Institutional missions serve many purposes within universities, but most studies focus on how mission points to direction, guidelines, or priorities. However, organizational missions have been shown to have other functions such as instructing members about actions or behaviors that are acceptable. This paper therefore examines texts for evidence of how respondents’ ideas about mission go beyond just a statement of direction or priorities.
Purpose/Objective/Research Question/Focus of Study
To consider the use of metaphor in describing institutional mission, the following research questions were examined: 1. How are metaphors used to describe institutional mission? 2. What function(s) is the discourse around institutional mission being used to serve?
Research Design
The study is a discourse analysis of written texts and interview transcripts as part of a qualitative, comparative case study of six master's-granting institutions that are campuses within one state's public university system.
Data Collection and Analysis
Interviews were conducted with 36 university leaders including chief academic officers, deans, department chairs, and faculty members including at least one: (a) member of the institution's body of collegiate deans, (b) department chair and/or collegiate dean directly involved in decision making, and (c) current and/or previous president of the faculty governance body. Qualitative data analysis was conducted using an iterative data analysis method drawing from grounded theory and constant comparative analysis. Following qualitative analysis, a subsequent word count was conducted to determine the extent to which the metaphors were used.
Conclusions/Recommendations
Results suggest mission is a socially constructed phenomenon with a variety of different functions revealed through metaphor that engage different audiences and are closely tied to institutional context and purpose. Metaphors of mission articulated by respondents include mission as: (a) symbolic unity, (b) boundary object, (c) tool, (d) cage, (e) metamorphosis, (f) cultural artifact, (g) motivator, (h) authoritative text, (i) transaction, and (j) treaty document. Understanding the complexities of institutional mission suggests a need to reconsider it and the ways in which leaders engage with their institutional missions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlemánA. M. M., & SalkeverK. (2003). Mission, multiculturalism, and the liberal arts college: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Higher Education, 74(5), 563—596.
AshforthB. E., & ReingenP. H. (2014). Functions of dysfunction: Managing the dynamics of an organizational duality in a natural food cooperative. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(3), 474—516.
6.
Audette-ChapdelaineM. (2016). Sensemaking and the political–administrative interface: The challenges of strategically steering and managing a local public service. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(3), 454—471. doi:10.1177/0020852315594857.
7.
AyersD. F. (2005). Neoliberal ideology in community college mission statements: A critical discourse analysis. Review of Higher Education, 28(4), 527—549.
8.
BartC. K. (1997). Industrial firms and the power of mission. Industrial Marketing Management, 26(4), 371—383.
9.
BartC. K., & TaboneJ. C. (1998). Mission statement rationales and organizational alignment in the not-for-profit health care sector. Health Care Management Review, 23(4), 54—69.
10.
BastedoM. N., & GumportP. J. (2003). Access to what? Mission differentiation and academic stratification in US public higher education. Higher Education, 46(3), 341—359.
11.
BesharovM. L. (2014). The relational ecology of identification: How organizational identification emerges when individuals hold divergent values. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1485—1512.
12.
BlanchardK., & StonerJ. (2003). The vision thing: Without it you'll never be a world class organization. Leader to Leader, 2004(31), 21—28. doi:10.1002/ltl.59
13.
BoyerE. L., MoserD., ReamT. C., & BraxtonJ. M. (2015). Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
14.
BrunssonN. (1985). The irrational organization: Irrationality as a basis for organizational action and change. New York, Ny: John Wiley & Sons.
15.
CadyS. H., WheelerJ. V., DeWolfJ., & BrodkeM. (2011). Mission, vision, and values: What do they say?Organization Development Journal, 29(1), 63—78.
16.
CampbellA., & YeungS. (1991). Creating a sense of mission. Long Range Planning, 24(4), 10—20.
17.
CohenM. D., MarchJ. G., & OlsenJ. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(2), 1—25.
18.
ColeJ. R. (2010). The great American university: Its rise to preeminence, its indispensable national role, why it must be protected. New York, NY: Public Affairs.
19.
CollinsJ. (2008). Question 1: What is our mission? In DruckerP. F. (Ed.), The five most important questions you will ever ask about your organization. (pp. 11—29). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
20.
CorbinJ., & StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
21.
CornelissenJ. P. (2005). Beyond compare: Metaphor in organization theory. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 751—764. doi:10.2307/20159166
22.
CornelissenJ. P. (2006). Making sense of theory construction: Metaphor and disciplined imagination. Organization Studies, 27(11), 1579—1597.
23.
CreswellJ. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
24.
Cypress State University, Office of Institutional Assessment and Research. (2012, November 24). University fact book 2012–2013. Retrieved from [website redacted].
25.
CzarniawskaB. (2005). Karl Weick: Concepts, style and reflection. Sociological Review, 53(s1), 267—278.
26.
DavidF. R. (1989). How companies define their mission. Long Range Planning, 22(1), 90—97
27.
DaviesS. W., & GlaisterK. W. (1997). Business school mission statements–the bland leading the bland?Long Range Planning, 30(4), 481—594.
