Community colleges are drawing renewed attention from policy makers and advocates seeking to increase college attendance and completion. Nearly half of all students awarded a bachelor's degree attended a community college. However, we know little about how community college students decide where and how to pursue postsecondary education, or how they select a four-year institution—choices that have significant implications for student outcomes.
Focus of Study
This study examines transfer-intending community college students’ choice sets, or the list of institutions they are selecting from. Specifically, we ask: What kinds of colleges and universities are in transfer-intending students’ choice sets, and how are these choice sets shaped by individual and structural barriers?
Setting
The research took place in two community college systems in Central Texas.
Research Design
Drawing on data from 95 interviews with transfer-intending community college students in Texas—the majority of whom are first-generation college-goers, low-income, or students of color—we examine their choice sets, the institutions to which they considered transferring.
Conclusions/Recommendations
Our findings suggest significant heterogeneity among our sample of community college students seeking transfer to four-year institutions. We find that geography, financial concerns, and quality of institution all play a role in student considerations—though these mechanisms operate differently for groups of students. Students’ choices are bounded, but in different ways. We identify five approaches to choice-set construction among our sample that have differential implications for programs and policies that help students successfully apply and transfer to high-quality four-year institutions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Andre-BechelyL. (2005). Public school choice at the intersection of voluntary integration and not-so-good neighborhood schools: Lessons from parents' experiences. Educational Administration Quarterly, 41(2), 267—305. doi:10.1177/0013161X04269593
2.
AtkinsonR. C., & GeiserS. (2009). Reflections on a century of college admissions tests. Educational Researcher, 38(9), 665—676. doi:10.3102/0013189X09351981
3.
BackesB., & VelezE. D. (2014). Who transfers and where do they go? Community college students in Florida. National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research. Retrieved from https://caldercenter.org/sites/default/files/WP%20126.pdf
4.
BallS. J., DaviesJ., DavidM., & ReayD. (2002). “Classification” and “judgement”: Social class and the “cognitive structures” of choice of higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 23(1), 51—72. doi:10.1080/01425690120102854
5.
BastedoM. N., & JaquetteO. (2011). Running in place: Low-income students and the dynamics of higher education stratification. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 318—339. doi:10.3102/0162373711406718
6.
BeattieI. R. (2002). Are all “adolescent econometricians” created equal? Racial, class, and gender differences in college enrollment. Sociology of Education, 75(1), 19—43. doi:10.2307/3090252
7.
BellC. (2009). All choices created equal? The role of choice sets in the selection of schools. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 191—208. doi:10.1080/01619560902810146
8.
BernheimB. D., & RangelA. (2007). Behavioral public economics: Welfare and policy analysis with nonstandard decision-makers. In DiamondP., & VartiainenH. (Eds.), Behavioral economics and its applications (pp. 7—77). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9.
BersT. H., & GalowichP. M. (2002). Using survey and focus group research to learn about parents' roles in the community college choice process. Community College Review, 29(4), 67—82. doi:10.1177/009155210202900404
10.
BeshearsJ., ChoiJ. J., LaibsonD., & MadrianB. (2008). How are preferences revealed?Journal of Public Economics, 92(8–9), 1787—1794. doi:10.3386/w13976
11.
BlackS. E., CortesK. E., & LincoveJ. A. (2015). Academic undermatching of high-achieving minority students: Evidence from race-neutral and holistic admissions policies. American Economic Review, 105(5), 604—610.
12.
BridgeG., & WilsonD. (2015). Towards an interactive sociological rational choice approach to theorising class dimensions of school choice. Policy & Politics, 43(4), 493—507. doi:10.1332/030557314X13923920087710
13.
CastlemanB. L., SchwartzS., & BaumS. (Eds.). (2015). Decision making for student success: Behavioral insights to improve college access and persistence. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
CastroE. L. (2015). Addressing the conceptual challenges of equity work: A blueprint for getting started. New Directions for Community Colleges, 2015(172), 5—13. doi:10.1002/cc.20159
15.
CohenA., BrawerF., & KiskerC. (2014). The American community college. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16.
