What Guides Pre-K Programs?

Abstract

Background/Context

Early childhood education joined the standards movement in 2002 with the Good Start, Grow Smart initiative, with advocates arguing that standards were a tool for creating more continuity and coherence in Pre-K systems. Critics posed concerns about a perceived poor fit between standards-based and developmentally appropriate practices, pointing to standardization and pressure from the K–12 system. With growth in public Pre-K programs guided by state early learning standards, we set out to understand what guides Pre-K programs.

Setting

We sampled two states with mature Pre-K programs: New Jersey (NJ), a targeted, highly regulated full-day program for 3- and 4-year-olds and Wisconsin (WI), a universal, local control half-day program for 4-year-olds. Both programs implement Pre-K programs in schools, Head Start, and child care classrooms.

Purpose/Focus of Study

The purpose of the project was to compare the role of standards in Pre-K programs in NJ and WI, analyzing standards conceptualization and enactment by district administrators and teachers.

Research Design

We designed a multi-state, comparative case study including interviews with state actors who identified rural, midsize, and urban districts for fieldwork, weekly observations of Pre-K classrooms in elementary schools, Head Start, and childcare centers and interviews with the teachers in these sites.

Conclusions

Policy and standards alone were not very good predictors of the Pre-K programs’ enacted practices. The logic of practice embedded in standards evolved through policy enactment in the local context, through the work of actors, like local child care advocates, the administrative designs of district leaders, and the policies of the adjacent K–12 system. The nonlinear implementation of early learning standards in this study shows the importance of looking beyond policy inputs and child outcomes and the need to include the administrative and instructional practices between if we are to understand how to best support young learners and their teachers.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbott v. Burke, 163 N.J. 95 (N.J.S.C. 2000).

Administration for Children and Families. (n.d.). Good Start, Grow Smart background information. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED499401.pdf

Administration for Children & Families. (2015). Getting started with the Head Start Early Learning Outcomes Framework. (U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Publication). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Barnett

W. S.

, Friedman-Krauss

A. H.

, Gomez

, Horowitz

, Weisenfeld

G. G.

, Brown

K. C.

, & Squires

(2016). The state of preschool 2015: State preschool yearbook. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research (NIEER).

Berlin

(2004). From statehouse to schoolhouse: A mixed-method study of the implementation of early learning standards (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Virginia.

Bowman

(2006). Standards at the heart of educational equity. Young Children, 61(5), 7. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=EJ751412

Bracken

B. A.

, & Crawford

(2009). Basic concepts in early childhood educational standards: A 50-state review. Early Childhood Education 37(5), 421—430.

Braun

, Ball

S. J.

, Maguire

, & Hoskins

(2011). Policy enactments in schools introduction: Towards a toolbox for theory and research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(4), 585—596.

Bredekamp

(2009). Early learning standards and developmentally appropriate practice: Contradictory or compatible? In Feeney

, Galper

, & Seefeldt

(Eds.), Continuing issues in early childhood education (3rd ed., pp. 258—271). New York, NY: Merrill.

10.

Brown

C. P.

(2007). Unpacking standards in early childhood education. Teachers College Record, 109(3), 635—668.

11.

Brown

C. P.

(2009) Being accountable for one's own governing: A case study of early educators responding to standards-based early childhood education reform. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 10(1), 3—23.

12.

Coburn

C. E.

, & Stein

M. K.

(2006). Communities of practice theory and the role of teacher professional community in policy implementation. In Honig

M. I.

(Ed.), New directions in education policy implementation: Confronting complexity (pp. 25–46). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

13.

Copple

, & Bredekamp

(Eds.) (2009). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood programs serving children from birth through age 8 (3rd Ed.). Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.

14.

Department of Public Instruction (DPI). (2008). Policy and information advisory 08.01. Retrieved from http://dpi.wi.gov/fscp/pdf/4kbul08.pdf.

15.

Goldstein

L. S.

(2007). Beyond the DAP versus standards dilemma: Examining the unforgiving complexity of kindergarten teaching in the United States. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 22, 39—54.

16.

Graue

(2009). Reimagining kindergarten: Restoring a developmental approach when accountability demands are pushing formal instruction on the youngest learners. School Administrator, 66(10), 6. Retrieved from http://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=EJ861360

17.

