The Promise of Mixed Methods for Understanding and Addressing Educational Inequity: A Commentary on the Mixed Methods Working Group Report

Bornstein M. H. (2006). Parenting science and practice. In Renninger K. A. , & Sigel I. E. (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology: Child psychology and practice (Vol. 4, 6th ed., pp. 893—949). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

Ghavami N. , Kastiaficas D. , & Rogers L. O. (2016). Toward an intersectional approach in developmental science: The role of race, gender, sexual orientation, and immigrant status. In Horn S. , Ruck M. , & Liben L. (Eds.), Advances in child development and behavior (Vol. 50, pp. 31–73). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.

Greene J. C. , Caracelli V. J. , & Graham W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255—274.

Institute of Education Sciences. (2015). Mixed methods in education research: IES Technical Working Group meeting summary. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncer/whatsnew/techworkinggroup/pdf/MixedMethodsTWG.pdf

Lerner R. M. (2015). Promoting positive youth development and social justice: Integrating theory, research and application in contemporary developmental science. International Journal of Psychology, 50(3), 165—173. doi:10.1002/ijop.12162

Shadish W. , Cook T. D. , & Campbell D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.

Williams J. L. , & Deutsch N. L. (2016). Beyond between-group differences: Considering race, ethnicity, and culture in research on positive youth development programs. Applied Developmental Science, 20(3), 203—213. doi:10.1080/10888691.2015.1113880