Historians of education have chronicled the essential link between schools and communities from a variety of perspectives, exploring how ideology, material conditions, and political struggles have shaped public education. Viewing school reform historically allows us to see how schools are tied to their particular contexts, breathing in and out the values, beliefs, and conditions of local communities. This link is especially important to acknowledge in the high-poverty urban communities targeted by school reformers in the current policy landscape, which pits privatization against local democratic control of schools. This paper contributes to scholarship on school reform by portraying a local struggle to reimagine a longstanding neighborhood urban school in the context of an expanding marketplace of school choices.
Purpose
Our study uses an asset-based community school development framework to analyze the rich 90-year history of a particular school in the greater Los Angeles area. We were guided by the following research questions: (1) What are the multiple and overlapping demographic, political, educational policy, social, and economic contexts that have shaped or defined the history of the school since its opening? (2) How has this history shaped the community's relationship to the school now? (3) How does this history inform current efforts to increase public will and community engagement at the school?
Research Design
We conducted this historical case study as participants of a local design team comprised of university and school partners charged with re-envisioning a struggling neighborhood middle school as a K–12 university-assisted community school. Data sources included artifacts, primary and secondary historical sources, and in-depth semistructured interviews with a purposive sample of 14 current and past staff, faculty, alumni, parents, and community members.
Findings/Results
Our findings are visualized in a timeline that captures the school's reform history, changing demographics, and community context across three periods of school reform. We interpret this history by focusing on three tensions: reform means versus ends, public versus private goods, and critical hope versus despair. By grappling with these democratic tensions, we conclude, urban communities can counter the dominant policy discourse of failing and turnaround schools to reimagine the promise of neighborhood schools as anchor democratic institutions in urban communities.
Conclusions/Recommendations
We recommend that community school reformers consider local histories of neighborhood schools and their communities as important reform assets. Reflecting on these histories can help establish a shared understanding of education as a public good, affirm the linked fate of schools and communities, and set the stage for collective problem-solving.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlkinM.AtwoodN.BakerE.DobyW., & DohertyW. (1983). Evaluation of the Permits with Transportation Program. Los Angeles, CA: Los Angeles Unified School District Research and Evaluation Branch.
2.
AnyonJ. (2009). Progressive social movements and educational equity. Educational Policy, 231, 194—215.
3.
AnyonJ. (2014). Radical possibilities: Public policy, urban education, and a new social movement. New York, NY: Routledge.
4.
ArchbaldD. A. (2004). School choice, magnet schools, and the liberation model: An empirical study. Sociology of Education, 77, 283—310.
5.
BaldassareM. (1994). The Los Angeles riots: Lessons for the urban future. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
6.
BaumH. S. (2002, April). The community approach to school-community partnerships: Challenges and possibilities. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
7.
BellD. A.Jr. (1980). Brown v. Board of Education and the interest-convergence dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 933, 518—533.
8.
BensonL.HarkavyI.PuckettJ.HartleyM.HodgesR. A.JohnstonF. E., & WeeksJ. (2017). Knowledge for social change: Bacon, Dewey, and the revolutionary transformation of research universities in the twenty-first century. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
9.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
10.
BrownG. C.VigilJ. D., & TaylorE. R. (2012). The ghettoization of blacks in Los Angeles: The emergence of street gangs. Journal of African American Studies, 16, 209—225.
11.
ChengA.HittC.KisidaB., & MillsJ. N. (2017). “No excuses” charter schools: A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence on student achievement. Journal of School Choice, 112, 209—238.
12.
ChubbJ. E., & MoreT. M. (1990). Politics, markets and America's schools. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institute.
13.
ClarkM. A.GleasonP. M.TuttleC. C., & SilverbergM. K. (2015). Do charter schools improve student achievement?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 374, 419—436.
14.
CoburnC. E., & PenuelW. R. (2016). Research–practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 451, 48—54.
15.
CucchiaraM.GoldE. V. A., & SimonE. (2011). Contracts, choice, and customer service: Marketization and public engagement in education. Teachers College Record, 11311, 2460—2502.
16.
DardenJ. T. (1995). Black residential segregation since the 1948 Shelley v. Kraemer decision. Journal of Black Studies, 256, 680—691.
17.
Darling-HammondL. (2007). Race, inequality and educational accountability: The irony of ‘No Child Left Behind.’Race Ethnicity and Education, 10(3), 245—260. doi:10.108013613320701503207
18.
DavisM. (1990). City of quartz: Excavating the future in Los Angeles. New York, NY: Verso.
19.
DeweyJ. (1927). The public and its problems. Chicago, IL: Gateway.
