Currently, Native American education policy reports and empirical research papers have largely focused on sociocultural challenges to Native sovereignty and the policy that impedes Native sovereign states. This paper deviates from that theme by implicating policy as preventing improvement of educational outcomes by proxy of the fiscal revenue available to reservation schools, focusing specifically on the Navajo Nation. To date, this is the first empirically driven, Native-specific school finance study that attempts to compare how Anglo and Native schools are funded and how the quality and dispersion of this funding affects Native education and outcomes.
Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study
This study reports on a longitudinal descriptive analysis of school fiscal revenue (2006–2012), comparing Navajo K–12 school districts against Arizona public school districts. This empirical research paper attempts to answer the following questions: How did Navajo K–12 public school district demographics compare to those of Arizona public school districts from 2006 to 2012? How did Navajo K–12 public school districts perform academically compared to Arizona public school districts from 2006 to 2012? How did Navajo public school district tax rates and assessed property valuation compare to those of Arizona public school districts from 2006 to 2012? How did Navajo public school district revenues compare to those of Arizona public school districts from 2006 to 2012?
Research Design
This research study is a univariate statistical analysis (i.e., mean, median, standard deviation, range, and percentile) examining general descriptions of individual fiscal revenue variables for schooling.
Data Collection and Analysis
The data comprised publicly available Arizona Department of Education Excel files (Excel v14.0) merged into one consolidated dataset imported to SPSSv22.0. Our analysis began by selecting Navajo public school districts from our dataset and then comparing them to Arizona public districts (excluding Navajo and nontraditional LEA districts) from 2006 to 2012.
Findings/Results
This study has two conclusions: (a) There is a clear and growing achievement gap between Navajo and Arizona districts; and (b) Our results seem to suggest that Arizona's equalization formula is not effectively counterbalancing the impact of local property wealth, as shown by the disparities in combined state and local revenue between Navajo K–12 school districts and Arizona districts.
Conclusions/Recommendations
The findings in this study indicate that Arizona must address policy and practice in order to remedy the educational disparity between Navajo students and their non-Navajo peers. Navajo Nation schools require agency to designate priorities and state funding to meet these priorities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdamsD. W. (1988). Fundamental considerations: The deep meaning of Native American schooling, 1880–1900. Harvard Educational Review, 58(1), 1—29.
2.
AdamsD. W. (1995). Education for extinction: American Indians and the boarding school experience, 1875–1928. Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas.
3.
AlemánE. (2007). Situating Texas school finance policy in a CRT framework: How “substantially equal” yields racial inequity. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(5), 525—558.
4.
AlfredT., & CorntasselJ. (2005). Being Indigenous: Resurgences against contemporary colonialism. Government and opposition, 40(4), 597—614.
AndersonT. L., & ParkerD. P. (2008). Sovereignty, credible commitments, and economic prosperity on American Indian reservations. Journal of Law and Economics, 51(4), 641—666.
7.
ArchuletaM. L., ChildB. J., & LomawaimaK. T. (Eds.). (2004). Away from home: American Indian boarding school experiences. Phoenix, AZ: Heard Museum.
Arizona Rural Policy Institute. (n.d.). Demographic Analysis of the Navajo Nation Using 2010 Census and 2010 American Community Survey Estimates. Window Rock, AZ: Author.
13.
ArsenD., & NiY. (2012). The effects of charter school competition on school district resource allocation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(1), 3—38.
14.
AustinR. D. (2009). Navajo courts and Navajo common law: A tradition of tribal self-governance. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
15.
BakerB. D. (2012). Revisiting the age-old question: Does money matter in education?Washington, DC: Albert Shanker Institute.
16.
BalterA., & GrossmanF. (2009). The effects of the No Child Left Behind Act on the language and culture education in Navajo public schools. Journal of American Indian Education, 48(3), 19—46.
17.
BekisW. (2008). The impact of the No Child Left Behind Act on New Mexico public schools on the Navajo reservation. Unpublished dissertation, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
18.
BerlinerD. C. (2009). Poverty and potential: Out-of-school factors and school success. Boulder, CO: Education Policy Research Unit.
19.
BerlinerD. C., (2012). Effects of inequality and poverty vs. teachers and schooling on America's youth. Teachers College Record, 116(1), 1—26.
