What Does the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Mean for Early Childhood Education? A History of NCLB's Impact on Early Childhood Education and Insights for the Future under ESSA
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2018
What Does the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) Mean for Early Childhood Education? A History of NCLB's Impact on Early Childhood Education and Insights for the Future under ESSA
The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act has had profound and lasting impacts on early
childhood education both in the public education sector and in preschool contexts. In
light of the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), the newest iteration of NCLB, I first
trace the history of NCLB's influence on early childhood, which has resulted in placing
greater emphasis on assessments for young children, creating early learning standards, and
universalizing corporate notions of quality. I then examine several of the new and
modified aspects of ESSA, which encourage alignment of early childhood education with K-12
education and across early childhood programs, increased assessments for emergent
bilingual children, and the expansion of early childhood education through market-based
reforms. With unprecedented emphasis on young children, ESSA will likely have instrumental
impacts on early childhood education for years to come.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlemánE. (Producer), & LunaR. (Director). (2013).
Stolen education [Documentary].Salt Lake City, UT: Alemán/Luna
Productions.
2.
AnzaldúaG. E. (1987).
Borderlands/la frontera. San Francisco,
CA: Aunt Lute Books.
3.
BlochM., & KimK. (2015).
A cultural history of “readiness” in early childhood care and education:
Are there still culturally relevant, ethical, and imaginative spaces for learning open
for young children and their families? In IorioJ. M. & ParnellW. (Eds.), Rethinking
readiness in early childhood education: Implications for policy and practice
(pp. 19–36). New York, NY:
Palgrave Macmillan.
BraceyG.W. (2003).
On the death of childhood and the destruction of public schools: The
folly of today's education policies and practices.
Portsmouth, NH:
Heinemann.
6.
BredekampS. (1987).
Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving
children from birth through age 8. Washington,
DC: National Association for the Education of Young
Children.
7.
BrownC.P. (2007).
Unpacking standards in early childhood education.Teachers College Record, 109(3), 635–668.
8.
BrownC.P., WeberN.B., & YoonY. (2015).
The practical difficulties for early educators who tried to address
children's realities in their high-stakes teaching context.Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 36(1), 3–23.
CannellaG.S., PérezM. S., & LeeI.F. (Eds.). (2015).
Critical examinations of quality in childhood education and care:
Regulation, disqualification, and erasure. New York,
NY: Peter Lang.
11.
CoppleC., & BredekampS. (2009).
Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving
children from birth through age eight (3rd ed.).
Washington, DC: National Association for
the Education of Young Children.
12.
DahlbergG., MossP., & PenceA. (2007).
Beyond quality in early childhood education and care: Languages of
evaluation (2nd ed.). New York,
NY: Routledge.
13.
de los RíosC. V., & SeltzerK. (2017).
Translanguaging, coloniality and English classrooms: An exploration of
two bicoastal urban classrooms.Research in the Teaching of English, 52(1), 55–76.
14.
DelpitL. (2012).
“Multiplication is for White people:” Raising expectations for other
people's children. New York, NY:
New Press.
15.
DingersonL., MinerB., PetersonB., & WaltersS. (Eds.). (2008).
Keeping the promise? The debate over charter schools.
Milwaukee, WI: A Rethinking Schools
Publication.
16.
EllsworthJ., & AmesL.J. (Eds.). (1998).
Critical perspectives on project Head Start: Revisioning the hope and
challenge. Albany, NY:
SUNY Press.
17.
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015, Pub.
L. No. 114-95, §114, Stat. 1177 (2015–2016).
18.
First Five Years Fund.
(2016). Summary and analysis of the early learning
provisions of the Early Student Succeeds Act. Washington,
DC: Author. Retrieved from https://ffyf.org/resources/eceinessa2015/
19.
FoucaultM. (1977).
Discipline and punishment: The birth of the prison (A Sheridan,
Trans.). New York, NY:
Vintage Books.
20.
GarcíaO., & KleifgenJ. (2010).
Educating emergent bilinguals: Policies, programs, and practices for
English language learners. New York, NY:
Teachers College Press.
21.
GraueM.E. (1993).
Ready for what? Constructing meanings of readiness for
kindergarten. Albany:
State University of New York Press.
22.
GraueM.E. (2006).
The answer is readiness—Now what is the question?Early Education and Development, 17(1), 43–54.
23.
GraueM.E., RyanS., NoceraA., NortheyK., & WilinskiB. (2017).
Pulling preK into a K-12 orbit: The evolution of preK in the age of
standards.Early Years: An International Journal, 37(1), 108–122.
24.
HatchJ.A. (2002).
Accountability shovedown: Resisting the standards movement in early
childhood education.Phi Delta Kappan, 83(6), 457–462.
25.
HirschmanA.O. (1970).
Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations,
and states. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
26.
IorioJ.M., & ParnellW. (Eds.). (2015).
Rethinking readiness in early childhood education: Implications for
policy and practice. New York, NY:
Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
KaganS.L., & KauerzK. (2007).
Reaching for the whole: Integrations and alignment in early education
policy. In PiantaR. C., CoxM.J., & SnowK. L. (Eds.), School
readiness and the transition to kindergarten in the era of accountability (pp.
11–30). Baltimore, MD:
Brookes.