CooperC. W. (2005). School choice and the standpoint of African American mothers: Considering the power of positionality. The Journal of Negro Education, 74(2), 174—189.
17.
CrispG., & NuñezA.-M. (2014). Understanding the racial transfer gap: Modeling underrepresented minority and nonminority students' pathways from two-to four-year institutions. Review of Higher Education, 37(3), 291—320. doi:10.1353/rhe.2014.0017
18.
CuseoJ. B. (1998). The transfer transition: A summary of key issues, target areas and tactics for reform. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED425771) Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED425771
19.
DoyleW. R. (2009). The effect of community college enrollment on bachelor's degree completion. Economics of Education Review, 28(2), 199—206. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2008.01.006
20.
EisenhardtK. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532—550. doi:10.2307/258557
FlintT. A. (1992). Parental and planning influences on the formation of student college choice sets. Research in Higher Education, 33(6), 689—708. doi:10.1007/BF00992054
24.
GándaraP., AlvaradoE., DriscollA., & OrfieldG. (2012). Building pathways to transfer: Community colleges that break the chain of failure for students of color. Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles, UCLA. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED529493) Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED529493
25.
GlaserB., & StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. London, England: Aldine.
26.
Goldrick-RabS., HarrisD. N., & TrostelP. A. (2009). Why financial aid matters (or does not) for college success: Toward a new interdisciplinary perspective. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 1—45). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
27.
GonzalezA., & HilmerM. J. (2006). The role of 2-year colleges in the improving situation of Hispanic postsecondary education. Economics of Education Review, 25(3), 249—257. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2004.12.002
28.
GoodmanJ., HurwitzM., & SmithJ. (2016). Access to 4-year public colleges and degree completion. Journal of Labor Economics, 35(3), 829—867. doi:10.1086/690818
29.
GrodskyE., & JonesM. T. (2007). Real and imagined barriers to college entry: Perceptions of cost. Social Science Research, 36(2), 745—766. doi:16/j.ssresearch.2006.05.001
30.
GrubbW. N. (1991). The decline of community college transfer rates: Evidence from national longitudinal surveys. Journal of Higher Education, 62(2), 194—222. doi:10.2307/1982145
31.
HearnJ. C. (1984). The relative roles of academic, ascribed, and socioeconomic characteristics in college destinations. Sociology of Education, 57, 22—30. doi:10.2307/2112465
32.
HillmanN., & WeichmanT. (2016). Education deserts: The continued significance of “place” in the twenty-first century. Viewpoints: Voices from the Field. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.
33.
HilmerM. J. (1997). Does community college attendance provide a strategic path to a higher quality education?Economics of Education Review, 16(1), 59—68. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(96)00018-0
34.
HosslerD., & GallagherK. S. (1987). Studying student college choice: A three-phase model and the implications for policymakers. College & University, 62(4), 207—221.
35.
HoxbyC. M., & AveryC. (2012). The missing “one-offs”: The hidden supply of high-achieving, low income students (NBER Working Paper No. 18586). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w18586
36.
HurtadoS., InkelasK. K., BriggsC., & RheeB. S. (1997). Differences in college access and choice among racial/ethnic groups: Identifying continuing barriers. Research in Higher Education, 38(1), 43—75. doi:10.1023/A:1024948728792
37.
JabbarH., SánchezJ., & EpsteinE. (2017). Getting from here to there: The role of geography in community college students' transfer decisions. The Urban Review, 49(5), 746—776.
38.
JepsenC., & MontgomeryM. (2009). Miles to go before I learn: The effect of travel distance on the mature person's choice of a community college. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(1), 64—73.
39.
KahnemanD. (2003). Map of bounded rationality: Psychology for behavioral economics. The American Economic Review, 93(5), 1449—1475.
40.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
41.
KahnemanD., & TverskyA. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263—291. doi:10.2307/1914185
42.
LeighD. E., & GillA. M. (2003). Do community colleges really divert students from earning bachelor's degrees?Economics of Education Review, 22(1), 23—30. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(01)00057-7
43.
