Although there are federal protections for students with dis/abilities under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 1975, Black students with and without dis/abilities continue to be suspended and expelled at rates that exceed their peers. Still, there is limited research on how Black girls and Black boys are disciplined across suspension types, and based on their identification for special education services. The purpose of this article is to examine the overrepresentation of Black girls and Black boys with and without dis/abilities and to determine, using a quantifiable percentage, how the overrepresentation of Black students for in-school and out-of-school suspension can be eradicated. We use data from the U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, Civil Rights Data Collection 2011–2012 to examine equity (justice and fairness) in disciplinary referrals using state-by-state and regional data. Using an equity formula, we analyzed national data to determine the magnitude of Black females’ and Black males’ overrepresentation in in-school and out-of-school suspensions for students with and without dis/abilities. This study indicates that Black females with dis/abilities had the highest rate of overrepresentation in the Midwest in in-school and out-of-school suspension. In comparison, Black males experienced a greater representation in in-school suspension. Regardless of geographic area Black girls and Black boys are continuously being overrepresented in disciplinary punishments. To end the over-representation of Black girls and Black boys in in-school and out-of-school suspensions, schools and policy makers must collaborate with communities of color, eliminate teacher implicit and explicit racial biases, and discontinue racially punitive school policies.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BalfanzR., ByrnesV., & FoxJ. H. (2015). Sent home and put off-track. In LosenD.J. (Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 17–30)). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
2.
BlakeJ. J., GregoryA., JamesM., & HasanG. W. (2016, September). Early warning signs: identifying opportunities to disrupt racial inequities in school discipline through data-based decision making. School Psychology Forum, 10(3), 289–306).
3.
ChinnP. C., & HughesS. (1987). Representation of minority students in special education classes. RASE: Remedial & Special Education, 8, 41–46).
4.
CookT. L. (2015). Violated and victimized: The juvenile justice system and Black girls. In CollinsC.F. (Ed.), Black girls and adolescents: Facing the challenges (pp. 287–300)). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
5.
CortiellaC., & HorowitzS. H. (2014). The state of learning disabilities: Facts, trends and emerging issues. New York, NY: National Center for Learning Disabilities.
Fasching-VarnerK. J., MitchellR. W., MartinL. L., & Bennett-HaronK. P. (2014). Beyond school-to-prison pipeline and toward an educational and penal realism. Equity & Excellence in Education, 47(4), 410–429).
8.
FernandezJ. S., KirshnerB., & LewisD. G. (2016). Strategies for systemic change: Youth community organizing to disrupt the school-to-prison nexus. In ConnerJ., & RosenS.M. (Eds.), Contemporary youth activism: Advancing social justice in the United States (pp. 93–112)). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
9.
FordD. Y. (2012). Culturally different students in special education: Looking backward to move forward. Exceptional Children, 78(4), 391–405).
10.
FordD. Y. (2013). Multicultural issues: Gifted underrepresentation and prejudice—Learning from Allport and Merton. Gifted Child Today, 36(1), 62–67).
11.
FordD. Y. (2016). Desegregating gifted education for culturally different students. In DeCuir-GunbyJ.T., & SchutzP.A. (Eds.), Race and ethnicity in the study of motivation in education (pp. 183–197)). New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
FordD. Y., & KingR. A.Jr. (2014). No Blacks allowed: Segregated gifted education in the context of Brown v. Board of Education. Journal of Negro Education, 83(3), 300–310).
13.
FordD. Y., WhitingG. W., GoingsR. B., & RobinsonS. A. (2017). Students in special education. In Tejero HughesM., & TalbottE. (Eds.), The Wiley handbook of diversity in special education (pp. 131–148)). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
14.
GeorgeJ. A. (2015). Stereotype and school pushout: Race, gender and discipline disparities. Arkansas Law Review, 68, 101–129).
15.
GilliamW. S., MaupinA. N., ReyesC. R., AccavittiM., & ShicF. (2016). Do early educators’ implicit biases regarding sex and race relate to behavior expectations and recommendations of preschool expulsions and suspensions?Research Study Brief. Yale Child Study Center, Yale University, New Haven, CT.
16.
HarryB., & KlingnerJ. (2014). Why are so many minority students in special education?Teachers College Press. NY: New York.
