Developing countries desire institutions ranked as “world-class,” and want to increase postsecondary participation. Limited public monies require decisions that usually augment the welfare of one objective at the expense of another. An additional conundrum concerns the need for quality assurances. Research needs to be rigorous; students need to be well trained. The authors suggest that the social ecology of higher education has a crucial role to play in India. The challenges are whether to accommodate rapid expansion, how to improve the overall quality of the system, and invest in a research infrastructure.
Purpose/Objective/Research Questions/Focus of Study
The article's purpose is to ask if the social ecology of postsecondary education that has been created in India is in its best interests. Social ecology refers to the universe of postsecondary organizations that account for the 35,357 institutions in India. Insofar as the ecology is “social,” the citizens and government determine the shape of the ecology. The authors first offer a traditional definition of what has been meant by the public good and then turn to a consideration of India's social ecology of higher education. The article's purpose then, is specific to India and more generalized to postsecondary education in a globalized world. The text situates the institutions and systems of higher education into a social ecology that until recently has been framed by the idea of a public good.
Setting
The study took place in India during 2015–2016.
Research Design
The text is an analytic essay that utilized secondary texts pertaining to the structure and quality of the postsecondary system in India.
Conclusions/Recommendations
The authors suggest that the “'alphabet soup” of institutional forms that currently exists in India does not serve the country well; the taxonomy tends to obscure, rather than clarify, roles and responsibilities. They argue that a new social ecology of higher education needs to be put forward that streamlines relationships, clarifies roles and regulations, improves data analysis, and focuses on quality rather than quantity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgarwalP. (2007). Higher education in India: Growth, concerns and change agenda. Higher Education Quarterly, 61(2), 197—207.
2.
AgarwalP. (2009). Indian higher education: Envisioning the future. New Delhi, India: Sage.
3.
AltbachP. G. (2003). The costs and benefits of world-class universities. International Higher Education, 33, 5—8.
4.
AltbachP. G. (2014). India's higher education challenges. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(4), 503—510.
5.
AzadJ. L. (2008). Role of private sector in financing higher education in India. In GuptaA., LevyD. C., & PowarK. B. (Eds.), Private higher education—global trends and Indian perspectives (pp. 115—125). New Delhi, India: Shipra.
CarnoyM., FrouminI., LoyalkaP. K., & TilakJ. B. G. (2014). The concept of public goods, the state, and higher education finance: A view from the BRICs. Higher Education, (68)3, 359—378.
10.
CMR College of Engineering & Technology. (2014). NAAC-self-study report (2013–14). Andhra Pradesh, India: CMR College of Engineering & Technology.
11.
DAV College of Education. (2013). NAAC self-study report: 2013. Punjab, India: DAV College of Education.
12.
HansmannH. (1987). Economic theories of nonprofit organization. In PowellW. W. (Ed.), The non-profit handbook (pp. 27—42). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
KapurD. (2010). Indian higher education. In ClotfelterC. T. (Ed.), American universities in a global market (pp. 305—334). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
16.
KapurD. (2016, August). The dilemmas of higher education: India in comparative perspectives. Keynote address. Keynote address presented at the National University of Educational Planning and Administration, New Delhi, IN.
17.
KapurD., & MehtaP. (2007). Mortgaging the future: Indian higher education. India International Centre Quarterly, 34(3/4), 154—166.
18.
KapurD., & PerryE. J. (2015). Higher education reform in China and India: The role of the state. (Harvard-Yenching Institute Working Paper). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. Retrieved from https://dash.harvard.edu/handle/1/14005052
MarginsonS. (2007). The public/private divide in higher education: A global revision. Higher Education, 53(3), 307—333.
25.
Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India (MHRD/GOI). (2007). Statistics of higher and technical education (2007–08). New Delhi, India: Bureau of Planning, Monitoring and Statistics, Government of India.
26.
Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India (MHRD/GOI). (2009). Report of the committee for review of existing institutions deemed to be universities (2009). New Delhi, India: Department of Higher Education, Government of India.
