External Contextual Factors and Teacher Turnover: The Case of Michigan High Schools

Abstract

Background/Context

All organizations face turnover in their workforce; however, in schools high turnover can interfere with the effectiveness and efficiency of the school. While past research has examined school-related factors linked to teacher turnover, few studies have examined how external contextual factors are related to teacher turnover. This study examines the role of two external contextual factors in teacher turnover: economic downturns and changes in state curricular policy (the Michigan Merit Curriculum [MMC]).

Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study

This study asks the extent to which the economic crisis of 2009 and the implementation of the MMC are related to school-level teacher turnover rates and whether those relationships vary by school locale and within the school year.

Population/Participants/Subjects

The data include full-time high school teachers in the state of Michigan aggregated to the school level.

Research Design

Using eight years of statewide longitudinal data from Michigan, the study employs school fixed effects models to account for possible differences in unobservable school characteristics that are constant over time and may be related to teacher turnover. The study examines teacher turnover at both the mid-year and the end of the year as teachers leave schools at various points during the school year. Additionally, this study considers how turnover is experience differentially by urbanicity.

Findings/Results

Between 3.2% and 15.5% of teachers left their school over the eight-year period. The rates of turnover varied by the time of the school year with more teachers leaving at the end of the year than during mid-year. There was a significant increase in teacher turnover rates around the announcement of the MMC as well as the economic downturn. While all locations were impacted by the announcement of the MMC, the largest amount of turnover occurred in urban areas and the lowest for suburban areas. In terms of the economic downturn, towns were impacted the most, followed by rural and suburban schools. Urban areas did not see a significant increase in teacher turnover related to the recession.

Conclusions/Recommendations

The authors conclude that external contextual factors are related to increases in teacher turnover independent of each other. How these factors relate to teacher turnover does depend on school locale. While this study was based in Michigan, all states have their own policy and economic pressures to consider in related to school-level decision making and teacher turnover.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allensworth

, Ponisciak

, & Mazzeo

(2009). The schools teachers leave: Teacher mobility in Chicago Public Schools. Chicago: Consortium on Chicago School Research at the University of Chicago Urban Education Institute.

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2012). The Recession of 2007–2009. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/spotlight/2012/recession/

Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2015). Frequently Asked Questions. Retrieved from http://www.bls.gov/lau/laufaq.htm#Q01.

Byrd

, & Langer

(2010). Mandating change: Assessing the implementation of the Michigan merit curriculum. Retrieved from http://closup.umich.edu/files/closup-wp-29-michigan-merit-curriculum.pdf

Dynarski

S. M.

, Frank

, Jacob

B. A.

, & Schneider

(2012a). Impacts of the Michigan Merit Curriculum on student outcomes: Preliminary findings from the first cohort. Retrieved from http://michiganconsortium.org/research/

Dynarski

S. M.

, Frank

, Jacob

B. A.

, & Schneider

(2012b). The Michigan Merit Curriculum and teacher compositional change. Retrieved from http://michiganconsortium.org/research/

Feng

, Figlio

D. N.

, & Sass

(2010). School accountability and teacher mobility. NBER Working Paper 16070.

Frank

K. A.

(2009). Quasi-ties: Directing resources to members of a collective. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(12), 1613—1645.

Frank

K. A.

, Maroulis

, Belman

, & Kaplowitz

M. D.

(2011). The social embeddedness of natural resource extraction and use in small fishing communities. In Taylor

W. W.

, Lynch

A. J.

, & Schechter

M. G.

(Eds.), Sustainable fisheries: Multi-level approaches to a global problem (pp. 309—332). Bethesda, Maryland: American Fisheries Society. Retrieved from https://msu.edu/∼kenfrank/social%20embeddedness%20of%20natural%20resource%20use%20in%20small%20fishing%20communities.pdf

10.

Frank

K. A.

, Maroulis

, Duong

, & Kelcey

(2013). What would it take to change an inference? Using Rubin's Causal Model to interpret the robustness of causal inferences. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(4), 437—460

11.

Fulbeck

E. S.

(2014). Teacher mobility and financial incentives: A descriptive analysis of Denver's ProComp. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(1), 67—82.

12.

Goldhaber

, Strunk

K. O.

, Brown

, & Knight

D. S.

(2016). Lessons learned from the Great Recession: Layoffs and RIF-induced teacher shuffle. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 38(3), 517—548.