20.
BettingerE. P. (2005). The effect of charter schools on charter students and public schools. Economics of Education Review, 24(2), 133—147.
21.
BifulcoR., & LaddH. F. (2006). The impacts of charter schools on student achievement: Evidence from North Carolina. Education, 1(1), 50—90.
22.
Black Hills Knowledge Network (n.d.). Pine Ridge Indian reservation: Education and training. Pine Ridge, ND: Black Hills Knowledge Network.
23.
BowmanC. W. (2013). Defining student success through Navajo perspectives. Unpublished dissertation, New Mexico State University, Las Cruces, NM.
24.
BrandtE. A. (1992). The Navajo area student dropout study: Findings and implications. Journal of American Indian Education, 31(2), 48—63.
25.
BrayboyB. M. J., & CastagnoA. E. (2009). Self-determination through self-education: Culturally responsive schooling for Indigenous students in the U.S.A. Teaching Education, 20(1), 31—53.
26.
BrayboyB., & McKinleyJ. (2005). Toward a tribal critical race theory in education. The Urban Review, 37(5), 425—446.
27.
CastagnoA. E., & BrayboyB. M. J. (2008). Culturally responsive schooling for Indigenous youth: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 941—993.
28.
CastagnoA. E., & LeeS. J. (2007). Native mascots and ethnic fraud in higher education: Using tribal critical race theory and the interest convergence principle as an analytic tool. Equity & Excellence in Education, 40(1), 3—13.
29.
CodyH. (2012). The implementation of the Navajo language and culture mandates of the Title X Education Amendment, Navajo Sovereignty in Education Act of 2005, in Navajo schools (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
30.
ColemanM. (1993). American Indian children at school, 1850–1930. Jackson, MS: University Press of Mississippi.
31.
CooperM. L. (1999). Indian school: Teaching the White man's way. Wilmington, MA: Clarion Books.
32.
CrowellS. (1973). Life on the largest reservation: Poverty and progress in the Navajo Nation. Civil Rights Digest, 6(1), 3—9.
33.
Darling-HammondL. (1995). Inequality and access to knowledge. In BanksJ. A., and McGee BanksC. A. (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education (pp. 465—483). New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing.
34.
DeeT. S., & JacobB. (2011). The impact of No Child Left Behind on student achievement. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(3), 418—446.
35.
DeyhleD. (1995). Navajo youth and Anglo racism: Cultural integrity and resistance. Harvard Educational Review, 65(3), 403—445.
36.
EhrenbergR. G., BrewerD. J., GamoranA., & WillmsJ. D. (2001). Class size and student achievement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 2(1), 1—30.
37.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 6301 (1965).
38.
Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 20 U.S.C. § 7401 (1965).
39.
EllisM. G. (1988). Navajo economic behavior. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 17(2), 119—131.
40.
FairclothS. C., & TippeconnicJ. W.III (2010). The dropout/graduation crisis among American Indian and Alaska Native students: Failure to respond places the future of Native peoples at risk. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles at the University of California at Los Angeles.
41.
Flores v. Arizona, 48 F. Supp.2d 937 (D. Ariz. 1999).
42.
Flores v. Arizona, 516 F. 3d 1140 (9th Cir. 2008).
43.
FlorezI. R. (2010). Do the AZELLA cut scores meet the standards? A validation review of the Arizona English language learner assessment. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles at the University of California at Los Angeles.
44.
Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice. (2013). A Win-Win Solution: The Empirical Evidence on School Choice. Indianapolis, IN: Author.
45.
GarciaE., LawtonK., & Diniz de FigueiredoE. H. (2010). Assessment of young English language learners in Arizona: Questioning the validity of the state measure of English proficiency. Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles at the University of California at Los Angeles.
46.
GentryM., & FugateC. M. (2012). Gifted native American students: Underperforming, underidentified, and overlooked. Psychology in the Schools, 49(7), 631—646.
47.
GoldenbergC., & QuachS. R., (2010). Arizona home language survey and the identification of students for ELL services. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles at the University of California at Los Angeles.
48.
GreenwaldR., HedgesL. V., & LaineR. D. (1996). The effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361—396.
49.
