Currently, chances for English learners (ELs) to reach higher education in the United States are slim. Almost half of ELs do not attend postsecondary education (PSE), and access to four-year college is particularly limited, but we do not exactly know why.
Purpose
To examine what inhibits ELs’ four-year-college access in the United States, Bourdieu's notion of habitus and a related concept of institutional habitus were used as the theoretical framework.
Research Design
A longitudinal, ethnographic investigation. The study tracked the college choice experiences of two high-performing ELs who nonetheless elected to attend a local community college without applying to a single four-year institution. Data consist of interviews with the students and key staff members, classroom observations, and relevant documents.
Data Analysis
The data on each EL were first qualitatively analyzed to create an overall picture of her college trajectory (within-case analysis); the cases were then compared with one another to identify common barriers to their college access (cross-case analysis). Data segments related to the school's institutional habitus and the students’ individual habitus were extracted and coded, and patterns of the interplay between the two were identified.
Results
Three factors inhibiting ELs’ four-year college access were identified: (a) limited access to advanced-level college preparatory courses; (b) underdeveloped college knowledge to effectively navigate college planning and application; and (c) linguistic insecurity about their English proficiency. The school's institutional habitus highlighted ELs’ linguistic deficits and inclined educators to view high-performing ELs as community-college-bound. The students themselves internalized the deficit orientation and came to view community college as the only possible college choice for them.
Conclusions
A fundamental reexamination of the deficit orientation to ELs’ linguistic and academic capabilities is necessary. ELs need to be placed in advanced college preparatory courses commensurate with their abilities and provided with regular, frequent, and accessible college guidance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbediJ. (2004). The No Child Left Behind Act and English language learners: Assessment and accountability issues. Educational Researcher, 33(1), 4—14. doi:10.3102/0013189X033001004
2.
AdelmanC. (2006). The toolbox revisited: Paths to degree completion from high school through college. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Involvement.
3.
AlfonsoM. (2006). The impact of community college attendance on baccalaureate attainment. Research in Higher Education, 47(8), 873—903. doi:10.2307/40197515
4.
AlmonP. C. (2010). English language learner engagement and retention in a community college setting (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3408684)
5.
AriasB. M., & Morillo-CampbellM. (2008). Promising ELL parental involvement: Challenges in contested times. Retrieved from Great Lakes Center for Education Research and Practice website: http://greatlakescenter.org/docs/Policy_Briefs/Arias_ELL.pdf
6.
BourdieuP. (1974). The school as a conservative force: Scholastic and cultural inequalities. In EgglestonJ. (Ed.), Contemporary research in the sociology of education (pp. 32—46). London, England: Methuen.
7.
BourdieuP. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice (NiceR., Trans.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
8.
BourdieuP. (1984). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9.
BourdieuP. (1986). The forms of capital. In RichardsonJ. G. (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education. (pp. 241—258). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
10.
BourdieuP., & PasseronJ.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (2nd ed., NiceR., Trans.). London, England: Sage.
11.
BowenW. G., ChingosM. M., & McPhersonM. S. (2009). Crossing the finish line: Completing college at America's public universities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
12.
BradburnE. M., HurstD. G., & PengS. (2001). Community college transfer rates to 4-year institutions using alternative definitions of transfer. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2001/2001197.pdf
13.
BucchiW., & BaxterM. (1984). Problems of linguistic insecurity in multicultural speech contexts. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 433(1) 185—200. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1984.tb14767.x
14.
ByrdD. (2013). Beyond barriers to entry–institutional habitus and postsecondary success: A literature review and research. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, CA. Retrieved from the AERA Online Paper Repository website: http://www.aera.net/Default.aspx?TabID=10250
15.
CabreraA. F., BurkumK. R., & La NasaS. M. (2005). Pathways to a four-year degree: Determinants of degree completion among socioeconomically disadvantaged students. In SeidmanA. (Ed.), College student retention: Formula for student success: Formula for student success (pp. 155—214). Westport, CT: Praeger.
16.
CallahanR. M. (2005). Tracking and high school English learners: Limiting opportunity to learn. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 305—328. doi:10.3102/00028312042002305
17.
