In schools, a major obstacle to drawing on emergent bilingual students’ knowledge and skills in their first language is a widespread lack of awareness about language use among adolescent English learners, including how peer talk can connect knowledge and abilities in both languages to school-based learning. Although research often acknowledges the importance of engaging students’ home language and culture to bridge to academic literacies in English, few have explicitly examined bilingual peer talk as a resource for language learning during adolescence.
Purpose
This study explores how emergent bilinguals engaged multiple linguistic codes to scaffold their own academic language development with peer support.
Research Design
Ethnography and discourse analysis of student interactions were used to contextualize and analyze the academic language use of four Spanish-speaking adolescent immigrant students, taking into account the affordances of classroom discourse structures and peer talk.
Conclusions
The study describes the linguistic resources available to Spanish-speaking adolescent immigrant students through their peers and shows that emergent bilingual youth used academic language in both Spanish and English most frequently—and in more elaborated interactions—while off-task or in less supervised spaces. Classroom discourse structures often limited student participation, particularly when students used nonstandard linguistic codes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaileyA. (2007). The language demands of school: Putting academic English to the test. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
2.
BaileyA., & ButlerF. (2003). An evidentiary framework for operationalizing academic language for broad application to K-12 education: A design document. Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST).
3.
BakerC. (2011). Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism (5th ed.). Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.
4.
BatalovaJ., FixM., & MurrayJ. (2007). Measures of change: The demography and literacy of adolescent English learners—A report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
5.
BerndtT. (1999). Friends' influence on students' adjustment to school. Educational Psychologist, 34, 15—28.
6.
BunchG. (2006). Academic English in the 7th grade: Broadening the lens, expanding access. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 5, 284—301.
7.
Carhill-PozaA. (2015). Opportunities and outcomes: The role of peers in developing the academic English proficiency of adolescent English learners. Modern Language Journal, 99(4), 678—695.
8.
Carhill-PozaA. (2016). “If you don't find a friend in here, it's gonna be hard for you”: Structuring bilingual peer support in urban high schools. Linguistics & Education, 37, 63—72.
9.
CarhillA., Suárez-OrozcoC., & PáezM. (2008). Explaining English language proficiency among adolescent immigrant students. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 1155—1179.
10.
CazdenC. (2001). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning (2nd ed.) Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
11.
CollierV. (1987). Age and rate of acquisition of second language for academic purposes. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 617—641.
12.
CumminsJ. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49, 221—225.
13.
EckertP. (2000). Linguistic variation as social practice. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
14.
EnrightC. (2010). Academic literacies and adolescent learners: English for subject-matter secondary classrooms. TESOL Quarterly, 44, 804—811.
15.
EriksonF., & SchultzJ. (1981). When is a context? Some issues and methods in the analysis of social competence. In GreenJ., & WallatC. (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 147—150). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
16.
FasoldR., & Connor-LintonJ. (2006). Introduction. In FasoldR., & Connor–LintonJ. (Eds.), An introduction to language and linguistics (pp. 1—12). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17.
FineM., Jaffe-WalterR., PedrazaP., FutchV., & StoudtB. (2007). Swimming on oxygen: Resistance and possibility for immigrant youth under siege. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 38, 76—96.
18.
GándaraP., LosenD., AugustD., UriarteM., GómezM., & HopkinsM. (2010). Forbidden language: A brief history of U.S. language policy. In GándaraP., & HopkinsM. (Eds.), English learners and restrictive language policies (pp. 20—33). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
19.
GarcíaO., & WeiL. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
20.
GassS. (2013). Second language acquisition: An introductory course (4th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
GayG. (2000). Culturally responsive teaching: Theory, practice, & research. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
22.
GeeJ. (1990). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press.
23.
GestS., & RodkinP. (2011). Teaching practices and elementary classroom peer ecologies. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 257—265.
24.
GibsonM., GándaraP., & KoyamaJ. (2004). The role of peers in the schooling of U.S. Mexican youth. In GibsonM., GándaraP., & KoyamaJ. (Eds.), School connections: U.S. Mexican youth and school achievement (pp. 1—17). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
25.
GoffmanE. (1981). Forms of talk. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
26.
GottardoA., & MuellerJ. (2009). Are first- and second-language factors related in predicting second-language reading comprehension? A study of Spanish-speaking children acquiring English as a second language from first to second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 330—344.
27.
GumperzJ. (1982). Discourse strategies. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GumperzJ., & Cook-GumperzJ. (2006). Interactional sociolinguistics in the study of schooling. In Cook-GumperzJ. (Ed.), The social construction of literacy (pp. 50—75). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
29.
GutiérrezK. (1992). A comparison of instructional contexts in writing process classrooms with Latino children. Education in Urban Society, 24, 244—252.
30.
HakutaK., ButlerY., & WittD. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency? (Policy Report 2000–1). Santa Barbara: University of California Linguistic Minority Research Institute.
31.
HarklauL. (1994). ESL and mainstream classes: Contrasting second language learning contexts. Linguistics and Education, 6, 217—244.