HedgesL. V., LaineR. D., & GreenwaldR. (1994). An exchange: Part I: Does money matter? A meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23(3), 5—14.
50.
HemphillF. C., & VannemanA. (2011). Achievement gaps: How Hispanic and White students in public schools perform in mathematics and reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NCES 2011-459). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
51.
HessF., MarantoR., & MillimanS. (2001). Small districts in big trouble: How four Arizona school systems responded to charter competition. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1102—1124.
52.
HoffmanD. (2009). Education funding in Arizona: Constitutional requirement and the empirical record. Tempe, AZ: Arizona State University W.P. Carey School of Business.
53.
HoffmanD., & RexT. R. (2008). Tax reductions, the economy and the deficit in the Arizona state government general fund. Tempe, AZ: Center for Competitiveness and Prosperity Research, L. William Seidman Research Institute at the WP Carey School of Business of Arizona State University.
54.
HoffmanD., & RexT. R. (2009). The economic effects of government spending reductions relative to other options: A report from the Office of the University Economist. Tempe, AZ: Center for Competitiveness and Prosperity Research, L. William Seidman Research Institute at the WP Carey School of Business of Arizona State University.
55.
HolmA., & HolmW. (1990). Rock Point, a Navajo way to go to school: A valediction. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 508(1), 170—184.
56.
HolmA., & HolmW. (1995). Navajo language education: Retrospect and prospects. Bilingual Research Journal, 19(1), 141—167.
57.
House Bill 2208, 52nd Legislature 1st Regular Session. (2015).
58.
House Bill 2478, 52nd Legislature 1st Regular Session. (2015).
59.
HouseD. (2002). Language shift among the Navajos: Identity politics and cultural continuity. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
60.
HoxbyC. M. (2000). The effects of class size on student achievement: New evidence from population variation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(4), 1239—1285.
61.
HoxbyC. M. (2004). Achievement in charter schools and regular public schools in the United States: Understanding the differences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
62.
HuntingD. (2013). Arizona's education financing: Elementary and secondary education: 2002–2011. Phoenix, AZ: Arizona State University Morrison Institute for Public Policy.
63.
Indian Self-Determination and Education Assistance Act of 1975, 25 U.S.C. § 5301 et seq. Pub. L. No. 93-638, 88 Stat. 2203 (1996).
64.
IversonP. (2002). Diné: A history of the Navajos. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
65.
JacobsM. D. (2004). A battle for the children: American Indian child removal in Arizona in the era of assimilation. The Journal of Arizona History, 45(1), 31—62.
66.
JamesT. (1988). Rhetoric and resistance: Social science and community schools for Navajos in the 1930s. History of Education Quarterly, 28(4), 606—900.
67.
JensenK. (1983). Teachers and progressives: The Navajo day-school experiment 1935–1945. Arizona and the West, 25(1), 49—62.
68.
Jiménez-CastellanosO., (2010). Relationship between educational resources and school achievement: A mixed method intra-district analysis. The Urban Review, 42(4), 351—371.
69.
Jiménez-CastellanosO., CombsM. C., MartinezD., and GomezL. (2013). English language learners: What's at stake for Arizona?Phoenix, AZ: Morrison Institute for Public Policy at Arizona State University.
JohnsonB. H. (1973). Navajo stories of the long walk period. Tsaile, AZ: Diné College Press.
72.
LaddH. F. (2002). School vouchers: A critical view. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4), 3—24.
73.
Ladson-BillingsG., (2006). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Researcher, 35(7), 3—12.
74.
LeeJ., (2002). Racial and ethnic achievement gap trends: Reversing the progress toward equity?Educational Researcher, 31(1), 3—12.
75.
LeeJ., & McintireW. G. (2000). Interstate variation in the mathematics achievement of rural and nonrural students. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 16(3), 168—181.
76.
LomawaimaK. T. (1995). Educating Native Americans. In BanksJ. (ed.), Handbook of Research on Multicultural Education (pp. 331—347). New York, NY: Macmillan.
77.
LomawaimaK. T. (2000). Tribal sovereigns: Reframing research in American Indian education. Harvard Educational Review, 70(1), 1—23.
78.
LomawaimaK. T., & McCartyT. L. (2002). When tribal sovereignty challenges democracy: American Indian education and the democratic ideal. American Educational Research Journal, 39(2), 279—305.
