To enhance postsecondary completion and minimize equity gaps, researchers have focused on defining, measuring, and developing students’ college readiness, or the preparation required to persist in higher education. While this work has been useful to identify the ingredients of postsecondary success, the emphasis on individual achievement runs the risk of portraying marginalized students as deficient. Culturally relevant studies that highlight institutional accountability for college readiness are needed to inform policy and practice.
Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study
Using Holland and colleagues’ (1998) figured worlds theory, this study examines college readiness through the lens of student identity in an urban magnet high school. We investigate how first-generation, low-income students of color interpreted and negotiated local discourses and artifacts to “figure” college-going identities—that is, who they should become and how they should behave to earn a college degree. The purpose of this empirical approach is to contribute information that can inform college readiness efforts nationwide.
Research Design
The study utilizes an ethnographic approach that focused on how students conceptualized and developed their identities within the figured world of the magnet school. Data collection took place over the course of one school year and included over 200 hours of participant observation, in-depth interviews with 25 students and school staff, and document analysis.
Findings
The figured world of Jackson Magnet fostered and reinforced a hierarchy that consisted of magnet students (“scholars”) and their counterparts in the regular school (“ditchers”). A local feedback loop implied that the magnet school provided more rigorous college preparation than the regular school and, by extension, magnet students figured they would be ready for college. However, real-world feedback (standardized test scores) suggested magnet course rigor did not accurately reflect postsecondary standards. The result was that magnet students were underprepared but did not know it, an outcome that positioned them to experience a drastic identity reckoning in college.
Conclusions/Recommendations
While most college-readiness research focuses on academic skills preparation, our findings reveal the need to consider how high schools prepare students in terms of identity. In particular, our data suggest the threat of well-intentioned achievement discourses on pre-college identity development. Salient questions include whether and how to increase postsecondary opportunity without socializing students either to discriminate against their peers or to figure a false identity that undermines preparation and future cognitive stability.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AdelmanC. (1999). Answers in the tool box: Academic intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor's degree attainment. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/pubs/Toolbox/index.html
2.
AdelmanC. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
3.
AllenJ., NdumE., & MatternK. (2017). An empirically-derived index of high school academic rigor. ACT Working Paper 2017-5. Iowa City, IA: American Testing Company.
AnB. P. (2013). The influence of dual enrollment on academic performance and college readiness: Differences by socioeconomic status. Research in Higher Education, 54, 407—432.
6.
AnyonJ. (1997). Ghetto schooling: A political economy of urban educational reform. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
7.
ArtilesA. (2015). Beyond responsiveness to identity badges: Future research on culture in disability and implications for response to intervention. Educational Review, 67(1), 1—22.
8.
AstinA. W., & OsegueraL. (2012). Pre-college and institutional influences on degree attainment. In SeidmanA. (Ed.), College student retention (2nd ed., pp. 119—145). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
9.
AuW. (2007). High-stakes testing and curricular control: A qualitative metasynthesis. Educational Researcher, 36(5), 258—267.
10.
BartonP. E., & ColeyR. J. (2009). Parsing the achievement gap II. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
11.
BettieJ. (2003). Women without class: Girls, race and identity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
12.
BuiS. A., CraigS. G., & ImbermanS. A. (2014). Is gifted education a bright idea? Assessing the impact of gifted and talented programs on students. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 6(3), 30—62.
13.
BurkeP. J. (1991). Identity processes and social stress. American Sociological Review, 62, 836—849.
14.
CaraballoL. (2011). Theorizing identities in a “just(ly)” contested terrain: Practice theories of identity amid critical-poststructural debates on curriculum and achievement. Journal of Curriculum and Pedagogy, 8(2), 155—177.
15.
CarterP. L. (2003). “Black” cultural capital, status positioning, and schooling conflicts for low-income African American youth. Social Problems, 50(1), 136—155.
16.
Carter-AndrewsD. J. C. (2009). The construction of black high-achiever identities in a predominantly white high school. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40(3), 297—317.
17.
CastilloL. G., Lopez-ArenasA., & SaldivarI. M. (2010). The influence of acculturation and enculturation on Mexican American high school students' decision to apply to college. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 38, 88—98.
18.
CastroE. L. (2013). Racialized readiness for college and career: Toward an equity grounded social science of intervention programming. Community College Review, 41, 292—310.
19.
CazdenC. B., & BeckS. W. (2003). Classroom discourse. In GraesserA. C., GernsbacherM. A., & GoldmanS. R. (Eds.), Handbook of discourse processes (pp. 165—197). New York, NY: Routledge.
20.
CimettaA. D., D'AgostinoJ. J., & LevinJ. R. (2010). Can high school achievement tests serve to select high school students?Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 29, 3—12.