20.
DixsonA. D.BurasK. L., & JeffersE. K. (2015). The color of reform: Race, education reform, and charter schools in post-Katrina New Orleans. Qualitative Inquiry, (21)3, 288—299.
21.
Dudley-MarlingC., & BakerD. (2012). The effects of market-based school reforms on students with disabilities. Disability Studies Quarterly, 322. Retrieved from http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3187/3072
22.
Duncan-AndradeJ. (2009). Note to educators: Hope required when growing roses in concrete. Harvard Educational Review, 792, 181—194.
23.
EversJ., & KneyberR. (2016). Flip the system: Changing education from the ground up. New York, NY: Routledge.
24.
Farris-BergK., & DirkswagerE. J. (2012). Trusting teachers with school success: What happens when teachers call the shots. Lanham, MD: R&L Education.
25.
FermanB. (2017). The fight for America's schools: Grassroots organizing in education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
26.
FineM. (2012). Disrupting peace/provoking conflict: Stories of school closings and struggles for educational justice. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 18, 144—146. doi:10.1037/a0028099
27.
GibbsJ. T., & BankheadT. (2000). Joblessness and hopelessness: The case of African-American youth in South Central Los Angeles. Journal of Ethnic & Cultural Diversity in Social Work, 9(1/2), 1—20.
28.
GorskiP. C. (2015). Reaching and teaching students in poverty: Strategies for erasing the opportunity gap. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
29.
GrayM. (2011). Back to basics: A critique of the strengths perspective in social work. Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 921, 5—11.
30.
GreenT. (2017). “We felt they took the heart out of the community”: Examining a community-based response to urban school closure. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 2521, 1—30.
31.
GregoryJ. N. (2009). The second great migration: a historical overview. In KusmerK. L., & TrotterJ. W. (Eds.), African American urban history: The dynamics of race, class and gender since World War II (pp. 10—38). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
32.
GutmannA. (1987). Democratic education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
33.
HerbertS. (1997). Policing space: Territoriality and the Los Angeles Police Department. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
34.
HooksG., & BloomquistL. E. (1992). The legacy of World War II for regional growth and decline: The cumulative effects of wartime investments on US manufacturing, 1947–1972. Social Forces, 712, 303—337.
35.
HowardT. C. (2010). Why race and culture matter in schools: Closing the achievement gap in America's classrooms. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
36.
KaestleC. F. (1983). Pillars of the republic: Common schools and American society, 1780-1860. New York, NY: Hill and Wang.
37.
KatzM. B. (1987). Reconstructing American education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
38.
KerrK.DysonA., & GallannaughF. (2016). Conceptualising school-community relations in disadvantaged neighbourhoods: Mapping the literature. Educational Research, 583, 265—282.
39.
KleinN. M., & SchieslM. J. (Eds.). (1990). 20th century Los Angeles: Power, promotion, and social conflict. Claremont, CA: Regina Books.
40.
KozolJ. (1991). Savage inequalities: Children in America's schools. New York, NY: Crown.
41.
KretzmannJ., & McKnightJ. (1993). Building communities from the inside out: A path toward finding and mobilizing a community's assets. Chicago, IL: ACTA Publications.
42.
KunJ., & PulidoL. (Eds.). (2014). Black and brown in Los Angeles: Beyond conflict and coalition. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
43.
Lacireno-PaquetN.HolyokeT. T.MoserM., & HenigJ. R. (2002). Creaming versus cropping: Charter school enrollment practices in response to market incentives. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 242, 145—158.
44.
LarabeeD. (1997). Public goods, private goods: The American struggle over educational goals. American Educational Research Journal, 341, 39—81.
45.
LeovyJ. (2015). Ghettoside: A true story of murder in America. New York, NY: Spiegel & Grau.
46.
LincolnY. S., & GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
47.
LindbloomC. E. (1990). Inquiry and change: The troubled attempt to understand and shape society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
48.
LipmanP. (2004). High stakes education: Inequality, globalization, and urban school reform. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
49.
LipmanP., & HainesN. (2007). From accountability to privatization and African American exclusion: Chicago's “Renaissance 2010.”Educational Policy, 21(3), 471—502.
50.
MannH. (1960). Twelfth annual report of the Secretary of the Board of Education of Massachusetts. In CreminL. A. (Ed.), The republic and the school: Horace Mann on the education of free men. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. (Original work published 1848.)
51.
MarcianoR.GoldbergD., & HouC. (2009). T-RACES: A testbed for the redlining archives of California's exclusionary spaces [Map of residential securities 1939].Retrieved from http://salt.umd.edu/T-RACES/mosaic.html
52.