CallahanR. M., & GándaraP. (2004). On nobody's agenda: Improving English-language learners' access to higher education. In MichaelS. (Ed.), Teaching immigrant and second-language students: Strategies for success (pp. 107—127). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
18.
CallahanR. M., & HumphriesM. H. (2016). Undermatched? School-based linguistic status, college going, and the immigrant advantage. American Educational Research Journal, 53(2), 263—295. doi:10.3102/0002831215627857
19.
CallahanR. M., & ShifrerD. R. (2016). Equitable access for secondary English learner students: Course taking as evidence of EL program effectiveness. Educational Administration Quarterly, 1—34. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0013161X16648190
20.
CallahanR. M., WilkinsonL., & MullerC. (2010). Academic achievement and course taking among language minority youth in U.S. schools: Effects of ESL placement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 32(1), 84—117. doi:10.3102/0162373709359805
CarlsonD., & KnowlesJ. E. (2016). The effect of English language learner reclassification on student ACT scores, high school graduation, and postsecondary enrollment: Regression discontinuity evidence from Wisconsin. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(3), 559—586. doi:10.1002/pam.21908
23.
DabachD. B. (2014). “I am not a shelter!”: Stigma and social boundaries in teachers' accounts of students' experience in separate “sheltered” English learner classrooms. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 19(2), 98—124. doi:10.1080/10824669.2014.954044
24.
FloresN., KleynT., & MenkenK. (2015). Looking holistically in a climate of partiality: Identities of students labeled long-term English language learners. Journal of Language, Identity and Education, 14(2), 113—132. doi:10.1080/15348458.2015.1019787
25.
GándaraP., & OrfieldG. (2012). Segregating Arizona's English learners: A return to the “Mexico Room”?Teachers College Record, 114(9), 1—27.
GlaserB. G., & StraussA. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
28.
GrubbW. N. (2006). “Like, what do I do now?”: The dilemmas of guidance counseling. In BaileyT., & MorestV. S. (Eds.), Defending the community college equity agenda (pp. 195—222). Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
29.
GuoY. (2006). “Why didn't they show up?”: Rethinking ESL parent involvement in K–12 education. TESL Canada Journal, 24(1), 80—95.
30.
HarklauL. (2000). From the “good kids” to the “worst”: Representations of English language learners across educational settings. TESOL Quarterly, 34(1), 35—67. doi:10.2307/3588096
31.
HillL. D. (2008). School strategies and the “college-linking” process: Reconsidering the effects of high schools on college enrollment. Sociology of Education, 81(1), 53—76. doi:10.1177/003804070808100103
32.
HorvatE. M. (2000). Understanding equity and access in higher education; The potential contribution of Pierre Bourdieu. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 16, pp. 195–238). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
33.
HosslerD., & GallagherK. S. (1987). Studying college choice: A three-phase model and the implication for policy makers. College and University, 2, 207—221.
34.
KannoY., & CromleyJ. (2013). English language learners' access to and attainment in postsecondary education. TESOL Quarterly, 47(1), 89—121. doi:10.1002/tesq.49
35.
KannoY., & CromleyJ. (2015). English language learners' pathways to four-year colleges. Teachers College Record, 117(120306), 1—44.
36.
KannoY., & CromleyJ. (2016, April). English learners' high school academic preparation, community college enrollment, and eventual bachelor's degree attainment. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA), Washington, DC.
37.
KannoY., & GrosikS. A. (2012). Immigrant English learners' access to four-year universities. In KannoY., & HarklauL. (Eds.), Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access, and persistence (pp. 130—147). New York, NY: Routledge.
38.
KannoY., & KangasS. E. N. (2014). “I'm not going to be, like, for the AP”: English language learners' limited access to advanced college-preparatory courses in high school. American Educational Research Journal, 51(5), 848—878. doi:10.3102/0002831214544716
39.
KannoY., & VargheseM. (2010). Immigrant English language learners' challenges to accessing four-year college education: From language policy to educational policy. Journal of Language, Identity, and Education, 9(5), 1—19. doi:10.1080/15348458.2010.517693
40.
KarpM. M., O'GaraL., & HughesK. L. (2008). Do support services at community colleges encourage success or reproduce disadvantage? CCRC Working Paper, 10. Retrieved from http://inpathways.net/community-college-support.pdf
41.
LabovW. (1966). The social stratification of English in New York City. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics.
