AlexanderJ., EntwisleD., & OlsonL. (2014). The long shadow: Family background, disadvantaged urban youth, and the transition to adulthood. Volume in the American Sociological Association's Rose Series in Sociology. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
2.
BartlettL., & VavrusF. (2014). Transversing the vertical case study: A methodological approach to studies of educational policy as practice. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 45(2), 131—147.
3.
BernheimerL. P., & WeisnerT. S. (2007). “Let me just tell you what I do all day…”: The family story at the center of intervention research and practice. Infants & Young Children, 20(3), 192—201.
4.
BoalerJ., & StaplesM. (2008). Creating mathematical futures through an equitable teaching approach: The case of Railside School. Teachers College Record, 110, 608—645.
5.
DeLucaS., & RosenblattP. (2010). Does moving to better neighborhoods lead to better schooling opportunities? Parental school choice in an experimental housing voucher program. Teachers College Record, 112(5), 7—8.
6.
DuncanG. J., HustonA. C., & WeisnerT. S. (2007). Higher ground: New hope for the working poor and their children. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
7.
FrodemanR., KleinJ. T., & MitchamC. (2010). The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
8.
HeinrichC. J., BurchP., GoodA., AcostaR., ChengH., DillenderM., … StewartM (2014). Improving the implementation and effectiveness of out-of-school-time tutoring. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(2), 471—494.
9.
HillH. C., KapitulaL., & UmlandK. (2011). A validity argument approach to evaluating teacher value-added scores. American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 794—831.
10.
HollandD., & SkinnerD. (1987). Prestige and intimacy: The cultural models behind Americans' talk about gender types. In HollandD., & QuinnN. (Eds.), Cultural models in language and thought (pp. 78—111). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
11.
KimK. H. (2014). Community-involved learning to expand possibilities for vulnerable children: A critical communicative, Sen's capability, and action research approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8, 308—316.
12.
LeVineR. A., LeVineS., Schnell-AnzolaB., RoweM., & DexterE. (2012). Literacy and mothering: How women's schooling changed the lives of the world's children. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
13.
OliverM., & ShapiroT. M. (2006). Black wealth/White wealth: A new perspective on racial inequality. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
PenuelW. R., RielM., KrauseA., & FrankK. A. (2009). Analyzing teachers' professional interactions in a school as social capital: A social network approach. Teachers College Record, 111(1), 124—163.
15.
PoteeteA. R., JanssenM. A., & OstromE. (2010). Working together: Collective action, the commons, and multiple methods in practice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16.
ReamR. K. (2003). Counterfeit social capital and Mexican American underachievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(3), 237—262.
17.
RowanB., & CorrentiR. (2009). Studying reading instruction with teacher logs: Lessons from the study of instructional improvement. Educational Researcher, 38(2), 120—131.
18.
RumbautR. G. (2005). Sites of belonging: Acculturation, discrimination, and ethnic identity among children of immigrants. In WeinerT. S. (Ed.), Discovering successful pathways in children's development: Mixed methods in the study of childhood and family life (pp. 111—164). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
19.
WeisnerT. S. (2011). “If you work in this country you should not be poor, and your kids should be doing better”: Bringing mixed methods and theory in psychological anthropology to improve research in policy and practice. ETHOS, 39(4), 455—476.