32.
HasanA. (2006). Analysing bilingual classroom discourse. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(1), 7—18.
33.
HellerM. (1996). Legitimate language in a multilingual school. Linguistics & Education, 8, 139—157.
34.
Kayi-AydarH. (2014). Social positioning, participation, and second language learning: Talkative students in an academic ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 48(4), 686—714.
35.
KiblerA. (2011). Understanding the “mmhm”: Dilemmas in talk between teachers and adolescent emergent bilingual students. Linguistics and Education, 22, 213—232.
36.
KiblerA., AtteberryA., HardigreeC., & SalernoA. (2015). Language across borders: Social network development in an adolescent two-way language program. Teachers College Record, 117, 1—48.
37.
KiblerA., ValdésG., & WalquiA. (2014). What does standards-based educational reform mean for English language learner populations in primary and secondary schools?TESOL Quarterly, 48(3), 433—453.
38.
KiefferM., BiancarosaG., & Mancilla-MartinezJ. (2013). Roles of morphological awareness in the reading comprehension of Spanish-speaking language minority learners: Exploring partial mediation by vocabulary and reading fluency. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 697—725.
39.
KiefferM., & LesauxN. (2012). Direct and indirect roles of morphological awareness in the English reading comprehension of native Spanish, Filipino, Vietnamese, and English speakers. Language Learning, 62, 1170—1204.
40.
LaveJ., & WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, England: University of Cambridge Press.
41.
LekiI. (2001). A narrow thinking system: Nonnative-English-speaking students in group projects across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 39—67.
42.
LemkeJ. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. New York, NY: Ablex.
43.
LeungC. (2005). Language and content in bilingual education. Linguistics and Education, 16, 238—252.
44.
MehanH. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45.
MichaelsS. (1981). Sharing time: Children's narrative styles and differential access to literacy. Language in Society, 10, 423—442.
46.
NagyW., McClureE., & MirM. (1997). Linguistic transfer and the use of context by Spanish-English bilinguals. Applied Psycholinguistics, 18, 431—452.
47.
NakamotoJ., LindseyK., & ManisF. (2008). A cross-linguistic investigation of English language learners' reading comprehension in English and Spanish. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 351—371.
48.
New York City Department of Education. (2005). Annual school reports. New York, NY: Division of Assessment and Accountability, New York City Department of Education.
49.
NietoS. (2010). The light in their eyes: Creating multicultural learning communities (10th anniversary ed.). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
50.
OrellanaM., MartínezD., LeeC., & MontañoE. (2012). Language as a tool in diverse forms of learning. Linguistics and Education, 23, 373—387.
51.
Pearson. (2009). New York State testing program: English as a second language achievement test (NYSESLAT) 2008 administration. Technical manual. New York, NY: Author.
52.
PeregoyS., & BoyleO. (2017). Reading, writing and learning in ESL: A resource book for teaching K-12 English learners (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
53.
PhilipsS. (1984). The invisible culture. New York, NY: Longman.
54.
RamirezG., ChenX., GevaE., & KieferH. (2010). Morphological awareness in Spanish-speaking English language learners: Within and cross-language effects on word reading. Reading and Writing, 23, 337—358.
55.
ReeseL., GarnierH., GallimoreR., & GoldenbergC. (2000). Longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of emergent Spanish literacy and middle-school English reading achievement of Spanish-speaking students. American Educational Research Journal, 37, 633—662.
56.
RymesB. (2009). Classroom discourse analysis: A tool for critical reflection. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
57.
RymesB. (2010). Classroom discourse analysis: A focus on communicative repertoires. In HornbergerN., & McKayS. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 528—546). Tonawanda, NY: Multilingual Matters.
58.
SadowskiM. (Ed.). (2008). Adolescents at school: Perspectives on youth, identity and education (2nd ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
59.
SinclaireJ., & CoulthardM. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London, England: Oxford University Press.
60.
Suárez-OrozcoC., Suárez-OrozcoM., & TodorovaI. (2008). Learning a new land: Educational pathways of immigrant youth. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
61.
SwainM. (1993). The output hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren't enough. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158—180.
62.
SwansonH., OroscoM., LussierC., GerberM., & Gusman-OrthD. (2011). The influence of working memory and phonological processing on English language learner children's bilingual reading and language acquisition. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 838—856.
63.
U.S. Department of Education. (2016). English language learners in public schools. In The Condition of Education 2016 (NCES 2016-144). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
64.
ValdésG. (2001). Learning and not learning English: Latino students in American schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
65.
ValenzuelaA. (1999). Subtractive schooling: U.S.-Mexican youth and politics of caring. Albany: State University of New York Press.
66.
Van LierL. (2000). From input to affordance: Social-interactive learning from an ecological perspective. In LantolfJ. (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 245—260). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
67.
ZentellaA. (1997). Growing up bilingual: Puerto Rican children in New York. Oxford, England: Blackwell.
68.
ZwiersJ. (2008). Building academic language: Essential practices for content classrooms, grades 5-12. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