28.
DavisJ. H., RuheJ. A., LeeM., & RajadhyakshaU. (2007). Mission possible: Do school mission statements work?. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(1), 99—110.
29.
DelucchiM. (1997). “Liberal arts” colleges and the myth of uniqueness. Journal of Higher Education, 68(4), 414—426.
30.
DillD. D. (1997). Focusing institutional mission to provide coherence and integration. In PetersonM. W., DillD. D., & MetsL. A. (Eds.), Planning and management for a changing environment: A handbook on redesigning postsecondary institutions. (pp. 171—191). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
31.
DingfelderD. (2007). Exploring the dimensions of entrepreneurial community colleges (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
32.
DominickC. A. (1990). Revising the institutional mission. New Directions for Higher Education, 1990(71), 29—36.
33.
DowlingJ., & PfefferJ. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122—136.
34.
EckelP. D. (2002). Decision rules used in academic program closure: Where the rubber meets the road. Journal of Higher Education, 73(2), 237—262. doi:10.1353/jhe.2002.0018
35.
EisenbergE. M. (2006). Karl Weick and the aesthetics of contingency. Organization Studies, 27(11), 1693—1707.
36.
EldenburgL., HermalinB. E., WeisbachM. S., & WosinskaM. (2004). Governance, performance objectives and organizational form: evidence from hospitals. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(4), 527—548.
37.
FischerG., & ReevesB. N. (1995). Beyond intelligent interfaces: exploring, analyzing and creating success models of cooperative problem solving. In BaeckerR., GrudinJ., BuxtonW., & GreenbergS. (Eds.), Readings in human-computer interaction: Toward the year 2000 (2nd ed., pp. 822—831). San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
38.
FordR. C., SivoS. A., FottlerM. D., DicksonD., BradleyK., & JohnsonL. (2006). Aligning internal organizational factors with a service excellence mission: an exploratory investigation in health care. Health Care Management Review, 31(4), 259—269.
39.
GardinerL. F. (1989). Planning for assessment: Mission statements, goals, and objectives. New Jersey Department of Higher Education, Office of Learning Assessment.
HartleyM. (2002). A call to purpose: Mission-centered change in three liberal arts colleges. New York, NY: Routledge.
49.
HendersonB. B. (2009). Mission creep and teaching at the master's university. College Teaching, 57(4), 185—187. doi:10.3200/CTCH.57.4.185-187
50.
HernandezM. (2008). Promoting stewardship behavior in organizations: A leadership model. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(1), 121—128.
51.
HillsF. S., & MahoneyT. A. (1978). University budgets and organizational decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23(3), 454—465
52.
HollandB. A. (1999). From murky to meaningful: The role of mission in institutional change. In BringleR., GarnesR., & MalloyE. (Eds.), Colleges and universities as citizens (pp. 48—72). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
53.
HoonC., & JacobsC. D. (2014). Beyond belief: Strategic taboos and organizational identity in strategic agenda setting. Strategic Organization, 12(4), 244—273.
KezarA. J., & KinzieJ. (2006). Examining the ways institutions create student engagement: The role of mission. Journal of College Student Development, 47(2), 149—172.
56.
KimS. E., & LeeJ. W. (2007). Is mission attachment an effective management tool for employee retention? An empirical analysis of a nonprofit human services agency. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27(3), 227—248.
57.
LangD. W., & Lopers-SweetmanR. (1991). The role of statements of institutional purpose. Research in Higher Education, 32(6), 599—624
58.
LeporiB., UsherJ., & MontautiM. (2013). Budgetary allocation and organizational characteristics of higher education institutions: a review of existing studies and a framework for future research. Higher Education, 65(1), 59—78.
59.
LouisM. R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(2), 226—251.
60.
MarchJ., & OlsenJ. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.
61.
MarginsonS., & RhoadesG. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43, 291—309.
62.
McDonaldR. E. (2007). An investigation of innovation in nonprofit organizations: The role of organizational mission. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 36(2), 256—281.
63.
MeadN., BeckmanK., LawrenceJ., O'MaryG., ParishC., UnpingcoP., & WalkerH. (1999). Industry/university collaborations: different perspectives heighten mutual opportunities. Journal of Systems and Software, 49(2), 155—162.
64.
MerriamS. B. (1998). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
65.
MeyerA. D. (1984). Mingling decision making metaphors. Academy of Management Review, 9(1), 6—17. doi:10.2307/258227
MorganG. (1997b). Imaginization: New mindsets for seeing, organizing, and managing. Berrett-Koehler Publishers: San Francisco, CA.
73.
MorphewC. C., & HartleyM. (2006). Mission statements: A thematic analysis of rhetoric across institutional type. Journal of Higher Education, 77(3), 456—471.
74.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). Number of degree-granting postsecondary institutions and enrollment in these institutions, by enrollment size, control, and level of institution: Fall 2014 [Table 317.40]. In Digest of education statistics: 2015. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d15/tables/dt15_317.40.asp?current=yes
75.