42.
LabovW. (1990). The intersection of sex and social class in the course of linguistic change. Language Variation and Change, 2(2), 205—254. doi:10.1017/s0954394500000338
43.
LillieK. E., MarkosA., AriasM. B., & WileyT. G. (2012). Separate and not equal: The implementation of Structured English Immersion in Arizona's classrooms. Teachers College Record, 114(9), 1—33.
44.
LincolnY. S., & GubaE. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45.
LópezG. (2015). Hispanics of Spanish origin in the United States, 2013. Retrieved from Pew Research Center database: http://www.pewhispanic.org/
46.
MartinezG. F., & Deil-AmenR. (2015). College for all Latinos? The role of high school messages in facing college challenges. Teachers College Record, 117(030301), 1—50.
47.
McDonoughP. M. (1997). Choosing colleges: How social class and schools structure opportunity. Albany: State University of New York Press.
48.
McKenzieK. B., & ScheurichJ. J. (2004). Equity traps: A useful construct for preparing principals to lead schools that are successful with racially diverse students. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(5), 601—632. doi:10.1177/0013161X04268839
49.
MerriamS. B. (2009). Qualitative research and case study applications in education (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
50.
Norton PeirceB. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9—31. doi:10.2307%2F3587803
51.
NuñezA.-M., Rios-AguilarC., KannoY., & FloresS. M. (2016). English learners and their transition to postsecondary education. In PaulsenM. B. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 31, pp. 41–90). New York, NY: Springer.
52.
NuñezA.-M., & SparksP. J. (2012). Who are linguistic minority students in higher education? An analysis of the Beginning Postsecondary Students Study 2004. In KannoY., & HarklauL. (Eds.), Linguistic minority students go to college: Preparation, access, and persistence (pp. 110—129). New York, NY: Routledge.
53.
ObolerS. (1998). Hispanics? That's what they call us. In DelgadoR., & StefancicJ. (Eds.), The Latino/a condition: A critical reader (pp. 3—5). New York: New York University Press.
54.
PattonM. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
55.
PernaL. W. (2006). Studying college access and choice: A proposed conceptual model. In SmartJ. C. (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 21, pp. 99–157). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
56.
ReayD. (1998). “Always knowing” and “never being sure”: Familial and institutional habituses and higher education choice. Journal of Education Policy, 13(4), 519—529. doi:10.1080/0268093980130405
57.
ReayD., DavidM. E., & BallS. (2005). Degree of choice: Class, race, gender and higher education. Stoke on Trent, England: Trentham Books.
58.
SmythE., & BanksJ. (2012). “There was never really any question of anything else”: Young people's agency, institutional habitus and the transition to higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 33(2), 263—281. doi:10.1080/01425692.2012.632867
59.
SnyderT. D., & DillowS. A. (2015). Digest of education statistics 2013 (NCES 2015-011). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
60.
Solano-FloresG. (2008). Who is given tests in what language by whom, when, and where? The need for probabilistic views of language in the testing of English language learners. Educational Researcher, 37(4), 189—199. doi:10.3102/0013189X08319569
61.
SolórzanoR. W. (2008). High stakes testing: Issues, implications, and remedies for English language learners. Review of Educational Research, 78(2), 260—329. doi:10.3102/0034654308317845
62.
Stanton-SalazarR. D. (2001). Manufacturing hope and despair: The school and kin support networks of U.S.-Mexican youth. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
63.
UmanskyI. (2016). Leveled and exclusionary tracking: English learners' access to core content in middle school. Standford, CA: Stanford University Center for Education Policy Analysis.
64.
U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics. (2015). The condition of education 2017. Retrieved from National Center for Education Statistics database: https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2017/2017144.pdf
ValadezJ. R. (2008). Shaping the educational decisions of Mexican immigrant high school students. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 834—860. doi:10.3102/0002831208320244
WakelingP. (2005). La noblesse d'état anglaise? Social class and progression to postgraduate study. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 26(4), 505—522. doi:10.1080/01425690500200020
69.
WillisP. (1977). Learning to labor: How working class kids get working class jobs. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
70.
WoodsC. S., & DominaT. (2014). The school counselor caseload and the high school-to-college pipeline. Teachers College Record, 116(100301), 1—30.