Martinez HoSangD. (2014). The changing valence of white racial innocence: Black-brown unity in the 1970s Los Angeles school desegregation struggles. In KunJ., & PulidoL. (Eds.), Black and brown in Los Angeles: Beyond conflict and coalition (pp. 115—142). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
53.
MathieA., & CunninghamG. (2005). Who is driving development? Reflections on the transformative potential of asset-based community development. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement, 261, 175—186.
54.
McConeJ., & ChristopherW. (1965). Violence in the city: An end or a beginning?Los Angeles, CA: Governor's Commission on the Los Angeles Riots.
55.
MedirattaK.ShahS., & McAlisterS. (2009). Community organizing for stronger schools: Strategies and successes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
56.
MilnerH. R. (2015). Rac(e)ing to class: Confronting poverty and race in schools and classrooms. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
57.
MorrisonP. A., & LowryI. S. (1994). A riot of color: The demographic setting. In BaldassareM. (Ed.), The Los Angeles riots: Lessons for the urban future (pp. 19—46). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
58.
MussetP. (2012). School choice and equity: Current policies in OECD countries and a literature review. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 66. Paris, France: OECD Publishing (NJ1).
59.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Number and enrollment of public elementary and secondary schools that have closed, by school level and type: Selected years, 1995-96 through 2013-14. In U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics (Ed.), Digest of Education Statistics, 2015. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=619
60.
NogueraP. (2003). City schools and the American dream: Reclaiming the promise of public education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
61.
OakesJ.MaierA., & DanielJ. (2017). Community schools: An evidence-based strategy for equitable school improvement. Aurora, IL: Great Lakes Center.
62.
OakesJ.QuartzK. H.RyanS., & LiptonM. (2000). Becoming good American schools: The struggle for civic virtue in education reform. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
63.
OakesJ., & RogersJ. (2006). Learning power: Organizing for education and justice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
64.
OngP.ChengA.PechC., & GonzalezS. (2017). 1992 revisited: Divergent paths. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Neighborhood Knowledge.
65.
PainoM.BoylanR. L., & RenzulliL. A. (2017). The closing door: The effect of race on charter school closures. Sociological Perspectives, 604, 747—767.
66.
PastorM. (2014). Keeping it real: Demographic change, economic conflict, and interethnic organizing for social justice in Los Angeles. In KunJ., & PulidoL. (Eds.), Black and brown in Los Angeles: Beyond conflict and coalition (pp. 33—66). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
67.
PattilloM. (2015). Everyday politics of school choice in the Black community. Du Bois Review: Social Science Research on Race, 121, 41—71.
68.
PedroniT. C. (2011). Urban shrinkage as a performance of whiteness: Neoliberal urban restructuring, education, and racial containment in the post-industrial, global niche city. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 322, 203—215.
69.
QuartzK. H.WeinsteinR. S.KaufmanG.LevineH.MehanH.PollockM.… WorrellF. C. (2017). University-partnered new school designs: Fertile ground for research-practice partnerships. Educational Researcher, 463, 143—146.
70.
RafteryJ. R. (1992). Land of fair promise: Politics and reform in Los Angeles schools, 1885-1941. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
71.
RogersJ. S., & TerriquezV. (2009). “More justice”: The role of organized labor in educational reform. Educational Policy, 231, 216—241.
72.
SaldañaJ. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
73.
SandelM. (1996). Democracy's discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74.
SchneiderJ. (2008). Escape from Los Angeles: White flight from Los Angeles and its schools, 1960-1980. Journal of Urban History, 346, 995—1012.
75.
Shelley v. Kraemer, 334 U.S. 1 (1948).
76.
ShirleyD. (1997). Community organizing for urban school reform. Austin, TX: University of Te xas Press.
77.
SidesJ. (2003). LA city limits: African American Los Angeles from the Great Depression to the present. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
78.
StakeR. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
79.
TyackD. (1974). The one best system: A history of American urban education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). U.S. demography 1790 to present [Interactive map of historical Census data by tract prepared by Social Explorer]. Retrieved from https://www.socialexplorer.com/6f4cdab7a0/explore
82.
WarrenM. (2005). Communities and schools: A new view of urban education reform. Harvard Educational Review, 752, 133—173.
83.
WarrenM. R., & MappK. L. (2011). A match on dry grass: Community organizing as a catalyst for school reform. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
WestC. (2001). The moral obligations of living in a democratic society. In BatstoneD., & MendietaE. (Eds.), The good citizen (pp. 5—12). New York, NY: Routledge.
