BergmanM. M. (2008). Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications. London, England: SAGE.
2.
FrodemanR., KleinJ. T., & MitchamC. (2010). The Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
3.
GeertzC. (1980). Blurred genres: The refiguration of social thought. The American Scholar, 49(2), 165—179.
4.
GreeneJ. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
5.
JohnsonR. B., & OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14—26.
6.
MaxwellJ. A. (2011). A realist approach for qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
MossP., & HaertelE. (2016). Engaging methodological pluralism. In GitomerD., & BellC. (Eds.), Handbook of research on teaching (pp. 127—248). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
8.
RepkoA. F. (2012). Interdisciplinary research: Process and theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
9.
TashakkoriA., & TeddlieC. (Eds.). (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
YoshikawaH., WeisnerT. S., KalilA., & WayN. (2008). Mixing qualitative and quantitative research in developmental science: Uses and methodological choices. Developmental Psychology, 44(2), 344—354.