Graue

M. E.

, & Karabon

(2013). Standing at the corner of Epistemology Ave, Theoretical Trail, Methodology Blvd, and Methods Street: The intersections of qualitative research. In Trainor

A. A.

, & Graue

M. E.

(Eds.), Reviewing qualitative research in the social sciences (pp. 11—20). New York, NY: Routledge.

18.

Graue

M. E.

, Ryan

, Nocera

, Northey

, & Wilinski

(2016). Pulling Pre-K into a K–12 orbit: The evolution of Pre-K in the age of standards. Early Years: An International Journal of Research and Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/09575146.2016.1220925

19.

Graue

, Whyte

, & Delaney

K. K.

(2014). Fostering culturally and developmentally responsive teaching through improvisational practice. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 35(4), 37—41. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2014.968296

20.

Graue

M. E.

, Whyte

K. L.

, & Karabon

A. E.

(2015). The power of improvisational teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 48, 13—21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.01.014

21.

Graue

M. E.

, Wilinski

, & Nocera

(2016). Local control in the era of accountability: A case study of Wisconsin Pre-K. Educational Policy Analysis Archive, 24(60), 1—30.

22.

Haglund

(2005). Development of the Wisconsin Model Early Learning Standards: A historical view focusing on the Department of Public Instruction involvement. A paper for the Wisconsin Model Early Learning Standards (WMELS) trainers. La Crosse, WI: Viterbo University.

23.

Hatch

(2002). Accountability shovedown: Resisting the standards movement in early childhood education. Phi Delta Kappan, 83, 457—462.

24.

Head

(2010). A case study of pre-school teachers' perceptions aligning early learning content standards to existing pre-k programming and instruction (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Northcentral University.

25.

Kagan

S. L.

(2012). Early learning and development standards: An elixir for early childhood systems reform. In Kagan

S. L.

, & Kauerz

(Eds.). Early childhood systems: Transforming early learning (pp. 55—70). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

26.

Kagan

S. L.

, & Kauerz

(2012). Early childhood systems: Transforming early learning. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

27.

Kagan

S. L.

, & Scott-Little

(2004). Early learning standards: Changing parlance and practice of early childhood education. Phi Delta Kappan, 85(5), 388—396.

28.

Levinson

, Sutton

, & Winstead

(2009). Education policy as a practice of power theoretical tools, ethnographic methods, democratic options. Education & Education Research 23(6), 767—795.

29.

Lowenstein

A. E.

(2011). Early care and education as educational panacea: What do we really know about its effectiveness? Educational Policy, 25(1), 92—114.

30.

McCabe

L. A.

, & Sipple

J. W.

(2011). Colliding worlds: Practical and political tensions of Pre-Kindergarten implementation in public schools. Educational Policy 25(1).

31.

Merriam

(2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

32.

Neuman

, & Roskos

(2005). Whatever happened to developmentally appropriate practice in early literacy? Young Children, 60(4).

33.

New Jersey Department of Education [NJDOE]. (2014). Preschool teaching and learning standards. Retrieved from http://www.nj.gov/education/ece/guide/standards.pdf.

34.

New Jersey Department of Education [NJDOE]. (2015). Preschool program implementation guidelines. Retrieved from http://www.nj.gov/education/ece/guide/impguidelines.pdf.

35.

Rader

S. N.

(2013). Understanding standards-based reform in early childhood education: An exploratory study of implementation (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota.

36.

Rose

E. R.

(2010). The promise of preschool: From Head Start to universal pre-kindergarten. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

37.

Scott-Little

, Kagan

S. L.

, & Frelow

V. S.

(2003). Standards for preschool children's learning and development: Who has standards, how were they developed, and how are they used? Retrieved from: http://www.serve.org/uploads/publications/EarlyLearningStandards.pdf

38.

Scott-Little

, Lesko

, Martella

, & Milburn

(2007). Early learning standards: Results from a national survey to document trends in state-level policies and practices. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 9(1).

39.

Stake

R. E.

(2005). Multiple case study analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

40.

Wisconsin Model Early Learning Standards Steering Committee. (2013). Wisconsin model early learning standards with introduction. Retrieved from: http://www.collaboratingpartners.com/documents/WMELS4thEdition_web_edit2.pdf