27.
Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India (MHRD/GOI). (2014). Status of international students in India for higher education. New Delhi, India: Department of Higher Education, Government of India.
28.
Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India (MHRD/GOI). (2015). All India survey of higher education (2013–14), New Delhi, India: Department of Higher Education, Government of India.
29.
MuhammadJ., ChanH. C., SuhaimiS., & SuzyrmanS. (2006). Enhancing quality of faculty in private higher education institutions in Malaysia. Penang, Malaysia: National Higher Education Research Institute.
30.
NaikJ. P. (1979). Equality, quantity and quality: The elusive triangle in Indian education. International Review of Education, 25(2/3), 167—185.
31.
Nalanda College of Education. (2010). NAAC: Self-study report (2010–2011). Uttarakhand, India: Nalanda College of Education.
32.
National Sample Survey Office, Government of India (NSSO/GOI). (2007). Education in India: 2007–08 participation and expenditure, NSS 64th round. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.
33.
National Sample Survey Office, Government of India (NSSO/GOI). (2014). India: Social consumption education survey 2014, NSS 71st round. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, Government of India.
Patel College of Education. (2015). NAAC: Self-study report (2014–15). Bhopal, India: Patel College of Education.
36.
Planning Commission, Government of India (PC/GOI). (2008). Eleventh five-year plan (2007–2012): Social sectors (Vol. 2). New Delhi, India: Oxford.
37.
Planning Commission, Government of India (PC/GOI). (2013). Twelfth five-year plan (2012–2017): Social sectors (Vol. 3). New Delhi, India: Sage.
38.
PusserB. (2002). Higher education, the emerging market, and the public good. In GrahamP. A., & StaceyN. (Eds.), The knowledge economy and post-secondary education (pp. 105—126). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology University. (2015). NAAC: Self-study report (2014–15). Patiala, India: Thapar Institute of Engineering & Technology University.
45.
TierneyW. G. (2009). Globalization, international rankings and the American model: A reassessment. Higher Education Forum, 6, 1—18.
46.
TierneyW. G. (2010). Forms of privatization: Globalization and the changing nature of tertiary education. In FindlayC., & TierneyW. G. (Eds.), Globalization and tertiary education in the Asia Pacific: The changing nature of a dynamic market (pp. 163—199). Toh Tuck, Singapore: World Scientific.
47.
TierneyW. G. (2012). The conundrum of profit-making institutions in higher education. In PernaL. (Ed.), Preparing today's students for tomorrow's jobs in metropolitan America (pp. 149—176). Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
48.
TierneyW. G. (2015). Rethinking education and poverty. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
49.
TierneyW. G., & LanfordM. (2017). From massification to globalization: Is there a role for rankings? In HazelkornE. (Ed.), Global rankings and the geo-politics of higher education. Understanding the influence and impact of rankings on higher education, policy, and society. Oxford, U.K.: Routledge.
50.
TierneyW. G., & SabharwalN. S. (2016). Analyzing corruption in Indian higher education. International Higher Education, 87, 6—7.
51.
University Grants Commission, Government of India (UGC/GOI). (2014). Annual report 2013–2014. New Delhi, India: University Grants Commission, Government of India.
VargheseN. V. (2012). Private higher education: The global surge and Indian concerns. In IDFC Foundation (Ed.), India infrastructure report: Private sector in education (pp. 145—156). London, U.K.: Routledge.
54.
VargheseN. V. (2015). Challenges of massification of higher education in India. New Delhi, India: Centre for Policy Research in Higher Education.
55.
VargheseN. V., MalikG., & GautamD. R. (2015). Teacher recruitment in higher education in India: The role of the national eligibility test. New Delhi, India: Centre for Policy Research in Higher Education.
56.
VargheseN. V., & PanigrahiJ. (2015). Massification of higher education in large academic systems. New Delhi, India: CPRHE/NUEPA and British Council.