21.
Clauss-EhlersC. S., & WibrowskiC. R. (2007). Building educational resilience and social support: The effects of the educational opportunity fund program among first- and second-generation college students. Journal of College Student Development, 48, 574—594.
CooperR., & LiouD. D. (2007). The structure and culture of information pathways: Rethinking opportunity to learn in urban high schools during the ninth grade transition. High School Journal, 91(1), 43—56.
27.
CorwinZ. B., & TierneyW. G. (2007). Getting there—and beyond: Building a culture of college-going in high schools. Los Angeles, CA: Center for Higher Education Policy Analysis.
28.
CreswellJ. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five designs. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
29.
CroccoM. S., & CostiganA. T. (2007). The narrowing of curriculum and pedagogy in the age of accountability: Urban educators speak out. Urban Education, 42(6), 512—535.
30.
DeAngeloL., FrankeR., HurtadoS., PryorJ. H., & TranS. (2011). Completing college: Assessing graduation rates at four-year institutions. Higher Education Research Institute, Graduation School of Education & Information Studies, University of California, Los Angeles.
31.
Deil-AmenR., & TevisT. L. (2010). Circumscribed agency: The relevance of standardized college entrance exams for low SES high school students. The Review of Higher Education, 33, 141—175.
32.
DenzinN. K. (2009). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. New Brunswick, NJ: Aldine Transaction.
33.
DesjardinsS. L., & LindsayN. K. (2008). Adding a statistical wrench to the “Toolbox.” Research in Higher Education, 49, 172—179.
34.
DiamondJ. B., RandolphA., & SpillaneJ. P. (2004). Teachers' expectations and sense of responsibility for student learning: The importance of race, class, and organizational habitus. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 35(1), 75—98.
35.
Dixon-RománE. J., EversonH. T., & McArdleJ. J. (2013). Race, poverty and SAT scores: Modeling the influences of family income on black and white high school students' SAT performance. Teachers College Record, 115, 1—33.
36.
DuncheonJ. C. (2015). The problem of college readiness. In TierneyW. G., & DuncheonJ. C. (Eds.), The problem of college readiness (pp. 3—44). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
37.
EckertP. (1989). Jocks and burnouts: Social categories and identity in the high school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
38.
EdgertonJ. D., & RobertsL. W. (2014). Cultural capital or habitus? Bourdieu and beyond in the explanation of enduring educational inequality. Theory and Research in Education, 12(2), 193—220.
39.
FineM. (1991). Framing dropouts: Notes on the politics of an urban public high school. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
40.
FloresL. Y., OjedaL., HuangY., GeeD., & LeeS. (2006). The relations of acculturation, problem-solving appraisal, and career decision-making self-efficacy to Mexican American high school students' educational goals. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(2), 260—266.
41.
FordD. Y., ColemanM. R., & DavisJ. L. (2014). Racially, ethnically, and linguistically different gifted and talented students. Gifted Child Today, 37(3), 133—134.
42.
GeertzC. (1973). Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In GeertzC., The interpretation of cultures (pp. 3—30). New York, NY: Basic Books.
43.
GeertzC. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
44.
GirouxH. A. (2003). Public pedagogy and the politics of resistance: Notes on a critical theory of educational struggle. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 35(1), 5—16.
45.
GlaserB., & StraussA. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
46.
GubaE. G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(2), 75—91.
47.
GurinP., DeyE. L., HurtadoS., & GurinG. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 330—366.
48.
GutiérrezK. D., & RogoffB. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19—25.
49.
HattB. (2007). Street smarts vs. book smarts: The figured world of smartness in the lives of marginalized, urban youth. The Urban Review, 39(2), 145—166.
50.
HillL. D., BegmanA., & AndradeF. (2015). Social capital for college: Network composition and access to selective institutions among urban high school students. Urban Education, 50(3), 316—345.
51.
HoffmanN., VargasJ. A., VeneziaA., & MillerS. M. (Eds.). (2007). Minding the gap: Why integrating high school with college makes sense and how to do it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
52.
HollandD., LachicotteW.Jr., SkinnerD., & CainC. (1998). Identity and agency in cultural worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
53.
HowardT. C. (2003). “A tug of war for our minds”: African American high school students' perceptions of their academic identities and college aspirations. High School Journal, 87(1), 4—18.
54.
HoxbyC. M., & MurarkaS. (2009). Charter schools in New York City: Who enrolls and how they affect their students' achievement (Working Paper No. 14852). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
55.
IatarolaP., CongerD., & LongM. C. (2011). Determinants of high schools' advanced course offerings. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(3), 340—359.
56.
