Currently, most Latinx emergent bilingual (EB) students are educated in English-medium programs alongside English-dominant peers. Legally mandated social integration of EB students coincides with a prescriptive linguistic emphasis on content-language integration in ESL (English as a second language) programs; both integrative approaches are particularly salient in the current hyperracial climate in the United States.
Focus of Study
We explore two schools’ responses to Latinx EB population growth via the intersecting racial and language ideologies informing and influenced by programmatic changes, educator perceptions, and pedagogical practices.
Research Design
This qualitative multiple case study spans two Texas schools selected by purposeful maximal sampling over the course of two separate academic years. Data include semistructured interviews, focus group interviews, and participant observations.
Findings
We find that institutional structures across the sites tended to promote a denial of responsibility for racial stratification and a concomitant disciplining of the school curriculum. We argue that both integrative approaches ultimately perpetuated white racial domination.
Conclusions/Recommendations
We suggest that ESL research and practice would benefit from an explicit questioning of racializing discourses and boundaries of academic disciplines as part of a racially literate critical practice designed to counter the normalization of whiteness.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AggarwalU. (2016). The ideological architecture of whiteness as property in educational policy. Educational Policy, 30(1), 128—152.
2.
AgirdagO., Van AvermaetP., & Van HoutteM. (2013). School segregation and math achievement: A mixed-method study on the role of self-fulfilling prophecies. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1—50.
3.
AlexanderM. (2012). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York, NY: The New Press.
4.
AlimH. S. (2005). Critical language awareness in the United States: Revisiting issues and revising pedagogies in a resegregated society. Educational Researcher, 34(7), 24—31.
5.
AlimH. S., RickfordJ. R., & BallA. F. (Eds.). (2016). Raciolinguistics: How language shapes our ideas about race. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
6.
AnnammaS. A., ConnorD., & FerriB. (2013). Dis/ability critical race studies (DisCrit): Theorizing at the intersections of race and dis/ability. Race Ethnicity and Education, 16(1), 1—31.
7.
AnnammaS. A., JacksonD. D., & MorrisonD. (2017). Conceptualizing color-evasiveness: Using dis/ability critical race theory to expand a color-blind racial ideology in education and society. Race Ethnicity and Education, 20(2), 147—162.
8.
ArtilesA. J., RuedaR., SalazarJ. J., & HigaredaI. (2005). Within-group diversity in minority disproportionate representation: English language learners in urban school districts. Exceptional Children, 71(3), 283—300.
9.
BatalovaJ., & McHughM. (2010, August). Number and growth of students in U.S. schools in need of English instruction, 2009. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
10.
BensonJ., & BormanG. (2010). Family, neighborhood, and school settings across seasons: When do socioeconomic context and racial composition matter for the reading achievement growth of young children?Teachers College Record, 112(5), 1338—1390.
11.
BialystokE., & MajumderS. (1998). The relationship between bilingualism and the development of cognitive processes in problem solving. Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(1), 69—85.
12.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2017). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
13.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (NiceR., Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14.
BowlesS., & GintisH. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life (Paperback ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
15.
BrownA. L., & De LissovoyN. (2011). Economies of racism: Grounding education policy research in the complex dialectic of race, class, and capital. Journal of Education Policy, 26(5), 595—619.
16.
CallahanR. M. (2005). Tracking and high school English learners: Limiting opportunity to learn. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 305—328.
17.
CallahanR. M., & GándaraP. C. (Eds.). (2014). The bilingual advantage: Language, literacy and the US labor market. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
18.
CallahanR., WilkinsonL., & MullerC. (2010). Academic achievement and course taking among language minority youth in US schools: Effects of ESL placement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(1), 84—117.
19.
Cervantes-SoonC. G. (2014). A critical look at dual language immersion in the new Latin@ diaspora. Bilingual Research Journal, 37(1), 64—82.
20.
Cervantes-SoonC. G., DornerL., PalmerD., HeimanD., SchwerdtfegerR., & ChoiJ. (2017). Combating inequalities in two-way language immersion programs: Toward critical consciousness in bilingual education spaces. Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 403—427.
21.
CoadyM. R., HarperC., & de JongE. J. (2016). Aiming for equity: Preparing mainstream teachers for inclusion or inclusive classrooms?TESOL Quarterly, 50(2), 340—368.
22.
CoyleD. (2007). Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda for CLIL pedagogies. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 10(5), 543—562.
CreswellJ. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
25.
de JongE. J., & HarperC. A. (2005). Preparing mainstream teachers for English language learners: Is being a good teacher good enough?Teacher Education Quarterly, 32(2), 101—124.