NowlinB. M. (2009). The influence of mission statements on select aspects of organizational decision making by executive directors of California State University nonprofit charitable foundations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Pepperdine University, Malibu, California.
OswickC., KeenoyT., & GrantD. (2002). Metaphor and analogical reasoning in organization theory: beyond orthodoxy. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 294—303. doi:10.2307/4134356
78.
OswickC., & MontgomeryJ. (1999). Images of an organization: The use of metaphor in a multinational company. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 21(5), 501—523.
79.
PalmerI., & DunfordR. (1996). Conflicting uses of metaphors: Reconceptualizing their use in the field of organizational change. Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 691—717.
80.
ParryG. (2013). Colleges and the Governance of Higher Education. Higher Education Quarterly, 67(4), 315—339.
81.
PattenM. L. (2003). Understanding Research Methods: An Overview of the Essentials (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Pyrczak Pub.
82.
PaulF. G. (1990). Access to college in a public policy environment supporting both opportunity and selectivity. American Journal of Education, 98(4), 351—388.
83.
PfefferJ., & SalancikG. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
84.
PhillipsN., LawrenceT. B., & HardyC. (2004). Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review, 29(4), 635—652.
85.
PikeG. R., KuhG. D., & GonyeaR. M. (2003). The relationship between institutional mission and students' involvement and educational outcomes. Research in Higher Education, 44(2), 241—261.
86.
Poplar State University. (2012a, Summer). Poplar State University Alumni Magazine, 16(2).
87.
RomanelliE., & TushmanM. L. (1994). Organizational transformation as punctuated equilibrium: An empirical test. Academy of Management Journal, 37(5), 1141—1166.
88.
RowleyL. L., HurtadoS., & PonjuanL. (2002, April). Organizational rhetoric or reality? The disparities between avowed commitment to diversity and formal programs and initiatives in higher education institutions. Paper presented at the 83rd annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, New Orleans, LA. Retrieved from http://www.umich.edu/∼divdemo/2002%20aera%20institutional%20survey%20paper.pdf
89.
SaichaieK., & MorphewC. C. (2014). What college and university websites reveal about the purposes of higher education. Journal of Higher Education, 85(4), 499—530.
90.
SandersM. L. (2013). Being nonprofit-like in a market economy: Understanding the mission-market tension in nonprofit organizing. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 44(2), 205—222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764013508606
91.
SapsedJ., & SalterA. (2004). Postcards from the edge: Local communities, global programs and boundary objects. Organization Studies, 25, 1515—1534.
92.
SauntsonH., & MorrishL. (2010). Vision, values and international excellence: The “products” that university mission statements sell to students. In MolesworthM., NixonL., & ScullionR. (Eds.), The student as consumer and the marketisation of higher education (pp. 73—85). London, UK: Routledge.
93.
ScottJ. C. (2006). The mission of the university: Medieval to postmodern transformations. Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 1—39.
94.
ScottR. W. (1985). Organizations: Rational, natural, and open system perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
95.
ScottR. W., & DavisG. (2015). Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural, and open system perspectives. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
96.
SidhuJ. (2003). Mission statements: Is it time to shelve them?European Management Journal, 21(4), 439—446.
97.
SimsekH., & LouisK. S. (1994). Organizational change as paradigm shift: Analysis of the change process in a large, public university. Journal of Higher Education, 65(6), 670—695.
98.
StarS., & GriesemerJ. (1989). Institutional ecology, “translations” and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387—420.
99.
TaylorB. J., & MorphewC. C. (2010). An analysis of baccalaureate college mission statements. Research in Higher Education, 51(5), 483—503.
100.
TierneyW. G. (2008). The impact of culture on organizational decision-making: Theory and practice in higher education. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing, LLC.
101.
TsoukasH. (1991). The missing link: A transformational view of metaphors in organizational science. Academy of Management Review, 16(3), 566—585.
Van WagonerR. J. (2004). Influencing the perception of organizational change in community colleges. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 28(9), 715—727.
104.
WeickK. E. (1974). Amendments to organizational theorizing. Academy of Management Journal, 17(3), 487—502.
105.
WeickK. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628—652.
106.
WeickK. E. (1998). Improvisation as a mindset for organizational analysis. Organization Science, 9(5), 543—555.
107.
WeickK. E., & QuinnR. E. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual Review of Psychology, 50(1), 361—386.
108.
WeickK. E., & SutcliffeK. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
109.
WetherellM., TaylorS., and YatesS. J. (2001). Discourse theory and practice: A reader. London, UK: Sage Publications.
110.
YinR. K. (2002). Case study research: Design and methods, Applied Social Research Methods (Vol 5, 3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
111.
YuchtmanE., & SeashoreS. E. (1967). A system resource approach to organizational effectiveness. American Sociological Review, 891—903
112.
ZenkL. R. (2014). Past, present, future: The role of mission and culture in higher education institutions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