79.
ManuelitoK. (2005). The role of education in American Indian self-determination: Lessons from the Ramah Navajo Community School. Anthropology and Education Quarterly, 36(1), 73—87.
McCartyT. L. (1998). Schooling, resistance, and American Indian languages. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 132(1), 27—42.
82.
McCartyT. L. (2002). A place to be Navajo: Rough Rock and the struggle for self-determination in indigenous schooling. New York, NY: Routledge Publishing.
83.
McCartyT. L. (2009). The impact of high stakes accountability policies on Native American learners: Evidence from research. Teaching Education, 20(1), 7—29.
84.
McCartyT. L. (Ed.). (2014). Ethnography and language policy. New York, NY: Routledge Publishing.
85.
McCartyT. L., Romero-LittleM. E., & ZepedaO. (2006). Native American youth discourses on language shift and retention: Ideological cross-currents and their implications for language planning. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(5), 659—677.
86.
McCartyT. L., WallaceS., LynchR. H., & BenallyA. (1991). Classroom inquiry and Navajo learning styles: A call for reassessment. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 22(1), 42—59.
87.
McFarlandJ., HussarB., de BreyC., SnyderT., WangX., Wilkinson-FlickerS., … HinzS (2017). The Condition of Education 2017 (NCES 2017- 144). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
88.
McGuinnP. (2012). Stimulating reform: Race to the Top, competitive grants and the Obama education agenda. Educational Policy, 26(1), 136—159.
89.
McPhersonR. S. (2001). The northern Navajo frontier: 1860–1900. Logan, UT: Utah State University Press.
90.
MeierD., & WoodG. H. (Eds.). (2004). Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our schools. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Navajo Nation Department of Diné Education, Office of Educational Research and Statistics. (n.d.). 2010–2011 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) summary. Window Rock, AZ: Author.
NiY. (2009). The impact of charter schools on the efficiency of traditional public schools: Evidence from Michigan. Economics of Education Review, 28(5), 571—584.
96.
No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, 20 U.S.C. § 6319 (2002).
97.
OrfieldG., & LeeC. (2005). Why segregation matters: Poverty and educational inequality. Los Angeles, CA: Civil Rights Project/Proyecto Derechos Civiles at the University of California at Los Angeles.
98.
OrtizA. M., & HeavyRunnerI. (2003). Student access, retention, and success: Models of inclusion and support. In BenhamM. K. P. A., and SteinW. J. (Eds.), The renaissance of American Indian higher education: Capturing the dream (pp. 215—240). New York, NY: Routledge Publishing.
99.
Parsons-YazzieE. (1995). Navajo-speaking parents' perceptions of reasons for Navajo language attrition. Journal of Navajo Education, 13(1), 29—38.
100.
PatrickR. (2008). Perspectives on change: A continued struggle for academic success and cultural relevancy at an American Indian School in the midst of No Child Left Behind. Journal of American Indian Education, 47(1), 65—81.
101.
PowersM. A., and JohnsonB. P. (1987). Defensive sites of Dinetah. Albuquerque, NM: New Mexico Bureau of Land Management and Cultural Resources.
102.
Proposition 203. [Arizona Revised Statutes, Title 15 (Education), § 3.1 (English Language Education for Children in Public Schools), 751-756.01.]
103.
PruchaPaul. (1979). The churches and the Indian schools, 1888–1912. Omaha, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
104.
RansonS. (2008). The changing governance of education. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 36(2), 201—219.
105.
ReschovskyA., & ImazekiJ. (2001). Achieving educational adequacy through school finance reform. Journal of Education Finance, 26(4), 373—396.
106.
ReyhnerJ., & EderJ. (1992). American Indian education: A history. Norman, OK: University of Oklahoma Press.
107.
RhodesR. W. (1994). Nurturing learning in Native American students. Hotevilla, AZ: Sonwai Books.
108.
RoesselR. A.Jr. (1977). Navajo education in action: The Rough Rock demonstration school. Window Rock, AZ: Navajo Curriculum Center.
109.
RuffingL. T. (1979). The Navajo Nation: A history of dependence and underdevelopment. Review of Radical Political Economics, 11(2), 25—43.