26.
De LissovoyN. (2015). Education and emancipation in the neoliberal era: Being, teaching, and power. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
De LissovoyN., & BrownA. L. (2013). Antiracist solidarity in critical education: Contemporary problems and possibilities. Urban Review, 45(5), 539—560.
28.
de OliveiraL. C. (2016). A language-based approach to content instruction (LACI) for English language learners: Examples from two elementary teachers. International Multilingual Research Journal, 10(3), 217—231. doi: 10.1080/19313152.2016.1185911
29.
Del ValleS. (2003). Language rights and the law in the United States: Finding our voices. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
30.
DelgadoR. (1989). Storytelling for oppositionists and others: A plea for narrative. Michigan Law Review, 87(8), 2411—2441.
31.
FaltisC., & AriasM. B. (2007). Coming out of the ESL ghetto: Promising practices for Latino immigrant students. Journal of Border Educational Research, 62(2), 19—35.
32.
FergusonA. A. (2002). Naughty by nature. In The Jossey-Bass reader on gender in education (pp. 584—608). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
33.
FloresN. (2018, April). From reform to redistribution: Developing a race-radical politics of bilingual education. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
34.
FloresN., & RosaJ. (2015). Undoing appropriateness: Raciolinguistic ideologies and language diversity in education. Harvard Educational Review, 85(2), 149—171.
35.
FosterW. C. (2008). Historic native peoples of Texas. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
36.
GándaraP. C. (2010). Overcoming triple segregation. Educational Leadership, 68(3), 60—64.
37.
GándaraP. C., & HopkinsM. (Eds.). (2010). Forbidden language: English learners and restrictive language policies. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
38.
GarcíaO. (2009a). Bilingual education in the 21st century: A global perspective. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
39.
GarcíaO. (2009b). Emergent bilinguals and TESOL: What's in a name?TESOL Quarterly, 43(2), 322—26.
40.
GarcíaO., & WeiL. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
41.
GonzálezG. G. (1999). Segregation and the education of Mexican children, 1900–1940. In MorenoJ. F. (Ed.), The elusive quest for equality: 150 years of Chicano/Chicana education (pp. 53—76). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educational Review.
42.
GonzálezN., MollL. C., & AmantiC. (2005). Funds of knowledge: Theorizing practices in households, communities, and classrooms. New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
GotandaN. (1991). A critique of “Our Constitution is Color-Blind.” Stanford Law Review, 44, 1—68.
44.
GrandeS. (2015). Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield. (Original work published 2004)
45.
GuinierL. (2004). From racial liberalism to racial literacy: Brown v. Board of Education and the interest-divergence dilemma. Journal of American History, 91(1), 92—118.
46.
HanedaM., & AlexanderM. (2015). ESL teacher advocacy beyond the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 49, 149—158.
47.
HarperC. A., & de JongE. J. (2009). English language teacher expertise: The elephant in the room. Language and Education, 23(2), 137—151.
48.
HerreraS., & Rodríguez-MoralesA. (2009). Colorblind nonaccommodative denial: Implications for teachers' meaning perspectives toward their Mexican-American English learners. In KubotaR., & LinA. (Eds.), Race, culture, and identities in second language education: Exploring critically engaged practice (pp. 197—214). New York, NY: Routledge.
49.
HopkinsM., LowenhauptR., & SweetT. M. (2015). Organizing English learner instruction in new immigrant destinations: District infrastructure and subject-specific school practice. American Educational Research Journal, 52(3), 408—439.
50.
IbrahimA. E. K. M. (1999). Becoming black: Rap and hip hop, race, gender, identity, and the politics of ESL learning. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 349—369.
51.
KannoY., & HarklauL. (Eds.). (2012). Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access, and persistence. Florence, KY: Routledge.
52.
KellyS., & PriceH. (2011). The correlates of tracking policy: Opportunity hoarding, status competition, or a technical-functional explanation?American Educational Research Journal, 48(3), 560—585.
53.
KubotaR. (2002). The author responds: (un)raveling racism in a nice field like TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 36(1), 84—92.
54.
KubotaR., & LinA. (2006). Race and TESOL: Introduction to concepts and theories. TESOL Quarterly, 40(3), 471—493.
55.
KubotaR., & LinA. (2009). Race, culture, and identities in second language education: Exploring critically engaged practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
56.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3—12.
57.
LamT. C. M. (1993). Testability: A critical issue in testing language minority students with standardized achievement tests. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 26(3), 179—191.
