As of 2018, a total of 19 states allow at least one community college to offer baccalaureate degrees. Previous researchers have suggested that community college baccalaureate (CCB) adoption will lead to a host of unintended consequences, including decreases in associate degree production.
Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study
This study empirically examines the impact of CCB adoption on associate degree production and adds to conversations surrounding the consequences of CCB adoption.
Research Design
We use a quantitative quasi-experimental research design to examine the effect of CCB adoption on associate degree production.
Findings/Results
When comparing adopting and non-adopting community colleges within the state of Florida, the authors find that the adoption of CCB degree programs has a positive impact on overall associate degree production, but this impact varies considerably according to the type of academic degree program.
Conclusions/Recommendations
Opponents of CCB legislation have argued that giving community colleges the authority to confer baccalaureate degrees will detract from the sub-baccalaureate institutional mission of community colleges, but our results suggest that the adoption of a CCB degree program is associated with an overall increase in associate degree production. Findings from this work should be an important consideration for policymakers seeking to increase baccalaureate degree production in addition to—not at the expense of—associate degree programs.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbadieA. (2005). Semiparametric difference-in-differences estimators. The Review of Economic Studies, 721, 1—19.
2.
AbadieA.AtheyS.ImbensG. W., & WooldridgeJ. M. (2014). Finite population causal standard errors (No. w20325). National Bureau of Economic Research.
3.
American Association of Community Colleges. (2018). Fast facts 2018. Washington, DC.
4.
AndersonE. L., & KimD. (2006). Increasing the success of minority students in science and technology. American Council on Education.
5.
AngristJ.LangD., & OreopoulosP. (2009). Incentives and services for college achievement: Evidence from a randomized trial. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11, 136—163.
6.
AngristJ. D., & PischkeJ. S. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricst's companion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7.
BaileyT. R.JaggarsS. S., & JenkinsD. (2015). Redesigning America's community colleges. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8.
BelascoA. S.RosingerK. O., & HearnJ. C. (2015). The test-optional movement at America's selective liberal arts colleges: A boon for equity or something else?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 372, 206—223.
BemmelE. P. (2008). A cost-effectiveness analysis of two community college baccalaureate programs in Florida: An exploratory study (Doctoral dissertation, Florida Atlantic University Boca Raton, Florida).
11.
BemmelE. P.FloydD. L., & BryanV. C. (2008). Perceptions and reflections of administrators: Community colleges transitioning to baccalaureate colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 332, 151—176.
12.
BertrandM.DufloE., & MullainathanS. (2002). How much should we trust differences-indifferences estimates? (No. w8841). National Bureau of Economic Research.
13.
BettingerE., & BakerR. (2011). The effects of student coaching in college: An evaluation of a randomized experiment in student mentoring. NBER Working Paper, (w16881).
14.
BrenemanD. W. (1976). The Ph.D. production process. In FroomkinJ. T.JamisonD. T., & RadnerR. (Eds.), Education as an industry (pp. 3—52). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
15.
ChangM. J.SharknessJ.HurtadoS., & NewmanC. B. (2014). What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 515, 555—580.
16.
ChenX. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014-001. National Center for Education Statistics.
17.
ChenX., & WekoT. (2009). Students who study science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) in postsecondary education. U.S. Department of Education NCES—161.
18.
CookT. D., & CampbellD. T. (1986). The causal assumptions of quasi-experimental practice. Synthese, 681, 141—180.
19.
CruceT. M.WolniakG. C.SeifertT. A., & PascarellaE. T. (2006). Impacts of good practices on cognitive development, learning orientations, and graduate degree plans during the first year of college. Journal of College Student Development, 474, 365—383.
20.
Daun-BarnettN. (2011). Community college baccalaureate: A fixed effects, multi-year study of the influence of state policy on nursing degree production. Higher Education Policy, 243, 377—398.
21.
Daun-BarnettN., & EscalanteS. (2014). Local influences of community college baccalaureate legislation on nursing and teaching degree production in Florida. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 3811, 1030—1043.
22.
DiMaggioP., & PowellW. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 482, 147—160.
23.
DynarskiS. (2000). Hope for whom? Financial aid for the middle class and its impact on college attendance (No. w7756). National Bureau of Economic Research.
24.
EssinkS. E. (2013). The community college baccalaureate: A mixed methods study of implementation and best practices (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
FloydD. L.FalconettiA. M. G., & HrabakM. R. (2009). Baccalaureate community colleges: The new Florida College System. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 332, 195—202.
30.
FloydD. L., & WalkerK. P. (2009): The community college baccalaureate: Putting the pieces together. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 33, 90—124.
31.