Lockwood ReynoldsC. (2012). Where to attend? Estimating the effects of beginning college at a two-year institution. Economics of Education Review, 31(4), 345—362. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.12.001
44.
LongB. T. (2004). The impact of federal tax credits for higher education expenses. In HoxbyC. M. (Ed.), College choices: The economics of where to go, when to go, and how to pay for it (pp. 101—168). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
45.
LongB. T. (2007). The contributions of economics to the study of college access and success. Teachers College Record, 109(10), 2367—2443. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2003.10.004
46.
LongB. T., & KurlaenderM. (2009). Do community colleges provide a viable pathway to a baccalaureate degree?Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(1), 30—53. doi:10.3102/0162373708327756
ManskiC. F. (1993). Adolescent econometricians: How do youth infer the returns to schooling? In ClotfelterC. T., & RothschildM. (Eds.), Studies of supply and demand in higher education (pp. 43—60). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
49.
ManskiC. F., & WiseD. A. (1983). College choice in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50.
McDonoughP. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
51.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
National Student Clearinghouse Research Center. (2013). Baccalaureate attainment: A national view of the postsecondary outcomes of students who transfer from two-year to four-year institutions (Signature Report 5). Retrieved from https://nscresearchcenter.org/wp-content/uploads/SignatureReport5.pdf
54.
PageL. C., & Scott-ClaytonJ. (2016). Improving college access in the United States: Barriers and policy responses. Economics of Education Review, 51, 4—22. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2016.02.009
55.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
56.
PernaL. W. (2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 99–157). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
57.
RabinM., & WeizsäckerG. (2009). Narrow bracketing and dominated choices. American Economic Review, 99(4), 1508—1543. doi:10.1257/aer.99.4.150
58.
ReadD., LoewensteinG., & RabinM. (1999). Choice bracketing. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 19(1), 171—197. doi:10.1023/A:1007879411489
59.
SchuddeL., & Goldrick-RabS. (2015). On second chances and stratification: How sociologists think about community colleges. Community College Review, 43(1). Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0091552114553296
60.
ShawK. M., & LondonH. B. (2001). Culture and ideology in keeping transfer commitment: Three community colleges. Review of Higher Education, 25(1), 91—114. doi:10.1353/rhe.2001.0015
61.
SimonH. (1955). A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 69(1), 99—118. doi:10.2307/1884852
62.
SimonH. A. (1997). Models of bounded rationality. Vol. 3: Empirically grounded economic reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
63.
SkinnerB. T. (2016, March). Modeling college enrollment via conditional logic: How has college choice changed? Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Education Financial and Policy Annual Meeting, Denver, CO.
64.
SmithJ., PenderM., & HowellJ. (2013). The full extent of student-college academic undermatch. Economics of Education Review, 32, 247—261. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2012.11.001
65.
SomersP., HainesK., KeeneB., BauerJ., PfeifferM., McCluskeyJ., & SparksB. (2006). Towards a theory of choice for community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 30(1), 53—67. doi:10.1080/10668920500248886
66.
SuretteB. J. (2001). Transfer from two-year to four-year college: An analysis of gender differences. Economics of Education Review, 20(2), 151—163. doi:10.1016/S0272-7757(00)00013-3
67.
TateW. F.IV, (2008). “Geography of opportunity”: Poverty, place, and educational outcomes. Educational Researcher, 37(7), 397—411.
68.
ThalerR. H. (2000). From homo economicus to homo sapiens. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(1), 133—141. doi:10.1257/jep.14.1.133
69.
TierneyM. L. (1983). Student college choice sets: Toward an empirical characterization. Research in Higher Education, 18(3), 271—284. doi:10.1007/BF00979600
70.
TurleyR. N. L. (2009). College proximity: Mapping access to opportunity. Sociology of Education, 82(2), 126—146. doi:10.1177/003804070908200202
71.
WassmerR., MooreC., & ShulockN. (2004). Effect of racial/ethnic composition on transfer rates in community colleges: Implications for policy and practice. Research in Higher Education, 45(6), 651—672. doi:10.1023/B:RIHE.0000040267.68949.d1