58.
LeeE. (2015). Doing culture, doing race: everyday discourses of ‘culture' and ‘cultural difference' in the English as a second language classroom. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 36(1), 80—93. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2014.892503
59.
LeeE., & Simon-MaedaA. (2006). Racialized research identities in ESL/EFL research. TESOL Quarterly, 40(3), 573—594.
60.
LeeO., QuinnH., & ValdésG. (2013). Science and language for English language learners in relation to next generation science standards and with implications for Common Core state standards for English language arts and mathematics. Educational Researcher, 42(4), 223—233.
61.
LeeS. J., & HawkinsM. R. (2015). Policy, context and schooling: The education of English learners in rural new destinations. Global Education Review, 2(4), 40—59.
62.
LeonardoZ. (2009). Race, whiteness, and education. New York, NY: Routledge.
63.
LeonardoZ. (2012). The race for class: Reflections on a critical raceclass theory of education. Educational Studies, 48(5), 427—449.
64.
LópezF. A. (2018). Asset pedagogies in Latino youth identity and achievement: Nurturing confianza. New York, NY: Routledge.
65.
LucasS. R., & BerendsM. (2007). Race and track location in U.S. public schools. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 25, 169—187.
66.
LucasT., VillegasA. M., MartinA. D., & FivesH. (2015). Teachers' beliefs about English language learners. In FivesH., & GillM. G., International handbook of research on teachers' beliefs (pp. 453—474). New York, NY: Routledge.
67.
MacedoD. (2000). The colonialism of the English only movement. Educational Researcher, 29(3), 15—24.
68.
MaciasR. (2014). Benefits of bilingualism: In the eye of the beholder? In CallahanR. M., & GándaraP. C. (Eds.), The bilingual advantage: Language, literacy and the US labor market (pp. 16—44). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
69.
MacSwanJ. (2000). The threshold hypothesis, semilingualism, and other contributions to a deficit view of linguistic minorities. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 22(1), 3—45.
70.
MacSwanJ. (2017). A multilingual perspective on translanguaging. American Educational Research Journal, 54(1), 167—201.
71.
MacSwanJ., & RolstadK. (2006). How language proficiency tests mislead us about ability: Implications for English language learner placement in special education. Teachers College Record, 108(11), 2304—2328.
72.
MartínezR. A. (2017). Dual language education and the erasure of Chicanx, Latinx, and indigenous Mexican children: A call to re-imagine (and imagine beyond) bilingualism. Texas Education Review, 5(1), 81—92.
73.
MarxS. (2009). “It's not them; it's not their fault”: Manifestations of racism in the schooling of Latina/os and ELLs. In KubotaR., & LinA. (Eds.), Race, culture, and identities in second language education: Exploring critically engaged practice (pp. 81—97). New York, NY: Routledge.
74.
McKenzieK. B., & ScheurichJ. J. (2004). Equity traps: A useful construct for preparing principals to lead schools that are successful with racially diverse students. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(5), 601—632.
75.
MenkenK. (2010). NCLB and English language learners: Challenges and consequences. Theory Into Practice, 49(2), 121—128.
76.
MerryM. S. (2016). Equality, citizenship, and segregation: A defense of separation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
77.
MertensD. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage.
78.
MilesM. B., HubermanA. M., & SaldañaJ. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
79.
MothaS. (2014). Race, empire, and English language teaching: Creating responsible and ethical anti-racist practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
80.
MoyerM. G. (2008). Research as practice: Linking theory, method, and data. In WeiL., & MoyerM. G. (Eds.), The Blackwell guide to research methods in bilingualism and multilingualism (pp. 18—31). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
81.
MullerC., Riegle-CrumbC., SchillerK. S., WilkinsonL., & FrankK. A. (2010). Race and academic achievement in racially diverse high schools: Opportunity and stratification. Teachers College Record, 112(4), 1038—1063.
82.
OrfieldG., & EatonS. E. (1996). Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown vs. Board of Education. New York, NY: The New Press.
83.
OrfieldG., & FrankenbergE. (2014). Increasingly segregated and unequal schools as courts reverse policy. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(5), 718—734.
84.
OvandoC. J., CollierV., & CombsM. C. (2012). Bilingual and ESL classrooms: Teaching in multicultural contexts. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
85.
PalardyG. J., RumbergerR. W., & ButlerT. (2015). The effect of high school socioeconomic, racial, and linguistic segregation on academic performance and school behaviors. Teachers College Record, 117(12).