17.
Hines-DatiriD. (2015). When police intervene: Race, gender, and discipline of Black male students at an urban high school. Journal of Cases in Educational Leadership, 18(2), 122–133).
18.
Hines-DatiriD., & Carter AndrewsD. J. (2017). The effects of zero tolerance policies on Black girls: Using critical race feminism and figured worlds to examine school discipline. Urban Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085917690204
19.
HowardT. C. (2013). How does it feel to be a problem? Black male students, schools, and learning in enhancing the knowledge base to disrupt deficit frameworks. Review of Research in Education, 37(1), 54–86).
20.
HowardT. C. (2016). Why Black lives (and minds) matter: Race, freedom schools and the quest for educational equity. Journal of Negro Education, 85(2), 101–113).
21.
LosenD. J. (Ed.). (2014). Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
22.
LosenD., HewittD., & ToldsonI. (2014). Eliminating excessive and unfair exclusionary discipline in schools: Policy recommendations for reducing disparities. Discipline Disparities Research to Practice Collaborative. The Equity Project at Indiana University, Bloomington.
23.
LosenD., HodsonC., EeJ., & MartinezT. (2015). Disturbing inequities: Exploring the relationship between racial disparities in special education identification and discipline. Journal of Applied Research on Children: Informing Policy for Children at Risk, 5 (2), 15.
24.
LosenD., HodsonC., KeithM. A., MorrisonK., & BelwayS. (2015). Are We Closing the School Discipline Gap?Los Angeles, CA: The Center for Civil Rights Remedies, The Civil Rights Project, UCLA.
25.
LosenD. J., & MartinezT. E. (2013). Out of school and off track: The overuse of suspensions in American middle and high schools. K-12 Racial Disparities in School Discipline. Report. Los Angeles, CA: The Center for Civil Rights Remedies, The Civil Rights Project, UCLA.
26.
MorrisM. W. (2012). Race, gender, and the school-to-prison pipeline: Expanding our discussion to include Black girls. New York, NY: African American Policy Forum.
27.
MorrisM. W. (2016) Pushout: The criminalization of Black girls in schools. New York, NY: The New Press.
28.
MorrisR. C., & HowardA. C. (2003). Designing an effective in-school suspension program. The Clearing House, 76(3), 156–159).
29.
NocellaA. J., & AnthonyJ. (2011). An overview of the history and theory of transformative justice. Peace and Conflict Review, 6(1), 1–10).
ShollenbergerT. L. (2015). Racial disparities in school suspension and subsequent outcomes. In LosenD.J. (Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 31–43)). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
33.
SkibaR. J., ArredondoM. I., & RauschM. K. (2014). New and developing research on disparities in discipline. Bloomington: The Equity Project at Indiana University.
34.
SkibaR. J., & LosenD. J. (2016). From reaction to prevention: Turning the page on school discipline. American Educator, 39(4), 4–11).
35.
SlateJ. R., GrayP. L., & JonesB. (2016). A clear lack of equity in disciplinary consequences for Black girls in Texas: A statewide examination. Journal of Negro Education, 85(3), 250–260).
SullivanA. L., Van NormanE. R., & KlingbeilD. A. (2014). Exclusionary discipline of students with disabilities: Student and school characteristics predicting suspension. Remedial and Special Education, 35(4), 199–210).
38.
ToldsonI. A., McGeeT., & LemmonsB. P. (2015). Reducing suspensions by improving academic engagement among school-age Black males. In LosenD.J. (Ed.), Closing the school discipline gap: Equitable remedies for excessive exclusion (pp. 107–117)). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
U.S. Department of Education. (2017). Every Student Succeeds Act. Retrieved from https://www.ed.gov/esea
41.
U.S. Department of Education, Office for Civil Rights, Civil Rights Data Collection (2011–2012). Retrieved from https://ocrdata.ed.gov/
42.
WhitakerM. C., & HinesE. D. (2018). Teaching what we don't know: Community-based learning as a tool for implementing Critical Race Praxis. In Handbook of Research on Service-Learning Initiatives in Teacher Education Programs (pp. 315–332)). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
43.
WinnM. T. (2015). Exploring the literate trajectories of youth across time and space. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 22(1), 58–67).