KannoY., & HarklauL. (2012). Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access, and persistence. New York, NY: Routledge.
57.
KarpM., CalcagnoJ. C., HughesK., JeongD. W., & BaileyT. (2007). The postsecondary achievement of participants in dual enrollment: An analysis of student outcomes in two states. Louisville, KY: National Research Center for Career and Technical Education.
58.
KenaG., Musu-GilletteL., RobinsonJ., WangX., RathbunA., ZhangJ., … BallardD (2015). The condition of education 2014. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
59.
KohliR., PizarroM., & NevárezA. (2017). The “New Racism” of K–12 schools: Centering critical research on racism. Review of Research in Education, 41, 182—202.
60.
KurlaenderM. (2014). Assessing the promise of California's Early Assessment Program for community colleges. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 655, 36—55.
61.
Ladson-BillingsG. (1994). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
62.
LincolnY. S. (2001). Varieties of validity: Quality in qualitative research. In SmartJ., & TierneyW. G. (Eds.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 25—72). New York, NY: Agathon Press.
63.
LongM. C., IatarolaP., & CongerD. (2009). Explaining gaps in readiness for college-level math: The role of high school courses. Education Finance and Policy, 4(1), 1—33.
64.
MartinezG. F., & Deil-AmenR. (2015). College for all Latinos? The role of high school messages in facing college challenges. Teachers College Record, 117, 1—50.
65.
MaruyamaG. (2012). Assessing college readiness: Should we be satisfied with ACT or other threshold scores?Educational Researcher, 41(7), 252—261.
MatternK., ShawE., & WilliamsF. (2008). Examining the relationship between the SAT, high school measures of academic performance, and socioeconomic status: Turning our attention to the unit of analysis (College Board Research Note No. RN-36). New York, NY: College Board.
68.
McAlisterS., & MevsP. (2012). College readiness: A guide to the field. Providence, RI: Annenberg Institute for School Reform at Brown University.
69.
McDonoughP. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
70.
MilesM. B., & HubermanA. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
71.
NagaokaJ., FarringtonC. A., RoderickM., AllensworthE., KeyesT. S., JohnsonD. W., & BeechumN. O. (2013). Readiness for college: The role of noncognitive factors and context. College Readiness Indicator Systems, Fall, 45—52
72.
NasirN. S., & HandV. M. (2006). Exploring sociocultural perspectives on race, culture, and learning. Review of Educational Research, 76, 449—475.
73.
NasirN. S., McLaughlinM. W., & JonesA. (2009). What does it mean to be African American? Constructions of race and academic identity in an urban public high school. American Educational Research Journal, 46(1), 73—114.
74.
NiuS. X., & TiendaM. (2010). Minority student academic performance under the uniform admission law: Evidence from the University of Texas at Austin. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(1), 44—69.
75.
NogueraP. A. (2008). The trouble with black boys: And other reflections on race, equity, and the future of public education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
76.
NunnL. M. (2014). Defining student success: The role of school and culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
77.
NygreenK. (2013). These kids: Identity, agency, and social justice at a last chance high school. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
78.
OakesJ. (2005). Keeping track: How schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
79.
OsborneJ. W. (1997). Identification with academics and academic success among community college students. Community College Review, 25(1), 56—69.
80.
PattersonB. F., & EwingM. (2013). Validating the use of AP exam scores for college course placement (Research Report no. 2013-2). New York, NY: College Board.
81.
PernaL. W. (2005). The key to college access: Rigorous academic preparation. In TierneyW. G., CorwinZ. B., & ColyarJ. E. (Eds.), Preparing for college: Nine elements of effective outreach (pp. 113—134). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
82.
PetersonE. R., Rubie-DaviesC., OsborneD., & SibleyC. (2016). Teachers' explicit expectations and implicit prejudiced attitudes to educational achievement: Relations with student achievement and the ethnic achievement gap. Learning and Instruction, 42, 123—140.
83.
PikeG. R., & KuhG. D. (2005). First- and second-generation college students: A comparison of their engagement and intellectual development. Journal of Higher Education, 76(3), 276—300.
84.
PorterA., McMakenJ., HwangJ., & YangR. (2011). Common core standards: The new US intended curriculum. Educational Researcher, 40(3), 103—116.
85.
PorterA. C., & PolikoffM. S. (2012). Measuring academic readiness for college. Educational Policy, 26(3), 394—417.
86.
ReisS. M., & RenzulliJ. S. (2010). Is there still a need for gifted education? An examination of current research. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(4), 308—317.
87.
RellesS., & TierneyW. G. (2013). Understanding the writing habits of tomorrow's students: Technology and college readiness. Journal of Higher Education, 84(4), 477—505.