13.

Goldring

, Taie

, & Riddles

(2014). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2012–13 Teacher Follow-up Survey (NCES 2014-077). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

14.

Guin

(2004). Chronic teacher turnover in urban elementary schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 12(42).

15.

Hanushek

E. A.

, Kain

J. F.

, & Rivkin

S. G.

(2004). Why public schools lose teachers. Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 326—354.

16.

Holme

J. J.

, & Rangel

V. S.

(2012). Putting school reform in its place: Social geography, organizational social capital, and school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 49(2), 257—283.

17.

Ingersoll

(2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: An organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499—534.

18.

Ingersoll

, & May

(2012). The magnitude, destinations, and determinants of mathematics and science teacher turnover. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 34(4), 435—464.

19.

Ingersoll

, Merrill

, & May

(2016). Do accountability policies push teachers out? Educational Leadership, 73(8), 44—49.

20.

Jackson

C. K.

(2013). Match quality, worker productivity, and worker mobility: Direct evidence from teachers. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(4), 1096—1116.

21.

Jacob

, Dynarski

, Frank

, & Schneider

(2017). Are expectations alone enough? Estimating the effect of a mandatory college-prep curriculum in Michigan. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(2), 333—360.

22.

Johnson

S. M.

(2006). The workplace matters: Teacher quality, retention, and effectiveness. Washington, DC: National Education Association Research Department.

23.

Johnson

S. M.

, Kraft

M. A.

, & Papay

J. P.

(2012). How context matters in high-need schools: The effects of teachers' working conditions on their professional satisfaction and their students achievement. Teachers College Record, 114(10), 1—39.

24.

Keesler

(2010). Teacher turnover and undersupply: A school organizational analysis. Michigan State University. Unpublished dissertation manuscript.

25.

Keigher

, & Cross

(2010). Teacher attrition and mobility: Results from the 2008-2009 Teacher Follow-Up Survey. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES 2010-353).

26.

Kennedy

M. M.

(2005). Inside teaching: How classroom life undermines reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

27.

Kraft

M. A.

, Marinell

W. H.

, & Yee

(2016). Schools as organizations: Examining school climate, teacher turnover, and student achievement in NYC. New York: The Research Alliance for New York City Schools.

28.

Kukla-Acedvedo

(2009). Leavers, movers, and stayers: The role of workplace conditions in teacher mobility decisions. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(6), 443—452.

29.

Labor Market Information. (n.d.) Industry employment. Retrieved from http://milmi.org/cgi/dataanalysis/cesReport.asp?menuchoice=ces.

30.

Ladd

H. F.

(2011). Teachers' perceptions of their working conditions: How predictive of planned and actual teacher movement? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(2), 235—261.

31.

Leachman

, & Mai

(2014). Most states still funding schools less than before the recession. Washington, DC: Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

32.

Macy

M. W.

(1991). Chains of cooperation: Threshold effects in collective action. American Sociological Review, 56(6), 730—747.

33.

Michigan Department of Technology, Management, and Budget. (n.d.). Per-Capita Personal Income by State: 2000-2010. Retrieved from http://www.michigan.gov/cgi/0,4548,7-158-54534-253826—,00.html

34.

National Center for Education Statistics. (n.d.). Identification of rural locales. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/ccd/rural_locales.asp

35.

Obenauf

K. T.

(2014). Curricular reform and economic context: The case of the Michigan Merit Curriculum. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.

36.

Odden

A. R.

(2012). Improving student learning when budgets are tight. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

37.

Redding

, & Henry

G. T.

(2018). New evidence on the frequency of teacher turnover: Accounting for within-year turnover. Educational Researcher, 47(9), 577—593.

38.

Ronfeldt

, Loeb

, & Wyckoff

(2013). How teacher turnover harms student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 4—36.

39.

Singer

J. D.

, & Willett

J. B.

(2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.

40.

State Budget Office. (2013). Executive budget: Fiscal years 2012 and 2013. Lansing, MI: Department of Technology, Management, and Budget. Retrieved from http://www.michigan.gov/budget/0,4538,7-157-11460_18526—-,00.html

41.

Stuit

, & Smith

T. M.

(2010). Teacher turnover in charter schools. Nashville, Tennessee: National Center on School Choice.