86.
PalmerD., & LynchA. W. (2008). A bilingual education for a monolingual test? The pressure to prepare for TAKS and its influence on choices for language of instruction in Texas elementary bilingual classrooms. Language Policy, 7(3), 217—235.
87.
ParisD., & AlimH. S. (2014). What are we seeking to sustain through culturally sustaining pedagogy? A loving critique forward. Harvard Educational Review, 84(1), 85—100.
88.
Pérez-HuberL. (2011). Discourses of racist nativism in California public education: English dominance as racist nativist microaggressions. Educational Studies, 47(4), 379—401.
89.
PulinxR., Van AvermaetP., & AgirdagO. (2017). Silencing linguistic diversity: The extent, the determinants and consequences of the monolingual beliefs of Flemish teachers. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 20(5), 542—556.
90.
RicentoT. K., & WrightW. E. (2008). Language policy and education in the United States. In May (Series Ed.) S., McCartyT. L., & MayS. (Vol. Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education: Vol. 1. Language policy and political issues in education (2nd ed., pp. 285—300). New York, NY: Springer.
91.
RosaJ. D. (2016). Standardization, racialization, languagelessness: Raciolinguistic ideologies across communicative contexts. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology, 26(2), 162—183.
92.
RyanC. (2013). Language use in the United States: American community survey reports (Vol. ACS-22). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
93.
SantosB. d. S. (2014). Epistemologies of the South: Justice against epistemicide. London, UK: Routledge.
94.
SinclairJ. (2016). “Starving and suffocating”: Evaluation policies and practices during the first 10 years of the U.S. Bilingual Education Act. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/13670050.2016.1210565
95.
SmithL. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Zed Books.
96.
SolórzanoD. G., & YossoT. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative inquiry, 8(1), 23—44.
97.
StakeR. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
98.
StollL. C. (2014). Constructing the color-blind classroom: Teachers' perspectives on race and schooling. Race Ethnicity and Education, 17(5), 688—705.
99.
Suárez-OrozcoC., Suárez-OrozcoM. M., & TodorovaI. (2008). Learning a new land. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
100.
TaylorL. (2006). Wrestling with race: The implications of integrative antiracism education for immigrant ESL youth. TESOL Quarterly, 40(3), 519—544.
101.
TedickD. J., & CammarataL. (2012). Content and language integration in K–12 contexts: Student outcomes, teacher practices, and stakeholder perspectives. Foreign Language Annals, 45(1), 28—53.
102.
ThompsonK. D. (2013). Is separate always unequal? A philosophical examination of ideas of equality in key cases regarding racial and linguistic minorities in education. American Educational Research Journal, 50(6), 1249—1278.
103.
TuckE. (2009). Suspending damage: A letter to communities. Harvard Educational Review, 79(3), 409—428.
UmanskyI. M., & ReardonS. F. (2014). Reclassification patterns among Latino English learner students in bilingual, dual immersion, and English immersion classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 879—912.
106.
UmanskyI. M., ThompsonK. D., & DíazG. (2017). Using an ever–English learner framework to examine disproportionality in special education. Exceptional Children, 84(1), 76—96.
107.
UrrietaL.Jr. (2009). Working from within: Chicana and Chicano activist educators in whitestream schools. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
108.
ValdésG., KiblerA., & WalquiA. (2014). Changes in the expertise of ESL professionals: Knowledge and action in an era of new standards. Alexandria, VA: TESOL International Association.
109.
ValdezV. E., FreireJ. A., & DelavanG. (2016). The gentrification of dual language education. Urban Review, 48(4), 601—627.
110.
ValenciaR. R. (Ed.). (2012). The evolution of deficit thinking: Educational thought and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.
111.
ValenzuelaA. (2005). Leaving children behind: How “Texas-style” accountability fails Latino youth. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
112.
ValleM. S., WaxmanH. C., DiazZ., & PadrónY. N. (2013). Classroom instruction and the mathematics achievement of non-English learners and English learners. Journal of Educational Research, 106(3), 173—182.
113.
VandrickS. (2015). No “knapsack of invisible privilege” for ESL university students. Journal of Language, Identity & Education, 14(1), 54—59.
114.
WalshC., SchiwyF., & Castro-GómezS. (Eds.). (2002). Indisciplinar las ciencias sociales: Geopoliticas del conocimiento y colonialidad del poder. Quito, Ecuador: Universidad Andina Simón Bolívar.
115.
YancyG. (2008). Black bodies, white gazes: The continuing significance of race. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
