Many institutional leaders find themselves struggling to achieve racial equity in a sociopolitical context where hatemongering, misogyny, xenophobia, heterosexism, and racism have been normalized and minoritized students, staff, and faculty have been relegated to the margins. Few institutional leaders (e.g., presidents, provosts, chancellors, boards of trustees, deans) understand how, why, and the extent to which minoritized peoples are affected by multiple and overlapping forms of oppression. As a result, institutional change efforts to transform campuses into identity-affirming and socially just learning environments often prove ineffective because college and university leaders typically engage in single-axis identity politics to promote diversity, equity, and inclusion. In this article, the authors challenge institutional leaders to take up intersectionality as a method of engaging in lasting transformational change that promises to advance racial equity in higher education. The authors also expose the limitations of existing institutional change models by highlighting their intersectional failures and prompt readers to imagine Black women as possibility models for institutional change that transforms higher education and advances racial equity.
CollinsP. H. (1986). Learning from the outsider within: The sociological significance of Black feminist thought. Social Problems, 33(6), S14–S32). doi:10.2307/800672
3.
CollinsP. H. (1989). The social construction of black feminist thought. Signs, 14, 745–773).
4.
CollinsP. H. (1990). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment. New York, NY: Routledge.
5.
CollinsP. H. (1997). Defining black feminist thought. In NicholsonL.J. (Ed.), The second wave: A reader in feminist theory (Vol. 1, pp. 241–260)). New York, NY: Routledge.
6.
CollinsP. H. (2000). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (2nd ed., Rev. 10th anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
7.
CollinsP. H. (2009). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, consciousness, and the politics of empowerment (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
8.
CollinsP. H. (2017). On violence, intersectionality and transversal politics. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 40, 1460–1473). doi:10.1080/01419870.2017.1317827
GriffinF. J. (2000). Black feminists and Du Bois: Respectability, protection and beyond. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 568, 28–40). doi:10.1177/000271620056800104
18.
HarrisJ. C., & LinderC. (Ed.). (2017). Intersections of identity and sexual violence on campus: Centering minoritized students’ experiences. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
19.
Harris-PerryM. V. (2011). Sister citizen: Shame, stereotypes, and Black women in America. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
KabaA. J. (2008). Race, gender and progress: Are Black American women the new model minority?Journal of African American Studies, 12, 309–335). doi:10.1007/s12111-008-9043-8
26.
KezarA. (2001). Understanding and facilitating organizational change in the 21st century: Recent research and conceptualizations [Special issue]. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 28(4). Retrieved from ERIC database. (ERIC Number ED457711)
27.
KingstonC., & CaballeroG. (2009). Comparing theories of institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics, 5, 151–180). doi:10.1017/S1744137409001283
28.
LipsitzG. (2006). The possessive investment in whiteness: How white people profit from identity politics. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
MatsudaM. J. (1987). Looking to the bottom: Critical legal studies and reparations. Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review, 22, 323–396). Retrieved from http://harvardcrcl.org/archive/
SmithA. (2013). Heteropatriarchy and the three pillars of White supremacy: Rethinking women of color organizing. In AdamsM., BlumenfeldW., CastandedaR., HackmanH., PetersM., & ZunigaX. (Eds.), Readings for diversity and social justice (pp. 66–73)). New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
TuittF. (2016). Inclusive pedagogy 2.0. Implications for race, equity and higher education in a global context. In TuittF., HaynesC., & StewartS. (Eds.), Race, equity and the learning environment: The global relevance of critical and inclusive pedagogies in higher education (pp. 205–222)). Sterling, VA: Stylus.