110.
RyanJ. E. (2004). Perverse incentives of the No Child Left behind Act. New York University Law Review, 79(1), 932—67.
111.
Senate Bill 1074, 52nd Legislature 1st Regular Session. (2015).
112.
Senate Bill 1332, 52nd Legislature 1st Regular Session. (2015).
113.
Senate Bill 1431, 53rd Legislature 1st Regular Session. (2017).
114.
Silver, S., & Miller, W. R. (1997). American Indian languages: Cultural and social contexts. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
115.
SkinnerL. (1999). Teaching through traditions: Incorporating languages and cultures into curricula. In SwisherK. G., & TippeconnicJ. W.III (eds.), Next steps: Research and practice to advance Indian education. Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.
116.
SmithA. (2015). Conquest: Sexual violence and American Indian genocide. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
117.
SmithL. (1999). Decolonizing Methodologies. New York, NY: Zed Books Ltd.
118.
SnyderT. D., de BreyC., & DillowS. A. (2016). Digest of education statistics 2015 (NCES 2016-014). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
119.
SolorzanoD. G. (1992). An exploratory analysis of the effects of race, class, and gender on student and parent mobility aspirations. The Journal of Negro Education, 61(1), 30—44.
120.
SpolskyB. (2002). Prospects for the survival of the Navajo language: A reconsideration. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 33(2), 139—162.
121.
SpringJ. (2016). Deculturalization and the struggle for equality: A brief history of the education of dominated cultures in the United States. New York, NY: Routledge Publishing.
122.
SwisherK. G. (1996). Why Indian people should be the ones to write about Indian education. American Indian Quarterly, 20(1), 83—90.
123.
SzaszM. (1999). Education and the American Indian: The road to self-determination since 1928. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
124.
ThompsonG. (1976). The army and the Navajo: The Bosque Redondo Reservation experiment, 1863–1868. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
125.
ThompsonH. (1975). The Navajo's long walk for education: A history of Navajo education. Tsaile, AZ: Navajo Community College Press.
126.
TinkerG. E. (1993). Missionary conquest: The gospel and Native American cultural genocide. Minneapolis, MN: Fortress Press.
127.
TippeconnicJ. W.III (1999). Tribal control of American Indian education: Observations since the 1960s with implications for the future. In SwisherK. G., and TippeconnicJ. W.III (Eds.), Next steps: Research and practice to advance Indian education (pp. 33—52). Charleston, WV: ERIC Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools.
128.
TrafzerC. E., KellerJ. A., & SisquocL. (Eds.). (2006). Boarding school blues: Revisiting American Indian educational experiences. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
129.
Tribally Controlled Schools Act, 25 U.S.C. § 2501 et seq. Pub. L. No. 100-297, 115 Stat. 2063 (1988).
130.
TrosperR. (1996). American Indian poverty on reservations. In SandefurG. D., RindfussR. R., and CohenB. (Eds.), Changing numbers, changing needs: American Indian demography and public health (pp. 172—195). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
131.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). The American Indian and Alaska Native population: 2010. Washington, DC: Author.
132.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2016). Public education finances: 2014. Washington, DC: Author.
133.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2011). Revenues and expenditures for public elementary and secondary school districts: School year 2008–09 (NCES 2012-313). Washington, DC: Author.
134.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). (2012). National Indian education study 2011 (NCES 2012-466). Washington, DC: Author.
135.
VinjeD. L. (1996). Native American economic development on selected reservations. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 55(4), 427—442.
136.
WaunekaJ. D. (2008). The impact of the No Child Left Behind Act on Arizona public schools on the Navajo reservation (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
137.
WilkinsD. E. (Ed.). (2003). The Navajo political experience. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
138.
WinsteadT., LawrenceA., BrantmeierE. J., & FreyC. J. (2008). Language, sovereignty, cultural contestation, and American Indian schools: No Child Left Behind and a Navajo test case. Journal of American Indian Education, 47(1), 46—64.
139.
WrightB., & TierneyW. G. (1991). American Indians in higher education: A history of cultural conflict. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 23(2), 11—18.
140.
YoungT. J. (1990). Poverty, suicide, and homicide among Native Americans. Psychological Reports, 67(3), 1153—1154