28.
KantorH., & LoweR. (2006).
From New Deal to no deal: No Child Left Behind and the devolution of
responsibility for equal opportunity.Harvard Educational Review, 76(4), 474–502.
29.
KimK. (2016).
Teaching to the data collection? (Un)intended consequences of online
child assessment system, “Teaching Strategies GOLD.” Global
Studies of Childhood, 6(1), 98–112.
30.
KimK.H., & ZabelinaD. (2015).
Cultural bias in assessment: Can creativity assessment
help?International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 6(2), 129–147.
31.
KlarmanM. (2004).
From Jim Crow to civil rights: The Supreme Court and the struggle for
racial equality.New York, NY: Oxford University
Press.
32.
KohnA. (2004).
NCLB and the effort to privatize public education. In
MeierD. & WoodG. (Eds.), Many children left
behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging our children and our
schools (pp. 79–97). Boston,
MA: Beacon Press.
33.
Ladson-BillingsG. (2009).
The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American
children (2nd ed.). Hoboken,
NJ: Wiley.
34.
LeonardoZ. (2013).
Race frameworks: A multidimensional theory of racism and
education. New York, NY:
Teachers College Press.
35.
MeierD., & WoodG. (Eds.). (2004).
Many children left behind: How the No Child Left Behind Act is damaging
our children and our schools. Boston, MA:
Beacon Press.
NicholsonJ., Grant-GrovesM., BauerA., & WoolleyR. (2015).
Inserting postmodern epistemological perspectives into discourse on
readiness: Privileging assets, capacity building, and diversity to increase
equity. In IorioJ. M. & ParnellW. (Eds.), Rethinking
readiness in early childhood education: Implications for policy and practice
(pp. 203–220). New York, NY:
Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
PérezM. S. (2009).
Discourses of power surrounding young children, charter schools, and
public education in New Orleans post-Katrina(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arizona State University,
Tempe.
41.
PérezM. S., & CahillB. (2015).
“Readiness” as central to the (re)production of quality discourses in the
United States: An early childhood public policy analysis. In
CannellaG. S., PérezM. S., & LeeI. F. (Eds.), Critical
examinations of quality in childhood education and care: Regulation, disqualification,
and erasure (pp. 8–25). New York,
NY: Peter Lang.
42.
PérezM. S., & SaavedraC.M. (2017).
A call for onto-epistemological diversity in early childhood education
and care: Centering global south conceptualizations of childhood/s.Review of Research in Education, 41(1), 1–29.
43.
PetersL., OrtizK., & SwadenerB.B. (2015).
Something isn't right: Deconstructing readiness with parents, teachers,
and children. In IorioJ. M. & ParnellW. (Eds.), Rethinking
readiness in early childhood education: Implications for policy and practice
(pp. 51– 65). New York, NY:
Palgrave Macmillan.
44.
Pinedo-BurnsH.J. (2015).
Puffins, butterflies, and clouds in the preschool: The importance of
wonder. In IorioJ. M. & ParnellW. (Eds.), Rethinking
readiness in early childhood education: Implications for policy and practice
(pp. 178–191). New York, NY:
Palgrave Macmillan.
45.
RavitchD. (2014).
Reign of error: The hoax of the privatization movement and the danger to
America's public schools. New York, NY:
Vintage Books.
46.
SaavedraC.M. (2011).
Language and literacies in the borderlands: Acting upon the world through
testimonios.Language Arts, 88(4), 261–269.
47.
SaltmanK.J. (2007).
Schooling in disaster capitalism: How the political right is using
disaster to privatize public schooling.Teacher Education Quarterly, 34(2), 131–156.
SleeterC.E. (2013).
Power, teaching, and teacher education: Confronting injustice with
critical research and action. New York,
NY: Peter Lang.
51.
SotoL.D. (2001).
Making a difference in the lives of bilingual/bicultural
children. New York, NY:
Peter Lang.
52.
SotoL.D. (2010).
Constructing critical futures: Projects from the heart.
In CannellaG. S. & SotoL. D. (Eds.), Childhoods: A
handbook (pp. 376–387). New York,
NY: Peter Lang.
53.
Souto-ManningM. (2010).
Challenging ethnocentric literacy practices: (Re)positioning home
literacies in a Head Start classroom.Research in Teaching of English, 45(2), 150–178.
54.
Souto-ManningM. (2013).
Multicultural teaching in the early childhood classroom: Approaches,
strategies, and tools preschool-2nd grade. New York,
NY: Teachers College
Press.
55.
Souto-ManningM. (2016).
Honoring and building on the rich literacy practices of young bilingual
and multilingual learners.The Reading Teacher, 70(3), 263–271.
56.
StipekD. (2006).
No Child Left Behind comes to preschool.Elementary School Journal, 106(5), 455–465.
57.
SwadenerB.B., & LubeckS. (Eds.). (1995).
Children and families “at promise”: Deconstructing the discourse of
risk. Albany: State
University of New York Press.
ValenciaR.R., & SolorzanoD.G. (2004).
Today's deficit thinking about the education of minority
students. In AnaO. Santa (Ed.), Tongue-tied:
The lives of multilingual children in public education (pp.
124–133). Lanham, MD:
Rowman & Littlefield.
