Smart

John

(Eds.) Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 5, pp. 231—288). New York: Agathon Press.

19.

Long

B. T.

(2004). The impact of federal tax credits for higher education expenses. In Hoxby

C. M.

(Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 101—168). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

20.

Madaus

J. W.

, & Miller

W. K.

(2009). Veterans with disabilities in postsecondary education. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 22 1, 10—17.

21.

Mamiseishvili

, & Koch

L. C.

(2012). Students with disabilities at 2-year institutions in the United States: Factors related to success. Community College Review, 40 4, 320—339.

22.

McBain

Kim

Y. M.

Cook

B. J.

, & Snead

K. M.

(2012). From soldier to student II: Assessing campus programs for veterans and service members. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.

23.

Mora

, & Reggio

(2015). didq: A command for treatment-effect estimation under alternative assumptions. Stata Journal, 15 3, 796—808.

24.

Murray

Lombardi

Bender

, & Gerdes

(2013). Social support: Main and moderating effects on the relation between financial stress and adjustment among college students with disabilities. Social Psychology of Education, 16 2, 277—295.

25.

Newman

Wagner

Knokey

A. M.

Marder

Nagle

Shaver

, & Wei

(2011). The Post-High School Outcomes of Young Adults with Disabilities up to 8 Years after High School: A Report from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2. (NCSER 2011-3005). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International

26.

Orr

A. C.

, & Hammig

S. B.

(2009). Inclusive postsecondary strategies for teaching students with learning disabilities: A review of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 32 3, 181—196.

27.

Perna

L. W.

(2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In Smart

John

(Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 99—157). The Netherlands: Springer.

28.

Perna

L. W.

(2010). Toward a more complete understanding of the role of financial aid in promoting college enrollment: The importance of context. In Smart

John

(Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 129—180). The Netherlands: Springer.

29.

Polloway

E. A.

Patton

J. R.

, & Serna

(2008). Strategies for teaching learners with special needs. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

30.

Simon

C. J.

Negrusa

, & Warner

J. T.

(2010). Educational benefits and military service: An analysis of enlistment, reenlistment, and veterans’ benefit usage 1991–2005. Economic Inquiry, 48 4, 1008—1031.

31.

Sjoquist

D. L.

, & Winters

J. V.

(2012). Building the stock of college-educated labor revisited. Journal of Human Resources, 47(1), 270—285.

32.

Steele

J. L.

Salcedo

, & Coley

(2010). Service members in school: Military veterans’ experiences using the Post-9/11 GI Bill and pursuing postsecondary education. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.

33.

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (2011). Veterans benefits administration annual benefits report Fiscal Year 2010. Retrieved from http://benefits.va.gov/

34.

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (2012). Veterans benefits administration annual benefits report Fiscal Year 2011. Retrieved from http://benefits.va.gov/

35.

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. (2018). Veterans benefits administration annual benefits report Fiscal Year 2016. Retrieved from http://benefits.va.gov/

36.

Vacchi

D. T.

(2012). Considering student veterans on the twenty-first-century college campus. About Campus, 17 2, 15—21.

37.

Vacchi

D. T.

, & Berger

J. B.

(2014). Student veterans in higher education. In Smart

John

(Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 93—151). The Netherlands: Springer.

38.

Zhang

(2018). Veterans going to college: Evaluating the impact of the Post-9/11 GI Bill on college enrollment. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40 1, 82—102.

Evaluating the Impact of the Post-9/11 GI Bill on College Enrollment for Veterans with Service-Connected Disabilities

Abstract

Background/Context

Purpose/Objective

Population

Research Design

Data Collection and Analysis

Findings/Results

Conclusions/Recommendations

Get full access to this article

References