FultonM. (2015). Community colleges’ expanded role into awarding bachelor's degrees. ECS Education Policy Analysis. Education Commission of the States. Retrieved from http://www.ecs.org.
32.
FurlongT. E.Jr. (2005). St. Petersburg College: Increasing baccalaureate access in critical program areas. In FloydD. L.SkolnikM. L., & WalkerK. P. (Eds.), The community college baccalaureate: Emerging trends and policy issues. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
33.
GonzalesD. A. (2005). Identifying peer institutions: Creating a utilized-focused analysis of community colleges conferring select baccalaureate degrees. Retrieved from ProQuest (UMI Number 3151912)
34.
HendersonC. E. (2014). The community college baccalaureate degree in the United States: An event history analysis. Retrieved from ProQuest. (UMI Number 3638004).
35.
HendrickR. Z.HightowerW. H., & GregoryD. E. (2006). State funding limitations and community college open door policy: Conflicting priorities?Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 308, 627—640.
36.
HillmanN. W.TandbergD. A., & GrossJ. P. (2014). Performance funding in higher education: Do financial incentives impact college completions?The Journal of Higher Education, 856, 826—857.
37.
HrabakM. R. (2009). The community college baccalaureate movement: Cutting-edge dissertation research. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 332, 203—212.
38.
HuX., & OrtagusJ. (in press). A national study of the influence of the community college pathway on female students’ STEM baccalaureate success. Community College Review.
KhandkerS. R.KoolwalG. B., & SamadH. A. (2010). Handbook on impact evaluation: quantitative methods and practices. Herndon, VA: World Bank Publications.
41.
LabareeD. F. (2010). Understanding the rise of American higher education: How complexity breeds autonomy. Peking University Education Review, 83, 24—39.
42.
LabareeD. F. (2017). A perfect mess: The unlikely ascendancy of American higher education. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
43.
LäppleD., & Van RensburgT. (2011). Adoption of organic farming: Are there differences between early and late adoption?. Ecological Economics, 707, 1406—1414.
44.
LevinJ. S. (2004). The community college as a baccalaureate-granting institution. Review of Higher Education, 28, 1—22.
45.
LiefnerI. (2003). Funding, resource allocation, and performance in higher education systems. Higher Education, 464, 469—489.
46.
Lumina Foundation. (2017). Strategic plan for 2017 to 2020. Indianapolis, IN: Author.
47.
McKeeJ. V. (2001). Factors and issues surrounding development of one community college baccalaureate degree program. Retrieved from ProQuest (UMI Number 251725700).
48.
McKinneyL.ScicchitanoM., & JohnsT. (2013). A national survey of community college baccalaureate institutions. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 371, 54—63.
49.
MeyerB. (1995). Natural and quasi-experiments in economics. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 132, 151—161.
50.
MeyerJ. W., & RowanB. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 340—363.
MooreC., & ShulockN. (2014). From community college to university: Expectations for California's new transfer degrees. San Francisco, CA: Public Policy Institute of California.
53.
MorphewC. C., & HuismanJ. (2002). Using institutional theory to reframe research on academic drift. Higher Education in Europe, 274, 491—506.
54.
National Science Foundation (2010). Science and engineering indicators 2010. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
55.
ParkT. J.TandbergD. A.ShimH.HuS., & HerringtonC. D. (2016). Community college teacher education baccalaureate programs: Early evidence yields mixed results. Educational Policy, 1—23.
56.
PetryD. K. (2006). The transformation of five Florida community colleges: Converting to baccalaureate degree-producing programs. Doctoral dissertation, The University of West Florida.
ShipanC. R., & VoldenC. (2008). The mechanisms of policy diffusion. American Journal of Political Science, 524, 840—857.
61.
Steiner-KhamsiG. (2006). The economics of policy borrowing and lending: A study of late adopters. Oxford Review of Education, 325, 665—678.
62.
StevensM., & KirstM. W. (Eds.). (2015). Remaking college: The changing ecology of higher education. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
63.
Van VughtF. (2008). Mission diversity and reputation in higher education. Higher Education Policy, 212, 151—174.
64.
WalkerJ. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 633, 880—890.
65.
WalkerK. P. (2005). History, rationale, and the CCBA. In FloydD. L.SkolnikM. L., & WalkerK. P. (Eds.), The community college baccalaureate: Emerging trends and policy issues (pp. 9—23). Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
66.
WangX. (2015). Pathway to a baccalaureate in STEM fields: Are community colleges a viable route and does early STEM momentum matter?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 373, 376—393.
67.
WooldridgeJ. (2009). Introductory econometrics: A modern approach (4th ed.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
68.
ZhangL., & NessE. C. (2010). Does state merit-based aid stem brain drain?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 322, 143—165.