88.
RistR. (1970). Student social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfilling prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review, 40(3), 411—451.
89.
RoderickM., CocaV., & NagaokaJ. (2011). Potholes on the road to college: High school effects in shaping urban students' participation in college application, four-year college enrollment, and college match. Sociology of Education, 84(3), 178—211.
90.
RoderickM., NagaokaJ., & CocaV. (2009). College readiness for all: The challenge for urban high schools. The Future of Children, 19(1), 185—210.
91.
RosenbaumJ. E. (2001). Beyond college for all: Career paths for the forgotten half. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
92.
RubinB. (2007). Learner identity amid figured worlds: Constructing (in)competence at an urban high school. The Urban Review, 39(2), 217—249.
93.
SarupM. (1996). Identity, culture, and the postmodern world. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.
94.
SchieffelinB. B., & OchsE. (Eds.) (1986). Language socialization across cultures. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
95.
Schott Foundation. (2009). Opportunity to learn: A 50 state report on the opportunity to learn in America. Cambridge, MA: Author.
96.
SedlacekW. E. (2004). Beyond the big test: Noncognitive assessment in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
97.
ShawE. J., MariniJ. P., & MatternK. D. (2013). Exploring the utility of advanced placement participation and performance in college admission decisions. Educational and Psychological Measurement73, 229—253.
98.
SlembrouckS. (2005). Discourse, critique and ethnography: Class-oriented coding in accounts of child protection. Language Sciences, 27(6), 619—650. Sommerfeld, 2011
99.
SmithJ., HurwitzM., & AveryC. (2017). Giving college credit where it is due: Advanced placement exam scores and college outcomes. Journal of Labor Economics, 35, 67—147.
100.
SpradleyJ. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
101.
SteeleC. (2003). Stereotype threat and African-American student achievement. In PerryT., SteeleC., & HilliardA.III (Eds.), Young, gifted, and Black: Promoting high achievement among African American students (pp. 109—130). Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
102.
StephanJ. (2013). Social capital and the college enrollment process: How can a school program make a difference?Teachers College Record, 115(4), 1—39.
103.
TajfelH. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1—39.
104.
TorresV., Howard-HamiltonM. F., & CooperD. L. (2011). Identity development of diverse populations: Implications for teaching and administration in higher education: ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report (Vol. 12). John Wiley & Sons.
105.
UrrietaL. (2007a). Figured worlds and education: An introduction to the special issue. Urban Review, 39, 107—116.
106.
UrrietaL. (2007b). Identity production in figured worlds: How some Mexican Americans become Chicana/o activist educators. Urban Review, 39(2), 117—144.
107.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S. Mexican youth and the politics of caring. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
108.
VeneziaA., & JaegerL. (2013). Transitions from high school to college. The Future of Children, 23(1), 117—136.
109.
VeneziaA., & VolochD. (2012). Using college placement exams as early signals of college readiness: An examination of California's Early Assessment Program and New York's At Home in College Program. New Directions for Higher Education, 158, 71—79.
110.
WardD. S., & VargasJ. (2012). Using dual enrollment policy to improve college and career readiness: A web tool for decision makers (Policy Brief). Boston, MA: Jobs for the Future.
111.
WeickK. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
112.
WeltonA., & WilliamsM. (2015). Accountability strain, college readiness drain: Sociopolitical tensions involved in maintaining a college-going culture in a high “minority”, high poverty, Texas high school. High School Journal, 98, 181—204.
113.
WeltonA. D., & MartinezM. A. (2014). Coloring the college pathway: A more culturally responsive approach to college readiness and access for students of color in secondary schools. Urban Review, 46, 197—223.
114.
WileyA., WyattJ., & CamaraW. J. (2010). The development of a multidimensional college readiness index (Research Report No. 2010-3). New York, NY: The College Board.
115.
WilkinsA. C. (2014). Race, age, and identity transformations in the transition from high school to college for Black and first-generation White men. Sociology of Education87, 171—187.
116.
WolcottH. F. (1999). Ethnography: A way of seeing. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press.
117.
WongK. K., AnagnostopoulosD., RutledgeS., & EdwardsC. (2003). The challenge of improving instruction in urban high schools: Case studies of the implementation of the Chicago academic standards. Peabody Journal of Education, 78(3), 39—87.
118.
WynerJ. S., BridgelandJ. M., & DiiulioJ. J.Jr. (2007). Achievement trap: How America is failing millions of high-achieving students from lower-income families. Landsdowne, VA: Jack Kent Cooke Foundation.
119.
ZwickR., & Greif GreenJ. (2007). New perspectives on the correlation of SAT scores, high school grades, and socioeconomic factors. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44, 23—45.
